Submission and Evaluation Instructions N68335-20-R-0164.pdf

N68335-20-R-0164

SOLICITATION NO. N68335-20-R-0164

The Naval Air Warfare Center - Aircraft Division, Lakehurst (NAWC-AD LKE) intends to procure services to establish and maintain a Preventive Maintenance Program on various Numerical Controlled/Computer Numerically Controlled (NC/CNC) machines located at the Naval Air Warfare Center (NAWC), Lakehurst, NJ, Buildings 148, 149, 124 and 331. This effort will be procured through full and open competition, on a Fixed Price basis. It is anticipated that this effort will be one base year and four option years, for a five year total period of performance. This requirement shall be fulfilled by supplying “commercial items/services” as defined in Section 2.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulations.

Evaluation Criteria:

Proposals will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 13.106-2 Evaluation of Quotations or Offers. Award of the contract resulting from this solicitation will be made to the responsible offeror whose proposal is technically acceptable, is in full compliance to all other requirements set forth in the solicitation, and offers the lowest price.

Technical - Volume I – 10 Page Limit (not counting the appendix)

Potential sources shall document that they can perform in accordance with all requirements of the Statement of Work (SOW). Offerors shall provide a detailed technical narrative that demonstrates their capability to perform each function in the SOW. Digital copies should be submitted to Mrs. Devin Hader, devin.hader@navy.mil .

Note: This volume shall not contain any reference to cost or price aspects of the offer.

Price - Volume II: - No Page Limit

(a) All price information shall be submitted/populated into the Line Items and total cost on the Excel file, which will be provided as a separate document. The vendor will be evaluated on the total price of the base years and option years combined. No price or pricing information shall be included in any other volume, including cover letters. Offerors are responsible for submitting sufficient information to enable the Government to fully evaluate their price proposal. It is important to note that the Line Items in the Excel file reflect the anticipated CLIN structure of the resultant contract.

(b) Each offeror’s price proposal shall be evaluated to determine if it is complete, consistent and reasonable with the offeror’s technical approach, reflects a clear understanding of the solicitation requirements and contains any material imbalances. In its evaluation, the Government may use commercially published data, same or similar DoD contracts, Government estimates, industry standards, Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) audit information, or other information as deemed appropriate by the Government.

(c) The total evaluated Price will be derived as follows:

mailto:devin.hader@navy.mil

Ground Rules

(a) As this is a competitive acquisition with adequate price competition anticipated, any price documentation requested shall not be certified cost or pricing data in accordance with FAR 15.406-

2. However, in the event that adequate price competition does not exist after receipt of proposals, the Government reserves the right to request additional cost or pricing data as necessary from both the Offeror and subcontractors and may conduct negotiations with the Offeror, pursuant to FAR Part 15.403-4, in order to ensure a reasonable and realistic price. Further, the Offeror may be

CLIN / Machine Base Year Option Year One Option Year Two Option Year Three Option Year Four 0401 Accushearer 837510 SN 169 0402 Behringer Saw HBP530A 0403 Cincinnati Gilbert DF Mill 0304 Control Laser F30 FT220 Etcher 0405 Control Laser F30 FT220 Etcher 0408 Dahlih DL-HC200 Mill 0409 Delta 2000 Grinder 0411 Flow Mach 3B Waterjet

0413 G&L 84VTC

0414 G&L G50X Mill 0415 G&L Hypro Mill 0416 G&L PC50 Mill 0417 Haas HS1 Mill 0418 Haas SL40T Lathe 0419 Haas TL1 Lathe SN 69614 0420 Haas TL1 Lathe SN 3074658 0421 Haas TL-2 Lathe 0422 Haas TL-3 Lathe 0423 Haas TM-2P Mill 0424 Haas VF 5/50 Mill SN 1052386 0425 Haas VF5/50 Mill SN 1065537 0426 Haas VF4 Mill 0427 Haas VF6 Mill 0428 Haas VS1 Mill 0434 Jones & Lamson 312A Lathe 0436 Lucas 542884 Mill 0437 Mazak 400-III Lathe 0438 Mazak 450-III M Lathe 0439 Nagel DM200-1-1200 CNC Drill 0440 Niagra HBR230810 Press Brake 0443 Voest Alpine 70X3000 Lathe 0444 Wells Index 520-50 CNC Knee Mill 0445 You Ji YH-36/200 Mill 0451 Chevalier CPP-1240 0452 CLC Control Laser FT220 F30 0453 Flow M4 302C with XD 0454 Greenerd 650 0455 Haas VF 10/50 0456 Kent SGS-1640AHD 0457 Leadwell MCV-1300 0458 Manford VHG-1600 0459 Trak DPMSX3P 0460 Tykma Zetalase Type ZSED30PZT 0461 Doosan DMC5700 VMC #MC0091-002386 0462 Doosan Puma 4100B Mill #ML0278-000060 0463 Hurco I VMX64TI #H-650207 0464 Hurco II VMX64TI #H-650212 0465 Johnford DMC-1500H #VEC140001 0466 Johnford DMC-4100PH #VLB180051 0467 Boeschert Punch Press Compact 750 #1694 0468 Haas VF-4 Mill #1150531 0469 Flow Waterjet (Tool Control Room) MC2 0470 Flow Waterjet M500 (New) 0471 Agie Charmilles Cut P550 Wire EDM #591.063.060.0153 0472 Haas UMC-750 VMC #1133290 0473 Haas VF-5/50 (New) 0474 Haas VF-5/40 (New)

TOTAL: -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

required to provide a Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data prior to award, pursuant to FAR 15.406-2. Offeror shall acknowledge the requirement to provide additional cost or pricing information and certify the data prior to award if/when requested by the Government.

(b) The Offeror shall provide sufficient information to support its price as well as an explanation of all ground rules and assumptions that affect the price estimates. Any apparent imbalances in the pricing, high or low proposed prices as compared to historical data, or any other anomalies should be fully explained. Topics to be addressed include, but are not limited to, investments, programmatic variables (e.g., inflation/escalation, location, make/buy decisions, prime/subcontractor relationships, and business base concerns), etc.

(c) Reasonableness and Consistency between the Technical and Price Volumes. The Offeror shall demonstrate that the unit prices and the total proposed price are reasonable, realistic, and commensurate with the work required by the solicitation. The Price Volume shall show traceability with the CLINS, proposed effort, and the prices. The Price Volume shall refer to specific sections in the Technical Volume as needed to illustrate the consistency between the Price Volume and the Technical Volume. The Offeror shall explain any inconsistency between promised performance and price, as well as any appearance of unbalanced pricing, in the proposal.

EVALUATION CRITERIA:

A fair and reasonable price determination memorandum will be reviewed and approved by the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO). The fair and reasonable price determination memorandum will establish price reasonableness and the Eligible Offeror’s determination of responsibility (FAR 9.103) and financial stability (FAR 9.104-1(a)). In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(1), competition establishes price reasonableness. Therefore, when contracting on a firm-fixed basis, comparison of the proposed prices will usually satisfy the requirements to perform a price analysis, and a cost analysis need not be performed. In addition, Certified Cost or Pricing Data is not required in accordance with FAR 15.403(c) (1)(i).

The Government may award a contract on the basis of initial offers received, without discussions.

Therefore, each initial offer should contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, if considered necessary by the Contracting Officer, discussions will be conducted with only those offerors determined necessary to ensure efficient competition.

Technical Criteria Ratings / Definitions:

For the Technical Criteria, a Rating of Acceptable or Unacceptable will be assigned. Offerors are advised that during the evaluation process, a factor with an “Unacceptable” Rating may result in the entire proposal being found unacceptable and eliminated from the competition.

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings