36C10G18Q0157-006.docx
DOCX document 20 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Analytical Balances Electronic - BNOE
- Solicitation number
- 36C10G18Q0157
About this file
36C10G18Q0157 ATTACHMENT F - ANALYTICAL BALANCES - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.docx
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C10G18Q0157-00003000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C10G18Q0157-00002000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C10G18Q0157-00001006.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C10G18Q0157-00001001.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 36C10G18Q0157-00001005.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C10G18Q0157-00001002.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C10G18Q0157-00001000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C10G18Q0157-00001003.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C10G18Q0157-00001004.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C10G18Q0157-00001007.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 36C10G18Q0157-007.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 36C10G18Q0157-001.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 36C10G18Q0157-000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C10G18Q0157-002.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C10G18Q0157-003.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C10G18Q0157-005.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C10G18Q0157-004.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT F – ANALYTICAL BALANCES
PAST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
This office is currently in the process of awarding a competitive service contract. [CONTRACTOR NAME] has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding [CONTRACTOR’S NAME] record of past performance under Contract No. [CONTRACT NO.].
Offeror’s Name: ______________________________________________________________
Solicitation: Non-expendable Equipment –Analytical Balances - 36C10G-18-Q-0157
Name of Person Completing the Evaluation: _______________________________________ Telephone: _____________________E-Mail: _______________________________________ Title_____________________ Company/Organization: _______________________________
Please rate the Offeror in each of the following areas. Note there is room for comments where you deem remarks would be helpful to our evaluation.
· Not Applicable – N/A
· Marginal (M) Performance did not meet some contractual requirements
· Acceptable (A) Performance that meets the minimum contract performance standard or requirement
· Good (G) Performance that meets and occasionally exceeds the contract performance standard or requirement
· Outstanding (O) Performance that almost always exceeds the contract performance standard or requirement
| 1. Quality of Performance: |
| N/A |
| M |
| A |
| G |
| O |
Compliance with contract requirements, use of appropriate and helpful staff, and expertise in the accreditation of medical laboratories as a deemed organization.
| 2. Timeliness of Performance: |
| N/A |
| M |
| A |
| G |
| O |
The Offeror’s ability to meet milestones and delivery schedules.
| 3. Price/Price Control: |
| N/A |
| M |
| A |
| G |
| O |
The Offeror’s ability to control prices claims; change order issues.
| 4. Customer Satisfaction |
| N/A |
| M |
| A |
| G |
| O |
The Offeror’s commitment to customer satisfaction and their cooperative, reasonable businesslike behavior. This includes effective management, responsiveness to contract requirements, honesty and integrity, prompt notification of problems, flexible and proactive qualities and effective subcontract selection and management.
5. Have you issued a cure notice, show cause notice, suspension of progress payments or other letters directing the correction of a performance problem in the past 3 years? [ ] YES [ ] NO If yes, please explain.
6. Have you terminated this Contractor for default within the past 3 years, or are there any pending termination actions? [ ] YES [ ] NO If yes, please explain.
7. Based on the Offeror’s overall performance, would you award them another contract?
[ ] YES [ ] NO If no, please explain.
8. Have you discussed any adverse past performance problems with the Offeror and given them an opportunity to comment? [ ] YES [ ] NO Please explain Offeror Evaluation:
| Rating (List Number Based on Rating Guidelines Above) |
| Category |
| Description |
| Quality of Service |
| In compliance with contract requirements, submits accurate reports/deliverables, has effective personnel, and has achieved/maintained technical excellence: |
Comment from Reference: _______________________
| Cost Control |
| Has achieved efficiencies in costs, managed costs effectively, and has submitted timely/accurate invoices with supporting documentation: |
| Timeliness of Performance |
| Has met milestones, is reliable, is responsive to technical direction, and has completed milestones on-time or ahead of schedule: |
| Business Relations |
| Has maintained effective management of contract, has exhibited reasonable/cooperative behavior, is responsive to contract requirements, is responsive to inquiries/issues, and is proactive about resolving problems: |
| YES NO |
| Overall Satisfaction |
| Would you (reference) choose to work with this offeror again? |
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Past Performance Questionnaire AS AN ATTACHMENT via e-mail to Ninatile Bacote at Ninatile.bacote@va.gov in PDF format. The subject line of the email must read: RFQ 3610G18Q0157 - NX EQ Analytical Balances - Past Performance Questionnaire in order for the email to be successfully transmitted and received. Please e-mail the completed questionnaire by 2:00PM EST on May 30, 2018.
File details come from the government source that posted it.