All Federal Contract Awards

Purchase Order DOLB101A21255

Award Date 12/1/09
Potential Completion Date 6/1/10
Potential Value $1.8K
Funding Federal Agency
Not listed
Contracting Federal Agency
Employment and Training Administration
Awardee
Janusik, Laura A W3L6R48867T4
Ultimate Awardee
Not listed
NAICS Category
541618 - Other Management Consulting Services
PSC Category
R408 - Support- Professional: Program Management/Support
Set-Aside Type
No Set-Aside Used
Federal Contract Vehicle
  • Not listed
Extent Competed
Competed under SAP
Major Defense Program
Not listed
Pricing Type
Firm Fixed Price
Place of Performance
Kansas City, MO 64113, USA
Solicitation Procedures
Simplified Acquisition
Number Of Offers Received
500
Legislative Mandate
Not listed
National Interest Action
Not listed
Research Type
Not listed
Primary Consortia Member
Not listed
Similar Awards
  • Purchase Order DOLB051A20227
    A U.S. government agency awarded a purchase order contract to Janusik, Laura A (UEI: W3L6R48867T4) on July 27, 2005, with a ceiling value of $9,000. The contract, which operates under firm fixed price terms, was performed in Kansas City, Missouri and was not designated as a set-aside contract. The ultimate completion date was established as June 30, 2007, allowing approximately two years for contract fulfillment. The purchase order structure and modest contract value suggest this award was for...
  • Purchase Order DOLB101A21313
    The U.S. government awarded a $1,800.00 firm fixed-price purchase order to Karen Hickey (UEI: DCR8NNMH69G9) on December 3, 2009, with an ultimate completion date of June 1, 2010. The contract, funded under Treasury Account Symbol 16 0172, supports a solicitation for grant applications review panel and carries no set-aside designation. Work is to be performed in Kansas City, Missouri. This purchase order represents a professional services engagement for panel review activities related to grant...
  • Purchase Order DOLB101A21245
    The U.S. government awarded a firm fixed-price purchase order valued at $1,800 to Daron Sandbergh (UEI: F46LC5RMY5T9) on December 1, 2009, for services related to a Grant Applications Review Panel. The contract, which was not set aside for any particular business category, required completion by June 1, 2010, and was to be performed in Kansas City, Missouri. This contract type and structure suggest a specialized, time-limited engagement to support the review and evaluation of grant applications,...
  • Purchase Order DOLB101A21322
    The U.S. government awarded a $1,800 firm fixed-price purchase order to Michael Biskie (UEI: VJ2FZKJ6K8L3) on December 1, 2009, with an ultimate completion date of June 1, 2010. This contract supports a Grant Applications Review Panel solicitation, with the place of performance designated as Kansas City, Missouri. No set-aside designation was applied to this award. The contract represents a straightforward procurement for services related to grant application review activities. As a purchase...
  • Purchase Order DOLB101A21279
    The U.S. government awarded a $1,800 firm fixed-price purchase order to Chen, Vivian (UEI: M8LEC7WV8Q25) on December 1, 2009, with an ultimate completion date of June 1, 2010. The contract was issued under Task Appropriation Schedule 16 0172 for a Grant Applications Review Panel solicitation, with the place of performance designated as Kansas City, Missouri. No set-aside designation was applied to this award, and the contract was structured as a purchase order with a fixed pricing mechanism....
  • Purchase Order DOLB101A21289
    The U.S. government awarded a $1,800 firm fixed-price purchase order to Daniels, Marvel E J D (UEI: DT5UDKH8FT43) on December 1, 2009, for participation in a TAS Solicitation for Grant Applications Review Panel. The contract, which carried no set-aside designation, was completed by June 1, 2010, with the place of performance located in Kansas City, Missouri. This procurement was funded through Treasury Account Symbol 16 0172, indicating allocation through the federal appropriations system. The...
  • Purchase Order DOLB101A21307
    The U.S. government awarded a purchase order contract valued at $1,800 to Antonio Gallardo (UEI: JFBNM1MKWF15) on December 3, 2009, for services related to a Task and Schedule (TAS) solicitation for grant applications review panel activities. The contract utilized firm fixed-price pricing with no set-aside designation and was performed in Kansas City, Missouri, with an ultimate completion date of June 1, 2010. This contract type and structure indicate a straightforward procurement for...
  • Purchase Order DOLB101A21261
    The U.S. government awarded a $1,800 firm fixed-price purchase order to Stephen Bethke (UEI: ZUBVKVSGRMX1) on December 1, 2009, for participation in a grant applications review panel. The contract was executed without a set-aside designation and specified a place of performance in Kansas City, Missouri. With an ultimate completion date of June 1, 2010, the engagement provided a six-month performance window for the contractor's services in evaluating and reviewing grant submissions. This purchase...
  • Purchase Order DOLB101A21312
    On December 3, 2009, the federal government awarded a purchase order contract valued at $1,800 to Harris, Wilma (UEI: ZPNAVB31K4E9) for support services related to a grant applications review panel under Treasury Account Symbol 16 0172. The contract, issued on a firm fixed-price basis with no set-aside designation, is scheduled for completion by June 1, 2010, and will be performed in Kansas City, Missouri. This procurement appears to support administrative functions associated with federal grant...
  • Purchase Order DOLB101A21273
    The U.S. government awarded a $1,800.00 firm fixed-price purchase order to Dayton Angela (UEI: KTMGSC78TTF5) on December 1, 2009, for participation in a Task and Schedule (TAS) Solicitation for Grant Applications Review Panel. The contract was performed in Draper, Utah, with an ultimate completion date of June 1, 2010. This award utilized no set-aside designation and represents a direct procurement rather than a competitive grant mechanism. The engagement involved supporting grant application...