A.07.23_Attachment_2_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 19 KB Posted

Attached to
PROPOSAL DUE DATE IS AUGUST 29, 2018 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W9127S18R6022
Issued by
Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Little Rock

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to PROPOSAL DUE DATE IS AUGUST 29, 2018, newest first.
File Type Posted
A.07.23_Amendment_2_RFI_No_7618777.pdf PDF
A.07.23_Attachment_1_-_Bid_Schedule_R2_8-22-2018.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment_0001_Instruments-7602948_7602951.pdf PDF
A.07.23_Attachment_4_-_3_or_4_-_Commodity_Specifications.zip ZIP file
A0913B.docx DOCX document
R6070_Refrigerator_Freezer, Biological,Upright, 18 Cu Ft_Redacted.pdf PDF
E0945_Cart, Computer, Mobile_Redacted.pdf PDF
M0030_Audiometer, Diagnostic_Redacted.pdf PDF
M9025_Redacted.pdf PDF
F0740_Table, Occasional, Lamp_Redacted.pdf PDF
R6200_Refrigerator, U-C or F-S, 5 Cu Ft_Redacted.pdf PDF
F0205.docx DOCX document
F0500_Cart, Janitor_Redacted.pdf PDF
M5030_Stool, Surgeon, Stainless Steel_Redacted.pdf PDF
A1132.docx DOCX document
A.07.23_Attachment_6_-_Plans.pdf PDF
F0415.docx DOCX document
F2300_Rack, Magazine, Wall Mounted_Redacted.pdf PDF
F0225.docx DOCX document
L1350_Centrifuge, Table, Small, 5000 RPM, 6 Place_Redacted.pdf PDF
K4665.docx DOCX document
M7255.docx DOCX document
U0003 Storage Cabinet.docx DOCX document
A5075.docx DOCX document
A1015 Telephone.docx DOCX document
F2420.docx DOCX document
M1830_Redacted.pdf PDF
M1800.docx DOCX document
F0340_Stool, Adjustable, Physicians_Redacted.pdf PDF
F0775_Table, Work_Redacted.pdf PDF
M3073.docx DOCX document
U0004 Multimedia Projector.docx DOCX document
E0042_Redacted.pdf PDF
F0115_Bookcase, Open, 5 Shelf_Redacted.pdf PDF
M0550 Sampler.docx DOCX document
F0305.docx DOCX document
F0465B_Cabinet, Storage, 2 Door, 5 Shelf, Office_Redacted.pdf PDF
A.07.23_Attachment_5_-_Exterior_Photos_of_Building_30.pdf PDF
L2570.docx DOCX document
M3072_Frame, Infectious Waste Bag w-Lid_Redacted.pdf PDF
M4200.docx DOCX document
R7250 Refrigerator.docx DOCX document
F2020.docx DOCX document
F0206.docx DOCX document
A.07.23_Attachment_4_-_2_of_4_-_Commodity_Specifications.zip ZIP file
T0801_Workbench, Electric, Locker Base_Redacted.pdf PDF
M5027_Redacted.pdf PDF
A.07.23_Attachment_2_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
A.07.23_Attachment_5_-_Exterior_Photos_of_Building_30.pdf PDF
A.07.23_Attachment_3_-_Reuse_Disposal_List.zip ZIP file
Show all 50

PROPOSAL DUE DATE IS AUGUST 29, 2018 has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information
Firm Name:CAGE Code:
Address:DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: |_| Prime Contractor |_| Sub Contractor |_| Joint Venture |_| Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: |_| Firm Fixed Price |_| Cost Reimbursement |_| Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work |_| High |_| Med |_| Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
(VG) Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
(S) Satisfactory
Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
(M) Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.
(U) Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.
(N) Not Applicable
No information or did not apply to your contract
Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

File details come from the government source that posted it.