Combat_Marksmanship__Amendment.pdf

0010943588-0003

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

See attached summary of changes

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 5

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 03-Mar-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912PB-17-R-3013

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

13-Feb-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

02-Mar-2017

CODE

ECC RCO BAVARIA

AMERIKANISCHE BESCHAFFUNGSSTELLE

GEB 542

92655 GRAFENWOEHR LAGER

GERMANY

W912PB 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912PB-17-R-3013

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

General Information:

REGIONAL CONTRACTING OFFICE – BAVARIA

SSG Reonel Delacruz Contract Specialist

COMM: 0049-0964-83-8685

EMAIL: reonel.t.delacruz.mil@mail.mil

Contracting Officer: Ms. Andrea Schottenhammel

TEL/FAX: 475-8728/8558 (09641-83-8728)

Email: andrea.schottenhammel.ln@mail.mil

Short Description of Requirement:

Combat Marksmanship and Advanced Marksmanship System

Location: Grafenwoehr, Germany Pfullendorf , Germany Vicenza , Italy

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The purpose of this amendment to change the verbiage for are as follows:

1. ADDENDA, Sub Factor 2

Sub Factor 2 Personnel Staffing Plan and Qualifications The offeror must provide evidence that that has or will obtain personnel with the necessary professional skills and qualifications to meet the requirements of Combat Marksmanship and Advanced Marksmanship Simulation System such Small Arms Master Gunner course or equivalent, advanced marksmanship training , and educational degree based on PWS para 1.6.15. offeror providing documentation supporting this special qualification will be eligible for award. Proposals received that do not provide proof of certification or other credentials will be rejected based on not meeting this standard.

2. PERFOMANCE WORK STATEMENT paragraph 1.4.2, 1.4.3 , 1.6.15 and 1.6.22

1.4.2 Deployed Training Support:

Deployed training is training that occurs away from the permanent locations of Grafenwoehr, Germany and Vicenza, Italy. During deployed training, the same standards of performance and reporting for home station training (section

5) are applicable. Deployed training is scheduled directly by the COR. Deployed training requirements supersede home station training schedules.

Annually (or Each year, during the contract period of performance), four (4) deployments are planned by the International Special Operations Training Center (Pfullendorf, Germany). Each deployment shall consist of ten (10) training days over a two (2) week period. Normally, ISTC deployments will be supported by the Grafenwoehr site.

Deployed training beyond that outlined above will be by exception and will be costed, funded, scheduled and executed separately.

1.4.3 Instructor Training:

The contractor shall conduct five (5) train-the-trainer classes annually at home station or deployed locations as outlined below. Instructor training shall focus on enabling unit leaders to operate the system and plan training based on system capabilities and established scenarios. The contractor shall provide Subject Matter Experts to instruct the classes and all classroom materials, references and materials required to conduct the training. These classes are to be conducted over a 40 hour period and each be capable of supporting ten (10) students. Breakdown of the number of sessions and locations are below:

a. International Special Operations Training Center (Pfullendorf, Germany) – one (1) session annually

b. Grafenwoehr Germany – two (2) sessions annually

c. Vicenza, Italy – two (2) sessions annually

The government and contractor will coordinate for scheduling instructor training. Training sessions may run consecutively, but will not overlap. The government will ensure scheduling availability of the appropriate training suite required for instructor training. Additional instructor training sessions beyond that outlined above will be scheduled, costed and funded separately.

1.6.15 Special Qualifications: The contractor shall be qualified to perform the efforts specified in this contract prior to starting work. Contractor employees identified as operators shall have relevant combat marksmanship and advanced marksmanship experience which shall consist of current DoD combat marksmanship training, such as Small Arms Master Gunner course or equivalent, advanced marksmanship training and the following based on primary working location:

For performance at German locations: A bachelor’s degree in applicable major, plus 3 years of recent specialized experience, OR; An associate’s degree plus 7 years of recent specialized experience, OR; A major certification plus 7 years of recent specialized experience, OR; 11 years of recent specialized experience.

For performance at Italy: A Bachelor’s degree or Associates degree and four years of experience or a high school diploma and eight years of specialized experience.

In order to be considered a major certification, the certification must pass a three part test: (1) it must be widely recognized; (2) it must be independently administered; and (3) it must be difficult to obtain. Examples of major certifications would include:

−CCDP – Cisco Certified Design Professional −CCIE – Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert −CISSP – Certified Information Systems Security Professional −CCNP – Cisco Certified Network Professional −MCSE – Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer −MCDBA – Microsoft Certified Database Administrator −MCAD – Microsoft Certified Application Developer −MCSD – Microsoft Certified Solution Developer −MCSA --Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator −MCITP --Microsoft Certified IT Professional −MCM --Microsoft Certified Master −MCA --Microsoft Certified Architect −MCPD --Microsoft Certified Professional Developer

1.6.22 Data Rights: See DFARS 227.71

3. 52.212-2 Sub Factor 2 and Sub factor 3

Sub Factor 2 Personnel Staffing Plan and Qualifications

To be acceptable the offeror must provide evidence that has or will obtain personnel with the necessary professional skills and qualifications to meet the requirements of Combat Marksmanship and Advanced Marksmanship Simulation System .This sub-factor is met when the offeror's proposal clearly provides evidence that it has personnel or has identified prospective personnel with the necessary skills.

Specifically,documents submitted shall demostrate current and /or prospective personnel meet qualifications as outlines in PWS paragraph 1.6.15.This factor considers the extent of adequacy, effectiveness, and comprehensiveness of the offeror’s management approach, as well as the offeror’s ability to meet all the requirements of the PWS paragraph 1.6.15. Only offeror providing documentation supporting this special qualification will be eligible for award. Proposals received that do not provide proof of certification or other credentials will be rejected based on not meeting this standard. Proof of certification such as Small Arms Gunnery Course or Equivalent.

Sub Factor 3 System Approach and Execution Plan

To be acceptable the offeror must provide a detailed execution plan showing how it will execute all required tasks in the PWS.

The offeror proposal must clearly identify the weapons they can provide without any teathers based on PWS Para

5.1.1 and 5.1.5.And has the capability for the individual soldier in transition of weapon to another without weapon hardware or software change based on PWS Para 5.1.7

The offeror proposal must indicate that the system will provide enough space up to six soldier within the training environment to move and fire for collective and individual training as indicated in PWS Para 5.1.3.

The offeror proposal must indicate that the component of the system can sustain 220 degree environment that includes the secondary and tertiary area for individual soldier training as indicated in PWS para 5.1.2.

The offeror proposal must indicate the system has the capability to create and retain training statistics for individual soldier as indicated in in PWS para 5.1.4.

The offeror proposal must indicate the system has the ability to increase the soldier's situational awareness within the environment and improve decision making and reactions when engaging target while increasing level of difficulty without repetition. indicated in PWS para 5.1.8.

The offeror proposal must indicate that the system has the capability to provide targets of varying survivablity with increase of target ranges as indicated in PWS para 5.1.9.

The offeror proposal must indicate the capability for the system to support Soldier's training Combat Marksmanship skill in non-standard firing position. as indicated in PWS para 5.1.6.

The offeror proposal must capable of being fully setup/ torn down in 4.5 days or less by on site personnel as indicated on PWS para 5.1.10.

The offeror proposal must indicate a plan that has the capability to train a minimum of 20 soldiers per session as indicated in PWS para 5.1.12.

The Technical rating will be based on an “Acceptable” / “Unacceptable” basis. The following definitions will be used in evaluating the offeror’s proposal against the technical requirement.

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal provides clear evidence that the offeror has Meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation

Unacceptable Proposal provides clear evidence that the offeror has Meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation

The technical factor is met when the Offeror’s proposal clearly demonstrates evidence of the full capability for executing the PWS requirements and meeting the three subfactors above. A rating of unacceptable on any technical sub-factor will result in the technical factor being rated unacceptable.

4. The following have been deleted:

52.203-17 Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights and Requirement

To Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights

APR 2014

52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance OCT 2016 52.204-20 Predecessor of Offeror JUL 2016 52.216-1 Type Of Contract APR 1984

(End of Summary of Changes)