Technical_Exhibit_C_-_HAZMAT_Report.pdf

A

TT

A C

H M

EN

T

F H

A

ZA

R D

O U

S M

A

TE

R

IA

LS

R

EP

O

R T

(T A

SK

T

H R

EE

Professional Service Industries·7400 Blanco Road, Suite 257·San Antonio·Texas·78216·Phone 210.616.2119

August 29, 2014

Merrick & Company 401 E. Sonterra Blvd., Suite 250 San Antonio, Texas 78258

Attention: Ms. Tammy Johnson, LEED® BD+C Project Manager

RE: HAZMAT Visual Survey Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center Building 3600 Ft. Hood, Texas PSI Project: 0435-1789

Dear Ms. Johnson, In accordance with our agreement, Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) is providing two

(2) copies of the final report for the above referenced project.

Between June 17 and June 27, 2014 representatives from PSI conducted a visual survey for hazardous materials for the Carl R. Darnell Army Medical Center located at Building 36000, on Ft. Hood Texas. Suspect materials included in a hazardous material survey include, but are not limited to the following: potentially mercury-containing fluorescent light tubes; and illuminated exit signs (tritium) and related materials.

Hazardous materials observed at the Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center are listed in the following tables.

HAZMAT Visual Survey-Building 36000

MATERIAL APPROXIMATE

QUANTITIES LOCATION LABELED

HAZARDOUS

Fluorescent Light Tubes 5,690 Distributed

Throughout No

Fluorescent Light Ballasts 2,845 Distributed Throughout

No

Illuminated Exit Signs 429 Distributed Throughout

No

High Intensity Discharge Lights

94 Exterior building and pole mounted

No

Merrick & Company Building 36000 – Ft. Hood PSI Project No.: 0435-1875

We appreciate the opportunity to provide our services on this project and would be pleased to continue our role as your consultant for future investigations. If we can be of further assistance, or if you have any questions regarding this report, please feel free to contact us at (210) 616-2119.

Respectfully submitted, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC.

Joe Leal Guy Roberts Project Manager Principal Consultant Environmental Services Environmental Services

Report of

Asbestos Survey for

Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center Building 3600

Ft. Hood, Texas

Prepared for

401 E. Sonterra Boulevard, Suite 250 San Antonio, Texas 78258

Prepared by

Professional Service Industries, Inc.

7400 Blanco Road, Suite 257

San Antonio, Texas 78216

(210) 616-2119

PSI Project No.: 0435-1789

Professional Service Industries, Inc. 7400 Blanco Road, #257 San Antonio TX. 78216 Phone (210) 616-2119

401 E. Sonterra Blvd., Suite 250 San Antonio, Texas 78258

Attention: Ms. Christine Lurtz, LEED® BD+C Project Manager

Subject: Asbestos Survey Report Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center Building 3600 Ft. Hood, Texas PSI Project: 0435-1789

Dear Ms. Lutz:

Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) performed the Asbestos Survey of the above-referenced property that you requested. PSI provided its services in general accordance with our agreement. PSI transmits one electronic copy with this letter.

PSI thanks you for choosing us as your consultant for this project. Please contact us at

(210) 616-2119 if you have any questions or we may be of further service.

Respectfully Submitted, Joe Leal Guy Roberts Asbestos Building Inspector #602035 Principal Consultant

Carl R Darnall Army Medical Center.

PSI Project: 0435-1789

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2 INTRODUCTION

2.1 SCOPE OF SERVICES

2.2 PURPOSE

2.3 AUTHORIZATION

2.4 LIMITATIONS

2.5 WARRANTY

3 GENERAL BUILDING AND SURVEY INFORMATION

3.1 BUILDING INFORMATION

3.2 INSPECTION INFORMATION

4 METHODOLOGY

4.1 RECORD DOCUMENT REVIEW

4.2 VISUAL INSPECTION PROCEDURES

4.3 ASBESTOS SAMPLING PROCEDURES

4.4 ASBESTOS ANALYSIS PROCEDURES

5 FINDINGS

5.1 ASBESTOS RESULTS

6 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1 CONCLUSIONS

6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS

Carl R Darnall Army Medical Center.

TABLES

TABLE 1 – SUSPECT ACMs - SAMPLED TABLE 2 – SUSPECT ACMs - ASSUMED

LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX A – REPORT OF BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS FOR ASBESTOS

APPENDIX B – ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE LOG/CHAIN OF CUSTODY

APPENDIX C – SITE LAYOUT AND SAMPLE LOCATION DRAWING(S)

APPENDIX D – PHOTOGRAPHS

APPENDIX E – INSPECTOR & LABORATORY CERTIFICATIONS

Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center August 29, 2014

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Professional Service Industries (PSI), Inc., was retained by Merrick & Company to conduct a survey for asbestos-containing materials (ACM) in the Carl R. Darnall Medical Center, located Ft. Hood, Texas.

The subject building is a 624,844-sq. ft., 5-story, pier and beam, concrete structure that was constructed in 1990. The building also included additions that were built in 2008- 2009 and 2011-2012. The subject structure was occupied during the inspection and samples were limited to unobtrusive spaces.

The purpose of the investigation and sampling was to provide information regarding the presence, condition, and estimated quantity of accessible ACMs located at the facility prior to its planned renovation. Roof Systems were not included in the scope of this survey.

The asbestos inspection and sampling was conducted between June 17 and June 27, 2014. A total of 453 samples were collected from 122 suspect asbestos-containing homogeneous materials during the survey. The samples were analyzed by polarized light microscopy (PLM).

The following ACMs (>1% asbestos) were identified during this investigation:

12” brown floor tile/mastic located throughout the corridors and departments in the original building on floors 1 through 5.

12” light floor tile/mastic located on the 1st floor in room 1943, Oral/ Pain Management and on the 2nd floor in room 1556, ICU, the Eye Department, Network Case Managers, and Women’s Health.

12” brown floor tile/mastic located in room 154.

Black sink undercoating located on the stainless steel sinks from the ground to the 5th floors.

Marble sheet vinyl located on the 1st floor room 1155.

AHU units and HVAC duct mastic/coating in the mechanical rooms and along main duct runs throughout the building.

Gray sink undercoating located on the stainless steel sinks on the 2nd floor in rooms, 210, 208, 2126, 2054, 2153, and 2047.

Black spray-on fireproofing on the ground floor – Mech. Room 0511.

In addition, the following materials were not sampled due to inaccessibility, safety concerns, or in order to avoid compromising their integrity, and are assumed to be ACM:

Fire doors Mirror mastics HVAC vibration damper cloths Black laboratory table

The identified or assumed ACMs were observed to be in good condition at the time of the field investigation

ACMs should be maintained in a good non-damaged condition through use of an Operations and Maintenance (O&M) program. Regulated ACM (RACM) must be properly removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor prior to renovations or demolition that would disturb the material. Federal, State and Local regulations and guidelines should be strictly adhered to when removing the ACM.

In many areas, EPA Category I & II non-friable ACMs in good condition do not need to be removed prior to demolition. However, if demolition practices will cause these materials to be cut, sanded, ground or abraded, or otherwise made friable, they should be treated as RACM and removed prior to demolition. If non-friable ACM’s are not removed prior to demolition, the generated debris cannot be recycled or used as clean-fill.

In addition, prior to any future maintenance, renovation or demolition activities, any assumed ACMs should be tested, and any areas noted as inaccessible during this project, or any concealed areas, such as behind walls, where suspect ACMs are discovered, will require a survey for ACM.

No materials were point counted.

This summary does not contain all the information presented in the full report. The report should be read in its entirety to obtain a more complete understanding of the information provided and to aid in any decisions made or actions taken based on this information.

2 INTRODUCTION

2.1 SCOPE OF SERVICES

The scope of services for this project consisted of conducting an asbestos survey, including inspection, sampling and analysis of accessible and exposed areas at the subject facility, including the roof.

The subject area(s) of the facility for this investigation included the entire main building, 1st floor, 2nd floor, and roof. The adjacent warehouse building was entered where accessible and no suspect ACMs were observed.

The investigation included a review of client-provided records or documents (if available), visual inspection of the subject area(s), sample collection, polarized light microscopy (PLM) sample analysis, quantification of ACMs, and report preparation & review.

2.2 PURPOSE

The purpose of this survey was to provide general information for the subject building(s) regarding the presence, condition, and quantity of accessible and/or exposed friable and non-friable, building materials that contain asbestos.

2.3 AUTHORIZATION

Authorization to perform this work was given by Merrick & Company. The project was conducted in accordance with the scope, terms and conditions of PSI Proposal No.

103728, dated August 28, 2013.

2.4 LIMITATIONS

This asbestos survey was intended to meet the requirements of the National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Asbestos demolition or renovation.

The survey included a thorough inspection of all areas of planned renovation.

Due to the occupancy of the structure, PSI was generally not able to conduct ‘destructive’ sampling such as inside wall cavities or above plaster ceilings: therefore, the inspection was limited to areas that were accessible and exposed.

Roof Systems were included in the scope of this survey.

Destructive sampling, such as behind finished surfaces (plaster/drywall walls, above hard ceilings, etc.) inside mechanical chases, behind mirrored walls, under carpet or tiled floors, etc., was not generally conducted to assess inaccessible or concealed materials.

Inaccessible is defined as areas of the building that were locked, or where admittance was not permitted. It also includes areas/materials that could not be tested (sampled) without destruction of the structure or a portion of the structure, and areas/materials that could not be safely reached by the inspector or inspection team. In the event that access to a portion of the building was not obtained (which otherwise would have been tested), such limitations specifically are identified in the Findings Section of this report.

PSI did not sample any system which presented a hazard to the inspection team such as energized electrical systems or within confined spaces.

PSI did not collect samples from building elements where the intended use would be compromised by testing, such as fire rated doors, vapor barriers, mirror mastics, etc.

2.5 WARRANTY

The field and laboratory results reported herein are considered sufficient in detail and scope to determine the presence of accessible and/or exposed suspect ACM for the building structure. Professional Service Industries (PSI), Inc., warrants that the findings contained herein have been prepared in general accordance with accepted professional practices at the time of its preparation as applied by professionals in the community.

Changes in the state of the art or in applicable regulations cannot be anticipated and have not been addressed in this report.

The survey and analytical methods have been used to provide the client with information regarding the presence of accessible and/or exposed suspect ACM existing at the time of the inspection. Test results are valid only for the material(s) tested. There is a distinct possibility that conditions may exist which could not be identified within the scope of the study or which were not apparent during the site visit. This inspection covered only those areas that were exposed and/or physically accessible to the Inspector. The study is also limited to the information available from the client at the time it was conducted.

As directed by the client, PSI provided an assessment of the interior of the occupied area regarding the presence of mold and the results of the assessment are addressed in a separate report.

No other warrantees are implied or expressed.

3 GENERAL BUILDING AND SURVEY INFORMATION

3.1 BUILDING INFORMATION

Subject Property: Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center Building 36000 Ft. Hood Texas

Facility Construction Date: 1990

Previous Renovation Dates: 1991, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2011

Number of Floors: 5-stories

Est Square Footage 624,844 sq. ft. (excludes Emergency Room and Women’s Health Additions)

Construction Type: steel frame, concrete

Building Occupant(s) Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center

Additional Information None

3.2 INSPECTION INFORMATION

Name of PSI Inspector(s): Joe Leal, TDSHS License – 602035 Guy L. Roberts, TDSHS License-105465 Richard A. Klenke, Jr., TDSHS License- 105430

Date(s) of Inspection: June 17 – June 27, 2014

Escort(s): Patti Irwin James Blackman

4 METHODOLOGY

Inspection and sampling procedures were performed in general accordance with the guidelines published by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The inspection and survey described below was performed by an EPA accredited and Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) licensed inspector.

4.1 RECORD DOCUMENT REVIEW

Prior to conducting the visual inspection, PSI reviewed documents provided by the client, including: drawings, floor plans, historical data, maintenance records, previous survey reports, laboratory reports, etc. for information regarding construction history and building materials.

The following documents were reviewed as a part of this Asbestos Survey:

1979- Drawings-Calhoun, Tungate & Jackson/Mackie & Kamrath AIA 1982- Drawings-U.S. Army Engineering District Fort Worth, Corps of Engineers, Ft. Worth 1983- Drawings – Director of Facilities Engineering, Ft. Hood 1984- Drawings - Calhoun, Tungate & Jackson/Mackie & Kamrath AIA 1985- Drawings – Director of Facilities Engineering, Ft. Hood 1987- Drawings – Director of Facilities Engineering, Ft. Hood 1991- Drawings – U.S. Army Engineering District Fort Worth, Corps of Engineers, Ft. Worth 1992- Drawings – U.S. Army Engineering District Fort Worth, Corps of Engineers, Ft. Worth 1994- Drawings – U.S. Army Engineering District Fort Worth, Corps of Engineers, Ft. Worth 1995- Drawings – U.S. Army Engineering District Fort Worth, Corps of Engineers, Ft. Worth 1996- Drawings – U.S. Army Engineering District Fort Worth, Corps of Engineers, Ft. Worth 2004- Drawings – U.S. Army Engineering District Fort Worth, Corps of Engineers, Ft. Worth 2005- Drawings – U.S. Army Engineering District Fort Worth, Corps of Engineers, Ft. Worth 2007- Drawings – U.S. Army Engineering District Fort Worth, Corps of Engineers, Ft. Worth 2008- Drawings – U.S. Army Engineering District Fort Worth, Corps of Engineers, Ft. Worth This data was used to focus the walk through and scope of work to be followed over the course of our visual inspection and sampling. Information obtained from the references is included in the findings section of the report.

4.2 VISUAL INSPECTION PROCEDURES

An initial individual building structure walkthrough was conducted to determine the presence of suspect asbestos-containing materials that were accessible and/or exposed.

Exterior areas including the roof systems were included in the scope of this investigation.

The inspection and sampling was limited to those areas and materials that were accessible and did not involve destruction of walls, other building elements, physical barriers, or the structural integrity of the item being tested.

Materials which were similar in color, texture, general appearance and which appear to have been installed at the same time were grouped in Homogeneous Sampling Areas.

Such materials are termed "homogeneous materials" by the EPA. During this walkthrough, the approximate locations of these homogeneous materials were also noted.

The inspector evaluated the overall condition of the material and determined whether the materials were friable or non-friable by touching the material, where practical. A friable material is defined as any material able to be crushed, crumbled, pulverized or reduced to a powder by hand pressure when dry.

Each material was further assessed for overall condition. Conditions were rated as good, damaged or significantly damaged. PSI’s inspector also identified the EPA classification of the material: Regulated ACM (RACM), Category I non-friable ACM, and Category II non-friable ACM, based on the materials current condition. PSI’s inspector provided estimated quantities of the materials identified as ACM, based only on materials that were accessible and exposed.

4.3 ASBESTOS SAMPLING PROCEDURES

Following the walkthrough, the Inspector collected samples of suspect materials.

EPA guidelines were used to determine the sampling protocol. Sampling locations were chosen to be representative of the homogeneous sampling area. While an effort was made to collect samples randomly, samples were taken preferentially from areas already damaged or areas which were the least visible to minimize disturbance of the material.

Each sample location was sprayed with amended water and was kept wet during the entire sampling process. Samples were collected by coring through the material from the surface down to the base substrate. All layers of the material were extracted and placed into a sample container for transport to the laboratory. Sample containers were sealed and labeled with a unique sample identification number. Where appropriate, sampled materials were sealed with an encapsulant or covered with tape after sampling. PSI is not responsible for restoring the sampled areas to their pre-sampled condition.

In accordance with the agreement between PSI and the client, roofing materials were sampled as part of this survey.

In accordance with the agreement between PSI and the client, roofing materials were sampled by coring through the roof system to the base deck material. PSI applied a temporary patch to the roof core location following sample extraction. Due to the destructive nature of roof sampling however, PSI does not warrant a water tight condition following sample extraction, nor can PSI guarantee the continuance of any roof system warrantees by other entities.

4.4 ASBESTOS ANALYSIS PROCEDURES

All samples were analyzed at Professional Service Industries, Inc. located at 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15220. The PSI Pittsburgh Asbestos Laboratory is a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) Accredited (#101350-0) and an American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Accredited (#8222) Laboratory.

A copy of the Laboratory’s Accreditation Certificate is included in the Appendix.

The samples were analyzed for asbestos on a “positive-stop” basis by polarized light microscopy (PLM) in accordance with the “EPA Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116 July 1993). Analysis was performed by using bulk samples for visual observation and slide preparation(s) for microscopic examination and identification. The samples were mounted on slides and then analyzed for asbestos (chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, anthophyllite, actinolite/tremolite), and fibrous non-asbestos constituents (mineral wool, fiberglass, cellulose, etc.). Asbestos was identified by refractive indices, morphology, color, pleochroism, birefringence, extinction characteristics, and signs of elongation. The same characteristics were used to identify the non-asbestos constituents.

The microscopist visually estimated relative amounts of each constituent by determining the volume of each constituent in proportion to the total volume of the sample, using a stereoscope.

The EPA method allows samples which are visually determined to have 10% or less asbestos to be quantified using a Point Count procedure. An ocular reticule (cross hair or point array) is used to visually superimpose a point or points on the microscope field of view. A total of 400 points superimposed on either asbestos fibers or non-asbestos matrix material must be counted over at least eight different preparations of representative subsamples. If an asbestos fiber and matrix particle overlap so that a point is superimposed on their visual intersection, a point is scored for both categories. Point counting provides a quantification of the area percent asbestos. Point counted results supersede the results of the visual estimation. No samples were point counted for this survey.

It should be noted that some ACM might not be accurately identified or quantified by PLM.

As an example, the original fabrication of vinyl floor tiles routinely involved milling of asbestos fibers to extremely small sizes. As a result, these fibers may go undetected under the standard PLM method. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) is recommended for a more definitive analysis of these materials.

4.4.1 Laboratory Quality Control Program

The PSI Laboratory in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, maintains an in-house quality control program. This program involves blind reanalysis of ten (10) percent of all samples, precision and accuracy controls, and use of standard bulk reference materials. In addition, the PSI Laboratory is accredited by NVLAP, which also has quality control procedures inherent in its program.

5 FINDINGS

5.1 ASBESTOS RESULTS

A total of 453 samples were collected from 122 suspect homogenous materials during the asbestos survey. In addition, suspect homogeneous materials were observed during the asbestos survey but were not sampled, and are assumed to contain asbestos until sampling and laboratory analysis can be conducted.

The “Report of Bulk Sample Analysis for Asbestos,” the “Asbestos Bulk Sample Log,” Sample Location diagram and Photographs are included in the Appendices. The Tables attached to this report list the suspect ACMs observed throughout the building. Table 1 lists the materials that were sampled, along with the results of the inspection and laboratory analysis. Table 2 lists the suspect materials that were not sampled and are assumed to be ACM.

Both tables give a description of the materials, their general locations, condition, friability, EPA NESHAP Category, and estimated quantity, and an estimated cost estimate for abatement.

5.1.1 INACCESSIBLE AREAS

The following areas were inaccessible during the survey and therefore were not included in the scope of the survey.

Room 2729 Room 0401 Room 0706

These areas will require an asbestos inspection prior to any demolition or renovation activities within the areas.

5.1.2 NON-SUSPECT MATERIALS

The following materials were observed but are considered ‘non-suspect’ ACM due to their composition (fiberglass, rubber, etc.) and were not sampled.

Fiberglass ceiling panels Fiberglass pipe insulation

5.1.3 REGULATORY GUIDELINES:

ACM Definition – The EPA and OSHA consider a material to be asbestos-containing if at least one sample from the homogeneous area shows asbestos in an amount greater than 1%.

Point Count Quantification – If a material is found to contain 10% or less asbestos via visual estimation, it can be treated as non-asbestos-containing per EPA Regulations, if verified to contain 1% or less asbestos by the Point Count Quantification Procedure. If not point counted, a sample in which asbestos was visually detected and estimated (including trace to ≤1%) must be assumed to be greater than 1% and treated as ACM. Please refer to the laboratory analyses for a more detailed description of the microscopic analysis of individual samples.

No samples were quantified by the Point Count Procedure in this Asbestos Survey.

EPA NESHAP Category – EPA classifies ACM into several categories. A regulated asbestos-containing material (RACM) as defined by the Asbestos National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) is any (a) Friable asbestos material, (b) Category I non-friable ACM that has become friable, (c) Category I non- friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading, or (d) Category II non-friable ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations. A Category I Non-friable ACM includes packings, gaskets, resilient floor covering, and asphalt roofing products which contain more than one percent asbestos. A Category II Non-friable ACM includes any material, except for a Category I non-friable ACM, which contains more than one-percent asbestos and cannot be reduced to a powder by hand pressure when dry.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) – OSHA requires all suspect materials to be analyzed by layer, even materials such as drywall/joint compound, which may sometimes be composited per the EPA. If any layer contains asbestos in a concentration >1%, the material is considered an ACM.

OSHA has a classification system (I thru IV) for ACM depending on the type of material and the disturbance. Briefly, ‘Class I’ work is defined as activities involving the removal of ACM or presumed ACM (PACM) that is thermal system insulation (TSI) and surfacing materials. ‘Class II’ activities involve removal of ACM/PACM other than TSI or surfacing material. ‘Class III’ work includes repair and maintenance operations which are likely to disturb ACM/PACM, and ‘Class IV’ work includes maintenance and custodial activities during which employees contact but do not disturb ACM/PACM.

Materials where asbestos is detected, but where point counting is conducted and determined that the concentration is ≤1% asbestos, are not considered to be ACM by OSHA. However, these materials are considered unclassified asbestos work per OSHA. Some OSHA work control practices and prohibitions will still apply, with the extent depending on whether the worker's exposure to airborne asbestos exceeds the OSHA permissible exposure limit (PEL).

Additional details of the OSHA asbestos regulations related to the construction industry can be found in 29 CFR part 1926.1101.

5.1.4 QUANTIFICATION

Quantification of suspect ACMs was conducted using visual estimation by a licensed asbestos inspector. This visual estimation was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices in the asbestos industry based on materials that were accessible and exposed. It was noted by PSI that the ACM black mastic was sporadic and may be present in areas not noted. These values are sufficiently accurate for the purpose of documenting the presence of asbestos within its space for the purpose of identifying abatement control conditions or for general policy considerations. Actual quantities may differ between visually estimated values and physical measurements. If a licensed asbestos abatement contractor is engaged to remove asbestos containing materials, the abatement contractor is responsible for verifying reported quantities of ACM.

5.1.5 ABATEMENT COST ESTIMATION

PSI used recognized standard engineering principles in developing the unit cost budgetary estimate for removal of the listed asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and assumed ACM contained in this facility. This is an estimate for removal only, intended for general policy decisions regarding program development and planning. The figures are as of the date of the report and cover only the removal contractor's fees. Not included are items such as indirect or hidden costs, such as employee relocation during the project, lost revenues, replacement costs, project design or monitoring, etc. These items are considered during the development of an engineering cost estimate, which is beyond the scope of this study. Other variables included in an engineering cost estimate are the project schedule and phasing, size of the project, and other factors that can affect project cost.

6 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1 CONCLUSIONS

Asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) were found in the Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center.

Assumed ACMs were found in Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center.

Materials with low concentrations of asbestos (trace to 1%) were not identified in the subject facility(s).

The identified or assumed ACMs were observed to be in good condition at the time of the field investigation.

6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS

ACMs should be maintained in a good non-damaged condition and periodically inspected through use of an Operations and Maintenance (O&M) program. Damaged or significantly damaged ACMs should be repaired, encapsulated, enclosed or removed.

Regulated ACM (RACM) must be properly removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor prior to renovations or demolition that would disturb the material. Federal, State and Local regulations and guidelines should be strictly adhered to when removing the ACM.

Category I & II Non-Friable asbestos containing material may often be left in place during demolition if not made friable by cutting, grinding or sanding. If left in place, these materials cannot be recycled or used as clean fill.

Materials verified to contain low concentrations of asbestos (trace to 1%) are not considered ACM, and are not regulated by the EPA; however, some OSHA regulations will still apply based on the employee’s airborne exposure.

In addition, prior to any future maintenance, renovation or demolition activities, any assumed ACMs should be tested. Any areas that were noted as being inaccessible during this project or any concealed areas, such as behind walls, where suspect ACMs are discovered, will require a survey for ACM.

Prior to the initiation of a project that would involve abatement, a detailed engineering cost estimate and project design is recommended. The engineering cost estimate will incorporate such variables as scheduling and phasing of the project, the size and extent of the project, seasonal factors, operational factors and other restrictions, respiratory protection, alternate abatement options, and type of replacement material.

An engineering cost estimate would also include professional fees, such as for project design and management, and other expenses, such as on-site air monitoring and construction supervision.

Ca rl

R.

D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en te r

Au gu st

9, PS

I P ro je ct : 0

5-

TA

B

LE

S

R.

D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en st

9, PS

I P ro je ct : 0

5-

LE

S

U

SP

EC

T

A C

M S

SA

M

PL

ED

C ar l R . D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en te r, B ld g.

, F t.

H oo d, T

X.

Su rv ey D at e(

s) : J un e

-2

7, M at er ia l

Sa m pl e)

M at er ia l D es cr ip tio n M at er ia l L oc at io n

F

N F

C on d.

A C ty pe

EP

N

ES

H

A P

C at

Es t.

Q ty

Es t.

R em ov al os t (

(6

S m ok ey g ra y co ve ba se a nd as so ci at ed m tic ou th p en th ou se a nd g ro un d flo or

F G oo d

C ov e- N

D tic

-N

(3

D ar k br ow n co ve ba se ci at ed m th a nd n or th p en th ou se s N

F G oo d

C ov e

- N tic

-N

(1

2)

W hi te m as tic o n

TS

I p ip es th

, n or th p en th ou se s;

5t h, 4th , 3 rd g ro un d flo or s N

F G oo d

AD

(9

W hi te m as tic o n A

H U d uc ts th , n or th p en th ou se s;

rd g ro un d flo or s N

F G oo d

4%

H

R

3, S F

$5 4, 0.

1) ed fi re

-s to p S ou th

, n or th p en th ou

4th , 3 rd g ro un d flo or s N

F G oo d

9) ry w al l a nd jo in t c om po un d S ou th

, n or th p en th ou

4th , 3 rd g ro un d flo or s N

F G oo d

D ry w al l - N

Jo in t c m pd

0) la ck s pr ay

-o n fir ep ro of in g

S ou th p en th ou se

, 5 th

, 4 th . 3 rd an d gr ou nd fl oo r m ec h.

ro om s

N F

G oo d 6%

I

1, S

F $1

4, B la ck ta r m as tic o n

TS

I

S ou th p en th

G oo d

W al l t ex tu re th p en th ou se

, g ro un d

G oo d

C au lk in g

N or th p en th ou se

, 3 rd fl oo r F

G oo d 5%

I

L

F $3

.0

Fr ia bl e;

N

F

N on

-fr ia bl e

C on d.

C on di tio n

O f M at er ia ls

E ith er g oo d, d am d am ag ed

, s ig

. d am s ig ni fic an t d am ag e

N

A D

N o A sb es to s

D et ec te d, C h

C hr ys ot ile , A m

A m os ite

, P T

P oi nt

C ou nt A na ly si s

N

E S

H A

P C at eg or y

- R eg ul at ed A

C M

(R A

C M

),C at

I N

F= C at eg or y

I N on

-F ria bl e

A C

B M

, C at

II

N

F= C at eg or y

II

N on -F ria bl e A

C

R.

D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en st

9, PS

I P ro je ct : 0

5-

LE

S

U

SP

EC

T

A C

M S

SA

M l R . D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en te r, B ld g.

, F t.

H oo d, ey D at e(

s) : J un e

-2

7, M at er ia l er ia l D es cr ip tio n M at er ia l L oc at io n

F

N F

C on d.

A C

H

A P

C at

Es t.

Q ty

Es t.

R em

(4

G ra y m as tic p at ch o n

TS

I

N or th p en th ou se

, g ro un d

G oo d

M ud de d fit tin gs th p en th

G oo d 3&

-1 0% ea ch

$1

,4

.0

”x

” b ro w n flo or ti le ci at ed m

5th

, 4 th , 3 rd gr ou nd fl oo rs

G oo d

Fl oo r t ile

-2

3% tic -2

5%

I

,1

$2

1, 5.

5)

Li gh t b ro w n co ve ba se ci at ed m th , 3 rd gr ou nd fl

G oo d

C ov e- N tic -N

G ra y du ct m

, g ro un d flo or s

N F

G oo d

2’ x2

’ p in ho le c ei lin g til e

5th , 4 th , 3 rd g ro un d flo or s

F G oo d

W te d uc t m th , 3 rd g ro un d flo or s

N F

G oo d 2%

I

2)

2’ x2

’ f is su re c ei lin g til e

5th , 4 th , 3 rd g ro un d flo or s

F G oo d

(9

P la st er th , 3 rd fl

G oo d

(5

B la ck s in k un de rc oa tin g 5th

, 4 th , 3 rd fl

G oo d pe t m th , 3 rd g ro un d flo or s

N F

G oo d 3%

I

2, S

F $6

,6

.0

F

Fr ia bl e;

N

F

N on

-fr ia bl e

C on d.

C on di tio n

O f M at er er g oo d, d am d am ag ed

, s ig

. d am s ig ni fic an t d am ag e

N

A D

N o A sb es to s

D et ec te d, C h

C hr ys ot ile , A m

A m os ite

, P T

P oi nt

C ou nt A na ly si s

N

E S

H A

P C at eg or y

- R eg ul at ed A

C M

(R A

C M

),C at

I N

F= C at eg or y

I N on

-F ria bl e

A C

B M

, C at

II

N

F= C at eg or y

II

N on -F ria bl e A

C

R.

D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en st

9, PS

I P ro je ct : 0

5-

LE

S U

SP

EC

T A

C M

S

SA

M l R . D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en te r, B ld g.

, F t.

H oo d, ey D at e(

s) : J un e

-2

7, M at er ia l er ia l D es cr ip tio n M at er ia l L oc at io n

F

N F

C on d.

A C

H

A P

C at

Es t.

Q ty

Es t.

R em

”x

” W hi te /b ro w n sp ec ke d flo or ti le a nd a ss oc ia te d m th , 3 rd g ro un d flo or s

N F

G oo d Fl oo r T ile

- N tic

-N

M au ve c ov eb as e an d as so ci

4th ro un d flo or s N

F G oo d

C ov e

- N tic

-N

”x

” L ig ht b ro w n/ w sp ke d flo or ti le a nd a ss oc ia te d m

3rd ro un d flo or s

N F

G oo d Fl oo r T ile

- N tic

-2

I

”x

” B lu e flo or ti le ci at ed m

G un d flo or m ec h.

G oo d

Fl oo r T ile

- N tic

B lu e co ve ba se a nd a ss oc ia te d m un d flo or m ec h.

G oo d C ov e

- N tic -N

2’ x4 ’ F is su re c ei lin g til e G ro un d oo d

9” x9 ” G re en fl oo r t ile ci at ed m m G

G oo d

Fl oo r T ile

- 5 tic -4

”x

” T an fl oo r t ile ci at ed m

G oo d Fl oo r T ile

- N tic

-N

W hi te c ov eb as e an d as so ci

G oo d

C ov e- N tic

-N

P ip e w ra p G

A F

G oo d

Fr ia bl e;

N

F

N on

-fr ia bl e

C on d.

C on di tio n

O f M at er er g oo d, d am d am ag ed

, s ig

. d am s ig ni fic an t d am ag e

N

A D

N o A sb es to s

D et ec te d, C h

C hr ys ot ile , A m

A m os ite

, P T

P oi nt

C ou nt A na ly si s

N

E S

H A

P C at eg or y

- R eg ul at ed A

C M

(R A

C M

),C at

I N

F= C at eg or y

I N on

-F ria bl e

A C

B M

, C at

II

N

F= C at eg or y

II

N on -F ria bl e A

C

R.

D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en st

9, PS

I P ro je ct : 0

5-

LE

S

U

SP

EC

T

A C

M S

SA

M l R . D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en te r, B ld g.

, F t.

H oo d, ey D at e(

s) : J un e

-2

7, M at er ia l er ia l D es cr ip tio n M at er ia l L oc at io n

F / N

F

C on d.

A

C

H A

P C at

Es t.

Q ty

Es t.

R em

”x

” M in t g re en f lo or ti le ci at ed m

G oo d Fl oo r T ile

- N tic

-N

G ra y sp ec kl ed s he et v yl

A N

F G oo d i

”x

” B ro w n flo or ti le ci at ed m

Th ug ho ut st fl oo r

N F

G oo d Fl oo r T ile

- 2

3% tic

-3

0, S F

$1

,2

”x

” W hi te s tre ak ed fl oo r t ile an d as so ci at ed m ug ho ut

E R a re a N

F G oo d

Fl oo r T ile

- N tic -N

I

N F

”x

” W hi te s pe ck le d flo or ti le as so ci at ed m m E

G oo d

Fl oo r T ile

- N tic

”x

” T an s tre ak ed fl oo as so ci at ed m

, 1

0B , c or rid or s

N F

G oo d Fl oo r T ile

- N tic

-N

”x

” G re en fl oo r t ile ci at ed m

Fa ily

M ed ic in e F

G oo d Fl oo r T ile

- N tic

-N

”x

” L ig ht b ro w n flo or ti le ci at ed m m

N

F G oo d

Fl oo r T ile

- N tic -3

”x

” W hi te /b ro w n flo or ti le ci at ed m m

N

F G oo d

Fl oo r T ile

- N tic -N

”x

” B ro w n st re ak ed fl oo as so ci at ed m m

6, N ur s’ st io n N

F G oo d

Fl oo r t ile

- N tic -N

Fr ia bl e;

N

F

N on

-fr ia bl e

C on d.

C on di tio n

O f M at er er g oo d, d am d am ag ed

, s ig

. d am s ig ni fic an t d am ag e

N

A D

N o A sb es to s

D et ec te d, C h

C hr ys ot ile , A m

A m os ite

, P T

P oi nt

C ou nt A na ly si s

N

E S

H A

P C at eg or y

- R eg ul at ed A

C M

(R A

C M

),C at

I N

F= C at eg or y

I N on

-F ria bl e

A C

B M

, C at

II

N

F= C at eg or y

II

N on -F ria bl e A

C

R.

D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en st

9, PS

I P ro je ct : 0

5-

LE

S

U

SP

EC

T

A C

M S

SA

M l R . D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en te r, B ld g.

, F t.

H oo d, ey D at e(

s) : J un e

-2

7, M at er ia l er ia l D es cr ip tio n M at er ia l L oc at io n

F / N

F

C on d.

A

C

H A

P C at

Es t.

Q ty

Es t.

R em

”x

” L ig ht b ro w n sp ec kl ti le a nd a ss oc ia te d m m s

, 1

7, A , S ur ge oo d

Fl oo r t ile

- N tic -N

”x

” Y el lo w fl oo r t ile ci at ed m m

N F

G oo d Fl oo r t ile

- N tic

”x

” B ro w n st re ak ed fl oo as so ci at ed m m

N F

G oo d Fl oo r T ile -N tic

”x

” T an s pe ck le d flo or as so ci at ed m

P hy si ca l T he ra py

G oo d Fl oo r T ile

- N tic

”x

” M ul tic ol or ed fl oo r t ile ci at ed m m

N F

G oo d Fl oo r T ile

- N tic

-N

”x

” B ro w n st re ak ed fl oo as so ci at ed m m

N F

G oo d Fl oo r T ile

- N tic

-N

R ed fi re s to p

M ec ha ni ca l/e le ct ric s

F G oo d

D ry w al l a nd jo in t c om po un d

E m er ge nc y

G oo d

D ry w al l - N t c m pd

Fi re pr oo fin g E le ct ric al c lo se t, G oo d

Li gh t b lu e sh ee t v

, 1

0, , F am ily ic in e

N F

G oo d

B lu e sh ee t v er ge nc y oo d

Fr ia bl e;

N

F

N on

-fr ia bl e

C on d.

C on di tio n

O f M at er er g oo d, d am d am ag ed

, s ig

. d am s ig ni fic an t d am ag e

N

A D

N o A sb es to s

D et ec te d, C h

C hr ys ot ile , A m

A m os ite

, P T

P oi nt

C ou nt A na ly si s

N

E S

H A

P C at eg or y

- R eg ul at ed A

C M

(R A

C M

),C at

I N

F= C at eg or y

I N on

-F ria bl e

A C

B M

, C at

II

N

F= C at eg or y

II

N on -F ria bl e A

C

R.

D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en st

9, PS

I P ro je ct : 0

5-

LE

S

U

SP

EC

T

A C

M S

SA

M l R . D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en te r, B ld g.

, F t.

H oo d, ey D at e(

s) : J un e

-2

7, M at er ia l er ia l D es cr ip tio n M at er ia l L oc at io n

F / N

F

C on d.

A

C

H A

P C at

Es t.

Q ty

Es t.

R em

W hi te s he et v m

2, L ab

G oo d

2’ x2 ’ F is su re c ei lin g til e Th ro ug ho ut st fl oo r

F G oo d

2’ x2 ’ F la t c ei lin g til e E

R L ob by

/F oy er

E

,S up pl y oo d

2’ x2 ’ P in ho le c ei lin g til e R ep la ce m en t t ile s

F G oo d

P in k sh ee t v m

N F

G oo d

G ra y si nk u nd er co at in g R oo m s

,1

5A

,1

7, A ,1

N F

G oo d

B la ck s in k un de rc oa tin g O ra l/P ai n

C lin ic , 1

4, si ca l

Th er ap y, 3rd ,4 th ,5 th gr

G oo d 3%

$1

1.

C ar am el c ov eb as e an d as so ci at ed m m at ol og y/

N eu lin ic

G oo d C ov e

- N tic -N

D ar k

B ro w n co ve ba se ci at ed m

O l a nd

M ax ilo

S ur ge ry

, R oo m

5, si ca l T he

G oo d C ov e

- N tic -N

Ta n co ve ba se a nd a ss oc ia te d m er ge nc y

G oo d C ov e

- N tic -N

Li gh t b ro w n co ve ba se ci at ed m

O cc up at io na l T he ra py

D er m at ol og y F

G oo d C ov e

- N tic -N

R.

D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en st

9, PS

I P ro je ct : 0

5-

LE

S

U

SP

EC

T

A C

M S

SA

M l R . D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en te r, B ld g.

, F t.

H oo d, ey D at e(

s) : J un e

-2

7, M at er ia l er ia l D es cr ip tio n M at er ia l L oc at io n

F / N

F

C on d.

A

C

H A

P C at

Es t.

Q ty

Es t.

R em

G re en c ov eb as e an d as so ci

Fa ily

M ed ic in e N

F G oo d

C ov e

- N tic

-N

2’ x2 ’ F is su re c ei lin g til e Th ro ug ho ut st fl oo r

F G oo d

W hi te s in k un de rc oa tin

La bo r a nd

D el iv er y N

F G oo d

W hi te d uc t m m un ic at io ns

, R

G oo d

I

N F

B la ck

D uc t M m

N F

G oo d

6”

B ro w n co ve ba se ci at ed m m

N F

G oo d C ov e

- N tic -N

P ip e fit tin g co at in g R oo m s

, 1

N F

G oo d

V ap or

B ar rie r

M ec ha ni ca l R oo m

M -1

-2

G oo d

B ro w n co ve ba se a nd a ss oc ia te d m m

N

F G oo d

C ov e

- N tic

-N

B ei ge d uc t m ha ni ca l R oo m s

. 1

N F

G oo d

G ra y co ve ba se a nd a ss oc ia te d m m

F G oo d

C ov e

- N tic

-N

R.

D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en st

9, PS

I P ro je ct : 0

5-

LE

S

U

SP

EC

T

A C

M S

SA

M l R . D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en te r, B ld g.

, F t.

H oo d, ey D at e(

s) : J un e

-2

7, M at er ia l er ia l D es cr ip tio n M at er ia l L oc at io n

F / N

F

C on d.

A

C

H A

P C at

Es t.

Q ty

Es t.

R em

Ta n du ct m rid or s ab ov e dr op pe d ce ilin g at

N F

G oo d

M ar bl e sh ee t v m

N

F G oo d

S F

$8

.0

(3

B la ck v al ve w ra p

M ec ha ni ca l r oo m

N

F G oo d

C ho co la te

B ro w n co ve ba se ci at ed m m

N F

G oo d C ov e

- N tic -N

I

N F

”x

” P in k flo or ti le ci at ed m m

N

F G oo d

Fl oo r t ile

N tic

-N

Ta n co ve ba se a nd a ss oc ia te d m er ge nc y

G oo d C ov e

- N tic -N

Fi re pr oo fin ct ric

R oo m b y co ve oo d

G ra y du ct m ha ni ca l R oo m

M

-2

G oo d

D ry w al l/J oi nt c om po un

6/

W om en ’s lth

(n ew a a)

G oo d

C au lk in g

M -1

6/

W om lth

(n ew a a)

G oo d

”x

” P in k flo or ti le ci at ed m

8, M

W om en

’s H ea lth

(n ew

N F

G oo d Fl oo r t ile

N tic -N

R.

D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en st

9, PS

I P ro je ct : 0

5-

LE

S

U

SP

EC

T

A C

M S

SA

M l R . D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en te r, B ld g.

F t.

H oo d, ey D at e(

s) : J un e

-2

7, M at er ia l er ia l D es cr ip tio n M at er ia l L oc at io n

F / N

F

C on d.

A

C

H A

P C at

Es t.

Q ty

Es t.

R em

Li gh t b ro w n co ve ba se ci at ed m

,M

,S ta irw el l

S

G oo d C ov e

- N tic -N

2’ x2 ’ F is su re c ei lin g til e R oo m

N

F G oo d

B la ck s in k un de rc oa tin g M

-1

8, M

W om en

’s H ea lth

(n ew

N F

G oo d

Li gh t b lu e sh ee t v

, M

, M

G oo d

D ry w al l/J oi nt c om po er ge nc y

G oo d

D ry w al l - N t c m pd

”x

” B ro w n flo or ti le ci at ed m

2nd fl oo r I

C U

,P A

C

A ne st he si a, E ye

, E

G oo d Fl oo r t ile

- 3 tic

-3

I 2, SF

$3 ,5

.0

(3

”x

” C re am /g ra y flo or ti le ci at ed m oo r, R ec ds co rr id oo d

Fl oo r t ile

- N tic -N

”x

” W hi te fl oo r t ile ci at ed m oo r, R ec or ds ,2

1, , O

G oo d Fl oo r t ile

- N tic

-N

”x

” C re am /g ra y flo or ti le ci at ed m oo r I

U

G oo d

Fl oo r t ile

- N tic -N

W hi te d uc t m as tic a bo ve d ro pp ce ili ng s ys oo r h

G oo d

”x

” B ro w n sp ec kl ed fl oo as so ci at ed m oo r L ab or el iv er y

N F

G oo d Fl oo r t ile

N tic -N

R.

D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en st

9, PS

I P ro je ct : 0

5-

LE

S

U

SP

EC

T

A C

M S

SA

M l R . D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en te r, B ld g.

F t.

H oo d, ey D at e(

s) : J un e

-2

7, M at er ia l er ia l D es cr ip tio n M at er ia l L oc at io n

F / N

F

C on d.

A

C

H A

P C at

Es t.

Q ty

Es t.

R em

P ip e in su la tio n co at in g 2nd fl oo r R oo m

N F

G oo d

”x

” W hi te w

/ b ro w n flo or as so ci at ed m oo r L ab or el iv er y

N F

G oo d Fl oo r t ile

- N tic

-N

D ry w al l/J oi nt c om po

3n flo or

E du ca tio n N

F G oo d

D ry w al l - N t c m pd

(3

D ry w al l/J oi nt c om po oo r t hr ou gh ou t

N F

G oo d D ry w al l -

N t c m pd

(3

D ry w al l/J oi nt c om po oo r W om lth

G oo d

D ry w al l - N t c m pd

(3

Ta n co ve ba se a nd a ss oc ia te d m oo r I

C U

,P A

C

A ne st he si a, E ye

, E

G oo d C ov e-

N tic -N

I

(3

B ro w n co ve ba se a nd a ss oc ia te d m oo r, O R

A ne st he si a, E

T, es pi ra to ry T he oo d

C ov e- N tic

-N

(3

Li gh t b ro w n co ve ba se ci at ed m oo r, E ye

, E

T, a, R es pi ra to ap y

N F

G oo d C ov e-

N tic -N

(3

G ra y co ve ba se a nd a ss oc ia te d m oo r, D at a, M m

-0 3, N

F G oo d

(3

B ei ge d uc t c oa tin g 2nd fl oo r , R oo m

N

F G oo d

2%

I 2, S F

$3 2, (3

G re en c ov eb as e an d as so ci oo r, D at a ,L ib ra ry

M ot he r/B ab y

N F

G oo d C ov e

- N tic -N

R.

D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en st

9, PS

I P ro je ct : 0

5-

LE

S

U

SP

EC

T

A C

M S

SA

M l R . D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en te r, B ld g.

F t.

H oo d, ey D at e(

s) : J un e

-2

7, M at er ia l er ia l D es cr ip tio n M at er ia l L oc at io n

F / N

F

C on d.

A

C

H A

P C at

Es t.

Q ty

Es t.

R em

8(

3) k br ow n co ve ba se ci at ed m oo r , N

IC

U ,P

A C

G oo d C ov e-

N tic -N

(3

2’ x2

’ F is su re c ei lin g til e

Th ro ug ho ut nd fl oo r

N F

G oo d

(3

2’ x2

’ F la t c ei lin g til e

R ep la ce m en t t ile

G oo d

(3

”x

” B ei ge fl oo r t ile ci at ed m oo r r oo m

N

F G oo d

Fl oo r t ile

- N tic -N

(3

2’ x2

’ p in ho le c ei lin g til e

2nd fl oo r, su rg er y w ai tin g

G oo d

(3

B lu e co ve ba se a nd a ss oc ia te d m oo r , O m bu ds

G oo d C ov e-

N tic -N

I

(3

P in k co ve ba se a nd a ss oc ia te d m oo r, , h al l

F G oo d

C ov e- N tic

-N

(3

B la ck s in k un de rc oa tin g

2nd fl oo r, ,E N

T, ,2

A

B ,2

6, ,2

3, G oo d

(3

G ra y si nk u nd er co at in g

2nd fl oo r, 0, G oo d

3%

I

$3

.0

(3

M ul tic ol or ed s he et v oo r , ye

G oo d

(3

Li gh t b lu e sh ee t v oo r, M ot he r/B ab y N

F G oo d

R.

D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en st

9, PS

I P ro je ct : 0

5-

LE

S

U

SP

EC

T

A C

M S

SA

M l R . D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en te r, B ld g.

F t.

H oo d, ey D at e(

s) : J un e

-2

7, M at er ia l er ia l D es cr ip tio n M at er ia l L oc at io n

F / N

F

C on d.

A

C

H A

P C at

Es t.

Q ty

Es t.

R em

9(

3)

6” ro w n co ve ba se ci at ed m oo r, M ot he r/B ab y N

F G oo d

C ov e- N tic

-N

(3

B ei ge s he et v oo r, N F

G oo d

(3

W hi te d uc t s ea m m oo r 2

1, N

F G oo d

(3

B ei ge in su la tio n co at in g

2nd fl oo r r oo m

N

F G oo d

(3

Ta nk in su la tio n 2nd fl oo r, G oo d

(3

Fi tti ng c oa tin g 2nd fl oo r , G oo d

I

(3

G ra y du ct m oo r, oo d

C ov e- N tic

-N

(3

C ei lin g va po r b ar rie r

2nd fl oo r, M ec ha ni ca l ro om

-0

N

F G oo d

(3

C ei lin g te xt ur e

2nd fl oo r, G oo d

R.

D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en st

9, PS

I P ro je ct : 0

5-

LE

S

U

SP

EC

T

A C

M S

AS

SU

l R . D ar na ll Ar m y

M ed ic al

C en te r, B ld g.

F t.

H oo d, ey D at e(

s) : J un e

-2

7, M at er ia l am er ia l D es cr ip tio n M at er ia l L oc at io n

F

N F

C on d.

A C

H

A P

C at

Es t.

Q ty

Es t.

R em

(0

Fi re D ug ho ut b ui ld in g N

F G oo d

A ss um

T

II

do s

8, (0

M irr or m as tic s

R oo m s

,1

7, ,1

N

F G oo d

A ss

T

II

S

F $1

,6

.0

(0

H

V A

C v ib ra tio n da m pe r c lo th s M ec ha ni ca l r oo s, th ou se a nd g ro un d

V A

C u ni ts

G oo d A ss

T

II

S F

$3 ,6

.0

(0

B la ck la bo ra to ry ta bl e

2nd fl oo r, R oo m

N F

G oo d A ss

T

II

S

F $1

,5

.0

Fr ia bl e;

N

F

N on

-fr ia bl e on d.

C on di tio n O f M at er er g oo d, d am d am ag ed , s ig . d am s ig ni fic an t d am ag e

N A

D

N o

A sb es to s D et ec te d, C h

C hr ys ot ile

, A m

A m os ite , P

T

P oi nt C ou nt

A na ly si s

N E

S H

A P

C at eg or y

- R eg ul at ed

A C

M (R

A C

M ),C at I

N F=

C at eg or y I N on -F ria bl e A

C B

M , C at

II

N F=

C at eg or y

II

N on

-F ria bl e

A C

Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center

APPENDIX A – REPORT OF BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS FOR

ASBESTOS

Analyst's Comment

Inseparable Tan and Brown

No Drywall

Mainly Paint

No Mastic

No Joint Compound

No Mastic

No Covebase

No mastic

Insufficient mastic

APPENDIX B – ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE LOG / CHAIN OF

CUSTODY

APPENDIX C – SITE LAYOUT AND SAMPLE LOCATION DRAWING(S)

APPENDIX D - PHOTOGRAPHS

Project No. 0435-1789 CRDAMC, Building 36000, Ft. Hood, Texas June 2014

1. 12”x12” asbestos-containing brown floor tile and associated black asbestos-containing mastic, 1st floor. These materials are located on all levels, except the penthouse.

2. 12”x12non-asbestos brown floor tile and associated black asbestos-containing mastic, 1st floor.

3. Asbestos-containing black sink undercoating under stainless sinks, 1st floor.

4. Asbestos-containing marble sheet vinyl flooring, 1st floor Nuclear Medicine.

5. 12”x12” asbestos –containing floor tile and associated asbestos-containing mastic, 2nd floor .

6. Asbestos-containing HVAC duct coating mechanical room 2501, 2nd floor.

7. Asbestos-containing gray sink undercoating 2nd floor.

8. White mastic on thermal system insulation HVAC duct, penthouse. Asbestos Found in sample number G-46, ground floor HVAC duct, room 0402.

9. Black spray-on fireproofing, penthouse. Asbestos found in sample G-46, ground floor mechanical room 0511.

10. Asbestos-containing window/louvre/door caulking, penthouse.

11. Carpet mastic 5th floor. Asbestos found in sample G-26, ground floor room 0707.

12. Asbestos containing floor tile and mastic, ground level, room G0507.

13. Asbestos-containing mudded elbow on piping, penthouse.

14. White duct seam mastic, 5th floor. Asbestos found in sample 3-30, 3rd floor room 3068.

15. Non-asbestos floor tile over asbestos-containing mastic. 3rd floor and ground level.

APPENDIX E – INSPECTOR & LABORATORY CERTIFICATIONS

Professional Service Industries, Inc. • 7400 Blanco Road Suite 257 • San Antonio, TX 78216 • Phone 210/616-2119

401 E. Sonterra Blvd., Suite 250 San Antonio, Texas 78258

Attention: Ms. Christine Lurtz, LEED® BD+C Project Manager

Re: Lead-Based Paint Survey

Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center Building 3600 Ft. Hood, Texas PSI Project: 0435-1789

Dear Mr. Lurtz

In accordance with our agreement, Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) has performed a lead paint inspection at the above referenced project.

The results of this testing performed on July 15 and July 16, 2014 can be found in the accompanying report.

We appreciate this opportunity to provide professional services for this project. If we can be of further assistance, or if you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to call.

Respectfully submitted, John Langan Project Manager Environmental Services

Professional Service Industries, Inc. • 7400 Blanco Road Suite 257 • San Antonio, TX 78216 • Phone 210/616-2119

LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY

For

Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center Building 3600

Ft. Hood, Texas

Prepared for

401 E. Sonterra Boulevard, Suite 250

San Antonio, Texas 78258

Prepared by

Professional Service Industries, Inc.

7400 Blanco Road, Suite 257 San Antonio, Texas 78216 Telephone (210) 616-2119

PSI PROJECT NO. 0435-1789

Guy Roberts Project Manager

John Langan Lead Risk Assessor TDH Certification No:

2070377

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2.0 INTRODUCTION

2.1 GENERAL INFORMATION

2.2 AUTHORIZATION

2.3 PURPOSE

2.4 WARRANTY

2.5 DISCLOSURE

3.0 METHODOLOGY

3.1 FIELD SURVEY - GENERAL

3.2 XRF SAMPLE LOCATIONS

4.0 FINDINGS

4.1 POSITIVE MATERIALS

APPENDICES

A Background Information on Lead and Lead-Based Paint B Logs of Lead-Based Paint Locations C Certifications D Glossary Definitions of Terms

1.0 Executive Summary

Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) was retained by Merrick & Company to conduct a lead-based paint survey of Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center, Building 36000 located at Ft. Hood, Texas. The inspection was performed under the direction of Mr. John Langan, a Texas Department of Health (TDH) Certified Lead Risk Assessor (Certificate No. 2070377). A brief summary of findings is contained in the following paragraphs.

An initial walk-through was conducted to determine the presence of accessible and/or exposed paint films. Coatings that were similar in general appearance and that appeared to have a similar painting history and substrates were grouped together for testing.

Following the walk-through, the inspector performed testing utilizing x-ray fluorescence (XRF). The 1997 Chapter 7 revisions to the U.S.