"" other functions: task order title: schedule risk analysis description of the work to be performed: the contractor shall perform the following task requirements: 4.1 the contractor shall participate…

Ended Awarded Last action

Contract number
NNL13AB50T
Awardee
Awarding agency
Obligated
$209,817

Award facts

Contract value 94% obligated
$223,188.00 Current and potential, with all options
Completion date 100% complete
Current and potential, with all options
Set-aside
No set-aside
Competition
Full and Open Competition after exclusion of sources Negotiated Proposal / Quote
Pricing
Cost Plus Fixed Fee
Place of performance
Columbia, MD 21046, USA

Award details come from SAM.gov/FPDS.

Transactions

Action Obligated Date
Other Administrative Action 6 -$834
Supplemental Agreement for work within scope 5 · "" task order title:schedule risk analysis description of the work to be performed: the contractor shall perform the following task requirements:4.1THE… -$12,537
Supplemental Agreement for work within scope 4 $68,089
Supplemental Agreement for work within scope 3 -$44,024
Supplemental Agreement for work within scope 2 $29,144
Supplemental Agreement for work within scope 1 $42,024
Original award $127,955

Description

"" other functions: task order title: schedule risk analysis description of the work to be performed: the contractor shall perform the following task requirements: 4.1 the contractor shall participate in the development of the programmatic analysis plan (PAP) in support of the SRB review plan; reference sopi 5.0-2, appendix a. 4.2 the contractor shall participate in the sufficiently review; reference sopi 5.0-2, section 5.3, reporting on findings regarding: p/p alignment with and contribution to agency strategic goals, adequacy of management approach, adequacy of technical approach, adequacy of the integrated cost and schedule estimates and funding strategy, adequacy and availability of resources other than budget, and adequacy of the risk management approach. (see NPR 8000.4 agency risk management procedural requirements and NASA/SP-2011-3422 NASA risk management handbook for further requirements and guidance on risk management and the NASA space flight program and project management handbook for further guidance on addressing the expected maturity for each of these criteria.). The review of this information shall be coordinated between the cost analyst and schedule and risk analyst so that an integrated programmatic assessment is performed. Team discussions shall be led on schedule uncertainty and risk identification. Schedule risks shall be quantified by probability of occurrence and impact if the risk does occur. 4.3 the program/project schedule management processes shall be evaluated to determine if they are able to develop, manage and assess schedule performance. 4.4 the program/project budget, workforce and other resources, and requirements as they relate to ability to successfully implement its schedule shall be assessed. 4.5 the p/p earned value management (EVM) procedures and practices shall be evaluated and the results of EVM reports shall be interpreted. 4.6 the contractor shall follow programmatic analysis group (PAG) processes outlined in the sopi 5.0-2, section 5.4.2 and deliver the following analysis as part of the independent schedule assessment and risk analysis: 4.6.1 the contractor shall assess the management approach, practices, acquisition planning, and methods of communication and reporting with respect to the schedule. 4.6.2 a schedule quality/health assessment of the given program/project (p/p) schedule shall be performed in accordance with the NASA schedule management handbook and the government accountability office (GAO) schedule assessment guide, GAO -12-12OG, criteria. The results shall be provided to the PAG schedule lead and p/p allowing for improvements to be made prior to the SR-60 date. 4.6.3 a schedule analysis shall be performed to include: critical path analysis, total float/slack analysis, performance trends (baseline VS. Scheduled/actual and trends from previous review to current review), margin/reserve analysis, and earned value (schedule) analysis. 4.6.4 a probabilistic schedule risk assessment shall be performed. 4.6.5 resources other than budget: manpower, fabrication, assembly, test facilities and equipment, test beds, ground support equipment, launch sites, communication networks and mission operations centers shall be assessed. 4.6.6 the p/p risk management process and plan shall be assessed. 4.6.7 initial findings shall be reported to the PAG lead 40 days prior to the site review. Preliminary analysis results shall be reported one week prior to the site review at the PAG peer review. 4.6.8 the independent programmatic analysis (IPA) report shall be generated and submitted in accordance with sopi 5.0-2, appendix g. 4.6.9 the contractor shall deliver all reports and analysis in accordance with the sopi 5.0-2, to be archived no later than the site review plus twenty days. Reports and presentations: programmatic assessment plan (PAP) standing review board (SRB) kick-off presentation, IPA initial analysis results, peer review & SRB

Quick answers

Who was awarded contract NNL13AB50T?

NNL13AB50T was awarded to Cornell Technical Services LLC by Langley Research Center (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) on June 26, 2013.

How much is contract NNL13AB50T worth?

The government has obligated $209,817 on NNL13AB50T. Its current value, with exercised options, is $223,188.

Is contract NNL13AB50T an order under another contract?

Yes. NNL13AB50T is a delivery order under NNL12AA00B, an indefinite delivery contract.

Was contract NNL13AB50T competed?

The extent of competition for NNL13AB50T was full and open competition after exclusion of sources.

On GovTribe

See this award's full record

  • Every transaction and funding action
  • The awardee's other awards and teaming partners
  • Similar awards and recompete opportunities
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this award