Final PASS Pre-Proposal Slides 31 Aug 10.ppt
PPT presentation 232 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Amended Synopsis Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W912JB10R4014
About this file
PreProposal Conference Powerpoint Slides
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ATTACHMENT3PP word 03.doc | DOC document | |
| Q A 1-61 and unanswered Q Sept 15.pdf | ||
| Q A 1-58 Sept 14.pdf | ||
| 10R4014-01.pdf | ||
| 10R4014 released.pdf | ||
| Q A 1-56 10 Sept 10.pdf | ||
| Q A 1-54 9 Sept 10.pdf | ||
| Pre Proposal Conference Q A 1-50 SEPT 8.pdf | ||
| PreProposal sign in.xls | XLS spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PROFESSIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES
(PASS)
Schedule I Engineering Support Services
PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE
31 August 2010
INTRODUCTION
Darryl Mitchell, Contracting Officer Patricia Paschick, Director of Contracting Andrea Senska, Contract Administrator Leslie Ewald, COR Tami McKenney, Admin. Support Patti Herron-Stringer, Admin. Support Audrey Dickman, Admin. Support
Introductions Make sure everyone signed in Inform that cards have been placed on each chair to write questions, will be accepted during the break.
HOUSEKEEPING
| Doors |
| Smoking |
| Restrooms |
East Doors for entrance and exit.
AGENDA
| Prepared Briefing |
| Break |
| Q and A’s |
| Note cards |
Inform that cards have been placed on each chair to write questions, will be accepted during the break.
PASS FACTS
| National requirement |
| One single IDIQ award will be made from this solicitation |
| 100% Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Set-aside |
| Award has maximum value of $80M |
| $70M National Guard, $10M Other DoD |
The original PASS solicitation included six single awards on six separate schedules. The contract values were $40M for each schedule. Although the contracts were anticipated to run through early spring of 2011, schedule I has reached the $40M capacity so it is being re-solicited.
SOLICITATION, PLANS
& SPECIFICATIONS
| ON THE WEB |
| http://www.fbo.gov |
| Solicitation |
| CDRL’s |
| Questions and Answers |
| check regularly & refresh web page |
There are many documents on the website, available for you to download. Please make sure you review the solicitation and all files carefully when preparing your proposal.
CONTRACT PERIOD
| BASIC CONTRACT PERIOD | |
| Date of Award – 12 Months | |
| Anticipated award date 06 Dec 2010 | |
| 4 OPTION YEARS | |
| xx Dec 2011 – xx Dec 2012 | |
| xx Dec 2012 – xx Dec 2013 | |
| xx Dec 2013 – xx Dec 2014 | |
| xx Dec 2014 – xx Dec 2015 |
If the award is not made by 06 Dec 2010, the basic year will still be 12 months after award.
*****No task order may exceed 12 months or $5M*****.
Task Orders may have options, not to exceed one year. (H3.4)
The contract resulting from this solicitation will be for a base year with 4 option years.
PREPARING YOUR PROPOSAL
| Submit all information required in the RFP with your initial requirement - in the required format |
| Provide a proposal that represents the best value to the Government |
| The lowest price is not necessarily the best value |
Details to be discussed later in this presentation
Read the instructions carefully and format the information as requested.
Following the requested format will ensure that all of your information is accurately evaluated.
DISCLAIMER
THE FOLLOWING IS A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
OFFERORS ARE STRONGLY CAUTIONED TO CAREFULLY READ THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOLICITATION AND COMPLY ACCORDINGLY
THE GOVERNMENT INTENDS TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSION AND THERE MAY NOT BE A CHANCE FOR DISCUSSIONS, CORRECTIONS, OR REVISED PROPOSALS!!
Failure to include all components of the proposal requirements may render the proposal unacceptable
WHAT DO I NEED TO SUBMIT??
SECTION L of the RFP details the required information and format for the proposal
| 3 PARTS ARE REQUIRED |
| PART I - RFP Documents and Price Proposal |
| PART II – Technical Proposal |
| PART III – Past Performance Proposal |
Failure to include all components of the proposal requirements may render the proposal unacceptable
Read the instructions in Section L carefully to ensure you comply with page limits for each PART L.
Part I – Original and (1) hard copy and (1) set on CD ROM using MS Word 2007 (rich text.rtf) format.
Part II – Original and (3) hard copies and (1) set on CD ROM using MS Word 2007 (rich text.rtf) format or Adobe Acrobat format. (“Read Only” files are acceptable).
Part III – Original and (3) hard copies and (1) set on CD ROM using MS Word 2007 (rich text.rtf) format or Adobe Acrobat format. (“Read Only” files are acceptable).
PART I
RFP DOCUMENTS AND PRICE PROPOSAL
| TAB 1 – Executive Summary |
| TAB 2 – Signed SF 33 and Amendment acknowledgement |
| TAB 3 – Section K, Representations and Certifications |
| TAB 4 – Price - completed price schedule including options |
Part I – Original and (1) hard copy and (1) set on CD ROM using MS Word 2007 (rich text.rtf) format.
Tab 1, The executive summary includes the proposal POC, phone number, cage code, DUNS number, Tax ID number, a table of contents, name of offeror’s cognizant DCAA office, (include a POC, Phone Number and date of last audit). (Section L, paragraph 6.2.1) TAB 2 – Will be the SF33, Amendments may be acknowledged on the face of the SF33 or signed copies of the amendments can be included in this section TAB 3 – Include only the Reps and Certs in Section K of this solicitation. All other required reps and certs are to be completed in ORCA. (Section L, para 6.2.3)
TAB 4, price. The schedule is comprised of 2 Groups; Group A (exempt) and Group B (non-exempt/SCA employees). You must provide pricing for the entire schedule (all groups all tiers all options) to be considered for award. Do not change the format of the schedules. Additionally, you must submit a breakdown of cost elements for the schedule. (See Section L paragraph 6.2.8);
CCR REGISTRATION
| Make sure your CCR registration is current |
| www.ccr.gov |
Make sure your registration is current and valid. You also want to make sure that it will not expire before contract award. Anticipated award date 06 DEC 2010
Joint Venture must register as a Joint Venture in CCR to receive an award
ORCA
| Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA) | |
| Must electronically complete the annual Representations and Certifications at: | |
| https://orca.bpn.gov |
Include any Reps & Certs contained in Section K of the solicitation only. All other required Reps & Certs are to be completed in ORCA.
ORCA information is valid for one year. (Section L, 6.2.3)
PART II
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
| 3 SUB-FACTORS (of equal value) |
| Capability and Experience |
| Employee Recruitment, Supervision and Management Plan |
| Compensation Plan, Employee Retention |
Offerors must address all three sub-factors in your proposals.
Part II shall be submitted as an Original and (3) hard copies and (1) set on CD ROM using MS Word 2007 (rich text.rtf) format or Adobe Acrobat format. (“Read Only” files are acceptable).
There is a 35 page limit for this part, which includes attachments (charts, graphs etc..).
The cover page, table of contents, Tabs and list of figures or list of exhibits or copy of JV/Teaming Agreement (if applicable) do not count in the page numbers. You may also include a compliance matrix after the table of contents/indexes and before the start of numbered pages, provided it is less than 5 pages. (Section L5.6)
PART III
PAST PERFORMANCE
| Performance within last 3 years |
| Arrange in order of relevance |
| Relevant (similar complexity, scope, labor categories, magnitude, etc.) |
| 40 page total |
| Narrative Assessment |
| Describe performance on previous contracts |
| No more than 10 pages; part of 40 page total |
Offerors are required to identify and submit a past performance record for each federal, state, local Government or private sector contract or subcontract the firm has performed within the last three years which are relevant to this project (ie. similar complexity, scope, labor categories, magnitude, etc). Arrange the information in order of most relevant. (L 6.4) **Past performance more than 3 years old will not be considered.**
Offeror should submit a narrative assessment of how the Offeror has performed on previous contracts. The narrative must not exceed 10 pages and is included in the 40 page count. (Section L, 6.4.4.1)
PART III
PAST PERFORMANCE
| Subcontractor’s Consent |
| Teaming partners and/or Subcontractors |
| Attachment 2 |
| Not in page count (if in last tab) |
| Reference Package Questionnaires |
| Send out questionnaires to references as soon as possible |
| Ensure references return questionnaires to the Contracting Office not later than the solicitation closing date |
Part III shall be submitted as an Original and (3) hard copies and (1) set on CD ROM using MS Word 2007 (rich text.rtf) format or Adobe Acrobat format. (“Read Only” files are acceptable).
There is a 40 page limit. Does not include: cover page, table of contents, tabs, list of figures or exhibits or subcontractor consent forms (if placed in a separate tab at the end of the Part III proposal. (Section L5.6)
Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor’s consent. Ensure you include the Subcontractor Information Consent Form with your proposal. (Section L Attachment 2). (Last Tab – not in page count if in last tab)
It is required that offerors prepare and submit a maximum of 7 reference packages in accordance with Section L 6.4.7. ( Max is 7 per company -not offer) JV/Teaming partners (Major Subs) may also submit) Attachment 3 of section L has instructions. The questionnaires must be submitted by the reference to the PCO office not later than the closing date for the solicitation. Since you are depending on your customers to provide vital information regarding your past performance, you should send out the packages early and follow up with them to ensure they understand the importance of their responses. We will accept the completed PP questionnaires by fax, email, or mail.
PROPOSAL AND DUE DATES
| All parts must be received not later than 20 September 2010, 2:00 p.m. Local |
| Make sure boxes/envelopes are clearly marked |
| No facsimile or electronic offers will be accepted |
| May hand carry proposal |
| Past Performance Reference Questionnaires are also due by this date and time |
Proposals are currently due on 20 September 2010 at 2:00 Local. We do not anticipate an extension, but if an amendment gets issued to extend the date, it will be posted to the solicitation website.
Section L, 4.1 Make sure you mark your proposals with the applicable info; PROPOSAL W912JB-10-R-4014 DO NOT OPEN.
Hand carried proposals at Section L, 3.4 If you choose to hand deliver your proposal, you must request base entry not later than 48 hours in advance. You also need to ensure that you allow time for potential delays at the base entry point. Late receipt of proposals due to base entry delays may not be deemed excusable and may render a proposal late.
HOW WILL THE PROPOSAL
BE EVALUATED?
| Evaluation process detailed in RFP Section M |
| Carefully review Section M when preparing proposal |
| Comply with Section L requirements |
| Technical and Past Performance, which are equal in weight, but when combined are significantly more important than Price |
FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS EXACTLY!!!
The Best Value is the most advantageous offer, price and other factors considered, and consistent with the Government's stated importance of evaluation criteria.
COMPLIANCE REVIEW
| Proposal timely |
| Price Schedule complete |
| Technical Proposal included |
| Past Performance included |
| Original and three copies |
| Failure to furnish a complete proposal may result in elimination from consideration |
“After Closing” a proposal compliance review will be conducted to look at key proposal requirements (M2).
If your answer is no to any of the bullets, your proposal could be found non-compliant and may not evaluated.
Pages in excess will be removed from the proposal before the evaluation.
EVALUATION OF TECHNICAL
| 3 Sub-factors, all of equal value |
| Ratings |
| “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” |
| Technical proposals evaluated as acceptable if proposal: |
| Provides a technical approach which clearly indicates an adequate understanding of the minimum technical and performance requirements. |
Three technical Sub-factors Section M, para 3.2 (Capability & Experience; Employee Recruitment, Supervision & Management Plan and Compensation Plan, Employee Retention).
Technical Evaluation will be accomplished first, only technical proposals evaluated to be “Acceptable” will be eligible for further consideration. Section M 2.2.1
Technical evaluation ratings and descriptions will be used in the evaluation and assessment of merit and risk for each Technical Sub-factor and the overall Technical rating of the Technical Proposal.
Proposal risk assesses the risk associated with the Offeror’s proposed approach as it relates to accomplishing the requirements of this Solicitation. Offers may be determined unacceptable, even though the minimum requirements are met, if the proposed approach poses too great a risk.
In order to be determined “Acceptable” an Offeror shall, in the determination of evaluators, be rated “Acceptable” in ALL criteria stated in Paragraph M 3.2 Technical.
EVALUATION OF TECHNICAL
| Technical proposals determined to be “unacceptable” shall be rejected, and not considered for further evaluation |
| Provides a technical approach or solution that clearly does not meet the minimum technical and performance requirements and is unawardable . |
| Do not simply state that services will be in accordance with the PWS |
| Pages in excess of 35 will not be evaluated |
No notification will be issued to the affected Offerors until the completion of the evaluation process (M2.2.1). The opportunity for Post-Award debriefings will be given to affected Offerors after evaluations are completed.
EVALUATION OF PAST PERFORMANCE
| Emphasis on recent and relevant experience |
| Information and Consent form for all Subcontractors or Teaming Partners |
| Questionnaires must be received from references not later than solicitation closing |
| Government may obtain past performance information from other sources |
| Pages in excess of 40 will not be evaluated |
Recent and relevant, Section M3.3.3 Information and Consent Section L 6.4.3 and Attachment 2 Questionnaires, Section L 6.4.7 and Attachment 3
Note: Gov’t may contact provided your references, PPIRS, or any other source. (L 6.4.8)
EVALUATION OF PRICE
| Price will be reviewed for compliance before evaluations |
| Total Evaluated Price (TEP) for evaluation only |
| Basic and options evaluated |
| Basic and option pricing cannot be unbalanced |
Price may be reviewed for compliance before the evaluation of technical and past performance. Offers that fail to meet compliance requirements may be eliminated from the competition. See Section M 3.4.1
Is Basic and options evaluated pricing balanced? Un-balanced pricing exists when (despite an acceptable TEP) the price of one or more Schedule items is significantly overstated or understated, as indicated by application of analysis techniques. See Section M 3.4.5.4
TEP CALCULATION
(For Evaluation Purposes Only)
| 6 classifications are randomly chosen |
| will be chosen from all tiers and all years |
| Group A Rates |
| multiplied by 12 months for the base year and each option year |
| Group B Rates |
| SCA wage rate x coefficient + H&W x 1920 for the base year and each option year |
| Total Group A + Group B = TEP |
TEP - The CO will randomly choose a total of 6 classifications from the schedule, mixed between Groups A & B (Group A will be pulled from all tiers). Group B SCA rates will be the wage rates in applicable SCA wage determination in effect at time of closing for DETROIT Michigan (Selfridge ANG Base, MI.) (FOR PROPOSAL PURPOSES ONLY) found at attachment 5 of Section J. The Group A rates will be multiplied by 12 for the base year and each option year. The Group B rates will be multiplied by 1920 hours for the base year and each option year. The total will be used to evaluate price (TEP) to determine the “low price”. (See Section M 3.4.5).
SAMPLE TRAVEL HANDLING RATE TEP CALCULATION
TEP = $425,000.00
Travel Handling Rate = 4% $425,000.00 x 5% = $21,250 x 4% = $850.00 Total TEP = $425,850.00
Travel handling rate = fee to cover company’s administrative costs to make travel arrangements for Government requested travel, in performance of employee’s official duties.
Shown as % and NO Profit or G&A paid in addition; if $0.00 state $0.00 on price schedule.
(if proposed) It will be included in the evaluation of price. 5% of TEP x travel handling rate + TEP = Total TEP
WHO WILL RECEIVE THE AWARD?
THE CONTRACTOR WHOSE PROPOSAL PROVIDES BEST VALUE TO THE GOVERNMENT, PRICE AND OTHER FACTORS CONSIDERED, WILL BE AWARDED THE CONTRACT
BEST VALUE AWARD DECISION
BEST VALUE IS DEFINED AS AN AWARD BASED ON THE GREATEST OVERALL BENEFIT IN RESPONSE TO THE REQUIREMENT. AWARD IS BASED ON PRICE AND OTHER NON-COST RELATED FACTORS.
Technical & PP (which are of equal value) when combined are significantly more important than price
SBA
| Offerors must be a Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) |
| Teaming arrangements and partnerships can be tricky, consult your SBA representative for guidance |
WHAT IF I HAVE A QUESTION?
| Reference Section L3 |
| Questions must be submitted in writing via Email only to: |
127wg.contractomb@ang.af.mil
| SUBMIT QUESTIONS no later than 13 September 2010 |
| Questions received after 13 September may be held and addressed after RFP closing with those offerors determined to be in the competitive range. |
Often, many people have the same question. If you have a question, we advise you to first look at the posted questions to see if the answer may already be there. If it is not, submit your question in writing. It will be posted (on a non-attribution basis) with the answer. All questions are posted to ensure a clear understanding by all.
Questions that reveal an error or weakness in the solicitation may result in an amendment.
It is imperative that any questions be submitted not later than 13 September. We do not intend to extend the solicitation due date. (Section L 3.1) If questions do come up after the cutoff date, we will make every effort to post answers, up to 2 days prior to solicitation closing.
HOW WILL MY QUESTION BE ANSWERED ?
| All questions and answers will be posted to website: http://www.fbo.gov |
| Amendments will be posted to the web site |
| Check the web site regularly and don’t forget to refresh the page |
COMMON QUESTIONS
| Is this a multiple award? |
| What NAICS is applicable? |
| Is this a new requirement? |
| Will one geographic region receive the predominance of work? |
| Is it possible for a large business to be a subcontractor on more than one small business team? |
| No, there will be a single award made An offeror needs to propose on the entire schedule. |
| The primary NAICS code is 541330 (Engineering Services) and can be found at section B3. |
| This is a follow-on contract for PASS schedule I. See Section J, Exhibits1A for historical data. It is not guaranteed that the volume will remain the same. |
| The answer is found in historical data, which is broken out by state. Usage will be based on mission needs. |
| Suggest you contact your local SBA representative for detailed information. |
COMMON QUESTIONS
What do we need to do with the Exhibit 2A & 2B information (Sample Task Order PWS)?
1. Nothing Exhibits 2A & 2B are provided merely to provide offerors with a sample of task order offering packages, including a PWS, SDS summary worksheet and Quality Assurance Plan Worksheet.
BREAK
QUESTIONS ???
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .