Combined_Synopsis_-_Solicitation-W9127S19Q0004.docx

W9127S19Q0004

REQUEST FOR QUOTE

Solicitation Number W9127S19Q0004 is issued as a Request for Quote (RFQ). The solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2005‐47.

This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; Quotes are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued.

Title: Municipal Services (MS), 63d U.S Army Reserve Readiness Division (RD)

Due Date for Quotes: 08 JAN 2019 12:00 PM CDT

This solicitation is small business set‐aside. NAICS Code 561210 applies and the small business size standard is $38.5 million.

This is a requirement to provide Janitorial Services and Grounds Maintenance Services. The period of performance is 3 years a 1 Year Base plus 2: Base - 05/02/2019 TO 05/01/2020, YR 2 - 05/02/2020 TO 05/01/2021, YR 3 - 05/02/2021 TO 05/01/2022.

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

Please see the electronic attachment titled: Performance Work Statement, found on FBO.GOV under the corresponding solicitation number. (63D_R2MS_Final_PWS_2MAY2018)

EXHIBIT LINE ITEMS SPREADSHEET

Please see the electronic attachment titled: Exhibit Line Items (ELINs), found on FBO.GOV under the corresponding solicitation number.

· Region 2 Grounds Maint ELINS_22OCT2018.xlsx;

· Region 2 Janitorial ELINS_14SEPT2018.xlsx

Exhibit Line Items (ELINs): ELINs spreadsheets are in MS Excel Format and posted with the solicitation shall be completed by the Offeror & submitted in MS Excel Format. The completed ELINs will constitute Of f e r o r s proposed prices for the services corresponding to the PWS. Upon contract award, a price schedule in contract section B will be created using the completed ELINs from the successful Offeror. Failure to bid on all the items in the ELIN spreadsheets may cause the bid to be considered nonresponsive and therefore ineligible for contract award.

QUOTE COVER PAGE

US Army Corps of Engineer, Little Rock District Contracting Division 700 W. Capitol Avenue Room # 7315 Little Rock, AR 72201

W9127S19Q0004, IDIQ

Municipal Services–Region 2

Submitted by

Offeror Name:

Offeror Address:

Offeror Address Cont’d:

Cage Code:

DUNS Number:

TIN:

Telephone Number:

Authorized Negotiators:

SECTION L

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS/OFFEROR

SUBMITTAL INFORMATION FOR OFFERORS (RFQS)

This requirement defines the criteria, organization, and policies to be used in selecting a contractor to provide The 63d U.S. Army Reserve RD critical work in the areas of MS to include, but not limited to Janitorial Services and Grounds Maintenance Services.

A. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Little Rock District (SWL) and the 63d RD have a requirement to provide MS on a regional basis.

B. ACQUISITION STRATEGY

This is a competitive acquisition for the award of a firm-fixed-price (FFP) Services contract. In accordance with (IAW) the Acquisition Plan (AP). This solicitation is restricted as set-aside for eligible and responsible small business (SB) firms. This is a competitive 100% small business set-aside. Award will be based on a Best Value Decision, Tradeoff process, IAW FAR 15.101-1 to the best overall proposal that is determined to be the most beneficial to the Government. The anticipated ordering period is 1 year base plus 2 IAW the Acquisition Plan.

The combination of all technical (non-price) evaluation factors are significantly more important than the price. As technical ratings and relative advantages and disadvantages become less distinct, differences in price between Quotes are of increased importance in determining the most advantageous Quote. Conversely, as differences in price become less distinct, differences in rating and relative advantages and disadvantages between Quotes are of increased importance to the determination.

Evaluation methodology for the instant procurement consists of a Best-value Trade-off.

1. INQUIRIES

Bidder Inquiry: Technical inquiries and questions relating to quote procedures or bonds are to be submitted via: Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at http://www.projnet.org/projnet

To submit and review bid inquiry items, bidders will need to be a current registered user or self- register into system. To self-register go to web page identified above, click Bid tab and select Bidder Inquiry, select agency USACE, enter Key for this solicitation listed below, and your e- mail address, click login. Fill in all required information and click create user. Verify that the information on next screen is correct, click and continue.

Bidders will receive an acknowledgement of their question via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed by our technical team.

The Review is open from November 30, 2018 to December 18, 2018 - 12:00 PM CDT.

The Bidder Inquiry System will be unavailable after December 18th for new inquires in order to ensure adequate time is allotted to form an appropriate response and amend the solicitation, if necessary.

Offerors are requested to review the specification in it’s entirely, review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.

Oral explanations or instruction are not binding. Any information given to an offeror which impacts the solicitation and/or offer will be given in the form of a written amendment to the solicitation.

As this is a competitive negotiation acquisition, there is no public bid opening and no information will be given out as to the number of offerors or the results of the competition until all awards are made.

2. SITE VISIT

WHEN: Tuesday, 11 December 2018 at 9:00 am CST WHERE: Grand Prairie Facility: 500 Camden Rd, Bldg. 8003 Grand Prairie, Texas 75051

Please provide the Contract Specialist (Thomas Cooper) via email at thomas.n.cooper@usace.army.mil, the following information if your company will be attending the site visit:

a. Names and Titles of those attending

b. Driver’s License State and Number

c. Contact Information (Emails and phone numbers)

****Items a-c are due to the Contract Specialist NLT: 07 December 2018 @ 09:00 am CST.

IMPORTANT NOTES: (1) There will be NO remarks, questions or explanations addressed during the site visit. Please submit all inquiries through the Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet. This ensures all participants have access to all questions and answers equally and fairly. (2) The terms and conditions of the solicitation remain unchanged unless the solicitation is formally amended in writing.

A guaranteed minimum will be given to the awardee in the event that no task orders are issued (Base Year). The guaranteed minimum shall be $25,000.00.

A. QUOTE SUBMISSION – INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFEROR’S (Section L)

1. Introduction: The Offeror’s Quote shall be submitted in hard copy, with accompanying digital copies, as set forth below. The RFQ shall provide the Government address and receipt date for Quote submittal.

The Offeror’s Quote shall consist of two (2) volumes. These Volumes are I – Technical, and II – Price.

A . Volume I – Technical Volume

a) Factor 1: Corporate Relevant Experience

b) Factor 2: Understanding of the Work

c) Factor 3: Past Performance

B . Volume II – Price Volume

a) Cover Sheet

b) Acknowledgement of Amendments (if any)

c) Copy of completed Standard Form (SF) 1449

d) Copy of ELINS Spreadsheet

e) Copy of Quote Data Sheet

f) Joint Venture Agreement (if applicable)

Offerors are cautioned that “parroting” of the Technical requirements or the PWS with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement or capability to perform. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each Quote. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked.

2. QUOTE SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

a. Each volume shall be submitted in a separate three-ring binder. Any pages that are changed (as a result of negotiations or Quote revisions) should be of a different color and have changed information clearly marked by a vertical line in the right margin of the page. The revised pages shall be dated. Each binder shall be clearly labeled with its Title and a copy number (e.g., copy 1 of 5).

b. Printing should be single spaced. Each paragraph shall be separated by at least one blank line. A standard, 12-point minimum font size applies. Arial or New Times Roman fonts are required. Tables and illustrations may use a reduced font size no less than 8- point and may be landscape.

c. The following volumes of material shall be submitted:

Volumes: I – Technical (non-price): Printed: 1 - Original & 3 copies Digital: 4 copies

II - Cost/Price: Printed: 1 - Original & 1 copy Digital: 2 copies

d. NOTE: Pages that exceed the required page limitations will not be evaluated. Additional pages over the maximum allowed will be removed or not read and will not be evaluated by the Government.

*Manpower charts and the small business subcontracting plan are excluded from the page count.

e. The following page limitations are established for each factor described above:

Factor 1, Corporate Relevant Experience – 8 Page Limit (a maximum of 2 page per contract) Factor 2, Understanding of the Work – 25 Page Limit Factor 3, Offeror Past Performance – No Page Limitations

Tables of content, Quote cover letters, and tabs between Quote information do not count toward any page limitations in the Quote

3. QUOTE FILES

a. Format. The submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled. Each volume shall be clearly identified and shall begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume shall be appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, date and RFQ number in the header and/or footer. A Table of Contents should be created using the Table of Content feature in MS Word. MS Word (doc) files shall use the following page setup parameters:

Margins – Top, Bottom, Left, Right – 1” Gutter – 0” From Edge – Header, Footer 0.5” Page Size, Width – 8.5” Page Size, Height – 11”

NOTE: 11X17 folded pages are acceptable for tables/graphic representations; however, each 11X17 page counts as two pages.

The following additional restrictions apply:

b. File Packaging. All of the Quote files shall be compressed (zipped) into one file entitled Quote zip using WinZip version 6.2 or later, or as separate uploads in their native format, i.e. doc, xls, ppt, etc., and provided on CDs or DVDs. Zip disks are not permitted. Files shall be in read-only format, using PDF files. All price breakdown information to aide in the cost/price evaluation shall be submitted in Microsoft Office Excel Read/Write format and viewable in Microsoft Excel 2007. Each disc shall be externally labeled with the volume number, date, and the Offeror’s name. **Please note – Self extracting exe files are not acceptable. ** If the hard-copy Quote differs from the electronic version, the hard copy will govern.

c. Content Requirement. All information shall be confined to the appropriate file. The offeror shall confine submissions to essential matters, sufficient to define the Quote in a concise manner, to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each Quote.

Each file of the Quote shall consist of a Table of Contents, Summary Section, and the Narrative discussion. The Summary Section shall contain a brief abstract of the file. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked. The following shall be included in the Narrative discussion:

(i) VOLUME I – Technical (non-price). The volume shall be organized into the following sections:

Tab A – Factor 1 - Corporate Relevant Experience. Include completed CORPORATE RELEVANT SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE DATA SHEETS in addition to your Quote information. A sample sheet is provided in this Section (See Appendix A).

Tab B- Factor 2 - Understanding of the Work. Include a brief narrative (See requirements in Section D Evaluation Approach, Factor 2, Understanding of Work), in addition to your Quote information.

Tab C- Factor 3 - Offeror Past Performance. Include completed Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire Forms in addition to your Quote information. A sample Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire Form is provided in this Section (See Attachment 1).

(ii) VOLUME II – Price. This volume shall consist of all information, required to support proposed prices. Certified cost and pricing data are not currently required; however, the Government reserves the right to request such data prior to award. The information submitted in this volume shall comply with FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, and the requirements set forth below. There are no page limitations for this volume.

Tabs:

a) Cover Sheet

b) Acknowledgement of Amendments (if any)

c) Copy of completed Standard Form (SF) 1449.

d) Completed ELINS spreadsheet

e) Completed copy of the Quote Data sheet (Appendix B)

f) Joint Venture Agreement (if applicable)

Exhibit Line Items (ELINs): ELINs spreadsheet posted with the solicitation shall be completed by the Offeror & submitted in MS Excel Format. The completed ELINs will constitute Offeror’s proposed prices for the services corresponding to the PWS. Upon contract award, a price schedule in contract section B will be created using the completed ELINs from the successful Offeror.

** See Quote Submission Requirements (2) Volume II – Price Volume

Submittal:

1. Quote Submittals:

Submit Quotes to:

CONTRACTING DIVISION USACE, LITTLE ROCK (W9127S) 700 W. CAPITOL AVE, RM # 7315

LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201-3225

1. The Packaging:

The Quotes shall be marked:

“Quotes for W9127S19Q0004 63d Reserve Municipal Services, Region 2 – TX”

“DO NOT OPEN”

Attn: Thomas Cooper Offer Closing Date: 08 JAN 2019 Offer Closing Time: 12:00 PM CST.

EVALUATION FACTORS

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

B. BASIS OF AWARD

The award will be made based on the best overall (i.e., best overall value) Quote that is determined to be the most beneficial to the Government, with appropriate consideration given to each offer that will consist of both a “price Quote”, as price to the Government must always be considered, and a “technical Quote”, which responds to the technical (e.g., “non-price”) evaluation factors in the solicitation. These three (3) non-price evaluation factors are: (1) Corporate Relevant Experience, (2) Understanding of the Work, (3) Past Performance. Both the Corporate Relevant Experience factor and the Understanding of the Work factor are considered of equal weight and will also be the most heavily weighted factors. Past Performance will be weighted less than factors one and two. To receive consideration for award, a rating of no less than “Acceptable” must be achieved for the Technical factors (non-price evaluation factors).

Offeror’s will be cautioned that the award may not necessarily be made to the lowest price offered.

NOTE: ALL NON-PRICE FACTORS COMBINED ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN COST/PRICE.

The Government intends to award ONE (1) contract to a small business to the responsible offeror whose Quote(s) is determined to be most advantageous to the Government in accordance with the following relationship between price and technical merit:

The technical evaluation factors, when combined, are approximately greater than the cost or price. The Government is concerned with striking the most advantageous balance between technical, quality and/or past performance features and cost to the Government.

C. FACTORS AND SUB-FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED

The Government will select the Quote that represents the best value to the Government by using the tradeoff process. This process permits tradeoffs among cost or price and non-price factors and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced Quote.

Concurrent with or upon completing the evaluation of all non-price Quotes, the Contracting Officer will, in accordance with the provisions of this RFQ and applicable acquisition regulations, evaluate price. In the event that discussions are determined necessary, the Contracting Officer will conduct discussions with Offeror’s determined to be within the competitive range. In determining the competitive range, the Government will include analysis of the non- price and price Quotes of Offeror’s. Upon conclusion of discussions, the Contracting Officer will request final Quote revisions and may, upon receipt of final Quote revisions, proceed to award a contract without further discussions or notice.

The following evaluation factors will be used to evaluate each Quote:

NON-PRICE FACTORS: The purpose of the non-price factors is to assess whether the Offeror’s Quote will satisfy the Government’s minimum requirements. An unacceptable evaluation for any one of these factors will result in an overall unacceptable Quote

Factor 1: Corporate Relevant Experience Factor 2: Understanding of the Work Factor 3: Past Performance

RELATIVE WEIGHTING OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS

The following Technical Evaluation Factors are listed in descending order of importance:

Factor 1 – Corporate Relative Experience is the most heavily weighted factor.

Factor 2 – Understanding of Work is weighted the same as Factor 1.

Factor 3 – Past Performance is weighted less than both factors 1 and 2.

D. EVALUATION APPROACH

All Quotes shall be subject to evaluation by the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) unless the Quote Package is incomplete and therefore would be rejected based on that factor.

NON PRICE FACTORS: Data provided in response to the non-price factors described below shall be included in Volume I, “Non-Price Quote.” If the Offeror is a joint venture, the Offeror must provide evidence of a binding teaming agreement or other contractual agreement, which creates legal responsibility on the part of all contractors in the joint venture and submit evidence or confirm that the contractor submitted its paperwork to its local small business administration office for this specific requirement. If the Offeror proposes to utilize a “key subcontractor” as described in FAR 9.6, it is Government policy to recognize the integrity and validity of contractor team arrangements. For a teaming arrangement to be recognized for purposes of source selection evaluation and the application of non- price factors, there must be full disclosure of the teaming arrangement and company relationships in the team’s Quote. The Quote must include a narrative that explains the major or critical aspects of the work to be performed by each team member. The Quote must also include an agreement that has been or will be executed prior to award between/among all team members. The Quote and agreement must be consistent; substantive inconsistencies between the Quote and agreement may be construed against the offeror. In the case of prime-sub teams, the prime contractor remains fully responsible for contract performance, regardless of any team arrangement between the prime contractor and its subcontractors. However, consistent with FAR 9.104, the Government may consider the responsibility of subcontractor team members when it may adversely affect the prospective prime contractor’s responsibility or when it is in the Government’s interest to do so.

The team agreement submitted with the Quote will govern the performance of the work by the team.

The agreement must address the following items: identification of team members, a full delineation of roles and responsibilities of team members, and the duration of the agreement. In the case of Joint

Ventures or other partnerships seeking award to the team as a prime contractor, the agreement must indicate the percentages of the participants, in particular the percent of the controlling party. In the case of a prime-sub team, the agreement must reflect that the prime contractor is vested with control and responsibility for the daily management of the work, and that it remains responsible for contract performance, including those items allocated to a subcontractor on the team. Contractor teams should not submit an agreement in their Quote that is subject to substantive revision because the agreement will be part of the evaluation process. The timely submission of the executed teaming agreement prior to award shall be a precondition to a finding of responsibility. In the case of prime-sub teams, any resulting subcontract(s) may not deviate from the substantive provisions of the teaming agreement.

Regardless of any provision to the contrary in a team or subcontract agreement, all members of a recognized team arrangement are bound to perform any resulting contract and options by means of the same team. There can be no substitution of subcontractor team members except that, in the case of a prime-sub team arrangement, the Government may (in its sole discretion and without any obligation whatsoever), at the request of the prime, permit the substitution of a subcontractor with equivalent or greater capability for a subcontractor on the identified team. The failure of the Offeror to perform with one or more subcontractors on a recognized team may be grounds for termination for default. Note: Only a Contracting Officer can approve such a change after contract award.

For evaluation purposes, the definition of a relevant contract is as follows: A recent contract awarded to the Offeror (or in the case of an Offeror which is a Joint Venture (JV), a contract awarded to either member of the JV) as the prime contractor. The contract should be substantially complete or completed projects within the last five years that are similar in terms of cost, complexity, design or features that have been perform by the Offeror to be used for reference and evaluation purposes.

Factor 1, Corporate Relevant Experience: Offers shall submit a minimum of three (3) relevant contracts, but no more than four (4). If there is a teaming arrangement, a minimum of 3 relevant contracts are required from the prime. Offeror’s shall complete and provide a Corporate Relevant Specialized Experience Data Sheet for each relevant contract; refer to Appendix A. The Corporate Relevant Specialized Experience Data Sheet shall not exceed 2 pages per contract. The Government’s experience evaluation will include an assessment of whether the Offeror demonstrates the ability to accomplish the work specified under the RFQ. This assessment will be based on consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances. Evaluators will assess experience on each relevant contract as defined above. For the experience evaluation, Offerors will be rated utilizing the chart provided below:

Factor 2, Understanding of the Work: Evaluators will determine whether the Offeror demonstrates an understanding of the complexity and magnitude of service requirements set forth in the performance objectives and standards of the Performance Work Statement.

The quote submission for this factor shall include a narrative (conceptual work plan) that clearly demonstrates an understanding of requirements of the solicitation. The narrative shall address how the Offeror will perform, develop and implement a Municipal Services Program (Grounds Maintenance and Janitorial Services). This information can be in charts, tables, sketches and maps as necessary to make the work approach understandable. The Narrative shall not exceed 25 pages. The narrative should contain a description of the following:

(1) Ability to perform Municipal Services (Janitorial and Grounds Maintenance) as required by the RFQ.

(2) A thorough understanding of the current commercial standards, policies, procedures, and processes utilized in each of the service areas identified in the PWS.

(3) A thorough understanding of the difficulties, uncertainties and risks associated with each of the service areas identified in the PWS, as well as administering the contract as a whole.

(4) A logical performance approach for each of the service areas identified in the PWS, as well as administering the contract as a whole.

(5) Management & administration capabilities commensurate with the magnitude of the resulting contract.

(6) Appropriate types of resources required to perform the work and of their appropriate allocation to the work activities in multiple locations during weekdays, weekends, and holidays when applicable;

(7) Personnel and subcontractors necessary to perform the work required by the RFQ.

(8) Organizational Chart: The Offeror shall provide an organizational chart that identifies key personnel and individuals on the project team that show clear lines of authority, responsibility, and communication between corporate staff, key on-site staff, and subcontractor interface. The Offeror should propose a logical flow of authority and demonstrate how assigned responsibilities and experience of proposed on-site personnel for the multiple geographic sites will enhance operation of the project.

For the Understanding of the Work evaluation, Offeror’s will be rated utilizing the chart provided below:

Factor 3, Past Performance: The Government’s past performance evaluation will include an assessment of past performance on relevant contracts (as defined above). The evaluators will assess whether the Offeror has obtained an overall satisfactory past performance rating on relevant contracts, to demonstrate the ability of the Offeror to accomplish the work specified under the RFQ. Key focus areas will include the following (see PPQ):

· Quality

· Schedule/Timeliness of Performance

· Customer Satisfaction

· Management/Personnel/Labor

· Cost/Financial Management

· Safety/Security

This assessment will be based on consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances, including any trends in past performance. Offeror’s shall complete and provide a Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire Forms from Attachment 1 on the same contracts submitted for consideration under Factor 1, Corporate Relevant Experience.

The offeror shall complete Blocks 1-4 of the provided Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire (Attachment 1) and have the Contracting Activity and the Technical Representative responsible for the past/current contract complete the remainder of the questionnaire. Offeror shall ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed Past Performance Questionnaires shall be submitted with the Quote. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before Quote closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the Quote the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s).

Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact via email no later than the closing date of this RFQ. Include Contractor Performance Assessment Rating System (CPARS) performance evaluation ratings, if available.

For projects which were performed for other government entities, submit the performance appraisal sheets used by that government entity if available. Also include performance recognition documents received for the Factor 1 projects such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition. The Government may call and confirm information provided by the offeror on the Past Performance Information Sheet with the points of contact. The Government reserves the right to interview other individuals if the point of contact is not available. If an offeror has no relevant past performance history, the offeror must affirmatively state that it possesses no relevant directly related or similar past performance.

The Government may use data provided by the Offeror in its Quote and data obtained from other sources. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the Offeror’s Quote, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror. In rating past performance, the Government may consider available past performance information on predecessor companies, or employment histories of key personnel, or major subcontractors performing key elements of the project. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation. The first is to evaluate the Offeror’s past performance to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the source selection. Common aspects of relevancy include similarity of service/support, complexity, dollar value, contract type and degree of subcontract/teaming. The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how well the contractor performed on the contracts.

1. Past Performance Relevancy Ratings (Adjectival) -- Past performance analysis provides insight into an Offeror’s probability of successfully completing the solicitation requirements based on the Offeror’s performance record on similar contract efforts.

2. Past Performance Confidence Assessment - Performance confidence is the confidence associated with an Offeror’s likelihood of success in performing the solicitation's requirements as indicated by that Offeror’s record of current or past performance. Performance Confidence Assessment: In conducting a performance confidence assessment, each offeror shall be assigned one of the ratings in accordance with the table below (Reference FAR 15.305(2) for information on assigning an unknown/neutral confidence rating.)

PRICE: Offerors will be required to price all line items for each contract period (base and option years). The Government will perform a price analysis on all Quotes received. Price analysis will be performed in accordance with FAR 15.404-1, to determine completeness, balanced pricing, reasonableness, and understanding of the work. The evaluation will determine the adequacy of the offer in fulfilling the requirements of the Quote. Completeness addresses the extent to which the elements of the price Quote are consistent with the requirements of the RFQ. Contract Line Items (CLINS) will be analyzed to determine if the prices are unbalanced. If the price analysis indicates that an offer is unbalanced, the contracting officer shall consider the risks to the Government associated with the unbalanced pricing in determining the reasonableness of the offer. An offer will be rejected if the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

DISCUSSION SCHEDULING: If discussions are conducted, the Contracting Officer will schedule the discussion sessions, and each offeror will be notified of the time and place at least two (2) business day prior to their discussion session. The Contracting Officer will provide additional instructions with the notification.

APPENDIX A – CORPORATE RELEVANT SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE DATA SHEET

APPENDIX B – QUOTE DATA SHEET

ATTACHMENT 1 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE FORM

Appendix A

CORPORATE RELEVANT SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE DATA SHEET

FACTOR 1: CORPORATE RELEVANT SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE.

On an attached sheet, provide information for substantially complete or completed projects within the last five years that are similar in terms of cost, complexity, design or features that have been performed by the Offeror to be used for reference and evaluation purposes. For each project provide the following information:

Project Title:

Location:

Contract number:

Nature of involvement in this project, i.e. General Contractor, subcontractor, designer:

Procuring activity:

Procurement point of contact and telephone number:

Performance period (month/year start to month/year end or percent complete if performance is underway):

Address of project:

Address and telephone number of owner:

Indicate type of project (private sector, Government, planned unit development, etc.):

General description of project:

How this project to relevant to the requirements of this solicitation:

Total cost:

TERMINATED PROJECTS:

Attach a list of any projects within the last three years that have been terminated. Provide an explanation, as well as a Point of Contact (Name, organization, email, phone number) for each terminated project.

APPENDIX B

QUOTE DATA SHEET

NOTE TO OFFERORS

This OFFEROR PERFORMANCE CAPABILITY QUOTE DATA SHEET must be completed and attached as the first page of the body of your Quote. The information required by this data sheet may be completed directly on this form or attached to the form as supplemental data sheets.

1. NAME OF OFFEROR. Name of Offeror(s):

If a joint venture or contractor-subcontractor association of firms, list the individual firms and briefly describe the nature of the association.

Firm 1:

Firm 2:

Nature of Association:

2. DUNS NUMBER FOR OFFEROR (If more than one DUNS number is to be considered, explain affiliation to Offeror)

3. AUTHORIZED NEGOTIATORS. FAR 52.215-11

4. CAGE CODE:

5. Tax ID#

The offeror represents that the following persons are authorized to negotiate on its behalf with the Government in connection with this Request for Quotes (RFQ). List names, titles, and telephone number of the authorized negotiator.

Name of Person(s) Authorized to Negotiate:

Negotiator's Address:

Negotiator's Telephone:

ATTACHMENT 1

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: |_| Prime Contractor |_| Sub Contractor |_| Joint Venture |_| Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: |_| Firm Fixed Price |_| Cost Reimbursement |_| Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work |_| High |_| Med |_| Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR QUOTE, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

7. GENERAL

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk.

Months

Janitorial Services

FFP

Janitorial Services, such as space cleaning, floor care, restroom services - for full description see PWS & location PWS/ELINS.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

Job

Janitorial Services - IDIQ

IDIQ Janitorial Services, such as space cleaning, floor care, restroom services - for full description see PWS & location PWS/ELINS. IDIQ work is identified in each applicable annex or sub-annex and shall be performed by the Contractor as ordered by the KO per the requirements of the contract. IDIQ work may consist of Unit Priced Tasks (UPT) (non-negotiated) and Unit Priced Labor (UPL) (negotiated). Unit Priced Tasks and Unit Priced Labor may be ordered as separate items or in combinations of items from the Schedule of Indefinite Quantity Work (Bid Schedule) in Section B on an as needed basis.

NET AMT

Months

Grounds Maintenance

This may include but not limited to: mowing, landscaping care, trees-shrubs, and plants - for full description see PWS & location PWS/ELINS.

NET AMT

Job

Grounds Maintenance - IDIQ

- for full description see PWS & location PWS/ELINS.

NET AMT

Job

Base-Contractor Manpower Reporting

The contractor shall report ALL contractor labor hours (including subcontractor labor hours) required for performance of services provided under this contract via a secure data collection site.

NET AMT

Job

Contractor Submittals

This CLIN is for the Start-up Submittal Period (first month only). This is to include but not limited to: successfully submit all permits, licenses, accident prevention plans, quality management plans, etc., required by the Government in Section F (Deliveries or Performance) of the PWS to successfully start in allocations designated in the region at the end of the start-up submittal period.

NET AMT

Months

Janitorial Services

Janitorial Services, such as space cleaning, floor care, restroom services - for full description see PWS & location PWS/ELINS.

NET AMT

Job

Janitorial Services-IDIQ

DIQ Janitorial Services, such as space cleaning, floor care, restroom services - for full description see PWS & location PWS/ELINS. IDIQ work is identified in each applicable annex or sub-annex and shall be performed by the Contractor as ordered by the KO per the requirements of the contract. IDIQ work may consist of Unit Priced Tasks (UPT) (non-negotiated) and Unit Priced Labor (UPL) (negotiated). Unit Priced Tasks and Unit Priced Labor may be ordered as separate items or in combinations of items from the Schedule of Indefinite Quantity Work (Bid Schedule) in Section B on an as needed basis.

NET AMT

ITEM NO

SUPPLIES/SERVICES

Months

Grounds Maintenance

This may include but not limited to: mowing, landscaping care, trees-shrubs, and plants - for full description see PWS & location PWS/ELINS.