W912CL20R0003 Att. 3 PP Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 16 KB Posted

Attached to
Apiay Base Operations Support Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W912CL-20-R-0003
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a federal contract solicitation. The solicitation is for base operations support services at Luis Gomez Nino Air Base in Apiay, Colombia under number W912CL-20-R-0003 issued by the Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command. The contractor shall provide non-personal services including repair and maintenance of facilities and equipment, grounds maintenance, housekeeping, janitorial services, administrative support, property accountability, cargo movement, and management of 94 billeting rooms and other support facilities at the operational support complex. The past performance questionnaire requests information about a contractor or offeror's performance on a prior contract to assess quality, timeliness, cost controls, customer satisfaction, and project management for evaluation in awarding the current solicitation.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Apiay Base Operations Support Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
W912CL20R0003 Att. 4 DD254.pdf PDF
W912CL20R0003 Att. 2 Apiay footprint.pdf PDF
W912CL20R0003 Att. 1 QASP.pdf PDF
W912CL20R0003.pdf PDF
W912CL20R0003 Att. 5 GFP.XLSX XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 3 Past Performance Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the solicitation.

Adjectival Rating Definitions:

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the solicitation.

Thank you for your assistance.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .