Attachment 2 SP470623R0005 Section L Am2.pdf

SECTION L

Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors

AFSI Solicitation SP4706-23-R-0005, Basic Contract (AFSI MATOC) ATG-R Solicitation SP4706-24-R-0003, (Task Order)

Unless otherwise specified the sections below apply to both the AFSI MATOC solicitation and the ATG-R solicitation.

GENERAL INFORMATION

The Offeror is required to submit sufficient information concerning the following areas to enable Government personnel to fully ascertain the capabilities of the Offeror to perform the requirements. The proposal must be sufficient in detail and scope to permit evaluation and provide the evaluators a clear understanding of the Offeror’s capability to meet or exceed the defined elements as required by the solicitation. All proposals must clearly and convincingly demonstrate that the Offeror has a thorough understanding of the requirements and associated risks, the Offeror is able, willing, and competent to devote the resources necessary to meet the requirements and has valid and practical solutions for all requirements and potential risk areas. The Offeror must respond to all requirements of the solicitation and not alter or rearrange the solicitation. The Offeror has the burden of proof to demonstrate compliance with all the evaluation factors and or subfactors identified in this solicitation. The Offeror is advised that the Government may incorporate into the final contract any portions of the Offeror’s proposal deemed beneficial to the Government. Alternate proposals are not acceptable.

In presenting material in the proposal, the Offeror is advised that quality of information is more important than quantity. Clarity, brevity, and logical organization is emphasized during proposal preparation. The Offeror is responsible for presenting enough information to allow the Government to evaluate the proposed work effort, support, approach, and the price proposal without opening discussions. Statements that the prospective Offeror understands, or can and/or will comply with, the specifications and paraphrasing the requirements or parts thereof without supporting information are considered inadequate by the Government and may result in a rating of unacceptable.

The Offeror must include any data that illustrates the adequacy of the various assumptions, approaches, and solutions to problems. Failure to address a specific factor or subfactor clearly may be considered a deficiency.

Unnecessarily elaborate brochures or other presentation materials beyond that sufficient to present a complete and effective proposal is neither necessary nor desired.

The Offeror is expected to comply with all requirements of the solicitation. The Government advises the Offeror that taking exception or deviating from any term or condition of the solicitation may make an offer unacceptable and the proposal un-awardable unless the solicitation expressly authorizes such an exception or deviation regarding the specific term or condition. The Government may consider any exception or deviation to any term or condition of the solicitation that is not expressly authorized by the solicitation to be a deficiency.

QUESTIONS:

It is requested that all questions be received NLT 13 March 2024.

Offerors may submit questions requesting clarification of solicitation requirements by emailing the Contracting Officer at Julie Miller (Julie.miller@dla.mil) and Trevor Webb (trevor.webb@dla.mil).

NO PHONE CALLS WILL BE ACCEPTED.

Responses to submitted AFSI MATOC solicitation questions, will be answered at least five (5) business days prior to the solicitation close date.

Responses to submitted ATG-R questions will be provided to all AFSI MATOC awardees at least five (5) business days prior to the solicitation close date.

mailto:Julie.miller@dla.mil mailto:trevor.webb@dla.mil

AFSI Solicitation SP4706-23-R-0005, Basic Contract (AFSI MATOC) ATG-R Solicitation SP4706-24-R-0003, (Task Order)

Responses to submitted questions will be provided to all the IDIQ Awardees at least five days prior to solicitation close date.

A list of questions is required to be placed on a MS Excel spreadsheet in the format below including document name, page number, paragraph or section number, context, and question or comment.

SAMPLE:

Document Name Page # Paragraph, Section # or context Question/Comment RFP (1449) 7 Paragraph 6 or last paragraph:

Contract Maximum Dollar Value Typo

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION

The submission date for all volumes shall be no later than the date and time specified in the solicitation. Please refer to the table in paragraph 2.6.4 for the proposal volume structure, page limitations, format, and copies required.

Electronic Submissions Only

The Offeror shall use electronic means (Email) of sending the proposal. Mailed copies will not be accepted.

The electronic documents must be clearly marked with the solicitation number and appropriate volume number.

If any documents submitted are considered Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI), they must be provided in a secure manner in compliance with DFARS 252.204-7012.

Late Submissions

Proposals submitted after the closing date and time specified for receipt of offers will be “late” and will not be considered for award.

The Government will process late submissions of proposals in accordance with FAR 52.212-1(f). If the electronic proposal is received late; it is not eligible for consideration in accordance with FAR 52.212-1(f), the Government will reject that proposal without evaluation.

Proposal Submission Address

AFSI MATOC / ATG-R Solicitation No: SP4706-23-R-0005 Opening/Closing Date and Time: 28FEB24 / 11APR24 1630 ET

Note: Proposals will be accepted any time before the closing date and time specified on page 1 for each of the solicitations (SF1449).

The Offeror shall submit one (1) electronic copy of the proposal as shown in paragraph 2.6.4 and must be emailed to Julie Miller at Julie.miller@dla.mil and Trevor Webb at Trevor.webb@dla.mil no later than the specified solicitation closing date.

CAUTION NOTICE – EMAIL DELAYS

mailto:Julie.miller@dla.mil mailto:Trevor.webb@dla.mil

Submission of proposals via electronic mail (email) is authorized. However, the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) has informed all DoD Activities that all email traffic from non-DoD sources is experiencing delays upon entry to the Enterprise Email Security Gateway (EEMSG). Therefore, it should be anticipated that any proposal submitted via email in response to this solicitation will experience some level of delay. All potential offerors are hereby cautioned that any proposal, modification, or revision that is received at the designated Government office AFTER the exact time specified for receipt of proposals is “late” and will not be considered. For purposes of this solicitation only, any proposal, modification, or revision that is submitted via email to the designated Government office AND received by DISA/EEMSG no later than the time specified by this solicitation will be considered to have been timely received at the designated Government office. It is highly encouraged that an email with no attachment is sent to those indicated above to alert them your proposal has been sent via email and to request confirmation of receipt.

Classified Data

All proposals must be UNCLASSIFIED.

Document Requirement

All volumes of the proposal shall be delivered to the email addresses provided prior to the closing date/time stated in this solicitation. There shall be no reference to pricing in the non-price proposal or in the cover letter or executive summary.

The Offeror shall mark each page of its proposal with the legend “Source Selection Information – See FAR

2.101 and 3.104.” This includes the cover page and EVERY page that may contain source selection information. Note that the Offeror has an independent requirement to mark anything deemed to be bid or proposal information, protected proprietary information, or other information that is to be protected from disclosure to ensure that the information is protected.

Proposal Content and Volumes

Cover Page

Each volume shall contain the following items in addition to the non-price and price proposal data required by the solicitation.

Cover Page: The cover should indicate the following:

Proposal Title Proposal Volume Volume Number Offeror Name and Address Principal Point of Contact Name and Phone Number Commercial And Government Entity (CAGE) Unique Entity Identifier (UEI)

Table of Contents: The table of contents shall provide sufficient detail as to allow the important elements to be easily located.

Note: The Cover Page and Table of Contents are not included in page counts with respect to page limitations.

Cover Letter and Executive Summary

The cover letter should be on company letterhead and must contain a statement committing the Offeror to the proposal and stating its validity for a period of at least 180 days. This letter should also include the name, title, phone number, and e-mail address for the persons authorized to negotiate with the Government in connection with the solicitation. The letter must be signed by a responsible officer or partner/principal of the Offeror who is authorized to bind the firm contractually. The letter must also contain a statement that the proposal meets the specifications of each subsection of the solicitation.

An Executive Summary of the Offeror’s entire proposal is required. This summary will not be evaluated but will be used to gain an understanding of the overall proposal contents. It should identify and highlight significant features of the proposal and include the salient points contained in the various volumes and chapters. The Executive Summary shall not include any price-related information.

The following format should be followed in developing the summary:

1. General Information (see Note 1)

2. An overview of Technical Capability

3. Solicitation Qualifications/Deviations/Request to tailor Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.212-4 (Contract Terms and Conditions – Commercial) (see Note 2)

Note 1: The General Information section of the Executive Summary should include the following information:

1. Company name and address

2. Company Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN)

3. Unique Entity Identification (UEI)

4. CAGE code

5. The name, phone number, and e-mail address for the authorized company negotiator relative to the proposal

Note 2: Solicitation exceptions and deviations are proposals that differ from the requirements contained in the Request for Proposal, Performance Work Statement (PWS), and resultant contract terms and conditions. Exceptions, deviations, qualifications (also known as ground rules and assumptions), or requests to tailor a term may cause proposals to be considered non-responsive and unacceptable. Offerors must address such exceptions, deviations, qualifications (also known as ground rules and assumptions), or requests to tailor a term in the Cover Letter and provide a detailed description of any form of exception, deviation, qualification, or request to tailor and indicate the firm’s difficulty with the applicable requirement in addition to the firm’s proposed approach. Exceptions, deviations, qualifications (also known as ground rules and assumptions), or requests to tailor a term that appear in the proposal, but are not identified in the Cover Letter, will be ignored, and will not be included in any resultant award.

Exceptions, deviations, qualifications (also known as ground rules and assumptions), or requests to tailor a term will be addressed during discussions, but note the Government reserves the right to award without discussion and bids with exception will render proposals un-awardable.

Additional Information and Solicitation Amendments (if Applicable)

If you need information to complete your proposal and it was not contained in the solicitation, attachments, or other data provided by the Government, you must request this information during the open question period of this solicitation.

If any amendments are issued to the solicitation, proposal shall include an acknowledgment of the amendments. This information should be included as an additional chapter. Refer to Volume Structure section.

AFSI Solicitation SP4706-23-R-0005, Basic Contract (AFSI MATOC) ATG-R Solicitation SP4706-24-R-0003, (Task Order)

Volume Structure

Proposals submitted shall be contained in separate volumes with any subfactors separated into individual chapters staying within the appropriate page limitations. Page limitations for each volume, if any, are also specified in the table below. Title and table of contents pages do not count towards page limit. Proposal pages beyond the specified maximum limit will NOT be reviewed as part of the evaluation. The contractor shall provide an independent response for each factor and subfactor. Information provided in one factor/subfactor response will not be considered in a differing factor/subfactor response.

Table 1: List of volumes and factors are as follows for AFSI MATOC:

Volume Chapter Page Limit For mat

Copies Required

Introduction Signed Cover Letter and Executive Summary 3 PDF 1 electronic copy

Introduction Solicitation Amendments Acknowledgment (if applicable)

No limit PDF 1 electronic copy

Vol IA Factor 1

Factor 1: Technical Approach MATOC

Subfactor 1A: Project Management Approach

Subfactor 1B: Key Personnel Qualifications

Subfactor 1C: Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Implementation and Integration Plan Approach

30 (does not include resumes)

PDF 1 electronic copy

Vol IIA Factor 2

Factor 2: Past Performance 15 (Does not include Past Performance Questionnaires)

PDF 1 electronic copy

Table 2: List of volumes and factors are as follows for ATG-R:

Volume Chapter Page Limit Format Copies Required

Introduction Signed Cover Letter and Executive Summary

3 PDF 1 electronic copy

Introduction Solicitation Amendments Acknowledgment (if applicable)

No limit PDF 1 electronic copy

Vol IB Factor 1

Factor 1: Technical Approach –

ATG-R

Subfactor 1A: Management Approach

Subfactor 1B: Installation Design Package (IDP) Approach

40 (does not include resumes)

PDF 1 electronic copy

Vol IIB Factor 2

Factor 2: Past Performance N/A N/A N/A

Vol IIIB Factor 3

Factor 3: Small Business Participation

10 PDF 1 electronic copy

AFSI Solicitation SP4706-23-R-0005, Basic Contract (AFSI MATOC) ATG-R Solicitation SP4706-24-R-0003, (Task Order)

Volume Chapter Page Limit Format Copies Required

Vol IVB Factor 4

Factor 4: Price No Limit Excel and

PDF

1 electronic copy

Notes:

(1) If any Exceptions, deviations, qualifications (also known as ground rules and assumptions), or requests to tailor a term are included in the Introduction Volume: Cover Letter & Executive Summary, an additional 3 pages are allowed in the page limit (up to 6 pages total). The Offeror is responsible for providing adequate documentation to enable a thorough evaluation of the proposal.

(2) Under ATG-R Subfactor 1A an Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) is requested and 1B an estimated material list with quantities is requested. Please provide these lists as Appendixes to Volume I – Factor 1

– Technical Approach. These Appendixes will not count against the page limit.

(3) Any spreadsheet information should be on functional EXCEL spreadsheet(s) (e.g., Total Column utilizes equation that sums appropriate lower-level items).

(4) The Offeror is responsible for providing adequate documentation to enable a thorough evaluation of the proposal.

(5) Commercial Interim Payments as defined at FAR 32.001, as adjusted per performance metrics, will be used as commercial financing for this Task Order. The Government has identified the milestones at which commercial interim payments will be made. The Milestone Plan to be completed is located in Attachment 7 of SP4706-23-R-0005 and shall be completed and included in the Introduction Volume under Solicitation Acknowledgment and Volume III, Pricing Background.

(6) Proposals must be formatted using a Times New Roman 12 pt. normal font (no reduction permitted), single-spaced, with 1-inch margins all around, and formatted for standard 8.5 x 11-inch paper. All pages should be numbered with section and page numbers. When foldout pages are used, they must not exceed 11 x 17 inches and will be counted as 1 page. Drawings may be provided separately and may be any size but should be folded to approximately 8.5 x 11-inch standard size and will count as 1 page. Graphs shall be presented in no smaller than a 10-pt. font and should contain a grid, which allows values to be read directly from the graph to the same accuracy that a 10 x 10 to the ½ inch grid provides. Graphic resolution, including such data as tables or charts, should be consistent with the purpose of the data presented.

EVALUATION FACTOR AND SUBFACTOR SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

Evaluation factors and subfactors are described in Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award, of the solicitations (AFSI MATOC and ATG-R). An Offeror’s proposal shall include all information necessary for evaluation as described in Evaluation Factors for Award. In addition, specific submission requirements items are described below.

Factor 1: Technical Approach AFSI MATOC

Subfactor 1A: Project Management Approach for MATOC

The Government will review and evaluate the Offeror’s Project Management Approach to assess the Offeror’s plans for strategy and a management organization structure for the effective and efficient management of contract tasks to successfully fulfill the requirements of the PWS. The Offeror’s approach shall address all aspects of the Project Management section found within the PWS. The Government will review and evaluate how well the Offeror’s proposed Project Management Approach, including plans for program, quality, security, risk, and personnel management ensure successful execution for the resultant contract.

The Government will review and evaluate the Offeror’s approach to determine how well it provides:

• Plan for managing the effort from a program perspective, including both information technology management and program support activities to include communication and interaction with the PMO, Governance Boards, Contracting Officer/Specialists, and functional requirements staff.

• Risk Management plan that identifies how the offeror will proactively track, identify, and mitigate risks throughout the life of the proposed effort and how risks will be communicated to appropriate AFSI program personnel.

• Plan for personal management including program specific training; continuity and succession management of proposed personnel labor mix; the organizational structure and the use of proposed team members and subcontractors in support of this effort.

3.1.2 Subfactor 1B: Key Personnel Qualifications for AFSI MATOC

The information presented in the Offeror’s proposal together with information from any other available sources will provide the primary input for evaluation of this factor. The Government reserves the right to verify personnel performance on other contracts identified by the Offeror in the proposal. The Government reserves the right to use other available information to evaluate personnel. The Government may query contract references and other end user representatives. The Government will review and evaluate the Offeror’s resumes proposed for: Project Manager and Senior Security System Engineer (SSE). The resumes of personnel proposed will be evaluated for a clear demonstration that the proposed resources meet or exceed the education and experience requirements outlined in the PWS below.

Project Manager

The Project Manager is responsible for planning and executing major portions of the project.

Prepares and maintains the project scope, schedule, and budget. Primary point of contact for the customer on assigned tasks. Oversees all work and takes corrective action as necessary to ensure success of assigned tasks. Manages staffing, budget, prioritization, and other personnel matters. May serve as technical lead for assigned tasks. Experience with Government or industry processes, procedures, standards, methodologies, or tools as relative to the assignment. A minimum of eight (8) years of experience in the project management field to include five (5) years of experience with commercial or government fuel terminal/pipeline operations or projects. Management experience also includes design, installation, logistics, and technical support of large, complex integrated electronic/electrical/mechanical systems.

Bachelor’s degree from an accredited university or college. PMP certification preferred.

Senior Security System Engineer (SSE) Level 2:

The Senior SSE is responsible for the design, development, implementation, and/or integration of a DOD CS architecture, system, or system component for use within CE (computing environment), NE (network environment), and/or enclave environments. Must meet the Department of Defense Directive (DODD) 8140.01, “Cyberspace Workforce Management” and DOD 8570-M “Information Assurance Workforce Improvement Program” IASAE (Information Assurance System Architect and Engineer) Level 2. Five (5) years of experience with complex software systems, to include: Systems Analysis, Systems Architecture, Systems/Equipment Support, Test and Evaluation, and Logistics support. Specific experience:

Five (5) years of experience in Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) development.

Senior Electrical/Electronic Engineer Level 3:

AFSI Solicitation SP4706-23-R-0005, Basic Contract (AFSI MATOC) ATG-R Solicitation SP4706-24-R-0003, (Task Order)

The Senior Electrical/Electronic Engineer will represent the company with engineering products and solutions. The person proposed shall have ten (10) years’ experience in the Electrical/Mechanical engineering field, including five (5) years of technical experience designing electronic and electrical system for hazardous areas and automation systems associated with bulk fuel delivery and storage systems. Must have significant experience with complex electrical/electronic systems to include System Analysis, Systems Architecture, Systems/Equipment Support, and Test, Evaluation, and Logistics support. Must be registered as or hold a license as a Professional Engineering (P.E.). A P.E. has the authority to sign off or stamp a design or a structure.

Note: All requirements for Key Personnel must be met as written.

Subfactor 1C: SCADA Implementation and Integration Plan Approach for AFSI MATOC

The Government will review and evaluate the Offeror’s approach to determine how well it:

• Describes methods, procedures, and personnel for system administration needed to develop the AFHE

Production Baseline

• Describes methods, procedures, and personnel for back-end development of the AFHE Production

Baseline

• Describes methods, procedures, and personnel for front-end development of the AFHE Production

Baseline

• Describes methods, procedures, and personnel for application development, testing and evaluation, troubleshooting, installation, and configuration required to complete the AFHE Production Baseline

Factor 2: Past Performance for the AFSI MATOC

The Government will use information from several Government systems and Past Performance Questionnaire as part of the Past Performance Evaluation. The Government will review and assign a Past Performance rating.

There are three aspects to the past performance evaluation: recency, relevancy (including context of data), and quality (including general trends in contractor performance and source of information). All three aspects must be considered for each of the contracts or requirements evaluated.

Recency

The first aspect is to evaluate the recency of the offeror’s past performance. Recency is generally expressed as a time period during which past performance references are considered relevant and is critical to establishing the relevancy of past performance information. The criteria to establish what prior performance is recent shall be unique to each source selection and shall be stated in the solicitation. The recency timeframe established should be based on the acquisition and the market/industry. For example, some efforts would require longer recency periods to avoid restricting competition simply due to the lack of item production.

Relevance

The second aspect is to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the source selection. The criteria to establish what prior performance is relevant shall be unique to each source selection and shall be stated in the solicitation. In establishing what is relevant for the acquisition, consideration should be given to those aspects of an offeror’s history of contract (or subcontract) performance that would provide the most context and give the greatest ability to measure whether the offeror will successfully

AFSI Solicitation SP4706-23-R-0005, Basic Contract (AFSI MATOC) ATG-R Solicitation SP4706-24-R-0003, (Task Order) satisfy the current requirement. Common aspects of relevancy include but are not limited to: similarity of product/service/support, complexity, dollar value, contract type, use of key personnel (for services), and extent of subcontracting/teaming.

Quality of Performance (Products or Services)

The third aspect is to establish that the quality of the Offeror’s past performance meets an acceptable level. The past performance evaluation is to determine how well the Offeror performed on prior contracts by such indicators as the organization’s history of successful completion of projects; history of producing high-quality reports and deliverables; commitment to customer satisfaction; and history of staying on schedule and within budget.

Evaluation of this aspect will be based on information provided in Past Performance Questionnaires and the Offeror’s proposal and may include the Government’s independent verification with Offeror’s prior customers or through past performance databases, see below. If the Government’s information conflicts with assertions made in the Offeror’s proposal, the Offeror will be asked to clarify this information.

Past Performance Questionnaire:

A Past Performance Questionnaire is provided as Attachment 3 in the solicitation. Offerors shall send copies to previous customers based on list of contracts submitted for the Past Performance Assessment in order to document past performance. The questionnaire shall be completed by the Offeror’s customers and emailed directly by those customers to both of the following Contracting personnel: Julie Miller (julie.miller@dla.mil);

Trevor Webb (trevor.webb@dla.mil).

Note: If the Offeror does not have any past performance, the Offeror shall provide an affirmative statement stating no past performance.

The Offeror shall list at least 3 and up to 5 contracts/task orders in progress or completed within the past five (5) years for work similar in size, scope, and complexity, specifically list work similar to the requirements outlined in the PWS; provided to either Government agencies or the private sector. The Offeror shall include the name, address, point of contact, current telephone number, e-mail address, dollar value, period of performance and a brief description of work. The Offeror shall discuss the similarities and differences between the proposed effort and contract being referenced. The proposal shall, at a minimum, include a narrative that describes the following for each contract cited:

• Scale of prior work performed, and complexity of work are relevant to the requirements of the PWS.

• Specify contracts for Government or private sector.

• Describe any significant problems or issues that occurred during performance of the contract and how issues were resolved.

The Offeror shall ensure that information presented for contact points is accurate and current (i.e., current phone numbers, titles, etc.). The Government may or may not attempt to track down reference data in cases where inaccurate data is presented. Any past performance information presented by the Offeror that cannot be verified will not be evaluated.

3.2.4.1 Other Past Performance Assessments

In addition to the Offeror’s response to Factor 2, the Government will consider all past performance information within its purview and available from Government or public sources.

mailto:julie.miller@dla.mil mailto:trevor.webb@dla.mil

AFSI Solicitation SP4706-23-R-0005, Basic Contract (AFSI MATOC) ATG-R Solicitation SP4706-24-R-0003, (Task Order)

Past performance information obtained from any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; the Defense Contract Management Agency; and interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee Determining Officials.

3.2.4.2 Neutral Rating

Offerors that have no record of past performance (i.e., new businesses) must submit a signed and dated statement to that effect. If an Offeror submits a certification statement and the Government has no information available regarding the Offeror’s past performance from Government or public sources, that Offeror will receive a neutral rating (i.e., the Offeror is evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably) for past performance. Furthermore, if an Offeror provides contract reference information that is not relevant and current as defined in the Instructions to Offerors and there is no information available regarding the Offeror’s past performance from Government or public sources that is sufficient for the Government to rate the Offeror, the Offeror will receive a neutral past performance rating for those contracts. If the offeror fails to provide either contract references per the Instructions to Offerors or a certification of no past performance, the proposal will be non-responsive and no longer considered for award

PROPOSAL EVALUATION FACTORS – AUTOMATIC TANK GAUGE REPLACEMENT (ATG-

R) TASK ORDER AWARD

Evaluation Factors and Subfactors are listed below:

Factor 1: Technical Approach

Subfactor 1A: Management Approach/Key Personnel Qualifications

Subfactor 1B: Installation Design Package (IDP) Approach

Factor 2: Past Performance

Factor 3: Small Business Participation

Factor 4: Price

DESCRIPTION OF EVALUATION FACTORS AND SUBFACTORS FOR ATG-R TO

The following locations will be part of the ATG-R TO: The Offeror shall use the requirements outlined in the ATG-R PWS, Multi-site ATG-R Task Order PWS and the Government provided PWS Enclosures listed below to respond to all Non-Price Factors.

Enclosure 1a - ATG-R Project Requirements Document Naval Air Station (NAS) JRB Fort Worth, TX

Enclosure 1b – ATG-R Site Survey for NAS JRB Fort Worth, TX

Enclosure 1c – Site Drawings for NAS JRB Fort Worth, TX

Enclosure 1d - PM Out brief Documents for NAS JRB Fort Worth, TX

Enclosure 2a - ATG-R Project Requirements Document Laughlin Air Force Base (AFB), TX

Enclosure 2b – ATG-R Site Survey for Laughlin AFB, TX

Enclosure 2c - Site Drawings for Laughlin AFB, TX

Enclosure 2d – PM Out brief Documents for Laughlin AFB, TX

Enclosure 3a - ATG-R Project Requirements Document Camp Shelby, MS

Enclosure 3b – ATG-R Site Survey for Camp Shelby, MS

Enclosure 3c - Site Drawings for Camp Shelby, MS

Enclosure 3d – PM Out brief Documents for Camp Shelby, MS

Enclosure 4a - ATG-R Project Requirements Document Cheyenne Air National Guard (ANG), WY

Enclosure 4b – ATG-R Site Survey for Cheyenne ANG, WY

Enclosure 4c - Site Drawings for Cheyenne ANG, WY

Enclosure 4d – PM Out brief Documents for Cheyenne ANG, WY

Enclosure 5a - ATG-R Project Requirements Document St. Paul ANG/AFRC, MN

Enclosure 5b – ATG-R Site Survey for St. Paul ANG/AFRC, MN

Enclosure 5c - Site Drawings for St. Paul ANG/AFRC, MN

Enclosure 5d – PM Out brief Documents for St. Paul ANG/AFRC, MN

Enclosure 6a - ATG-R Project Requirements Document Bradley Field, CT

Enclosure 6b – ATG-R Site Survey for Bradley Field, CT

Enclosure 6c - Site Drawings for Bradley Field, CT

Enclosure 6d – PM Out brief Documents for Bradley Field, CT

Enclosure 7a - ATG-R Project Requirements Document Davis Monthan AFB, AZ

Enclosure 7b – ATG-R Site Survey for Davis Monthan AFB, AZ

Enclosure 7c - Site Drawings for Davis Monthan AFB, AZ

Enclosure 7d – PM Out brief Documents for Davis Monthan AFB, AZ

Enclosure 8a - ATG-R Project Requirements Document Dobbins ARB, GA

Enclosure 8b – ATG-R Site Survey for Dobbins ARB, GA

Enclosure 8c - Site Drawings for Dobbins ARB, GA

Enclosure 8d – PM Out brief Documents for Dobbins ARB, GA

Enclosure 9a - ATG-R Project Requirements Document Fort McCoy, WI

Enclosure 9b – ATG-R Site Survey for Fort McCoy, WI

Enclosure 9c - Site Drawings for Fort McCoy, WI

Enclosure 9d – PM Out brief Documents for Fort McCoy, WI

Enclosure 10a - ATG-R Project Requirements Document NAS Whiting Field, FL

Enclosure 10b – ATG-R Site Survey for NAS Whiting Field, FL

Enclosure 10c - Site Drawings for NAS Whiting Field, FL

Enclosure 10d – PM Out brief Documents for NAS Whiting Field, FL

Enclosure 11a - ATG-R Project Requirements Document Truax Field, WI

Enclosure 11b – ATG-R Site Survey for Truax Field, WI

Enclosure 11c - Site Drawings for Truax Field, WI

Enclosure 11d – PM Out brief Documents for Truax Field, WI

Factor 1: Technical Approach for ATG-R TO

Subfactor 1A: Management Approach/Key Personnel Qualifications for ATG-R

The Government will review and evaluate the Offeror’s Management Approach to assess the Offeror’s plans for strategy and a management organization structure for the effective and efficient management of contract activities to successfully fulfill the requirements of the PWS. The Offeror’s approach shall address all aspects of Project Management found within the PWS. The Government will review and evaluate how well the Offeror’s proposed Project Management Approach, including plans for program, quality, security, risk, and personnel management ensure successful execution for the resultant task order.

The Government will review and evaluate the Offeror’s approach to determine how well it provides:

• Plan for personnel management including staffing plan, to include proposed personnel labor categories, hours and labor mix, the organizational structure, and the use of proposed team members and subcontractors.

• Proposed Integrated Master Schedule to determine:

o Inclusion of significant milestones, design, development, testing, deployment, and installation related activities o Provision of a comprehensive, implementable timeline that aligns with the approach in the technical proposal.

o Completion within 20 months (608 calendar days) after task order award

• Key Personnel: Project Manager o The Project Manager is responsible for planning and executing major portions of the project. Prepares and maintains the project scope, schedule, and budget. Primary point of contact for the customer on assigned tasks. Oversees all work and takes corrective action as necessary to ensure success of assigned tasks. Manages staffing, budget, prioritization, and other personnel matters. May serve as technical lead for assigned tasks. Experience with Government or industry processes, procedures, standards, methodologies, or tools as relative to the assignment. A minimum of eight (8) years of experience in the project management field to include five (5) years of experience with commercial or government fuel terminal/pipeline operations or projects. Management experience also includes design, installation, logistics, and technical support of large, complex integrated electronic/electrical/mechanical systems. Bachelor’s degree from an accredited university or college. PMP certification preferred.

Subfactor 1B: Installation Design Package (IDP) Approach for ATG-R

The Government will review and evaluate the Offeror’s IDP approach to assess the Offeror’s specific plans to replace obsolete and failing ATG systems for each specific ATG-R location identified in the PWS. The Offeror’s proposal shall address all aspects of a total installation plan in detail for the locations identified within the PWS. The Government will review and evaluate how well the Offeror’s proposed IDP demonstrates the following capabilities:

• Removing the existing tank gauges from the large Bulk Tanks and integrating to equivalent capability to ENRAF Servo gauging systems.

• Replacing the old gauging systems installed on smaller bulk tanks and at the service station(s) with a new automated gauging system which includes a Veeder Root Item #TLS-450 Plus ATG system or ATG System equivalent capability.

• Ensure the new gauging systems, tank fuel accountability and operational data will communicate with FMD software on the site’s operation Console. Contains logistic plans/procedures to ensure on-time delivery of equipment/materials to site’s operation Console.

The Government will also review Offeror’s submitted equipment and material lists, standard drawing list, references, legends, and general notes. Offeror will submit material lists in excel format with filters.

Factor 2: Past Performance for ATG-R

No information needs to be provided to the Government for past performance. The Government will refer to the IDIQ for Past Performance assessment

AFSI Solicitation SP4706-23-R-0005, Basic Contract (AFSI MATOC) ATG-R Solicitation SP4706-24-R-0003, (Task Order)

Factor 3: Small Business Participation

Small Business Evaluation: All Offerors will be evaluated on the level of Small Business commitment that they demonstrate for the proposed acquisition. Proposals will be evaluated based on their proposed approach to meet the target % in the table below which represents the overall Small Business goals for FY24.

The below are required goals. These goals are based on a percentage of subcontracted dollars, not total contract value.

Small Business Participation goals will be as follow (for CONUS based work only):

Small Business Participation Overall Goal 18%

SDB 5%

WOSB 5%

SDVOSB 5%

HubZone 3%

Table 6. Small Business Rating Method Adjectival Rating Description

Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the small business objectives.

Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the small business objectives.

Acceptable Proposal indicates an adequate approach and understanding of small business objectives.

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the small business objectives.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet small business objectives.

Factor 4: Price for ATG-R

A Price Proposal shall be submitted in accordance with instructions set forth in this solicitation. Evaluation of an Offeror’s proposal shall be based on the information presented in the proposal and information available to the Contracting Office from sources deemed appropriate. Sources typically considered include Defense Contract Audit Agency office, Defense Contract Management Agency, other contracts with the same firms for similar items or services, known commercial sources such as Global Insight Inc. (formally Data Resources, Inc.), Standard and Poor, other sources. The quality of organization and attention to detail reflected in the business proposal will be an indication of the quality of organization and level of capability during contract performance.

Price Analysis

The pricing template for “AFSI-Multi-task ATG-R TO Pricing” is Excel based and will be provided by the Government for use in the proposal. This template must be submitted in electronic form. To prevent rounding errors, all rates must be no more than two decimal places. This template is for the Offeror to use as part of their price proposal. These pricing templates will be used to conduct price analysis to determine if the proposed task order price is fair and reasonable. This data is considered “Other than Certified Cost or Price Data” IAW FAR 15.403-3.

AFSI Solicitation SP4706-23-R-0005, Basic Contract (AFSI MATOC) ATG-R Solicitation SP4706-24-R-0003, (Task Order)

Multi-site ATG-R Task Order Pricing Instructions

a. The pricing template will be used to calculate the Total Evaluated Price (TEP) for the Multi-site ATG- R Task Order as follows:

Please note, the Government will not reimburse Offerors for travel expenses incurred resulting from any site visit or any other expense incurred as a result of proposal preparation.

i. The “Direct Labor” price, line #1 of the “Task Order Cumulative Price” worksheet will auto populate based on the Offeror’s proposed burdened hourly rate and labor hours mix from the “Direct Labor” worksheet. The Offeror must enter hours and hourly rates for all rows for FY25-FY27 in the “Direct Labor” tab. The Offeror may propose zero hours against any labor category; however, the Offeror is responsible for providing all labor needed to complete the installation under the Task Order. The Period of Performance on this task order is expected to cross fiscal years. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to ensure that appropriate labor rates apply throughout the performance of the Task Order.

ii. The “Material” price, line #2 of the “Task Order Cumulative Price” worksheet will auto populate based on the Offeror’s proposed material unit cost and quantities mix from the “Material” worksheet. The Offeror must enter quantities and unit prices for all rows for FY25-FY27 in the “Material” tab. The Offeror may propose a quantity of zero when appropriate; however, the Offeror is responsible for providing all materials to complete the installation under the Task Order. The Period of Performance on this Task Order is expected to cross fiscal years.

It is the Offeror’s responsibility to ensure that appropriate material unit price applies throughout the performance of the Task Order.

iii. The “Travel” price, line #3 of the “Task Order Cumulative Price” worksheet will auto populate based on the Offeror’s proposed travel costs from the “Travel” worksheet. This line should represent the Offeror’s total travel needed to complete this Task Order. The Offeror is responsible for providing all travel necessary to complete the installation under the Task Order. The Period of Performance on this Task Order is expected to cross fiscal years.

It is the Offeror’s responsibility to ensure that appropriate travel costs are applied throughout the performance of the Task Order.

Please note, the Government will not reimburse Offerors for travel expenses incurred resulting from any site visit or any other expense incurred resulting from proposal preparation.

iv. The “Other Direct Cost – All Others” price, line #4 of the “Task Order Cumulative Price” worksheet should be manually entered. This line should represent the Offeror’s total other direct costs (excluding travel) needed to complete this Task Order.

v. The “G&A, Profit, All Other Indirect Burdens” price, line #5 of the “Task Order Cumulative Price” worksheet should be manually entered. This line should represent the Offeror’s total G&A, Profit and All Other Indirect Burdens not indicated elsewhere (if applicable) needed to complete this Task Order

b. The Offeror is responsible for ensuring the pricing formats are complete, contain all the prices/costs necessary to accomplish/meet the requirements of the Task Order, and reflect the Offeror’s proposed Firm-Fixed Price. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to ensure the calculations are correct and pulling information from the correct worksheet cells. If the Offeror does believe there is an error in any of the spreadsheets, inform the Contracting Officer. The Government does reserve the right to correct formula errors without consulting the Offeror but will not adjust any rates or quantities proposed.

AFSI Solicitation SP4706-23-R-0005, Basic Contract (AFSI MATOC) ATG-R Solicitation SP4706-24-R-0003, (Task Order)

Pricing Background

a. The pricing background shall include a statement that the Offeror understands and complies with the Service Contract Act. Additionally providing the applicable Wage Determination information to include Number, Revision, Location & State, and Date.

b. The pricing background shall include a completed Milestone Plan inclusive of price per Milestone. The Milestone Plan to be completed is located in Section B SP4702-24-R-0003.