Tab 5 - FDR 91435 LSJ Posted.pdf

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

HEADQUARTERS

8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD

FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA 22060-6221

Date

Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition IAW FAR 6.3

1. Nature and/or description of the action being approved:

2. A description of the supplies or services required to meet the agency’s needs (including the estimated value):

3. An identification of the statutory authority permitting other than full and open competition:

4. A demonstration that the proposed contractor’s unique qualifications or the nature of the acquisition requires use of the authority cited:

June 3, 2020

DLA Information Operations has a need to issue a 2-month sole source contract to continue coverage for SP7000-12-D-1001-0036 without using competitive procedures. Original contract provided for leased multi-functional devices (MFDs), full service maintenance, all consumable supplies (excluding paper), key operator training, networking functionality, security accreditation along with technical and network installation support that's required for CONUS.

Original order SP7000-12-D-1001-0036 procured (606) devices with full service maintenance and all consumable supplies (excluding paper) for CONUS. Lease support is requested to allow continuation of performance until new orders are delivered. The estimated 2 month value is $ .

FAR 6.302-1 Only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements.

The MFDs on SP7000-12-D-1001-0036 are leased by DLA. Ricoh is the owner of the MFDs. No other vendor can provide service or maintenance to the devices as the Government does not own them.

5. A description of efforts made to ensure that offers are solicited from as many potential sources as is practicable, including whether a notice was or will be publicized as required by Subpart 5.2 and, if not, which exception under 5.202 applies:

6. A description of the market research conducted (see Part 10) and the results or a statement of the reason market research was not conducted:

7. Any other facts supporting the use of other than full and open competition, such as:

Explanation of why technical data packages, specifications, engineering descriptions, statements of work, or purchase descriptions suitable for full and open competition have not been developed or are not available.

When 6.302-1 is cited for follow-on acquisitions as described in 6.302-1(a)(2)(ii), an estimate of the cost to the Government that would be duplicated and how the estimate was derived.

• Include a copy of the previous justification.

• The approval authority shall determine whether the planned actions were completed. If the actions were not completed, the justification for the follow-on acquisition shall be approved by the approval authority one-level above the approval authority for the previous justification (see FAR 6.304). If the previous justification was approved by the Senior Procurement Executive (SPE), the approval remains at the SPE level. DFARS PGI

206.304 (a)(s-70)(ii)

When 6.302-2 is cited, data, estimated cost, or other rationale as to the extent and nature of the harm to the Government.

8. A listing of the sources, if any, that expressed, in writing, an interest in the acquisition (Include the results of the request for information or the sources sought notification in accordance with DFARS PGI 206.302-1 or include the waiver from the HCA or designee):

The award notice will be posted to beta.SAM as required by FAR 5.301.

No other vendor can provide maintenance on devices owned by Ricoh, therefore, Ricoh is the only vendor capable of continuing coverage on the leased devices. No market research was conducted.

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

9. A statement of the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers to competition before any subsequent acquisition for the supplies or services required:

I certify that any supporting data that is the responsibility of technical or requirements personnel and which form a basis for the justification are complete and accurate.

Technical Personnel

Approval:

The justification, as presented above, is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. Additionally, I have determined that the anticipated cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable.

Contracting Officer

Competition Advocate (Above $650K)

Head of the Procuring Activity (Above $12.5 million but not exceeding $85.5 million)

Senior Procurement Executive (Above $85.5 million and as required by DFARS PGI 20 0 ( ))

Subsequent follow on actions for the lease of MFDs are competed among the GSA PRISM Blanket Purchase Agreement holders.

JACKSON.MARIS

SA.M.1296161701

Digitally signed by

JACKSON MARISSA.M.1296161701

Date: 2020 06.08 15:08:11 -04'00'