Purchase Order DOLB074R21559
Award Date 9/4/07
Potential Completion Date 12/31/07
Potential Value $2.6K
Funding Federal Agency
Not listed Contracting Federal Agency
Awardee
Not listed Ultimate Awardee
Not listed NAICS Category
PSC Category
Set-Aside Type
No Set-Aside Used
Federal Contract Vehicle
- Not listed
Extent Competed
Not Competed under SAP
Major Defense Program
Not listed Pricing Type
Firm Fixed Price
Place of Performance
Beaver, WV, USA
Solicitation Procedures
Simplified Acquisition
Number Of Offers Received
1
Legislative Mandate
Not listed National Interest Action
Not listed Research Type
Not listed Primary Consortia Member
Not listed Similar Awards
- This Firm Fixed Price purchase order, awarded on July 31, 2007, with a ceiling value of $8,503.00, represents a direct contract award with no set-aside designation applied. The work is scheduled for completion by September 1, 2007, with performance taking place in Beaver, West Virginia. The relatively modest contract value and compressed timeline suggest this purchase order addresses an immediate operational need or supplies requirement for a federal agency. While specific details regarding...
- This contract is a firm fixed price purchase order awarded on August 3, 2005, with a ceiling value of $1,971.00 and an ultimate completion date of September 3, 2005. The contract does not utilize a set-aside designation. Performance of the work is to be conducted in Beaver, West Virginia. The short performance period of approximately one month suggests this is a time-sensitive procurement for supplies or services required by the government agency. While specific details regarding the prime...
- This purchase order, awarded on October 2, 2006, represents a firm fixed-price contract with a ceiling value of $12,897.50. The contract was executed without a set-aside designation and is scheduled for ultimate completion by July 12, 2007. The work will be performed in Beaver, West Virginia. While specific details regarding the prime contractor, funding agency, and the nature of goods or services to be delivered are not provided in the available contract documentation, the modest contract value...
- This firm fixed-price purchase order was awarded on September 8, 2005, with a ceiling value of $49.7K and an ultimate completion date of October 8, 2005. The contract was performed in Cool Ridge, West Virginia, and was not issued under any small business set-aside program. The relatively short performance period of one month and the modest contract value suggest this was likely a procurement for supplies or services with a defined, near-term delivery requirement. While specific details regarding...
- This federal contract award is a purchase order issued on August 10, 2007, with a firm fixed price and a ceiling value of $18,065.60. The contract was awarded without a set-aside designation and is scheduled for ultimate completion on January 15, 2008. The place of performance is located in Beaver, West Virginia. While the specific prime contractor, funding agency, and product or service details are not provided in the available award information, the modest contract value and purchase order...
- This federal contract award represents a purchase order issued on September 13, 2005, with a ceiling value of $2,112.00. The contract was awarded without any set-aside designation and utilized other than standard pricing mechanisms. The ultimate completion date was established as September 30, 2005, providing approximately 17 days for contract performance and delivery. The relatively modest contract value and short performance period suggest this purchase order addressed an immediate, tactical...
- This purchase order contract was awarded on August 23, 2005, with a ceiling value of $2,000.00. The contract utilized standard competitive procurement procedures without any set-aside designation for small businesses or other protected categories. The contract type and pricing structure indicate a straightforward transactional procurement, though the specific products or services to be delivered are not detailed in the available award information. Without additional documentation regarding the...
- This federal contract award is a firm fixed price purchase order issued on October 1, 2005, with a ceiling value of $1,130.00 and an ultimate completion date of September 30, 2006. The contract was awarded without a set-aside designation, indicating it was competed among all eligible contractors. The place of performance is located in West Mifflin, Pennsylvania. The relatively modest contract value suggests this procurement addresses a specific, limited-scope requirement rather than a major...
- This federal contract award is a Purchase Order issued on September 19, 2007, with a ceiling value of $4,631.00 and an ultimate completion date of October 19, 2007. The contract was awarded using firm fixed price pricing and does not utilize a set-aside designation. The place of performance is located in West Mifflin, Pennsylvania. However, the specific details regarding the prime contractor, funding agency, originating solicitation requirements, and the products or services being delivered...
- This federal contract award is a purchase order with a ceiling value of $2,400 that was issued on October 1, 2004, with an ultimate completion date of December 30, 2005. The contract was awarded without a set-aside designation, indicating it was competed among all eligible contractors. The contract utilizes an "Other" pricing type classification, suggesting non-standard pricing arrangements beyond typical fixed-price or cost-reimbursable structures. The limited information available...
This federal contract award represents a Purchase Order issued on September 4, 2007, with a firm fixed price structure and a ceiling value of $2,633.61. The contract was performed in Beaver, West Virginia, and was scheduled for ultimate completion by December 31, 2007. No set-aside designation was applied to this procurement, indicating it was competed among all eligible contractors without restrictions based on business size or other socioeconomic factors. The relatively modest contract value and short performance timeline suggest this was a straightforward procurement for supplies or services required by the awarding agency. Without additional documentation identifying the specific products or services, the prime contractor, or the funding agency, the precise nature of the deliverables cannot be determined from the award data alone. However, the firm fixed price arrangement ensured cost certainty for the government and placed performance risk on the contractor.
Generated 11/1/25, 10:14 AM
Mod # | Description | ReasonForModification | Federal Obligation | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not listed | Not listed | $2.6k | 9/4/07 |