36C25618U0417-0005000.docx

DOCX document 13 KB Posted

Attached to
667-18-4-505-0508 Removal of asbestos insulation and contaminated soil
Solicitation number
36C25618U0417
Issued by

About this file

36C25618U0417 0005 36C25618U0417 0005.docx

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
36C25618U0417-0004000.docx DOCX document
36C25618U0417-0004001.pdf PDF
36C25618U0417-0003000.docx DOCX document
36C25618U0417-0003001.pdf PDF
36C25618U0417-0002000.docx DOCX document
36C25618U0417-0001000.docx DOCX document
36C25618U0417-001.pdf PDF
36C25618U0417-000.docx DOCX document
36C25618U0417-002.pdf PDF
36C25618U0417-003.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FedBizOpps Amendment to a Previous Combined Solicitation

CLASSIFICATION CODE

SUBJECT

CONTRACTING OFFICE'S

ZIP-CODE

SOLICITATION NUMBER

BASE NOTICE TYPE

RESPONSE DATE (MM-DD-YYYY)

ARCHIVE

DAYS AFTER THE RESPONSE DATE

RECOVERY ACT FUNDS

SET-ASIDE

NAICS CODE

CONTRACTING OFFICE

ADDRESS

POINT OF CONTACT

(POC Information Automatically Filled from User Profile Unless Entered)

DESCRIPTION

See Attachment

AGENCY'S URL

URL DESCRIPTION

AGENCY CONTACT'S EMAIL

ADDRESS

EMAIL DESCRIPTION

ADDRESS

POSTAL CODE

COUNTRY

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

GENERAL INFORMATION

PLACE OF PERFORMANCE

* = Required Field FedBizOpps Amendment to a Previous Combined Solicitation Rev. March 2010 J 667-18-4-505-0508 Removal of asbestos insulation and contaminated soil 70112 36C25618U0417 09-19-2018 N 562910 Department of Veterans Affairs Southeast Louisiana Veterans HCS 1555 Poydras Street New Orleans LA 70112 Rachel Babin Overton Brooks VAMC 510 E Stoner Ave Shreveport, LA 71101 rachel.babin@va.gov The purpose of this amendment is to answer the following:

1. The drawings identify select areas for soil removal to the 6’ depth while in the RFIs the response states the entire area beneath the West Wing. The quantity of material to be removed is dramatically different. Which response should we use for the proposal?

The CAD is only for the sub-basement west crawlspace which is the only area where the soil removal will need to take place.

2. In the RFIs, one question was a two part question. It was asked: Would the removed soil need to be replaced? Would river sand be acceptable? The response was “Yes”. Please have someone clarify if we are expected to replace all the removed soil.

River sand will be acceptable after all contaminated soil is removed from the sub-basement west crawlspace area.

File details come from the government source that posted it.