Attachment_II-Quality_Assurance_Surveillance_Plan.docx
DOCX document 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Radiological Sample Analysis Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W81XWH-16-R-0058
- Issued by
- Department of the Army Medical Command
About this file
Attachment II- QASP
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_01-W81XWH-16-R-0058-0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_I-SCHEDULE_of_SERVICES_V4.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_IV-_Tables_from_QSM.pdf | ||
| Attachment_III-Past_Performance_Questionaire.doc | DOC document | |
| Solicitation-W81XWH-16-R-0058.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan For U.S. Army Public Health Center (Provisional) [APHC (Prov)]
1. PURPOSE
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a standard of surveillance for APHC (Prov) analytical services support of Radiological sample analysis and a systematic approach for conducting surveillance over the performance aspects of the effort. The QASP is for the use of government Quality Assurance (QA) personnel to insure contract standards are being met. For the purposes of this effort, the applicable QA representative is the Government Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR).
The QASP provides a systematic method to evaluate the services that the Contractor is required to furnish, but not the details of how the Contractor accomplishes the work. This plan uses inspection as the primary evaluation criteria. This surveillance assures the Government that the Contractor’s performance is acceptable.
Any noncompliance with contract performance is deemed “sub par”. The term “sub par” refers to a support service that does not meet the standard of performance specified in the contract. The Contractor, not the Government, is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. The methods of surveillance recognize that unforeseen and uncontrollable problems do occur. Effective management and use of a quality control plan will allow the Contractor to operate within the specified surveillance requirements. QA personnel are expected to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating the Contractor’s performance against the standards.
2. PROCEDURES
2.1 Quality Assurance Schedule
The Contractor’s performance will be evaluated with scheduled verification check with every sample shipment. If the Contractor’s performance during the base year is considered satisfactory, then the Government intends to award the option year.
2.2 Surveillance
All surveillance inspections made by the COR (APHC (Prov) QA representative) will include examination of the Data Package and EDD deliverables for each sample delivery group to determine quality standards have been met, the package was received on time and is technically complete. It will also include the accuracy of the invoice submitted for each group. Any unacceptable deliverables will be documented by the COR and communicated to the contract or for immediate resolution. Documentation will record the Contractor’s past performance. This documentation becomes the official Government record of the Contractor’s performance.
When surveillance detects unacceptable service, the COR will record the information and request the Contractor to verify via email the unacceptable service. The Contractor will be required submit corrective actions, alleviating the unacceptable performance. The results will be documented.
3. UNACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE
When performance is deemed unacceptable, the COR will inform the Contractor POC for the situation to be addressed. If actions are not initiated to rectify the poor performance, the COR will inform the Contracting Officer and the management of the Contract Laboratory for further action.
The COR will notify the Contracting Officer of sub par performance. If any services do not conform to contract requirements, the Government may require the Contractor to re perform the contract requirements at no increased cost to the Government. When sub-par performance cannot be corrected by re-performance the Government may:
· Require the Contractor to take action necessary to ensure future performance conforms to contract requirements.
· Reduce the contract price to reflect the reduced value of the services performed. Per the terms identified in the contract.
If the Contractor fails to promptly re-perform the services, or to take the necessary action to ensure that future performance conforms to contract requirements, the Government may:
· By separate contract or otherwise, perform the services and charge to the Contractor any cost incurred by the Government that is directly related to the performance of such service or:
· Issue a Cure Notice
· Issue a Show Cause Notice
· Terminate the contract for Convenience
· Terminate the contract for Default
4. SURVEILLANCE GUIDE
The QASP Surveillance Guide defines the performance objective and shows the pertinent portion of the Performance Work Statement, the Performance Threshold and the Government’s Method of Surveillance for this contract.
Contract Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)
| Required |
| COR Comments |
| Method of |
| (Met or Not Met) |
Service
| Surveillance |
| Base Year Requirements |
Contractor will analyze samples within 21 calendar days of receipt (Standard)
· Track time and date of sample receipt in the lab and time and date of receipt of final report at APHC (Prov)
Scheduled Verification Check with every sample shipment
Contractor will analyze samples within 12 calendar days of receipt (High Priority)
· Track time and date of sample receipt in the lab and time and date of receipt of final report at APHC (Prov)
Scheduled Verification Check with every sample shipment
Contractor will analyze samples within 8 calendar days of receipt (High Priority)
· Track time and date of sample receipt in the lab and time and date of receipt of final report at APHC (Prov)
Scheduled Verification Check with every sample shipment
Technically Acceptable Report and Electronic Data Deliverable (EDD)
· Monitor reports and electronic data results for each project set
Scheduled Verification Check with every sample shipment
Certifications and accreditations
| · Monitor contract lab to insure required certifications and accreditations are maintained |
| Random Check |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .