274-WWP-2026-109.pdf
PDF 344 KB Posted
- Attached to
- NRRRF Headworks Improvements
- Solicitation number
- 274-WWP-2026-109
- Issued by
- Wake County, North Carolina
About this file
This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is issued by the City of Raleigh, North Carolina through its Water Department for engineering design services related to the NRRRF Headworks Improvements project. The City seeks one or more qualified firms to design new process equipment for the existing Headworks facility at the North Raleigh Reclamation and Reuse Facility (NRRRF). The project scope includes replacement and upgrade of fine screen process equipment (screening conveyors, compactors, rolling dumpster site, and addition of a third screen), hydraulic evaluation of the influent channel with modifications to ensure even flow distribution, and potential addition of a Parshall flume. A potential Phase 2 includes grit removal system upgrades, grit pump replacement, NPW water line and valve replacement, septage receiving station upgrades, and equalization pump station rehabilitation. The RFQ was issued on June 24, 2026, with a pre-submittal conference scheduled for July 13, 2026, at 1:00 PM at the NRRRF site. The written question deadline is July 27, 2026, with qualifications due by August 10, 2026, at 3:00 PM EST. Selection is anticipated for August 25, 2026. The contract will include a completion date to be specified by the City.
Pricing is not a determining factor in this procurement, which is conducted under North Carolina General Statute Chapter 143 Article 3D (the Mini-Brooks Act). The selected firm must submit hourly rates in a separate sealed envelope; these rates will be reviewed after evaluation based on qualifications criteria including corporate background and experience (10 percent weight), firm financial stability (5 percent), project understanding (15 percent), project approach (30 percent), and team experience and qualifications (35 percent). All submittals must include audited or reviewed financial statements, references from similar projects completed within the past five years, corporate background documentation, and detailed team qualifications with resumes. Responses are limited to twelve pages plus one optional cover letter. The City requires submission of one original, one electronic PDF version, and five hard copies of the signed submittal. No specific contract amount is stated; compensation will be determined through hourly rates based on actual services rendered, with a not-to-exceed total contract amount to be established. Standard City of Raleigh payment terms are NET 30 days from invoice.
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Request for Qualifications # 274-WWP-2026-109
Title: NRRRF Headworks Improvements
Issue Date: June 24, 2026
Due Date: August 10, 2026, not later than 3:00 PM EST
*LATE PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED*
Issuing Department: Raleigh Water
Direct all inquiries concerning this RFQ to:
Edward Stempien, PE Senior Project Administrator Email: Edward.Stempien@raleighnc.gov Or by mailTo: One Exchange Plaza, 219 Fayetteville Street, Suite 620 Raleigh, NC 27601
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
1.1. Purpose
1.2. Background
1.3. RFQ Timeline
1.4. Pre-Submittal Conference
1.5. Questions
1.6. Submittal Requirements and Contact Information
1.7. Business Engagement and Opportunities
1.8. Rights to Submitted Material
1.9. Communications
1.10. Lobbying
1.11. Conflicts of Interest
1.12. Proposer Expenses
1.13. Proposer Acceptance
2. Qualifications Package
2.1. Request for Qualifications Required Document Format
2.2. Hourly Rates
2.3. Qualifications Package Documents
3. Proposal Evaluation
3.1. Evaluation Criteria
3.2. Final Selection
3.3. Notice to Proposers Regarding RFQ Terms & Conditions
3.4. Contract Term…………………………………………………………..11
4. Scope of Services
Appendix I – Hourly Rate Schedule
Appendix II – Proposer Questionnaire
Appendix III – Reference Questionnaire (Instructions)
Appendix III – Reference Questionnaire Form
Appendix IV – Sample Contract
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose
The City of Raleigh is seeking one or more qualified firm(s) with which to contract for the following services:
Design of the new process equipment for the existing Headworks facility at the NRRRF
A detailed scope of services is provided in Section 4 of this document.
All information related to this solicitation, including any addenda, will be posted to the North Carolina electronic Vendor Portal (eVP) at https://evp.nc.gov/.
All questions related to this solicitation must be submitted in writing (via email) to the following individual – questions submitted via telephone will not be answered:
Contact Name Email Address Edward Stempien Edward.stempien@raleighnc.gov
Or by mailTo: One Exchange Plaza, Suite 620 Raleigh, NC 27601
1.2 Background
The City of Raleigh, the Capital City of North Carolina, remains one of the fastest growing areas in the country. A great economy, top educational institutions, and exceptional health care facilities are some of the characteristics that attract people to the triangle area. The mild climate, diverse work force and proximity to Research Triangle Park combine to make Raleigh a great place to live.
Raleigh is a 21st Century City of Innovation focusing on environmental, cultural, and economic sustainability. The City conserves and protects our environmental resources through best practice and cutting-edge conservation and stewardship, land use, infrastructure and building technologies. The City welcomes growth and diversity through policies and programs that will protect and enhance Raleigh’s existing neighborhoods, natural amenities, history, and cultural and human resources for future generations. The City leads to improve quality of life for neighborhoods and standard of living for all citizens. The City works with universities, colleges, citizens, and local partners to promote new technology, create new job opportunities, and encourage local businesses and entrepreneurs. The City enlists and prepares 21st Century staff with the skill sets to carry out the duties of the City through transparent civic engagement and by providing the very best customer service to our citizens.
The project will consist of new process equipment for the existing Headworks facility at the NRRRF and associated items described in section 4.
The August 2022 NRRRF Headworks Master Plan identified the need to provide design and upgrade of several areas due to general degradation and assets reaching the end of their useful life span. The project included the replacement and upgrade of the current fine screen process equipment including but not limited to screening conveyors, compactors and rolling dumpster site. The project also includes adding a 3rd screen.
https://evp.nc.gov/
The project has the potential to include the evaluations and replacement of the current grit removal system as a second phase or with the current project based on the needs of NRRRF.
1.3 RFQ Timeline
Provided below is a list of the anticipated schedule of events related to this solicitation. The City of Raleigh reserves the right to modify and/or adjust the following schedule to meet the needs of the project. All times shown are Eastern Time (ET):
RFQ Process Date and time
RFQ Date June 24, 2026
Pre-Submittal Conference (if required) July 13, 2026, at 1:00 PM (at the NRRRF)
Deadline for written questions
July 27,2026
City Response to Questions (anticipated)
July27, 2026.
Submittal Due Date and Time
August 10, 2026, at 3:00 pm
Evaluation Meeting (anticipated)
TBD
Interviews (if required)
TBD
Selection Announcement (tentative)
August 25, 2026
1.4 Pre-Submittal Conference
In the event that the City of Raleigh elects to conduct a Pre-Submittal Conference or Site Visit, attendance by prospective proposers is strongly encouraged but is not mandatory. Prospective Proposers are encouraged to submit written questions in advance.
1.5 Questions
Requests for clarification and questions to this RFQ must be received by the City not later than the date shown above in Section 1.3 RFQ Timeline, for the submittal of written inquires. The firm’s failure to request clarification and submit questions by the date in the RFQ Timeline above shall be considered to constitute the firm’s acceptance of all City’s terms and conditions and requirements.
The City shall issue addenda reflecting questions and answers to this RFQ, if any, and shall be posted to North Carolina electronic Vendor Portal (eVP). No information, instruction or advice provided orally or informally by any City personnel, whether made in response to a question or otherwise in connection with this RFQ, shall be considered authoritative or binding.
Respondents shall be entitled to rely only on written material contained in an Addendum to this
RFQ.
It is important that all Respondents submitting to this RFQ periodically check eVP for any Addenda. It is the Respondents responsibility to ensure that all addenda have been reviewed and, if required signed and returned.
All questions related to this solicitation must be submitted in writing (via email) to the following individual – questions submitted via telephone will not be answered:
Contact Name Email Address Edward Stempien edward.stempien@raleighnc.gov
Or by mailTo: One Exchange Plaza, Suite 620 Raleigh, NC 27601
1.6 Submittal Requirements and Contact Information
Submittals must follow the format as defined in Section 2 Qualifications Package and be addressed and submitted as follows:
DELIVERED BY US POSTAL SERVICE
MAIL:
DELIVERED BY OTHER DEIVERY
SERVICES:
City of Raleigh City of Raleigh
ATTN: Ed Stempien ATTN: Ed Stempien
P.O. Box 590 219 Fayetteville Street
Suite 620
Raleigh, NC 27602 Raleigh, NC 27601
RFQ No.WWP-2026-109 RFQ No. WWP-2026-109
Submittals must be enclosed in a sealed envelope or package and clearly marked with the name of the submitting company, the RFQ number and the RFQ Title, and must include:
A. one (1) signed hard-copy original submittal package;
B. one (1) electronic version of the signed submittal;
C. and (Five) (5) hard-copies of the signed submittal.
The electronic version of the Proposal must be submitted as a viewable and printable Adobe Portable Document File (PDF) on a flash drive. Both hard copy and electronic versions must be received by the City on or before the RFQ date and time provided in Section 1.3 RFQ Timeline. Proposals received after the RFQ deadline above will not be considered and will be returned unopened to the return address provided on the submission envelope.
Proposers must respond to the entire Request for Qualifications (RFQ). Any incomplete submittal may be eliminated from competition at the discretion of the City of Raleigh.
The City reserves the right to reject any or all submittals for any reason and to waive any informality it deems in its best interest.
Submittals that arrive after the due date and time will not be accepted or considered for any reason whatsoever. If the Firm elects to mail in its response, the Firm must allow sufficient time to ensure the City’s proper receipt of the package by the time specified in Section 1.3 RFQ Timeline. Regardless of the delivery method, it is the responsibility of the Firm to ensure that their response arrives at the designated location specified in this Section 1.6 by the due date and time specified in Section 1.3 RFQ Timeline.
1.7 Business Engagement and Opportunities
The City of Raleigh maintains processes to conduct business with all business enterprises, including small, emerging, growing, under-capitalized, and under-resourced firms or organizations.
1.8 Rights to Submitted Material
All qualification packages and supporting materials, as well as correspondences relating to this RFQ, shall become the property of the City. The content of all submittals will be held confidential until the selection of the firm is made. Qualifications will be reviewed by the Evaluation Team, as well as other City staff and members of the general public who submit public record requests. Any proprietary data must be clearly marked. In submitting qualifications, each submitting firm/company agrees that the City may reveal any trade secret materials contained in such submittal to all City staff and City officials involved in the selection process and to any outside consultant or other third party who serves on the Evaluation Team or who is hired by the City to assist in the selection process. Qualification submittals marked entirely as “confidential”, “proprietary”, or “trade secret” will be considered non-responsive and will be removed from the evaluation process.
1.9 Communications
All communications of any nature regarding this RFQ with any City staff, elected City officials, evaluation committee members are strictly forbidden from the time the solicitation is publicly posted until award. Questions must be submitted in writing to the individual designated in Section 1.1 Purpose, prior to the deadline provided in Section 1.3 RFQ Timeline. Violation of this provision may result in the firm’s proposal being removed from consideration.
1.10 Lobbying
By responding to this solicitation, the firm certifies that is has not and will not pay any person or firm to influence or attempt to influence an officer or employee of the City or the State of
North Carolina, or any elected official in connection with obtaining a contract as a result of this
RFQ.
1.11 Conflicts of Interest
City of Raleigh contracts are controlled by three conflict of interest provisions.
(1) First, federal procurement standards provided in 2 CFR 200.318 (c)(1) state:
No employee, officer, or agent may participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by a Federal award if he or she has a real or apparent conflict of interest. Such a conflict of interest would arise when the employee, officer, or agent, any member of his or her immediate family, his or her partner, or an organization which employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financial or other interest in or a tangible personal benefit from a firm considered for a contract. The officers, employees, and agents of the non-Federal entity may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from contractors or parties to subcontracts.
(2) Similarly, the North Carolina General Statutes provides a criminal statute for conflicts of interest in public contracting, N.C.G.S. § 14-234(a) states:
(1) No public officer or employee who is involved in making or administering a contract on behalf of a public agency may derive a direct benefit from the contract except as provided in this section, or as otherwise allowed by law.
(2) A public officer or employee who will derive a direct benefit from a contract with the public agency he or she serves, but who is not involved in making or administering the contract, shall not attempt to influence any other person who is involved in making or administering the contract.
(3) No public officer or employee may solicit or receive any gift, favor, reward, service, or promise of reward, including a promise of future employment, in exchange for recommending, influencing, or attempting to influence the award of a contract by the public agency he or she serves.
(3) City of Raleigh Charter Section 3.9 regulates private transactions between the City and its officials and employees, the charter states:
No member of the City Council, official, or employee of the City of Raleigh shall be financially interested, or have any personal beneficial interest, either directly or indirectly, as agent, representative, or otherwise, in the purchase of, or contract for, or in furnishing any materials, equipment or supplies to the City of Raleigh, nor shall any official or employee of the City of Raleigh accept or receive, or agree to accept or receive, directly or indirectly, from any person, firm or corporation to whom any contract may be awarded or from whom any materials, equipment or supplies may be purchased by the City of Raleigh, by rebate, gift, or otherwise, any money or anything of value whatsoever, or any promise, obligation or contract for future reward or compensation, for recommending or procuring the uses of any such materials, equipment or supplies by the City of Raleigh; no member of the City Council, official or employee of the City of Raleigh shall for his own personal benefit operate, directly or indirectly, any concession in any building or on any lands of the City of Raleigh, nor shall any official or employee of the City of Raleigh bid for or be awarded any contract granting concessionary rights of any nature or kind from the City of Raleigh; it shall be unlawful for any member of the City Council, official or employee of the City of Raleigh to bid for or to purchase or to contract to purchase from the City of Raleigh any real estate, equipment, materials, or supplies of any nature or kind whatsoever, either directly or indirectly, at either public or private sale, either singly, or through or jointly with any other person.
1.12 Proposer Expenses
The City of Raleigh will not be responsible for any expenses incurred by any Firm in the development of a response to this Request for Qualifications or any other activities associated with this procurement including but not limited to any onsite (or otherwise) interviews and/or presentations, and/or supplemental information provided, submitted, or given to City of Raleigh and/or its representatives. Further, the City of Raleigh shall reserve the right to cancel the work described herein prior to issuance and acceptance of any contractual agreement/purchase order by the recommended Firm even if the awarding authority for each entity has formally accepted a recommendation.
1.13 Proposer Acceptance
Submission of any proposal indicates a Proposer’s acceptance of the conditions contained in this RFQ. The City of Raleigh has the sole discretion and reserves the right to cancel this RFQ, and to reject any and all submittals, to waive any and all informalities and/or irregularities, if it is deemed to be in the City’s best interests to do so.
The City of Raleigh reserves the right to accept or reject any or all of the items in any proposal, and to award the contract in whole or in part and/or negotiate any or all items with individual firms if it is deemed in the City’s best interest. Moreover, the City reserves the right to make no selection if the submittals are deemed to be outside the fiscal constraint or not in the best interest of the City.
2 QUALIFICATIONS PACKAGE
Submittal responses must follow the format outlined below. The City may reject as non-responsive at its sole discretion any submittal that does not provide complete and/or adequate responses or departs in any substantial way from the required format.
Submittals shall not exceed 12 pages. A single page printed on both sides will be counted as (two) 2 pages. No more than four (4) pages may be devoted to Project Understanding. A one-page cover letter may be submitted, and this will not count towards the page limit. All pages in the qualifications package must be 8 1/2 x 11” and no additional correspondence should be submitted. Font text shall be no smaller than 10 point font. One 11x17” page may be used for map or other illustrative purpose. This map will not count towards the total page count.
2.1 Request for Qualifications Required Document Format
Responses should be divided using tabs to separate each section, listed sequentially as follows:
Tab 1: Cover Letter
Provide an introduction letter summarizing the unique qualifications of your firm to meet the needs of this project. This letter should be presented on the firm’s official letterhead and signed by an authorized representative who has the authority to enter into a contract with the City on behalf of the firm. Include the name, address, telephone and email address of the individual who serves as the point of contact for this solicitation.
Tab 2: Corporate Background and Experience
Include background information on the firm and provide detailed information regarding the firm’s experience with similar projects. Provide a list of all similar contracts performed in the past (5) number of years, accompanied by at least (3) references (contact persons, firm, telephone number and email address).
Include the total amount invoiced for each listed project, the length of the project, and list of personnel involved in the project who are also proposed for the subject project named in this solicitation. Failure to provide a list of all similar contracts in the specified period may result in the rejection of the firm’s proposal. The evaluation team reserves the right to contact any or all listed references, and to contact other public entities regarding past performance on similar projects.
Tab 3: Financial Information Review and provide one of the following three (3) financial statement options:
1. Recent audited or reviewed financial statements prepared by an independent certified public accountant (CPA) that shall include, at a minimum, a balance sheet, income statement (i.e., profit/loss statement) and cash flow statement and, if the audited or reviewed financial statements were prepared more than six (6) months prior to the issuance of this RFQ, the Proposer shall submit its most recent internal financial statements (balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement or budget with entries reflecting revenues and expenditures from the date of the audited or reviewed financial statements to the end of the most recent financial reporting period (i.e., the quarter or month preceding the issuance date of this RFQ)).
OR
2. Recent compiled financial statements prepared by an independent CPA that shall include, at a minimum, a balance sheet, income statement (i.e., profit/loss statement) and cash flow statement and, if the compiled financial statements were prepared more than three (3) months prior to the issuance of this RFQ, the Proposer shall submit its most recent internal financial statements (balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement or budget with entries reflecting revenues and expenditures to date), and other evidence of financial stability such as most recently filed income tax return, evidence of a line of credit/loans/other type of financing with statement of amount in use/outstanding balance (e.g., a complete copy commitment letter, loan agreement, billing statement reflecting the line of credit or statement from lender acknowledging the commitment to fund the Proposer’s stated financing), personal guaranty with copies of personal income tax filing and statement of net worth or such other evidence that is accurate, reliable and trustworthy regarding the Proposer’s financial stability.
OR
3. Include a certified, signed statement from a licensed CPA regularly engaged in the review of the firm’s financial information verifying the financial viability of the firm.
All financial information, statements and/or documents provided in response to this solicitation shall be kept confidential provided that EACH PAGE is marked as follows:
“CONFIDENTIAL – DO NOT DISCLOSE EXCEPT FOR THE EXPRESS PURPOSE OF
PROPOSAL EVALUATION.“
“Recent” shall be defined as financial statements that were prepared within the 12 months preceding the issuance date of this RFQ.
Consolidated financial statements of the Proposer’s parent or related corporation/business entity will not be considered, unless: (1) the Proposer’s actual financial performance for the designated period is separately identified in and/or attached to the consolidated statements; (2) the parent or related corporation/business entity provides the State with a document wherein the parent or related corporation/business entity will be financially responsible for the Proposer’s performance of the contract and the consolidated statement demonstrates the parent or related corporation’s/business entity’s financial ability to perform the contract, financial stability and/or such other financial considerations identified in the evaluation criteria;
and/or (3) Proposer provides its own internally prepared financial statements and such other evidence of its own financial stability identified above.
The firm’s failure to provide any of the above-referenced financial statements may result in the proposal being removed from consideration. Proposers are also encouraged to explain any negative financial information, and to provide documentation supporting those explanations and demonstrating the financial strength of the firm.
Tab 4: Project Understanding, Approach and Schedule Provide a comprehensive narrative, outline, and/or graph demonstrating the firm's understanding and approach to accomplishing the tasks outlined in the Scope of Work section of this RFQ. A description of each task and deliverable and the schedule for accomplishing each shall be included.
Tab 5: Team Firm, Experience and Certifications/Qualifications This section must include the proposed staffing, deployment and firm of personnel to be assigned to this project. The Proposer shall provide information as to the qualifications and experience of all executive, managerial, legal, and professional personnel to be assigned to this project, including resumes citing experience with similar projects and the responsibilities to be assigned to each person. A project-specific firm chart which clearly illustrates the roles, responsibilities, and the reporting relationships of each team member should be included.
2.2 Hourly Rates
This solicitation is being issued in accordance with NC G.S. Chapter 143 Article 3D (Procurement of Architectural, Engineering, and Surveying Services), otherwise known as the Mini-Brooks Act, and therefore price cannot and will not be a determining factor in the selection of the successful service provider. One copy of the Hourly Rate Schedule (see Appendix I) for all proposed project personnel should be enclosed in a separate, sealed envelope.
https://www.ncleg.gov/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/HTML/ByArticle/Chapter_143/Article_3D.html
2.3 Qualifications Package Documents
This RFQ is comprised of the base RFQ document, any attachments, and any addenda released before Contract award. All attachments and addenda released for this RFQ in advance of any Contract award are incorporated herein by reference.
3 SUBMITTAL EVALUATION
3.1 Evaluation Criteria
This is not a bid. There will not be a public opening. The submittals received in response to this RFQ will be evaluated and ranked, by the evaluation committee in accordance with the process and evaluation criteria contained below. Submittals will be evaluated in light of the material and substantiating evidence presented in the response, and not on the basis of what is inferred.
After thoroughly reading and reviewing this RFQ, each evaluation committee member shall conduct his or her independent evaluation of the submittals received and grade the responses on their merit in accordance with the evaluation criteria set forth in the following table:
Criteria (a) Weight
(b) Score (0-3)
(a) x (b) Weighted
Score
Corporate Background and Experience 10
Firm Financial Stability 5
Project Understanding 15
Project Approach 30
Team Firm, Experience, and Qualifications 35
Format/Length 5
Final Score
Score Points 0 - Missing or Does Not Meet Expectation 2 - Meets Expectation 1 - Partially Meets Expectation 3 - Exceeds Expectation
3.2 Final Selection
Qualifications will be reviewed after opening and will be ranked in order of choice, at which point contract negotiations will begin with the most qualified firm. If negotiations are unsuccessful, the City will then pursue negotiations with the next most qualified firm. The City shall not be bound or in any way obligated until both parties have signed a contract. The City also reserves the right to delay the award of a contract or to not award a contract.
3.3 Notice to Submitting Firms Regarding RFQ Terms and Conditions It shall be the submitting firm’s responsibility to read the RFQ Instructions, the City’s contract terms and conditions (within the sample City Engineering Services Contract provided in Appendix IV), all relevant exhibits and attachments, and any other components made a part of this RFQ and comply with all requirements and specifications provided herein. Submitters are responsible for obtaining and complying with all Addenda and other changes that may be issued in connection with this RFQ.
3.4 Contract Term
The contract issued by the City to the selected firm will state and define a completion date by which the services are to be finished and completed.
4 SCOPE OF SERVICES
Awarded firm shall provide services, all as set forth in this RFQ and more particularly described in this Section 4.
The NRRRF Headworks Improvement project includes design and upgrade of several areas due to general degradation and assets reaching the end of their useful life span. The project included the replacement and upgrade of the current fine screen process equipment including but not limited to screening conveyors, compactors and rolling dumpster site. The project also includes a 3rd screen. A hydraulic evaluation of the influent channel is required in the preliminary engineering phase. Modifications to ensure even flow across all screens and the potential to add a parshal fume to the influent channel are key part of the evaluation and design.
The potential phase 2 includes grit removal system upgrades (grit channel improvements including the addition of baffles), grit pump replacement (4), replacement of the NPW water lines and valves, upgrades to the septage receiving station, and equalization pump station rehabilitation (replacement of pumps (2), motors
(2) and instrumentation). Grit removal technology upgrades are recommended to be evaluated as part of this project phase comparing the vortex system currently in place to a stacked tray grit removal system.
The decision on changing the grit removal technology should be made as part of the preliminary engineering stage of this project.
Drivers for implementation include the poor condition of various assets within headworks, as observed during the IMP condition assessment and thru discussions with Raleigh Water O&M staff. The screening processing equipment has been identified to be undersized for the application requiring numerous work arounds to appropriately convey and dispose of the screenings, this includes very limited dewatering of the screenings requiring storage and extended drying periods before disposal. Adding an addition screening processing train will provide a redundant treatment train. In addition, Raleigh Water staff have expressed concerns about the effectiveness of the current grit removal system and the impact that grit, if it makes it through the treatment process, could potentially have on the new Bioenergy Recovery Program (BRP) system assets. The BRP system represents a significant investment by Raleigh Water and is sensitive to grit, both from an operational and asset maintenance/condition standpoint. Grit that is not removed effectively has the potential to cause process shutdowns as well as shorten the life cycle of assets.
APPENDIX I
HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE
Awarded firm shall perform the services to be performed as set forth in this RFQ and more particularly described in Section 4 Scope of Services utilizing the following hourly rate schedule below.
As stated above in section 2.2 Hourly Rates, provide the Hourly Rate Schedule in a separate, sealed envelope.
Position Title Hourly Rate
Firm Name: ____________________________________________________________
Authorized Signature: _________________________________Date_______________
Signed by: _____________________________________________________________
[Type or Print Name]
Title of Signer: __________________________________________________________
APPENDIX II
PROPOSER QUESTIONNAIRE
The following questions must be answered, and data given must be clear and comprehensive. If necessary, questions may be answered on separate sheets. The Proposer may submit any additional information desired.
Company Name: d/b/a (if applicable)
Street / PO Box:
City: State: Zip:
Phone: Fax: E-Mail:
Website (if applicable):
Sole Proprietor Partnership Corporation Other
Number of years in business under company’s present name:
Fed Tax ID #: DUNS # Are you registered with the North Carolina Secretary of State to conduct business (if required)? (Check One) YES: NO: Not Applicable:
Are you properly licensed/certified by the Federal and/or State of North Carolina to perform the specified work?
YES: NO: Not Applicable: ATTACH COPY OF ALL APPLICABLE LICENSING/CERTIFICATION DOCUMENTS Are/will you be properly insured to perform the work? YES: NO:
Contact for this Contract: Title:
Phone: Fax: E-Mail:
Have you ever defaulted or failed on a contract? (If yes, attach details) YES: NO:
List at least three (3) references for which you have provided these services (same scope/size) in the past three years - preferably government agencies. Do not include City of Raleigh as a reference to meet the requirement of listing at least (3) references.
PROPOSERS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR SENDING REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE (APPENDIX III) TO THEIR
REFERENCES.
1. Company:
Contact Person: Title:
Phone: Fax: E-Mail:
Describe Scope of Work:
2. Company:
Contact Person: Title:
Phone: Fax: E-Mail:
Describe Scope of Work:
3. Company:
Contact Person: Title:
Phone: Fax: E-Mail:
Describe Scope of Work:
4. Company:
Contact Person: Title:
Phone: Fax: E-Mail:
Describe Scope of Work:
5. Company:
Contact Person: Title:
Phone: Fax: E-Mail:
Describe Scope of Work:
The undersigned swears to the truth and accuracy of all statements and answers contained herein:
Authorized Signature: Date:
APPENDIX III
REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE
(Instructions)
RFQ # WWP-2026-109 NRRRF Headworks Improvements
The City of Raleigh, as a part of the RFQ, requires proposing companies to submit a minimum of three (3) business references as required within this document. The purpose of the references is to document the experience of the proposer relevant to the scope of services and assist in the evaluation process.
• The Proposer is required to send the reference form (the following two pages) to each business reference listed on Proposer Questionnaire.
• The business reference, in turn, is requested to submit the Reference Form directly to the City of Raleigh Point of Contact identified on the Reference Questionnaire form for inclusion in the evaluation process.
• The form and information provided will become a part of the submitted proposal. The business reference may be contacted for validation of the response.
• It is the Proposer’s responsibility to verify their references have been received by the City of Raleigh Point of Contact by the date indicated on the reference form.
APPENDIX III
REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE FORM
RFQ # WWP-2026-109 NRRRF Headworks Improvements
(Name of Business Requesting Reference)
This form is being submitted to your company for completion as a business reference for the company listed above.
This form is to be returned to the City of Raleigh, (Insert Name of Point of Contact), via email to (insert email address) no later than (Insert a time) p.m. ET, (Insert Month, Day, Year) and MUST NOT be returned to the company requesting the reference.
For questions or concerns regarding this form, please contact the City of Raleigh, Point of Contact above.
Company Providing Reference
Contact Name and Title/Position
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email Address
Questions:
1. In what capacity have you worked with this company in the past? If the company was under a contract, please acknowledge and explain briefly whether or not the contract was successful.
Comments:
2. How would you rate this company’s knowledge and expertise?
3= Excellent 2= Satisfactory 1= Unsatisfactory 0= Unacceptable
3. How would you rate the company’s flexibility relative to changes in the scope and timelines?
4. What is your level of satisfaction with hard-copy materials, e.g. reports, logs, etc. produced by the company?
5. How would you rate the dynamics/interaction between the company and your staff?
6. Who were the company’s principle representatives involved in providing your service and how would you rate them individually? Would you comment on the skills, knowledge, behaviors or other factors on which you based the rating?
(3= Excellent; 2= Satisfactory; 1= Unsatisfactory; 0= Unacceptable)
Name: Rating:
7. With which aspect(s) of this company’s services are you most satisfied?
8. With which aspect(s) of this company’s services are you least satisfied?
9. Would you recommend this company’s services to your organization again?
APPENDIX IV
SAMPLE CONTRACT
“SAMPLE”
NORTH CAROLINA
WAKE COUNTY
CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
THIS CONTRACT (the “Contract”) is entered into by and between__________, hereinafter referred to as the “Engineer”, and the City of Raleigh, a North Carolina municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the “City”.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, for purposes of this Contract, the Engineer is a person or entity which is licensed under and provides professional services regulated by Chapters 83A, 89A, 89C, 89E, or 89F of the General Statutes of North Carolina, or any such other statute or regulation hereafter enacted that regulates the practice of architecture, landscape architecture, engineering, land surveying, geology, or soil science in the state of North Carolina; and WHEREAS, the City desires to procure an Engineer to perform services; and WHEREAS, the City has completed necessary steps for retention of professional and other services under applicable City policies; and WHEREAS, the City has agreed to engage the Engineer, and the Engineer has agreed to contract with the City, for performance of services as described, and according to the further terms and conditions, set forth herein.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of sums to be paid to the Engineer, and other good and valuable consideration, the Engineer and City do contract and agree as follows:
1. Scope of Services/Description of Project The City desires to .
The Engineer will serve as the City's professional engineering representative in those tasks of the project to which this Contract applies and will give consultation and advice to the City during the performance of their services.
The Engineer will provide services as described in the following Exhibits, which are attached to and made part of this Contract:
The Engineer now has or will secure at their expense, including subconsultants, all personnel and facilities required to perform the services to be rendered under this Contract. Such personnel are not employees of, nor have they any direct contractual relationship with the City.
The Engineer is authorized to engage subconsultants, including surveyors, geotechnical and materials testing firms, etc., to assist in the work included under this contract to the extent such services are included herein. No subcontract work is authorized for which the City will incur any costs beyond those agreed upon and set forth in Section 4.
2. Responsibilities of the City It is understood that certain services, as required, may be performed and/or furnished by the City. These services may include the following:
2.1. Assist the Engineer by placing at their disposal all available information pertinent to the project, including previous reports and other relative data.
2.2. Assist in gaining access to and making all provisions for the Engineer to enter upon public and private property as required for performance of their services described herein.
2.3. Examine all studies, reports, sketches, drawings, specifications, proposals, and other documents prepared by the Engineer, obtaining advice of legal counsel and/or such other consultants as the City deems appropriate for such examination and rendering in writing decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the service of the Engineer.
2.4. Give prompt written notice to the Engineer whenever the City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any problems or changed circumstances in the project.
2.5. Furnish the Engineer in a timely manner with copies of pertinent correspondence relating to this project, which would not have otherwise been delivered to the Engineer.
2.6. Designate in writing a person to act as City's representative with respect to the work to be performed under this Contract; such person(s) shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define City's policies and decisions with respect to materials, equipment, elements and systems pertinent to the services covered by this Contract.
2.7. The City shall provide to the Engineer such information as is available to the City for rendering of services hereunder.
The Engineer may rely on the sufficiency of such information.
2.8. Insofar as any of the above services are necessary for the Engineer’s performance of their obligations under this Contract, the City shall be responsible for providing such services in a satisfactory and timely manner so as not to delay the Engineer in their performance thereof.
3. Schedule/Time of Performance The work to be performed and the services rendered under this Contract shall commence as directed in writing by the City. In performing the services described in this Contract, it is mutually agreed that time is of the essence. The Engineer shall complete work under the Contract by .
4. Compensation; Time of Payment For services to be performed hereunder, the City shall pay the Engineer a not to exceed total contract amount $ , unless changed by a duly authorized amendment.
4.1. The standard City of Raleigh payment term is NET 30 days from the date of invoice.
4.2. Send all invoices electronically by email accountspayable@raleighnc.gov (or send by mail to: City of Raleigh, Accounts Payable, PO Box 590, Raleigh, North Carolina 27602-0590).
4.3. All invoices must include the following Purchase Order Number __________. Invoices submitted without the correct purchase order number will result in delayed payment.
5. Standard of Care Engineer shall perform for or furnish to City professional engineering and related services in all phases of the project to which this Contract applies as hereinafter provided. Engineer shall serve as City's prime design professional and engineering representative for the project providing professional engineering consultation and advice with respect thereto.
5.1. Engineer may employ such Engineer's Consultants as Engineer deems necessary to assist in the performance or furnishing of professional engineering and related services hereunder. Engineer shall not be required to employ any Engineer's Consultant unacceptable to Engineer.
5.2. The standard of care for all professional engineering and related services performed or furnished by Engineer under this Contract will be the care and skill ordinarily used by members of Engineer’s profession practicing under similar conditions at the same time and in the same locality.
6. Opinions of Probable Construction Cost Engineer’s opinions of probable Construction Cost provided for herein are to be made on the basis of Engineer’s experience and qualifications and represent Engineer’s best judgment as an experienced and qualified professional engineer generally familiar with the construction industry. However, since Engineer has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor’s methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, Engineer cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual Construction Cost will not vary from opinions of probable Construction Cost prepared by the Engineer. If the City wishes greater assurance as to probable Construction Cost, City may employ an independent cost estimator.
7. Notices Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Contract, all notices, requests for payment, or other communications arising hereunder shall be sent to the following:
City of Raleigh Contractor Attn: Attn:
Title: Title:
Address 1: P.O. Box 590 Address 1:
Address 2: Raleigh, NC 27602 Address 2:
Telephone: Telephone:
E-mail: E-mail:
8. Non-Discrimination
8.1. To the extent permitted by North Carolina law, the Parties for themselves, their agents, officials, directors, officers, members, representatives, employees, and contractors agree not to discriminate in any manner or in any form based on actual or perceived age, mental or physical disability, sex, religion, creed, race, color, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, familial or marital status, economic status, veteran status or national origin in connection with this Contract or its performance.
8.2. The Parties agree to conform with the provisions and intent of Raleigh City Code §4-1004 in all matters related to this Contract. This provision is incorporated into the Contract for the benefit of the City of Raleigh and its residents and may be enforced by an action for specific performance, injunctive relief, or any other remedy available at law or equity.
mailto:accountspayable@raleighnc.gov
This section shall be binding on the successors and assigns of all parties with reference to the subject matter of the Contract.
9. Assignment Neither the City nor the Engineer will assign, sublet, or transfer their interest, duties, or obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the other. Nothing herein shall be construed as creating any personal liability on the part of any officer or agent of any public body which may be a party hereto, nor shall it create any rights or benefits to parties other than the City and the Engineer, except such other rights as may be specifically called for herein.
10. Applicable Law Both the City and the Engineer, for themselves and their respective agents, officials, employees, and servants, hereby acknowledge and agree that this Contract shall be governed and construed in accordance with the applicable laws of the State of North Carolina, without regard to its choice of law provisions, and no other.
The proper, sole, and exclusive venue for any civil action arising out of or in any way related to this Contract shall be the federal or state courts sitting in Wake County, North Carolina.
11. Insurance Engineer agrees to maintain, on a primary basis and at is sole expense, at all times during the life of this Contract the following coverages and limits. The requirements contained herein, as well as City’s review or acceptance of insurance maintained by Engineer is not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities or obligations assumed by Engineer under this Contract.
11.1. Commercial General Liability:
Combined single limit of no less than $1,000,000 each occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate. Coverage shall not contain any endorsement(s) excluding nor limiting Product/Completed Operations, Contractual Liability or Cross Liability.
11.2. Automobile Liability:
Limits of no less than $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit. Coverage shall include liability for Owned, Non-Owned and Hired automobiles. In the event Engineer does not own automobiles, Engineer agrees to maintain coverage for Hired and Non-Owned Auto Liability, which may be satisfied by way of endorsement to the Commercial General Liability policy or separate Auto Liability policy. Automobile coverage is only necessary if vehicles are used in the provision of services under this Contract and/or are brought on a City site.
11.3. Worker’s Compensation & Employers Liability:
Engineer agrees to maintain Worker’s Compensation Insurance in accordance with North Carolina General Statute Chapter 97 with statutory limits and employees liability of no less than $1,000,000 each accident.
11.4. Additional Insured:
Engineer agrees to endorse the City as an Additional insured on the Commercial General Liability, Auto Liability and Umbrella Liability if being used to meet the minimum liability limits for General Liability and Automobile Liability.
The Additional Insured shall read “City of Raleigh is named additional insured as their interest may appear”.
11.5. Certificate of Insurance:
Engineer agrees to provide the City a Certificate of Insurance evidencing that all coverages, limits and endorsements required herein are maintained and in full force and effect, and Certificates of Insurance shall provide a minimum thirty
(30) day endeavor to notify, when available, by Engineer’s insurer.
If Engineer receives a non-renewal or cancellation notice from an insurance carrier affording coverage required herein, or receives notice that coverage no longer complies with the insurance requirements herein, Engineer agrees to notify the City within five (5) business days with a copy of the non-renewal or cancellation notice, or written specifics as to which coverage is no longer in compliance.
The Certificate Holder address should read:
City of Raleigh Post Office Box 590 Raleigh, NC 27602-0590
11.6. Umbrella or Excess Liability:
Engineer may satisfy the minimum liability limits required above under an Umbrella or Excess Liability policy. There is no minimum per occurrence limit of liability under the Umbrella or Excess Liability, however, the annual aggregate limits shall not be less than the highest ‘Each Occurrence’ limit for required policies. Engineer agrees to endorse the City as an “Additional Insured” on the Umbrella or Excess Liability, unless the Certificate of Insurance states the Umbrella or Excess Liability provides coverage on a ‘Follow-Form’ basis.
11.7. Professional Liability:
Limits of no less than $1,000,000 each claim. This coverage is only necessary for professional services regulated by Chapters 83A, 89A, 89C, 89E, or 89F of the General Statutes of North Carolina or when otherwise required by the City.
11.8. All insurance companies must be authorized to do business in North Carolina and be acceptable to the City’s risk manager.
12. Indemnity
12.1. To the fullest extent allowed by law, the Engineer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, or indemnities (collectively called “Indemnified Parties”) from and against those Losses, liabilities, damages, and costs proximately caused by, arising out of, or resulting from the sole negligence of the Engineer, the Engineer’s agents, or the Engineer’s employees.
12.2. In matters other than those covered by subsection 12.1. above, and to the fullest extent allowed by law, the Engineer shall indemnify and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties from and against those Losses, liabilities, damages, and costs caused by, arising out of, resulting from, or in connection with the execution of the work provided for in this contract when the Fault of the Engineer or its Derivative Parties is a proximate cause of the Loss, liability, damage, or expense indemnified.
12.3. Costs and expenses shall include attorneys’ fees, litigation or arbitration expenses, or court costs actually incurred by the Indemnified Parties to defend against third-party claims alleged in any court, tribunal, or alternative dispute resolution procedure required of any of the Indemnified Parties by law or by contract, only if the Fault of the Engineer or its Derivative Parties is a proximate cause of the attorney’s fees, litigation or arbitration expenses, or court costs to be indemnified.
12.4. Only to the extent provided pursuant to a policy of insurance, the Engineer shall defend the Indemnified Parties against claims alleged in any court, tribunal, or alternative dispute resolution procedure if the Fault of the Engineer or its Derivative Parties is a proximate cause of such claims.
12.5. The Engineer’s duty to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless described hereinabove shall survive the termination or expiration of this Contract.
12.6. Definitions:
12.6.1. For the purposes of this Section 12, the term “Fault” shall mean any breach of contract; negligent, reckless, or intentional act or omission constituting a tort under applicable statutes or common law; or violation of applicable statutes or regulations.
12.6.2. For the purposes of this Section 12, the term “Loss” or “Losses” shall include, but not be limited to, fines, penalties, and/or judgments issued or levied by any local, state, or federal governmental entity.
12.6.3. For the purposes of this Section 12, the term “Derivative Parties” shall mean any of the Engineer’s subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons or entities for which the Engineer may be liable or responsible as a result of any statutory, tort, or contractual duty.
13. Intellectual Property Any information, data, instruments, documents, studies, reports or deliverables given to, exposed to, or prepared or…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .