Amendment_000003.pdf

18-233-SOL-00287 Amendment 000003

The purpose of this amendment is to add Down Select Evaluation Criteria for Factor(s) 1 and 2 and extend due date for Volume I.

M.5.1.1 Down-Select Evaluation Criteria

The Government will complete evaluation of proposals to include Volume I against the evaluation criteria stated below in conjunction with the Advisory Down-Select process.

Within each Factor, the Sub-factors are equal in importance. Vendors shall note that the evaluation

Factors and Sub-factors are closely correlated to the proposal content requested in Section L.

Factor 1: Past Performance

Each past performance reference will be evaluated against the Sub-factors listed below.

Additionally, the Government shall consider information obtained from any other sources, when evaluating the Offeror’s past performance. Unless otherwise indicated below, each factor will be weighted the same.

Rating Symbol Definition

Neutral N No past performance available for evaluation. Offeror has asserted that it has no directly related or similar relevant past performance experience. Proposal receives no merit or demerit for this factor.

Outstanding O Based on the Offeror’s record of past performance, no issues, concerns, or risks are associated with receiving timely services and contract performance. Past performance surveys and the

Offeror’s experiences indicate that the Offeror is capable of exceeding the requirements of the delivery order. The Offeror has demonstrated significant experience with and knowledge of the issues and problems of large organizations.

Good G The Offeror’s record of past performance indicates there is very little risk associated with receiving quality products, timely services and full contract performance. Past performance surveys and the Offeror’s experience indicate the Offeror will meet or exceed the requirements of the delivery order. The Offeror has demonstrated experience with and knowledge of the issues and problems of large organizations.

Acceptable A The Offeror’s record of past performance indicates that there is some potential risk associated with receiving quality products, timely services, and contract performance. Past performance surveys and the Offeror’s experience indicate the Offeror may have some problems during performance of the delivery order.

The Offeror has demonstrated limited experience with and knowledge of the issues and problems of large organizations.

Unsatisfactory U The Offeror’s record of past performance indicates it will be unable to perform successfully on the delivery order.

18-233-SOL-00287 Amendment 000003

Factor 2: Organizational Experience and Capacity

Adjectival

Rating

Description

Exceptional

Greatly exceeds all minimum requirements of the criteria; has a high probability of success; contains no weaknesses or deficiencies.

Good

Exceeds all the minimum requirements of the criteria; has an above average probability of success; contains no significant weaknesses and only minor, correctable weaknesses exist.

Acceptable

Meets all the minimum requirements of the criteria; has an above average probability of success; no significant weaknesses and no deficiencies.

Marginal

Fails to meet one or more of the minimum requirements of the criteria; low probability of success; major weaknesses and/or significant number of deficiencies exist.

Unacceptable

Fails to meet any of the minimum requirements of the criteria; proposal needs major revisions; very low probability of success.

The due date for Volume I submission is extended to August 22, 2018, 12:00 p.m. Eastern.