21Q0004__Stackers_PastPerformance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 18 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Reach Stacker Rental
- Solicitation number
- W912GY21Q0004
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract solicitation. The solicitation is for the rental of five reach stackers by the Sierra Army Depot located in Herlong, California. The period of performance is from January 11, 2021 to June 10, 2022 for two units and from March 22, 2021 to June 21, 2022 for three units. Delivery is to begin on January 11, 2021. The solicitation is unrestricted and has a NAICS code of 333120. Offerors must submit responses through the SAM.gov website and direct any questions to the named contract specialist either in writing or to the provided distribution email box. The past performance questionnaire is to be used to evaluate offerors on previous contracts and must be completed and returned by the response due date of January 11, 2021. It requests ratings on ten performance elements and recommendations.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W912GY-21-Q-0004.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance – The Offeror must submit at least three (3), but not more than five (5) references. It is the responsibility of the contractor to send the questionnaires to their customers and to ensure that they are received on time. Failure to submit surveys will result in non-responsiveness and proposal will not be evaluated.
Additional Government Past Performance Information
The Government reserves the right to obtain past performance information through random checks of provided contract references or through information maintained in the Government’s past performance database. Should this information be sufficient to negatively impact the Offeror's chance of being awarded a contract under this solicitation, the Government will provide this negative information to the Offeror and provide an opportunity for rebuttal, explanation, or clarification.
Offerors may identify federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts that were similar in nature to the current acquisition. References are limited to those for which services have been performed, in whole or in part, within the past three (3) calendar years. Any references not meeting this condition will not be evaluated. The Government will randomly check the provided past performance history, and may check and consider performance on tasks not identified by the Contractor.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE INSTRUCTIONS
Army Contracting Command – Warren Sierra Army Depot, CA
The information obtained from this questionnaire will be utilized to evaluate the past and present performance of offerors submitting proposals in response to W912GY21Q0004 – Sierra Army Depot (SIAD) Lease of Reach Stackers (5) each. The information you provide will be instrumental in allowing the Government to evaluate how well the contractor performed under your contract(s).
| a. | Please complete all sections of the attached questionnaire. Include your name and title, organizational address, e-mail address, telephone and fax number. |
| b. | Include the contractor’s name and address, the title and/or description of the type of work performed, the award number, the value of the contract (including options), the award and completion date of the project and the type of award/solicitation. |
| c. | Use the rating scale found on the bottom left corner of the questionnaire to rate each performance element. |
| d. | Comments are encouraged and would be appreciated. The last page may be used if additional space is needed for comments. Clear handwritten responses are sufficient. |
| e. | Due to time constraints, it is important that the questionnaire be completed and returned by the date proposal is due January 11th , 2021 by 1000. Please FAX or e-mail your response to the Contract Specialist whose number and address is shown at the bottom right corner of the questionnaire. |
Thank you for your time and participation.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
YOUR NAME & TITLE
YOUR ORGANIZATIONAL NAME AND ADDRESS
TEL NO.
FAX :
E-MAIL:
CONTRACTOR’S NAME & ADDRESS
TITLE OR DESCRIPTION OF REQUIREMENT:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
CONTRACT VALUE (INCLUDING OPTIONS):
CONTRACT TYPE:
|_| FIXED PRICE |_| COST + FEE
|_| COMPETITIVE |_| NON-COMPETITIVE
|_| SET-ASIDE
|_| SEALED BID |_| NEGOTIATED
|_| SEALED BID |_| NEGOTIATED
CONTRACT AWARD & COMPLETION DATE:
| PAST PERFORMANCE ELEMENT |
| RATING |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| NA |
| 1. | Contractor demonstrated a thorough understanding of technical requirements of the contract/task. |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| |
Comments:
| 2. | Contractor anticipated/identified and resolved problems effectively. |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| |
Comments:
| 3. | Contractor managed and directed resources (i.e. personnel, subcontractors, equipment, etc.) effectively. |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| |
Comments:
| 4. Rate the Contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
Comments:
| 5. Contractor was responsive to most questions, inquiries and general communication. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
Comments:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
| PAST PERFORMANCE ELEMENT |
| RATING |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| NA |
| 6. | Contractor met scheduled contract service dates. |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| |
Comments:
| 7. | Contractor provided accurate, complete and high quality service repairs. |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| |
Comments:
| 8. | Contractor complied with the terms of the contract. |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| |
Comments:
| 9. | Contractor was diligent in forecasting and controlling contract cost. |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| |
Comments:
| 10. I would recommend award to this contractor again. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
Comments:
| 1 |
| 0 – 25% of the time |
| Strongly Disagree |
| PLEASE RETURN COMPLETED RESPONSE TO: |
Army Contracting Command-Detroit Sierra Army Depot Contracting Office ATTN: Heidi Young 74 Currant Street Building 60 Herlong, CA 96113 E-MAIL: heidi.m.young.civ@mail.mil
FAX: 530-827-4722
| 2 |
| 26 – 40% of the time |
| Disagree |
| 3 |
| 41 – 55% of the time |
| Somewhat Disagree |
| 4 |
| 56 – 70% of the time |
| Somewhat Agree |
| 5 |
| 71 – 85% of the time |
| Agree |
| 6 |
| 86 – 100% of the time |
| Strongly Agree |
NA
No Knowledge of This Element
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .