Sol_140A1122B0003_Amd_0005.pdf
PDF 89 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SFIR 3(1)_INDIAN BEND BRIDGE Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140A1122B0003
About this file
This document is an amendment to a federal solicitation. The solicitation is for the SFIR 3(1)_INDIAN BEND BRIDGE project through the Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs Western Region. Amendment No. 5 provides responses to contractor questions and clarifies the design engineer's intent regarding excavation limits shown in the drawings. Specifically, it states that the limits were intended to indicate where a railbank footing will be installed, not restrict excavation work, which can extend into areas beyond those limits as needed provided it remains within the construction easement. All other terms and conditions of the solicitation remain unchanged.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140A1122B0003_Amd_0004.pdf | ||
| Sol_140A1122B0003_Amd_0003.pdf | ||
| Sol_140A1122B0003_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| Sol_140A1122B0003_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Sections_B_-_M_-_Full_And_Open.pdf | ||
| Sol_140A1122B0003.pdf | ||
| Section_C_DESCRIPTION_SPECIFICATIONS.pdf | ||
| DRAWINGS_(Drawings_NV_Indian_Bench_Bridge_Full_100__(2018-03-06).pdf | ||
| ADDENDUM_NO_1_-_SFIR_3(1)_SCRs_-_Revised_Section_628.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
(x)
140A1122B0003 x x
0 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE
RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR
OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
x
Phoenix AZ 85004
A11
SUITE 400 MAILROOM
2600 N CENTRAL AVENUE
Contracting Office
DOI, BIA WRO
Phoenix AZ 85004
A11
SUITE 400 MAILROOM
Contracting Office
2600 N CENTRAL AVENUE
BIA WRO 00011
09/23/20220005
13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) is not extended.is extended, Items 8 and 15, and returning
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
FACILITY CODE CODE
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
CODE
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)
7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)CODE 6. ISSUED BY
PAGE OF PAGES
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.3. EFFECTIVE DATE2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)
1. CONTRACT ID CODE
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
09/01/2022
CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return __________________ copies to the issuing office.
ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
Amendment No. 5 is issued as follows:
1. Response to questions are provided:
Question: Drawing 40 of 57 defines "construction excavation limits". There is approx.
140ft of railbank protection that is to be installed along the bank upstream of the bridge abutment, and in that area, the excavation limits shown on drawing 40 are inadequate for installation of the railbank protection detail provided on sheet 22 of 57. The width of the detail, including the riprap to be installed to a depth of 10' below existing streambed doesn't fit within the construction excavation limits provided. The 6'-6" width dimension shown on sheet 40 of 57 only reflects the "C" dimension shown on drawing 22 of 57. In order
Continued ...
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED
(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)
Renee Holly
STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)
Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
Previous edition unusable
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .
ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR
2 2
CONTINUATION SHEET
REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGE OF
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)
140A1122B0003/0005 to install the riprap section to a depth of 10' below the existing streambed, the toe of the buried riprap would extend approx.. 9' beyond the
6'-6" dimension shown on drawing 40. In order to excavate and install the riprap down to 10' depth, the overall width of the excavation could extend another 13.5ft to 18ft into the river and a significant dewatering system may be required.
Another option could be to install shoring, but the shoring would still extend beyond the excavation limits. Considering that drawing 22 and drawing 40 conflict with each other and are not constructable as shown, will the engineer please provide revised details with dimensions that are constructable or provide additional guidance on how to construct this feature?
Answer: The design engineer wanted to show the excavation limits as an indication of where the railbank footing will be installed; but not as a restriction for excavation. The project construction easement is what the Contractor's can not work outside of. These limits are far from the railbank footing "excavation limits".
2. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.
NSN 7540-01-152-8067 OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)
Sponsored by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.110
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .