6 - Evaluation Criteria Template - LPTA.docx
DOCX document 16 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 6685--Pharmacy Hood Certification (Multi-location) Service Contract Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C25625Q0258
About this file
This is an evaluation criteria template for a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) procurement related to pharmacy hood certification services at multiple VA locations. The evaluation includes two factors: Technical Capabilities (Factor 1) and Price (Factor 2). Technical proposals will be evaluated on a pass/fail basis, requiring offerors to demonstrate sufficient qualified personnel, capacity to deliver certification results on time, and quality control processes for hood certification services.
The associated opportunity (36C25625Q0258) is a 100% Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business set-aside for testing and certification of specialized room ventilation systems, chemical fume hoods, Laminar Flow Workstations, and Biological Safety Cabinets at VA facilities in New Orleans and Baton Rouge. The NAICS code is 238220 with a $19 million size standard. Electronic quotes are due by December 19, 2024, at 13:00 CT to Christopher.rossi2@va.gov, with questions due by December 11, 2024. The procurement is being conducted under simplified acquisition procedures combining FAR Parts 12 and 13.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C25625Q0258_Contract Opportunities Notice.docx | DOCX document | |
| WAGE DETERMINATION 2015-5189 REV 28.txt | TXT text file | |
| 2 -Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25625Q0258_1.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Criteria Template Lowest Price Technically Acceptable
Basis of Award:
A Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable procurement is being conducted. As such, award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for the non-cost factor. Past Performance history will be considered for responsibility determination purposes only (FAR 9.104-1(c). The evaluation factors are as follows:
Factor 1-Technical Factor 2-Price
Under the ‘technical factor,’ each offeror’s responses will be evaluated on a ‘pass/fail’ basis or ‘acceptable/unacceptable’ basis. This determination will be based on the offeror demonstrating in its proposal a technical solution that minimally meets the technical requirements specified in the Solicitation’s Statement of Work.
Price will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness.
Factor 1 – TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES: Offerors must submit relevant information demonstrating technical capability to satisfactorily perform the following requirement as expressed in the Statement of Work in the Solicitation
1. Sufficient number of trained and qualified personnel to conduct the specified hood certification.
2. Sufficient capacity to deliver certification results on a timely basis specified in the Statement of Work.
3. Sufficient quality control policies, processes, and procedures to ensure contract compliance.
Factor 2 – PRICE: Prices will be evaluated on the basis of price fairness and reasonableness.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .