W913E522R0011 CRREL JOC.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- CRREL Job Order Contract JOC Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W913E522R0011
About this file
This job order contract solicitation from the Department of the Army Corps of Engineers seeks a contractor to provide maintenance, repair, and minor construction services at the Cold Regions Research Engineering Laboratory in Hanover, New Hampshire. The contractor shall manage multiple concurrent projects, maintain a local office, and respond to task order requests within 10 days or 5 days for quick-response requirements. Key personnel minimum qualifications are identified. The contract value is $900,000 over three years in $300,000 increments. Task orders will range from $2,500 to $750,000. The contractor must be capable of daily site supervision and quality control management.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| PWS CRREL Bid Schedule JOC.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| PWS CRREL JOC 04 August 2022.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
One (1) Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) construction Job Order Contract (JOC) for w ork at the US Army Corps of Engineers, Cold Region Research Engineering Laboratory Hanover, New Hampshire Campus.
The purpose of this procurement is to obtain w ork that includes but is not limited to construction, alteration, and repair of real property (industrial, commercial) and utility projects for FY 2023 through 2025.
This procurement w ill be a 100% Small Business Set-Aside, Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ), Single Aw ard Task Order Contract (SATOC) w ith a three (3) year term. The North American Industry Classif ication Code (NAICS) for this procurement is 236220; size standard $39.5 Million applies. Multiple projects are anticipated. The ceiling amount is $900,000.00 ($300,000.00 per year).
Individual task orders are expected to range from $2,500 to $750,000; how ever, task orders above or below these amounts may be considered if deemed to be in the Government’s best interest.
Guaranteed Minimum:
Base Year: $25,000
ZAVIEN T BEAL
NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".
10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS
NEGOTIATED
16-Aug-2022
(RFP)
(IFB)
X
CALL:
B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)
See Item 7
2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION
SEALED BID
3. DATE ISSUED
9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME
SOLICITATION
NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)
Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)
11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______30 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________ calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________
12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?
(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)
X YES NO
13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:
A. Sealed offers in original and __________1 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________16 Sep 2022 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.
shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time of fers are due.
B. An offer guarantee is, X is not required.
C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.
D. Offers providing less than _______60 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.
SOLICITATION, OFFER,
AND AWARD
(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)
1. SOLICITATION NO.
IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.
4. CONTRACT NO.
7. ISSUED BY CODE
ERDC CONTRACTING OFFICE
HANOVER OFFICE
72 LYME ROAD
HANOVER NH 03755-1290
W913E5
PAGE OF PAGES
1 OF
CODE
(Title, identifying no., date):
12B. CALENDAR DAYS
12:00 PM (hour)
Sealed envelopes containing offers
5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.
8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)
(217) 373-6773FAX:TEL: (217) 373-7297 TEL: FAX:
W913E522R0011 149
601-940-2470
20B. SIGNATURE
(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK
TO SIGN
NSN 7540-01-155-3212
SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)
CODE FACILITY CODE
17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.
the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)
AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES
18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.
19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS
(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)
AMENDMENT NO.
DATE
20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN
OFFER (Type or print)
AWARD (To be completed by Government)
21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:
22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM
(4 copies unless otherwise specified)
CODE
(Insert any number equal to or greater than
20C. OFFER DATE
25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO
10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)
CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY
(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)
See Item 14
(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS
30B. SIGNATURE
29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)
document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .
gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.
30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
30C. DATE
(Type or print)
TEL: EMAIL:
31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE
BY
CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE
(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT
(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER
Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation
ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
0001 1 Job
CRREL JOC BASE
FFP
Contractor shall provide, upon receipt of a task order, all work, materials, supplies,supervision, labor, transportation, and equipment (except when specified as Government Furnished) for maintenance, repair, upgrade and construction of real property facilities for Cold Regions Research Engineering Laboratory in Hanover, NH in strict accordance with all the terms, conditions, special contract requirements, specifications, drawings, attachments, and exhibits.
FOB: Destination
PSC CD: Y1QA
NET AMT
ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
0002 1 Job OPTION CRREL JOC Option Year 1
FFP
Contractor shall provide, upon receipt of a task order, all work, materials, supplies,supervision, labor, transportation, and equipment (except when specified as Government Furnished) for maintenance, repair, upgrade and construction of real property facilities for Cold Regions Research Engineering Laboratory in Hanover, NH in strict accordance with all the terms, conditions, special contract requirements, specifications, drawings, attachments, and exhibits.
FOB: Destination
PSC CD: Y1QA
NET AMT
ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
0003 1 Job OPTION CRREL JOC Option Year 2
FFP
Contractor shall provide, upon receipt of a task order, all work, materials, supplies,supervision, labor, transportation, and equipment (except when specified as Government Furnished) for maintenance, repair, upgrade and construction of real property facilities for Cold Regions Research Engineering Laboratory in Hanover, NH in strict accordance with all the terms, conditions, special contract requirements, specifications, drawings, attachments, and exhibits.
FOB: Destination
PSC CD: Y1QA
NET AMT
DELIVERY INFORMATION
CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /
CAGE
0001 POP 01-OCT-2022 TO
30-SEP-2023
N/A N/A
0002 POP 01-OCT-2023 TO
30-SEP-2024
0003 POP 01-OCT-2024 TO
30-SEP-2025
BID SCHEDULE
Pricing Schedule
Item Description Coefficient Factor
0001 Normal Working Hours:
Offerors shall perform all functions called out in any task order during normal working hours for the unit price sum specified in the RSMeans Unit Price Book, for any work required to be performed, multiplied times the proposed coefficient factor.
0002 Other Than Normal Working Hours:
Offerors shall perform all functions called out in any task order during other than normal working hours for the unit price sum specified in the RSMeans Unit Price Book, for any work required to be performed, multiplied times the proposed coefficient factor.
0003 Non-Prepriced Items Overhead and profit rate for all non-prepriced items on a task order. Overhead and profit is defined as all items associated with performing the tasks, other than direct labor, equipment, and material costs. Coefficient factor to be applied to direct costs of task order non-prepriced items.
0004 Hazardous Material Abatement – Officers shall perform all functions called out in any task order for the unit price sum specified in the RSMeans Unit Price Book for any work required to be performed for the removal and disposal of asbestos and lead-based paint, multiplied times the coefficient factor.
COEFFICIENT INCLUSIONS PAGE
Notes:
1. The offeror's Construction price coefficient factor(s) SHALL include all prime and sub-contractor profit, home office overhead, jobsite overhead, and other costs not included in the bare labor, material, and equipment costs from the unit price book or in the non-prepriced items. These costs include, but are not limited to, the following:
(2) Corporate, Regional, and Site offices (i.e. Office buildings, office spaces, office trailers, office management, office equipment and supplies, etc)
(3) Profit
(4) Performance and Payment Bonds (per Army Federal Regulation Supplement (AFARS) 17.9004 2(h))
(5) Insurance
(6) Compliance with environmental laws, protection and safety
(7) Tax Laws
(8) Protection for moving of Government property
(9) Submittals (i.e. preparation and distribution of Work Plans, Risk Analyses and weekly reports, as-builts, CQC Plans, Safety Plans, Accident Prevention Plans, Hazard Analyses, Test Procedures, Tests, Test Reports, Status Reports, Catalog Cut Sheets, Technical Data Sheets, Shop Drawings, Schedules, O&M Manuals, etc.)
(10) Price quotations
(11) Contractor adjustments to Government Unit Prices
(12) Clean-up shall be applicable per each task order.
(13) All waste and excess materials (m)Permits, licenses and fees
a. Mobilization, such as heavy equipment and equipment not usually required to be delivered to jobsite, shall be negotiated with each task order whereas work trucks (and lower tier work trucks) small trailers, etc shall be included in the coefficient
b. Bulletin Board and Project and Safety Signs “ if required/applicable” should be amended to include the statement “ local barricades (i.e. construction safety fence in and around work site, construction safety tape, etc) shall also be included in Contractor’ s coefficient whereas more substantial signage/barricade effort (i.e. traffic safety plan and controls) shall be negotiated with each task order if applicable.
c. Principles, project management, supervision and construction supervision
d. Technical support staff (i.e. estimator, draftsman/CADD operator, etc.)
e. Administrative support staff (i.e. clerks, secretaries, assistants, etc.)
f. Quality Control and Quality Control Staff
g. Travel (includes all associated costs for all personnel)
h. Marketing and Training (i.e. videos, user guides, brochures, promotions, associated travel, etc)
i. Collaboration/face-to-face meetings with all Program/Project stakeholders (i.e. progress reviews, negotiations, etc.)
j. Interest associated with funding of equipment and payroll
k. Employee payroll taxes, insurance and fringe benefits
l. Risk of lower than expected contract dollar volume
m. Risk of high inflation costs for option periods
(aa) Risk of poor subcontractor performance and re-performance (bb) Other risks of doing business
(cc) Business taxes, contributions, memberships, corporate headquarters support (legal, financial, etc.)
(dd) Cost of using electronic payroll software. (ee) Toilet Facilities
(ff) DD1354
(gg) Utility Locations (hh) Warranty Tag
(ii) O&M Training (jj) O&M Manual
(kk) cost of e4Clicks Project Estimator Software
2. The unit prices stated in RSMEANS/E4Clicks include labor, materials and equipment.
3. Coefficient pricing shall remain throughout the performance period of the contract, economic adjustments will only be made through the annual updated pricing of the RSMEANS/E4Clicks.
Offerors are cautioned to distribute direct costs, such as material, labor, equipment, subcontracts, etc. and to evenly distribute indirect costs, such as job overhead, home office overhead, bond, etc., to the appropriate contract line items. Both parties shall presume that field overhead costs through the proposed contract duration are inclusive in the offered price for the contract. If deemed necessary, the supplemental price breakdown information will be used to assist the Government in performing the price evaluations described above.
All pricing should be included in the coefficients. The Government considers a coefficient below 1.0 to be unreasonable and that Offerors proposal with coefficients below 1.0 will not be considered for award.
Section 00 20 00 - Instructions for Procurement
NOTICE TO OFFERORS
INSTRUCTION, CONDITIONS AND NOTICE TO
OFFERORS
1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION
The scope of this acquisition includes maintenance, repair, upgrade, and construction of real property facilities at the Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) in Vicksburg, MS.
This will include a wide variety of services such as minor new construction, sustainment, restoration and/or modernization services to include the following:
Repair and Alteration of real and personal property facilities, e.g. maintenance, repair, and minor construction services relating to the following:
Mechanical, Plumbing, Structural, Electrical, Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Instrumentation repair incidental to construction Asbestos and lead based paint abatement, and other environmental remediation incidental to the construction.
Anti-terrorism and force protection system upgrades, repairs, and installation.
Repair of roadways, parking areas, and pedestrian walkways.
Lighting installation and repair.
Interior or exterior painting of buildings and structures.
Storm water system improvement and repair.
Other site work including site grading and drainage, landscape plantings, exterior irrigation systems, and retaining walls incidental to the construction.
Based on the type of work being performed, four bare cost adjustment coefficients shall be used to determine the total price when applied to the RSMeans Unit Price Book line items and the necessary quantities.
• CONTRACT COST CEILING LIMITATION FOR DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION COSTS
The JOC contract value is $900,000.00 to include a 12-month base contract period and two 12-month option periods for a total of three years. Individual task orders will be awarded between $2,500 and $750,000 per task order, but may exceed the stated estimated task order amount if such award is deemed to be in the best interest of the Government. The Base Year and each option year will have a capacity of $300,000.00. Capacity not used in any period may be carried forward for a total of $900,000.00.
• COPIES OF SOLICITATION DOCUMENTS AND AMENDMENTS
All copies of the solicitation and amendments will be posted in www.BETA.SAM.gov. The Offeror shall submit its proposal and all requested information as specified in this solicitation to the contact listed in the www.BETA.SAM.gov announcement.
1.4 RESERVED
1.5 SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARD/NAICS CODE
The small business size is $39.5M and the NAICS is 236220.
1.6 PROPOSAL EXPENSES AND PRE-CONTRACT COSTS
This solicitation does not commit the Government to pay as a direct charge any cost incurred by the Offeror in the preparation and submission of the proposal or revisions. A stipend is not authorized for unsuccessful offerors.
1.7 ACCURACY IN PROPOSALS
Proposals shall be set forth with full, accurate, and complete information as required by this solicitation, including all amendments to the solicitation.
1.8 PROPOSAL SUBMITTALS
Proposals shall be submitted via email with the subject line reading CRREL JOC RFP to:
Zavien.T.Beal@usace.army.mil. Only electronic submissions will be accepted. All questions concerning this solicitation must be submitted to the Government via email to Zavien.T.Beal@usace.army.mil. The Government will accept questions up to ten (10) calendar days of the due date.
• PROPOSAL FORMAT AND NUMBER OF SUBMITTALS
• The Government will not make assumptions concerning an Offeror’s intent, capabilities, or experiences. Clear identification of proposal details shall be the Offeror’s sole responsibility. The Government may reject incomplete proposals after initial evaluation without further consideration. Therefore, all proposals must meet the following basic requirements at the time of submission:
n. The proposal must be typed, submitted in English, and easy to read.
o. The proposal must be organized, concise, and submitted in the volumes and order indicated below. Volumes shall be clearly identified. Each evaluation factor and subfactor shall be described in a separate section.
p. Reference is made to contract clause 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition. Only electronic submissions will be accepted. There are no page limits;
however, documents must be submitted by email; therefore, max file size is 15 megabytes.
Each proposal should contain a cover sheet as the first page which identifies the following:
(1) the Offeror’s name, (2) the Offeror’s address, (3) the Offeror’s phone number, and e-mail address, (4) the Offeror’s point(s) of contact including contact information, (5) the Offeror’s authorized signer(s)/negotiator(s) including their contact information, (6) the Offeror’s cage code and duns number, (7) the volume number, and (8) the requirement’s solicitation number, and (9) the proposal’s period of validity. The second sheet should be an index/table of contents.
q. Offerors are required to submit the proposal in the format as shown below. All proposal materials shall contain a table of contents. All pages shall be numbered to correspond with a table of contents.
Volume I - Technical:
Factor 1 Management Approach
Factor 2 Past Performance
This Volume shall also include the Joint Venture Agreement (if applicable). The JV agreement will not count against total page limit.
Volume II - Price:
Tab A Standard Form 1442; including verification of receipt of all amendments Tab B Section 00010, Proposal Bid Schedule, and;
Tab C Section 600 Representations and Certifications (reps and Certs) or SAM Reps and Certs Tab D Letter of current bonding capacity
r. Volume I, Technical Proposal shall be limited to no more than 50 pages total (10 pages
Operations Plan, 10 pages Key Personnel, and 10 pages Experience with JOC’s, and 20 pages Past Performance, note; past performance questionnaires do not count toward the page limitation). Pages should have a one-inch margin on all sides. Text should be 12-point, Times New Roman.
(Captions for drawings and tables may be 10-point.) Pages exceeding the page limit will be removed and not evaluated. No mention of price shall be included in Volume I.
f. Volume II, Price Proposal should be limited to no more than the above stated requirements for Tab A, Tab B, Tab C, and Tab D.
Section 00 21 00 - Instructions
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT
52.215-20 REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFIED COST OR PRICING DATA AND DATA OTHER THAN
CERTIFIED COST OR PRICING DATA (NOV 2021)
(a) Exceptions from certified cost or pricing data.
(1) In lieu of submitting certified cost or pricing data, offerors may submit a written request for exception by submitting the information described in the following subparagraphs. The Contracting Officer may require additional supporting information, but only to the extent necessary to determine whether an exception should be granted, and whether the price is fair and reasonable.
(i) Identification of the law or regulation establishing the price offered. If the price is controlled under law by periodic rulings, reviews, or similar actions of a governmental body, attach a copy of the controlling document, unless it was previously submitted to the contracting office.
(ii) Commercial product and commercial service exception. For a commercial product and commercial service exception, the offeror shall submit, at a minimum, information on prices at which the same item or similar items have previously been sold in the commercial market that is adequate for evaluating the reasonableness of the price for this acquisition. Such information may include--
(A) For catalog items, a copy of or identification of the catalog and its date, or the appropriate pages for the offered items, or a statement that the catalog is on file in the buying office to which the proposal is being submitted. Provide a copy or describe current discount policies and price lists (published or unpublished), e.g., wholesale, original equipment manufacturer, or reseller. Also explain the basis of each offered price and its relationship to the established catalog price, including how the proposed price relates to the price of recent sales in quantities similar to the proposed quantities;
(B) For market-priced items, the source and date or period of the market quotation or other basis for market price, the base amount, and applicable discounts. In addition, describe the nature of the market;
(C) For items included on an active Federal Supply Service Multiple Award Schedule contract, proof that an exception has been granted for the schedule item.
(2) The offeror grants the Contracting Officer or an authorized representative the right to examine, at any time before award, books, records, documents, or other directly pertinent records to verify any request for an exception under this provision, and the reasonableness of price. For items priced using catalog or market prices, or law or regulation , access does not extend to cost or profit information or other data relevant solely to the offeror's determination of the prices to be offered in the catalog or marketplace.
(b) Requirements for certified cost or pricing data. If the offeror is not granted an exception from the requirement to submit certified cost or pricing data, the following applies:
(1) The offeror shall prepare and submit certified cost or pricing data, data other than certified cost or pricing data, and supporting attachments in accordance with the instructions contained in Table 15-2 of FAR 15.408, which is incorporated by reference with the same force and effect as though it were inserted here in full text. The instructions in Table 15-2 are incorporated as a mandatory format to be used in this contract, unless the Contracting Officer and the Contractor agree to a different format and change this clause to use Alternate I.
As soon as practicable after agreement on price, but before contract award (except for unpriced actions such as letter contracts), the offeror shall submit a Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data, as prescribed by FAR 15.406-2.
(End of provision)
52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)
(a) Protests, as defined in section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are filed directly with an agency, and copies of any protests that are filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from ______________________. (Contracting Officer designate the official or location where a protest may be served on the Contracting Officer.)
(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within one day of filing a protest with the GAO.
52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995)
(a) The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.
(b) Site visits may be arranged during normal duty hours by contacting:
A site visit will be held to accommodate vendors.
(1) Offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.
(2) An organized site visit has been scheduled for—
10:00 a.m. EST 29 August 2022 Site visit POC: Lisa DeGeorge
(3) Participants will meet at Cold Regions Research Engineering Laboratory 72 Lyme Road Hanover, NH 03755
(14) Site Visit Point of Contact- Lisa DeGeorge
603-646-4175
Lisa.d.degeorge@usace.army.mil Interested parties must submit names of attendees along with their company's name to Zavien.T.Beal@usace.army.mil NLT 2:00 PM CST on 22 August 2022.
Section 00 21 16 - Instructions to Proposers
INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS
SECTION 00115
1.0 PROPOSAL CONTENT
1.1 Volume I - Technical Proposal
A. Factor 1 – Management Approach: Submission Requirements Submission Requirements
Factor 1 – Subfactor 1: Operations Plan.
Offeror’s Operation Plan will be rated based on the following:
a. The plan must adhere to the proposal submission instructions and address the Offeror’s approach and methodology and depth of understanding of the contract performance requirements for management, supervision, manpower and equipment resources, quality control/assurance, and safety associated with Job Order Contracts.
b. The Operations Plan shall also include an organizational structure, which demonstrates the efficiency in day-to-day operations, quick resolution of problems, clear roles and responsibilities and excellent communication networks.
c. The plan should also demonstrate the ability of the firm to manage multiple construction projects of varying magnitudes relating to the repair and alteration of real and personal property facilities, e.g. maintenance, repair, and minor construction services.
Factor 1 – Subfactor 2: Key Personnel
Offeror’s Key Personnel will be rated based on the following:
a. Project Superintendent (PS)
b. Quality Control Manager (QCM)
c. Site Safety Health / Environmental Compliance Manager (SSHO)
The QCM, PS, and SSHO may be a single person if that person meets the qualifications of every position.
-The Project Superintendent must have a minimum of five (5) years of relevant construction Project Superintendent experience, and a minimum of ten (10) years’ experience similar in nature, size, scope and complexity of this solicitation. Resumes for key personnel to include Letter of Commitments signed by key personnel.
-The Quality Control Manager and Site Safety Health / Environmental Compliance Manager must have a minimum of five (5) years’ relevant experience in projects similar in nature, size, scope and complexity of this solicitation.
Factor 1 – Subfactor 3: Experience Executing Job Order Contracts The Offeror’s experience will be evaluated to allow the Offeror to demonstrate their ability to execute Contract requirements. Offeror shall submit a minimum of two (2) and no more than five (5) contracts that are ongoing or have been completed within five (5) years from the date of this solicitation that best represent their experience similar to the scope of work herein. If an offeror is proposing as a Joint Venture (JV) and project experiences cannot be provided as a JV, each partner shall submit experience information, with no more than five (5) contracts each.
The evaluation of experience is a subjective assessment of the Offeror’s experience on contracts of a similar nature, size, scope, and complexity, utilizing a comparable number of personnel with like skills. The Government will assess the Offeror’s experience and determine whether the contractor’s experience is similar in depth and breadth of experience and demonstrates their ability to execute contract requirements.
Factor 2 - Past Performance Submission Requirements
The Offeror shall provide past performance information in one of two formats for each project provided under Factor 1 – Subfactor 3: Experience Executing Job Order Contracts.
(1) Copies of Contractor Performance Assessment Reports (CPARs – also commonly referred to as CCASS reports) for projects performed for the U.S. Government. If the project provided has a CPAR, it must be used by the Offeror to demonstrate past performance. If CPAR submission is used to validate past performance, it shall be the most recent evaluation in the system (i.e., for projects submitted as completed, the final 100% completed CPAR shall be provided). If the Offeror submits a CPAR, they are not required to submit a separate Past Performance Questionnaire for the specific project.
(2) If CPAR information is not available for a project provided for experience, a completed Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), attached at the end of this section (Form PPQ-0) must be provided per the following guidance:
a. The Past Performance Questionnaire included in the solicitation is provided for the
Offeror to submit to the client for each project the Offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1 – Subfactor 3: Experience. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact.
b. Completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror should still submit Form PPQ-0 with their proposal, only with blocks 1-6 filled out, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s).
c. Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, the Government, via email to:
Zavien.T.Beal@usace.army.mil with the subject reading “CRREL JOC PPQ” prior to the proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.
It is the Offeror’s responsibility to ensure the Government will be able to contact the POCs using the contact information provided. Offerors are encouraged to send their request to the POC as soon as possible once a project is identified for experience under Factor 1.
The Offeror may also include performance recognition documents received within the last 3 years such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition.
While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate, and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.
1.2 Volume II, Price Proposal
a. Tab A, Standard Form 1442
Submission Requirements
A Standard Form (SF) 1442 must be submitted in Volume II.
b. Tab B, Section 00010, Proposal Bid Schedule
Submission Requirements
The Offeror shall complete and submit in its entirety Section 00010, Proposal Bid Schedule.
This form is included in Section 00010 of the RFP.
c. Tab C, Representations and Certifications, Submission requirements
Each Offeror shall complete all representations and certifications in Section 00600 if they have not previously completed the Representations and Certifications Section at www.SAM.gov.
d. Letter of Bonding Capacity, Each Offeror shall submit a letter of bonding capacity verifying the contractor is able to obtain a minimum of $1 million bonding capacity annually.
Past Performance Questionnaire:
NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0) CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)
1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:
Address: DUNs Number:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Information Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):
Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):
Explain Differences:
4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)
CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information Name:
Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
6. Describe the client’s role in the project:
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
8. Client’s Signature:
NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS
QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR.
THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO
USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS.
CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES
DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE
SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR
FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE
RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
RATING DEFINITION NOTE
(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
(VG) Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.
(U) Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.
(N) Not Applicable
No information or did not apply to your contract
Rating will be neither positive nor negative.
TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST
REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.
1. QUALITY:
a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N
b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance
E VG S M U N
c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
E VG S M U N
d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)
E VG S M U N
2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)
E VG S M U N
b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract
E VG S M U N
3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?
E VG S M U N
b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)
E VG S M U N
c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?
E VG S M U N
d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR
a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?
E VG S M U N
b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort
E VG S M U N
c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N
d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel
E VG S M U N
e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N
f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines
E VG S M U N
g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes
E VG S M U N
h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
E VG S M U N
5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?
E VG S M U N
b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client
E VG S M U N
c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)
E VG S M U N
d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.
Yes No
e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.
Yes No
f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.
Yes No
6. SAFETY/SECURITY
a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)
E VG S M U N
b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.
E VG S M U N
7. GENERAL
a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).
E VG S M U N
b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)
E VG S M U N
c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)
Yes No
d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
E VG S M U N
Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks.
Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):
Section 00 22 16 - Supplementary Instructions to Proposers
SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS
SECTION 00130
1.0 OVERVIEW
The Government will evaluate the proposal in accordance with the evaluation factors stated in this solicitation. The evaluation factors in this solicitation are described herein using the evaluation rating systems outlined for selection procedures.
2.0 BASIS OF AWARD
The source selection for this Competitive Procurement will be conducted utilizing the FAR Part 15 “Best Value” and “Tradeoff” Source Selection Procedures and Techniques and the Department of Defense Source Selection Procedures. Award will be made to the offeror the Government determines will be able to accomplish the necessary work in the manner most advantageous to the Government and whose offer represents the best value to the Government;
as determined by the Source Selection Authority (SSA) after considering all factors, including evaluated cost. Best value means the expected outcome of an acquisition that, in the Government’s estimation, provides the greatest overall benefit in response to the requirement.
Tradeoff means it may be in the Government’s best interest to consider award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror. Award will be made based on the best value proposal that is determined to be the most beneficial to the Government, with appropriate consideration given to the two non-price/cost factors.
Factor I – Technical and Factor II – Past Performance are of equal importance and combined are greater than Factor III - Price.
The Government intends to select ONE contractor for award of this effort. For the purpose of award, the government shall evaluate offers based on the evaluation factors described below:
3.0 Evaluation Factors
Factor Location Description FACTOR 1 VOLUME 1 Management Approach – Offerors shall describe their Operations Plan, Key Personnel, and Experience Executing Job Order Contracts (JOC).
FACTOR 2 VOLUME 1 Past Performance – Offeror shall demonstrate past performance in successfully executing JOCs.
FACTOR 3 VOLUME 2 Price and Other Required Information – Submit a properly filled out SF1442, bid schedule, Letter of Bonding capacity, and representations and certifications.
I. Evaluation of Factor 1 - Management Approach
The technical aspects of the Management Approach proposal will be evaluated based upon the following subfactors: Operations Plan, Key Personnel, and Experience Executing Job Order Contracts (JOC).
Factor 1 – Subfactor 1: Operations Plan.
Offeror’s Operation Plan must accomplish the following:
a. The Operations Plan must adhere to the proposal submission instructions and address the Offeror’s approach and methodology and depth of understanding of the contract performance requirements for management, supervision, manpower and equipment resources, quality control/assurance, and safety associated with Job Order Contracts.
b. The Operations Plan shall also include an organizational structure, which demonstrates the efficiency in day-to-day operations, quick resolution of problems, clear roles and responsibilities and excellent communication networks.
c. The plan should also demonstrate the ability of the firm to manage multiple projects of varying magnitudes relating to the repair and alteration of real and personal property facilities, e.g., maintenance, repair, and minor construction services.
Factor 1 – Subfactor 2: Key Personnel
Offeror’s must identify the qualifications of key personnel in the following positions:
a. Project Superintendent (PS)
b. Quality Control Manager (QCM)
c. Site Safety Health / Environmental Compliance Manager (SSHO)
The QCM, PS, and SSHO may be a single person if that person meets the qualifications of every position.
-The Project Superintendent must have a minimum of five (5) years of relevant construction Project Superintendent experience, and a minimum of ten (10) years’ experience on construction similar in nature, size, scope and complexity of this solicitation. Resumes for key personnel to include Letter of Commitments signed by key personnel.
-The Quality Control Manager, and Site Safety Health / Environmental Compliance Manager must have a minimum of five (5) years’ relevant experience in the operations of construction projects similar in nature, size, scope and complexity of this solicitation.
Factor 1 – Subfactor 3: Experience Executing Job Order Contracts
The Offeror’s experience will be evaluated to allow the Offeror’s to demonstrate their ability to execute Contract requirements. Offeror shall submit a minimum of two (2) and no more than five (5) contracts that are ongoing or have been completed within five (5) years from the date of this solicitation that best represent their experience similar to the scope of work for this solicitation. If an offeror is proposing as a Joint Venture (JV) and project experiences cannot be provided as a JV, each partner shall submit experience information, with no more than five (5) contracts each.
NOTE: Every contract used as an example of Experience shall also be submitted as Past Performance. Any Contract submitted for experience that does not also contain Past Performance may be omitted.
Technical Factors Rating. The rating for Technical will be expressed as an adjectival assessment of Outstanding, Good, Acceptable, Marginal, or Unacceptable. The adjectival ratings will be evaluated utilizing the following adjectival rating methodology:
TABLE 1 – COMBINED TECHNICAL/RISK RATINGS
Color Rating Description
Blue Outstanding Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.
Purple Good Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.
Green Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.
Yellow Marginal Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.
Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is unawardable.
II. Factor 2 - Past Performance
The contractor shall submit the same projects for past performance that were used to show experience in Factor 1 Experience Executing Job Order Contracts.
To demonstrate past performance, the Offeror shall provide performance on past or current contracts of a similar type, size, scope and complexity, have been completed within five (5) years from the date of this solicitation, including references, with names and contact information of the references who can verify such past performance.
New Corporate Entities -- New corporate entities may submit data on prior relevant and recent contracts (within the last 3 calendar years) involving its officers and employees. However, in addition to the other requirements in this section, the Offeror shall discuss in detail the role performed by such persons in the prior contracts cited. Past performance information on work for state and local governments, private sector clients, and subcontractors that are similar to the Government requirement will be evaluated equally with similar federal contracts. Offeror may submit information on key personnel, major subcontractors, and work performed as part of a team or joint venture and other previous reincarnation of its current organization.
In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .