C-05_W912DR-17-B-0016-0001_FINAL.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to provide the off icial responses to all ProjNet submitted Request for Information (RFIs) and to revise Page

25 (Attachment B) of the solicitation to remove reference to "Runway Dimensions".

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 2

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 04-Aug-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912DR17B0016

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10-Jul-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

04-Aug-2017

CODE

USACE, BALTIMORE DISTRICT

10 S. HOWARD ST

ROOM 7000

BALTIMORE MD 21201

W912DR 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912DR17B0016

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

(End of Summary of Changes)

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Bid Inquiry Contractor Report All Inquiries

Project: Dyke Marsh Wetland Restoration and Stabilization Review: Dyke Marsh Wetland Restoration and Stabilization (00001) (sorted by CommentID ) Displaying 17 inquiries.

Id Discipline Sheet Detail Spec 7057743 Project Management SF33 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please confirm that the Technical Proposal (Step One) is the only deliverable due to USACE on 8/82017 and that no pricing is due at that time.

On: Jul 11 2017.

Government Response. . The technical proposal (Step One) will be the only deliverable due to USACE- Baltimore on 8/8/17. Please note the specifications attached are not finalized. The final and complete specifications will be issued in Step Two of the solicitation. On: Jul 13 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7069263 Environmental 01.57.20.00 10 Environmental Protection

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Part 3 - Execution Para 3.1 States that it is the Contractor's responsibility to obtain permits. Is this correct?

On: Jul 18 2017.

Government Response. . Some permits will be obtained ahead of time by USACE or National Park Service. The contractor will be responsible to assure all required permits are in place before construction begins. This will be clarified better in the Final Specs during the Step Two bid process. On: Jul 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7069307 Civil G-003 A. Stone Breakwater Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The sequence of construction outlines the means & methods for placement of the rock filled marine mattresses.

There are references to determining if " excessive settlement" has or is occurring. Contractors are to develop Mitigation plans to correct this condition. Please define "excessive settlement" and if the prescribed means and methods were used to place the mattresses will contractors be compensated for correction of the condition?

On: Jul 18 2017.

Government Response. . This will be adequately defined in the Final Specs during Step Two of the Acquisition Process which will be forwarded to only the bidders that are selected for Step Two. We provided drilling information and dilatometer results in the Geotechnical Report that was attached to the original draft Specifications which shows what to expect for bottom material. It will be the Contractor and supplier's responsibility to come up with placement procedures. On: Jul 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7069325 Civil G-003 Sequence of Construciton B- Cobble Beach Sill Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Item #1- Contractors are to protect against the loss of Clean soil fill or other material. Since the structure is designed below MHW elevation, the only way to protect against loss of material is to raise it to 6" above MHW.

On: Jul 18 2017.

Government Response. . It is up to the contractor as how to protect the area from loss. There are other alternatives available besides raising to 6" above MHW. The results would need to be what is shown on the drawings. On: Jul 21 2017

Page 1 of 4ProjNet: Logged In User

8/4/2017https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicPublicReportAll...

e1ctxdsd Highlight e1ctxdsd Highlight e1ctxdsd Highlight e1ctxdsd Highlight

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7069371 Construction Phasing 01 32 01. 00 10 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

In developing the schedule what would be a reasonable expectation for contractors to use as a starting timeframe NTP for the project?

On: Jul 18 2017.

Government Response. . This will depend upon how quickly permits can be put in place. At this time, for draft schedule purposes, I would plan on December 2017. On: Jul 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7069397 Cost Engineering Wage Determination Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Since the project is in Virginia won't the Davis Bacon Wage Determination VA35 dated 6/9/2017 be the correct one to use?

On: Jul 18 2017.

Government Response. . Correct- the VA 170035 dated 6/9/2017 is the Wage Determination that was issued with the solicitation as Attachment A. On: Jul 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7072927 Other Attachment E EFT form Attachment E Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Does the EFT form and the Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (Attachment E) have to be turned in with the technical proposal on 8/13?

On: Jul 20 2017.

Government Response. . Yes On: Jul 21 2017 Government Response. . The text below appends or clarifies ALL previous replies.

Yes, The technical proposal is due 8/8 On: Aug 04 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7075641 Civil 00 21 13 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Submission requirements are limited to 25 pages. Please confirm Table of Contents and Tabs are not page counted.

On: Jul 23 2017.

Government Response. . As stated in the solicitation under Submission Requirements Section 4.1.1 - Pages furnished for organizational purposes only, such as a "Table of Contents" or divider tabs are excluded from page limitations. On: Aug 04 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7075642 Civil 00 21 13 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

A note in Section 5.2.1 states "All escalation values are to be labeled as escalated and the Offeror must explain in detail their escalation rationale."

Given that no price information is provided in Step One, what escalation is referenced? Further, under an FFP contract that is competitively bid, is escalation rationale required? Please clarify the circumstances that would require escalation rationale / documentation.

On: Jul 23 2017.

Page 2 of 4ProjNet: Logged In User

8/4/2017https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicPublicReportAll...

e1ctxdsd Highlight e1ctxdsd Highlight e1ctxdsd Highlight

Government Response. . This escalation factor requirement is only for the projects that they are using for examples and only if they are trying to meeting the $4,000,000 threshold to make the project usable as an example. On: Aug 04 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7075644 Civil G-003 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Note 5 of Site Access and Staging Area. Please confirm Belle Haven marine is unavailable for staging and laydown.

On: Jul 23 2017.

Government Response. . Bell Haven Marina is a small marina using National Park Service land. It has been made clear to us that it cannot be used as laydown area. Also, the space and water levels are only suitable to small boats. Barges cannot come to shore there. We also cannot interfere with traffic in and out of that marina. On: Aug 04 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7075645 Civil G-003 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

It is acknowledged that there are no landside construction access roads, and that landside disturbance is to be kept to a minimum. Please confirm that it is acceptable for equipment to move upland to achieve necessary site prep such as clearing and grubbing.

On: Jul 23 2017.

Government Response. . All access must be done by water. Land can be worked from the water in limited areas as will be shown on Final Plans and Specs. On: Aug 04 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7075647 Civil SF1442 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

In a scenario where an offeror submits all required information and is selected as eligible to bid in Step Two and then enters into a joint venture or partnership with another firm that did not originally submit under Step One, would the new JV entity be eligible to submit pricing during step two based on the single entity's proven qualifications/approach?

On: Jul 23 2017.

Government Response. . No, it must be what you submitted in Step One. On: Aug 04 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7075649 Civil 00 21 13 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Offeror acknowledges the desire for consistency of the Technical Approach and pricing. If the specifications adjust an offerors approach during Step Two how will this change be managed by CENAB?

On: Jul 23 2017.

Government Response. . Currently we are in step 1 phase which is only to prove the contractor has the experience and background to be capable of doing the work. That is why only draft plans and specs are currently out there to give an idea of what work will need to be performed. In Step two, where we will ask for actual bids, Final Plans and Specs will be submitted for contractor use in creating their bid. On: Aug 04 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7076197 Other page 14 of 51 Attachment B Experience of relevant projects Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 3 of 4ProjNet: Logged In User

8/4/2017https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicPublicReportAll...

e1ctxdsd Highlight e1ctxdsd Highlight e1ctxdsd Highlight e1ctxdsd Highlight

Please elaborate what Attachment B is referring to when it asks for "Runway Dimensions:" in the experience in relevant projects section.

On: Jul 24 2017.

Government Response. . Runway Dimensions is an error and will be removed via an amendment. On:

Aug 04 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7076326 Geotechnical G003 ITEM #8 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Item #8 states that "with authorization from the COR, begin placement of geotextile & clean soil fill and topsoil.

Does this mean that the existing bottom below this fill is to be covered by geotextile? The cross sections of the sills on page c303 only have geotextile under the marine mattress & up the back of the structures. Is this supposed to be the extent of the geotextile placement?

On: Jul 24 2017.

Government Response. . We are in step 1 phase where the contractor is only required to submit their qualifications and proof they are capable to do the work, only draft plans and specs were used for this phase to help the contractors understand the type of work required. Step two is for preparation of bids and final plans and specs will be submitted to contractors for preparing bids. The final plans and specs will show where Geotextile is to be placed. On: Aug 04 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7077041 Civil All Drawings Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please provide the plans and drawings in CAD Format.

On: Jul 24 2017.

Government Response. . Step II will be for creating bids. Final Plans and Specs in CAD format will be issued at that time to prepare bids. Currently contractors only have to prove their ability to do the work as stated in the solicitation. On: Aug 04 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7077048 Civil G-003 Note 6 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Note 6 under the Stone Breakwater section on Contract Drawing G-003 calls for a 7-day settlement waiting period after placement of the first course of marine mattresses. The notes for the Cobble Beach Sill installation do not provide a specific waiting period. Is there a defined settlement waiting period associated with the Cobble Beach Sill marine mattress installation?

On: Jul 24 2017.

Government Response. . Step 1 is for the contractor to prove they are qualified to build the project. This comment will be clear in the Final Plans and Specs when they are submitted with Step 2 for the bids. On:

Aug 04 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Report Complete

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Patent 11/892,984 ProjNet property of ERDC since 2004.

Page 4 of 4ProjNet: Logged In User

8/4/2017https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicPublicReportAll...

e1ctxdsd Highlight e1ctxdsd Highlight e1ctxdsd Highlight

ATTACHMENT B

Experience in Relevant Projects

<<Picture>>

Contractor’s Name (Who performed the work?):

Project Name:

Project Location:

City, State

Design-Build or Design-Bid-Build:

New Construction or Renovation:

Project Owner: Point of contact information (owner name, POC name, address, and phone minimum) If Government Contract, additionally provide the contract number and contracting office)

Project Description: General scope. Provide a description of the project. Be sure to include features of this project that make it comparable in type or nature to the proposed project described in this request for proposal.

Description of the actual work performed by the contractor submitting this project:

Explanation of Relevancy (Must be in narrative format): All relevant projects must clearly identify at least two of the elements specified under section 2.1.1.

Explanation of Management and Control of Project: Must provide a detailed explanation of the Offeror’s role and approach to how this project was managed and controlled from project start to project completion.

Problems encountered during performance and solutions to stated problems:

Lessons learned:

Lost Time Accidents:

Schedule:

Start Date:

MM-DD-YYYY

Original Completion:

MM-DD-YYYY

Final Contract Completion:

MM-DD-YYYY

Beneficial Occupancy Date:

MM-DD-YYYY

Cost

Original Project Cost:

Final Project Cost:

Cost Difference

*Original Subcontractor Cost:

*Final Subcontractor Cost:

*Cost Difference

Cost and Time Growth Discussion: Reason(s) for differences between original and final schedule or costs. This section can be excluded if not applicable to the project. Response should contain more detail than “Owner requested/initiated changes”. Provide examples to support growth.

*Only to be completed if the experience was performed as a subcontractor on the submitted project.

OFFERORS MAY INCREASE SPACING IN FORM AS NECESSARY