AMENDMENT_0001_VA_LOCATIONS.pdf

PDF 330 KB Posted Jul 22, 2016

Attached to: VIDEO INTERCOM SYSTEM(S), VA AREA Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number: W912DR-16-T-0061
Issued by: Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Baltimore

About this file

From the source

AMENDMENT 0001 TO SOLICITATION

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to VIDEO INTERCOM SYSTEM(S), VA AREA, newest first.
File	Type	Posted
FILE_COPY_OF_BASIC_RFQ.pdf	PDF	Jun 30, 2016

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is for the offerors to replace the follow ing sections in the solicitation package w ith the attached -

A. REV 07 21-2016 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

B. REV 07-21-2016 FLOOR PLAN, ALEXANDRIA, VA (PART OF ATTACHMENT NO. 2 OF PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT) C. REV 07-21-2016 FLOOR PLAN, MANASSAS, VA (PART OF ATTACHMENT NO. 2 OF PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT) D. REV 07-21-2016 - SPEC FOR GT SERIES (2ND PAGE OF ATTACHMENT NO. 4 OF THE PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT) NOTE: POTENTIAL OFFERORS ARE REQUIRED TO NOTIFY Gloria.s.haw kins@usace.army.mil (410)962-2003 TO SCHEDULE A SITE VISIT.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 2

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 22-Jul-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912DR-16-T-0061

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

30-Jun-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

22-Jul-2016

CODE

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BALTIMORE

10 S. HOWARD STREET

ROOM 7000

BALTIMORE MD 21201

W912DR 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912DR-16-T-0061

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The below Table of Contents has been added

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Exhibit 1 REV 07-21-2016

INSTRUCTIONS TO

OFFERORS

21-JUL-2016

Exhibit 2 REVISED 07-21-2016

ATTCH 2 FLOOR PLAN

ALEXANDRIA, VA

21-JUL-2016

Exhibit 3 REV 07-21-2016

ATTACH 2 FLOOR

PLAN FOR

MANASSAS,VA

21-JUL-2016

Exhibit 4 REVISED 07-21-2016

SECOND PAGE TO

ATTACHMENT NO. 4

21-JUL-2016

(End of Summary of Changes)

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

SUBMISSION OF QUOTES: REVISED 21-JULY-2016

Quotations shall be submitted electronically by e-mail to Josephine.E.Baran@usace.army.mil or by U.S. mail/hand delivered to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Contracting Division, Simplified Acquisition Team, ATTN: Josephine Baran, 10 South Howard Street, 7th floor, Room 7000, Baltimore, MD 21201-2530. Quotations received after the required date and time may be rejected and may not be considered.

Offeror is not required to quote on all locations. However, offeror is required to quote on all the line items associated with any individual location (e.g. video intercom system; frosted film;

peephole; motorized shades).

General questions about a solicitation may be answered via telephone, Josephine Baran (410)962-0972. Any questions (e.g. that may affect the item description, price, quantity, quality, or delivery schedule) of any item needs to be sent in writing to Josephine.E.Baran@usace.army.mil).

Quotes submitted shall incorporate the following:

QUOTATION FORMAT

A. The quote shall be logically assembled.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

The

offeror

shall

confine

submissions

essential

matters,

sufficient

define

the

offer

details,

concise

manner,

permit

complete

and

accurate

evaluation

the

quote.

The

offeror

shall

submit

the

quote

along

with

capability

statement

perform

this

work

that

demonstrates

the

offeror’s

technical

ability.

Additionally,

describe

how

the

project

team

will

structured;

the

principle

firms,

responsibilities,

relationships,

interactions,

and

qualifications.

The

offeror

shall

submit

list

key

personnel

that

indicates

each

individual’s

current

assignment

and

the

offeror’s

plan

ensure

that

the

named

personnel

shall

used

this

project.

The

project

team

members

may

include,

but

not

limited

the

following

members.

Project Manager Laborer Electrician

D. PROVIDE SCHEDULE: Discuss the sequence of the project, including ordering, delivery and

installation

equipment

and

accessories.

The

anticipated

award

date

not

later

than

August

2016.

Discuss

how

the

offeror

will

coordinate

with

the

Government’s

representatives.

Discuss

how

the

offeror

shall

maintain

the

Government’s

schedule.

Elaborate

areas

work

where

high

degrees

risk

are

involved

that

may

adversely

affect

the

planned

performance

period

and

the

offeror’s

plan

mitigate

those

risks.

Provide

itemized

schedule

from

start

finish

with

necessary

tasks

and

duration

addressed.	Gantt	or	Milestone	chart	would	be	acceptable	and	shall	discuss	installation,
inspection,	punch‐list	and	final	acceptance	by	the	Government.

E. Offeror

shall

provide

the

name

and

phone

number

for

the

three

references

that

the

offeror

provided

the

enclosed

Form

PPQ‐0)

NAVFAC/USACE

PAST

PERFORMANCE

QUESTIONNAIRE

to.

Offeror

shall

provide

descriptive

literature

accordance

with

the

provision

FAR

52.214‐

quoting

other

than

the

brand

name(s)

specified

the

solicitation

used

the

technical

evaluation.

See

the

provision

FAR

52.211‐6,

Brand

Name

Equal.

BASIS FOR AWARD

A. The

Government

using

FAR

Part

and

will

award

contract

resulting

from

this

solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation.

B. For

each

location,

the

Government

anticipates

award

Firm‐Fixed‐Price

(FFP)

Lowest

Price

Technically

Acceptable

(LPTA)

quote,

(i.e.

the

offeror

with

the

lowest

evaluated

realistic

price

quote

meeting

the

acceptability

standards

for

non‐cost

factors).

The

offeror

not

required

quote

all

individual

locations.

However,

they

are

required

quote

all

the

line

items

associated

with

individual

location

(e.g.

video

intercom

system;

frosted

film;

motorized

shades;

peephole).

For

example,

individual

location

requires

the

video

intercom

system;

the

frosted

film;

and

motorized

shades,

contractor

will

found

non‐

responsive

they

quote

just

the

video

intercom

system

and

nothing

else

associated

with

that

location.

For

award

purposes,

possible

that

than

one

award

would

made

the

same

contractor,

provided

that

contractor

the

lowest

price

technically

acceptable

quote.

receive

consideration

for

award,

rating

less

than

“Acceptable”

must

achieved

for

the

Technical

factor.

Award

will

made

with

appropriate

consideration

given

the

two

evaluation

factors.

C. The

Government

intends

evaluate

quotes

and

make

award

without

questions

offerors.

Therefore,

the

Offeror's

initial

quote

should

contain

the

Offeror's

best

terms

from

Technical

and

Cost

standpoint.

D. Unclear

quotes

may

not

result

questions

for

clarifications.

Offers

with

omission

unclear

quote

may

judged

mean

the

contractor

does

not

fully

understand

the

requirements

understand

what

takes

meet

the

requirements,

regardless

the

proposed

cost/price

and

will

rated

unacceptable.

that

case,

the

Offeror

may

found

unacceptable,

and

ineligible

for

award.

The

Government

reserves

the

right

ask

questions

offerors

the

Contracting

Officer

determines

them

necessary.

EVALUATION CRITERIA

The

following

evaluation

factors

will

used.

Award

will

made

with

appropriate

consideration

based

upon

the

evaluation

factors

described

below:

Factor 1‐Technical.

The

quote

will

evaluated

ensure

all

the

items

below

were

provided:

The

offeror

confined

submissions

essential

matters,

sufficient

define

the

offer

details,

concise

manner,

permit

complete

and

accurate

evaluation

the

quote.

The

offeror

submitted

the

quote

along

with

capability

statement

perform

this

work

that

demonstrates

the

offeror’s

technical

ability.

The

offeror

described

how

the

project

team

will

structured;

the

principle

firms,

responsibilities,

relationships,

interactions,

and

qualifications.

The

offeror

submitted

list

key

personnel

that

indicates

each

individual’s

current

assignment

and

the

offeror’s

plan

ensure

that

the

named

personnel

shall

used

this

project.

D. The

offeror

provided

schedule

discussing

the

sequence

the

project,

including

ordering,

delivery

and

installation

equipment

and

accessories.

Anticipated

award

date

not

later

than

August

2016.

The

offeror

discussed

how

the

offeror

will

coordinate

with

the

Government’s

representatives.

The

offeror

discussed

how

the

offeror

shall

maintain

the

Government’s

schedule.

The

offeror

elaborated

areas

work

where

high

degrees

risk

are

involved

that

may

adversely

affect

the

planned

performance

period

and

the

offeror’s

plan

mitigate

those

risks.

The

offeror

provided

itemized

schedule

from

start

finish

with

necessary

tasks

and

duration

addressed.

Gantt

Milestone

chart

was

provided

and

discussed,

installation,

inspection,

punch‐list

and

final

acceptance

the

Government.

Offeror

provided

the

name

and

phone

number

for

three

references

that

the

offeror

provided

the

Form

PPQ‐0)

NAVFAC/USACE

PAST

PERFORMANCE

QUESTIONNAIRE

to.

Offeror

provided

descriptive

literature

accordance

with

the

provision

FAR

52.214‐21

offeror

quoted

other

than

the

brand

name(s)

specified

the

solicitation

used

the

technical

evaluation.

See

the

provision

FAR

52.211‐6,

Brand

Name

Equal.

A. Technical Ratings:

a. The following adjectival ratings will be assigned to the technical factor.

Ratings Definitions:

ADJECTIVAL	RATINGS
ACCEPTABLE	Offer	clearly	meets	the	minimum	requirements

of	the	solicitation.
UNACCEPTABLE	Offer	does not	clearly	meet	the	minimum

requirements of the solicitation

FACTOR 2 – COST/PRICE

A. The

Government

will

evaluate

quotes

for

each

location

for

award

purposes

adding

the

total

all

CLIN

prices

that

are

associated

for

each

location

ensure

that

pricing

realistic

and

not

unbalanced.

Prices

will

evaluated

for

fairness

and

reasonableness

using

the

techniques

FAR

15.404‐1(b)

(2).

B. The following will be evaluated:

Fair and Reasonableness

Completeness, Accuracy, and Balance.

A. For each location, the total price shall be equal to the sum of the total of all of the cost

elements

(Labor,

and

Materials).

The

Government

will

verify

the

Offerors

calculation

the

total

quoted

price

for

each

location.

REVISED

07-21-2016

REVISED 07-21-2016

THIS PAGE REVISED 07-21-2016 (SECOND PAGE OF ATTACHMENT #4 OF PWS - GT SERIES)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Nov 14, 2017.