Sol_140L3723Q0003_Amd_0001.pdf
PDF 94 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Piceance & Rangely Basin CRI 2023, 4152 acres Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140L3723Q0003
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| BLM_Handbook__Cultural_Resources.pdf | ||
| SOW_Piceance__Rangely_Basins_2023_CRI.pdf | ||
| Sol_140L3723Q0003.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
(x)
140L3723Q0003 x x copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE
RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR
OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
x
LFA
BOISE ID 83705
3833 S. DEVELOPMENT AVE.
BLM FA-NTL INTRAGCY FIRE CTR(FA250)
12/02/20220001
13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) is not extended.is extended, Items 8 and 15, and returning
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
FACILITY CODE CODE
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
CODE
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)
7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)CODE 6. ISSUED BY
PAGE OF PAGES
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.3. EFFECTIVE DATE2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)
1. CONTRACT ID CODE
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
11/14/2022
CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return __________________ copies to the issuing office.
ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
Amendment 0001 is issued to answer questions received about the RFQ. The closing date and time for quotes remains unchanged.
Q1. Does firm fixed price mean that there will not be any opportunities for change orders due to unanticipated sites, testing needs, or other unforseen circumstances?
A1. Per the RFQ vendors must have a valid Colorado consulting archaeological permit or be able to obtain a permit, and have or be able to obtain a Colorado Office of Archaeology and
Historic Preservation consulting permit; which require they have experience working in the area, so we expect that vendors will be familiar enough with the area to be able to quote a firm fixed price for the work. We do not plan to issue change orders but if the contractor
Continued ...
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED
(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)
STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)
Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
Previous edition unusable
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .
ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR
2 3
CONTINUATION SHEET
REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGE OF
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)
140L3723Q0003/0001 comes across something extraordinary or that could not have been reasonably foreseen we would consider it. It would be the contractor's responsibility to immediately notify the
Contracting Officer and COR of the situation and request guidance about what steps to take before performing any additional work.
Q2. Can the BLM provide GIS shape files of the project areas to use in proposal prep?
A2. Yes. KML and location shape files in various formats (CPG, DBF, PRJ, SBN, SBX, SHP, SHX) are available but these are not file formats that can be uploaded to sam.gov. Email Laura
StJohn at lstjohn@blm.gov to request the files.
Q3. Is it possible that smaller portions or phases of the project will be awarded to different contractors or at different times, or will one award for the entire project go to a single contractor?
A3. Our intent is to award one contract for the entire project to a single contractor.
Q4. Are separate reports expected for each task, or one report that covers all tasks?
A4. We assume the question is asking about the 3 tasks in the SOW. Ultimately it is one overall report, just two separate versions - draft final and final.
Q5. We are a small business that meets the qualifications to participate in this RFQ.
Although we are relatively new, we are permitted to conduct archaeology throughout Colorado. We have conducted work in other areas with satisfactory or exceeds expectations ratings in the CPARS system; however, we have not had previous company experience in the NW region.
Does this exclude us from meeting the requirements to respond to the RFP? In particular, the section of the RFQ we are concerned with is under the award decision info:
"and on the quality of past work demonstrated by example of acceptable work in northwest Colorado
(Submit a minimum of 2 and no more than 4).
Continued ...
NSN 7540-01-152-8067 OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)
Sponsored by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.110
ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR
3 3
CONTINUATION SHEET
REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGE OF
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)
140L3723Q0003/0001
A5. That section would require previous experience in the Northwest Colorado area. This does not necessarily need to be with BLM. If they have previous projects with USFS or NPS, those could be used as previous acceptable work. This vendor (the vendor asking the question) was also permitted for survey in Canyon of the Ancients
National Monument and Tres Rios Field Office.
These offices are similar enough that I would be confident that the contractor could cite previous work in those field office areas, to show equivalent experience for northwest Colorado.
Period of Performance: 05/01/2023 to 12/31/2023
NSN 7540-01-152-8067 OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)
Sponsored by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.110
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .