SP330014R0004.pdf
PDF 435 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Domestic Single and Double Wall Corrugated Boxes Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- SP3300-14-R-0004
- Issued by
- Defense Logistics Agency Distribution
About this file
Solicitation Pages 1 - 36
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SP330014R0004_A0001_Questions.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment_0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1_Schedule_of_Supplies_and_Services_-_Amendment_0001.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_1_Schedule_of_Supplies_and_Services.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_2_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Technical_Exhibit_1_Historical_Contract_Data.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS
OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, & 30 1000017773
1. REQUISITION NUMBER
2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE
DATE
4. ORDER NUMBER
SP3300-14-R-0004
5. SOLICITATION NUMBER
2014 JAN 13
6. SOLICITATION ISSUE
DATE
Kimberly LeCates PNNAB56
a. NAME
Phone: 717-770-6434
b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (No Collect calls)
2014 FEB 12
8. OFFER DUE DATE/
LOCAL TIME
9. ISSUED BY CODE SP3300
DLA DISTRIBUTION
OFFICE OF PROCUREMENT - EBS
2001 MISSION DRIVE
NEW CUMBERLAND PA 17070-5000
USA
10. THIS ACQUISITION IS 100UNRESTRICTED OR SET ASIDE: % FOR:
SMALL BUSINESS
HUBZONE SMALL
BUSINESS
WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS
(WOSB) ELIGIBLE UNDER THE WOMEN-OWNED
SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM
8 (A)
SERVICE-DISABLED
VETERAN-OWNED
SMALL BUSINESS
322211NAICS:
500 employeesSIZE STANDARD:
11. DELIVERYFOR FOB DESTINA-
TION UNLESS BLOCK IS
MARKED
12. DISCOUNT TERMS
13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A
RATED ORDER UNDER
DPAS (15 CFR 700)
13b. RATING
14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION
RFQ IFB RFP
15. DELIVER TO CODE 16. ADMINISTERED BY CODE
17a. CONTRACTOR/ CODE
OFFEROR
FACILITY
CODE
TELEPHONE NO.
18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE
17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT SUCH ADDRESS IN
OFFER
18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a UNLESS BLOCK
BELOW IS CHECKED
19.
ITEM NO.
20.
SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/SERVICES
21.
QUANTITY
22.
UNIT
23.
UNIT PRICE
24.
AMOUNT
See Schedule
(Use Reverse and/or Attach Additional Sheets as Necessary)
25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA 26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Govt. Use Only)
27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1, 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3 AND 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED
27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED
28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN
COPIES TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND
DELIVER ALL ITEMS SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY
ADDITIONAL SHEETS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED
29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REF. OFFER
DATED . YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION
(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE
SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:
30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER)
30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or Print) 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or Print) 31c. DATE SIGNED
SEE SCHEDULE
7. FOR SOLICITATION
INFORMATION CALL:
SEE SCHEDULE
36PAGE 1 OF
04:00 PM
STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012)
Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.212
AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION
PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE
SEE ADDENDUM
EDWOSB
32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN
ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED:RECEIVED INSPECTED
COMPLETE PARTIAL FINAL
STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012) BACK
36. PAYMENT
PARTIAL FINAL
20.
SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/SERVICES
21.
QUANTITY
22.
UNIT
23.
UNIT PRICE
24.
AMOUNT
19.
ITEM NO.
32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT
REPRESENTATIVE
32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT
REPRESENTATIVE
32f. TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE
32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE
33. SHIP NUMBER 34. VOUCHER NUMBER 35. AMOUNT VERIFIED
CORRECT FOR
37. CHECK NUMBER
38. S/R ACCOUNT NO. 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY
42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)
41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE
42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS
41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT
32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE
42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)
CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE
See Page 4 for continuation pages.
PAGE 3 OF 36 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:
SP3300-14-R-0004
Form
SF1449 Continuation Pages
SF 1449, SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS CONTINUATION SHEET
NOTICE TO OFFERORS
This is a firm fixed price requirements solicitation for domestic single wall and double wall corrugated fiberboard shipping boxes used on a daily basis by DLA operated warehousing and distribution sites.
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: The period of performance for this contract action will be one base year and two one-year option periods beginning March 1, 2014.
Base Period March 1, 2014 through Feb 28, 2015 Option Year 1 March 1, 2015 through Feb 28, 2016 Option Year 2 March 1, 2016 through Feb 28, 2017
Limitations on Subcontracting: Any contractor under a small business set-aside for supplies shall be a small business within the applicable size standard stated in the solicitation and must provide either its own manufactured product or that of another domestic small business manufacturing or processing concern for this acquisition. In addition, the Limitations on Subcontracting (LOS) clause referenced in this solicitation requires any small business manufacturer of these products to corrugated fiberboard boxes to perform at least 50 percent of the cost of manufacturing the boxes, not including the cost of materials.
Estimated quantities: The quantities shown in the Schedule of Supplies/Services are estimated only. They represent the Government’s best known estimate for each line item. Payment will be made for ONLY the actual quantities provided to the Government at the price specified. If the Government requirements do not result in the quantities estimated; such event shall not constitute the basis for an equitable adjustment under the contract.
Delivery Orders: Delivery Orders will be issued by fax or electronic commerce methods such as e-mail. Any contracting officer or ordering officer at DLA Distribution is authorized to place orders against this contract.
The primary contract specialist for delivery orders for this contract is:
DLA Distribution J7 (AB) 2001 Mission Drive, Bldg 404 Attn: Kimberly LeCates Phone: 717-770-6434 E-mail: Kimberly.lecates@dla.mil
Upon shipment of the supplies on the written delivery order, the contractor shall contact the contract specialist who issued the written delivery order.
Packaging and Marking Requirements: All products shall be packaged best commercial practice in accordance with ASTM 3951, marked in accordance with MIL-STD-129P. All shipments must contain proper shipping documentation.
Contractor shall attach, in a water resistant envelope, to the exterior shipping container a commercial packing list. All documents must include at a minimum, contract number and document number for the item, stock number, quantity, and unit of issue. Omission of any data on the shipping documentation could cause a delay iin receipt of goods and significantly delay payment.
Unit of Issue: BD= Bundle
Delivery/Shipment: The Government requires delivery of the item(s) identified on the delivery order within 30 calendar days after receipt of a delivery order.
PAGE 4 OF 36 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:
mailto:Kimberly.lecates@dla.mil
Historical Data: Technical Exhibit 1 provides historical shipping data on orders for similar items placed under the previous contract, SP3300-10-D-0024, from October 2012 through August 2013. The data is for informational purposes only and may not be representative of future requirements.
This solicitation requires vendors to submit pricing for each CLIN and each zone defined below. Delivery Orders will be shipped to destinations in Zones 1 and 2. The destination address will be provided in the individual Delivery Orders placed against this contract. F.O.B. Destination prices shall include delivery to all destinations within Zones 1 and 2, including delivery to the continental United States (CONUS) Consolidation and Containerization Points (CCP) within the respective zones if the ultimate destination is OCONUS or overseas. Destinations within the zones include, but are not restricted to CONUS Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Distribution sites. Vendors may not propose alternate zones. The zones are defined as follows:
Zone 1: Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, D. C., West Virginia, Wisconsin.
Zone 2: Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Washington, Wyoming.
Following is a list of CONUS DLA Distribution sites in each zone by state, with the associated DoD Activity Address Code (DoDAAC). Destinations within the zones are not restricted to these sites.
Zone 1:
SITE LOCATION DoDAAC Anniston AL DDAA DLA Distribution Anniston Anniston, AL 36201-4199 SB3540
Groton CT NWT-FISC Fleet Industrial Support Center Groton, CT 06349-5500 SW3132
Groton CT NWT-FISC Fleet Industrial Support Center Groton, CT 06349-5500 SW3140
Jacksonville FL DDJF DLA Distribution Jacksonville Jacksonville, FL 32212-103 SB3520
Panama City FL NWT-NAS Naval Supply Activity Panama City Panama City Beach, FL 32407-7018 SW310E
Tampa FL DDMA-MSO DLA Distribution Mapping Activity MacDill AFB, FL 33621-5404 SW3138
Albany GA DDAG DLA Distribution Albany Albany, GA 31704-1128 SB3550
PAGE 5 OF 36 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:
Warner-Robins GA DDWG DLA Distribution Warner Robins Robins AFB, GA 31098-1887 SB3525
Crane IN NWT-FISC Fleet Industrial Support Center Crane, IN 47522-5001 SW3151
Indian Head MD NWT-NSA Navy Support Facility Indian Head Indian Head, MD 2640-5125 SW3148
Gulfport MS NWT-NCBC Dept of Navy Rec Officer Gulfport MS 39501-5001 SW310M
Cherry Point NC DDCN DLA Distribution Cherry Point Cherry Point, NC 28533-5040 SB3101
New Cumberland, PA DDC DLA Distribution New Cumberland, PA 17070-5000 SB3300
New Cumberland PA DDED DLA Distribution New Cumberland, PA 17070 SW3192 DLA Distribution New Cumberland, PA 17070 SW3181 DLA Distribution New Cumberland PA 17070 SW3233 DLA Distribution New Cumberland PA 17070 SW3230 DLA Distribution New Cumberland PA 17070 SW3247 DLA Distribution New Cumberland PA 17070 SW3248 DLA Distribution New Cumberland PA 17070 SW3245 DLA Distribution New Cumberland PA 17070 SW3246 DLA Distribution New Cumberland PA 17070 SW310A DLA Distribution New Cumberland PA 17070 SW310B
New Cumberland PA DDSP DLA Distribution Susquehanna New Cumberland, PA 17070 SB3300 DLA Distribution Susquehanna New Cumberland, PA 17070-5002 SB3102 DLA Distribution Susquehanna New Cumberland, PA 17070 SB3222
Tobyhanna PA DDTP DLA Distribution Tobyhanna Tobyhanna, PA 18466-5059 SB3103
Newport RI NWT-FISC Fleet Industrial Support Center Newport, RI 02841 SW3145
Chesapeake VA NWT-Staging Fac Staging Facility Chesapeake VA 23325 SW3197
PAGE 6 OF 36 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:
Dahlgren VA NWT-NSA Naval Support Facility Dahlgren Dahlgren, VA 22448-5106 SW3146
Norfolk VA DDNV DLA Distribution Norfolk Norfolk, VA 23512-0001 SB3106
Richmond VA DDRV DLA Distribution Richmond Richmond, VA 23297-5900 SB3108
Richmond VA DDMA DLA Distribution Mapping Activity Richmond, VA 23297-5516 SW3141
Norfolk VA DDMA - MSO DLA Distribution Mapping Activity Norfolk, VA 23511-4004 SW3134
Norfolk VA NWT - FISC-N Fleet Industrial Supply Center Norfolk, VA 23511 SW3128
Norfolk VA NWT-CARP Consumable Asset Reutilization Program Norfolk, VA 23511 SW3198
Norfolk VA NWT-NAB Naval Amphibious Base Little Creek Norfolk, VA 23521 SW3130
Norfolk VA NWT-CEP CEP - 126 D&S Piers Norfolk, VA 23511 SW3131
Portsmouth VA NWT-FISC-N Fleet Industrial Supply Center Portsmouth, VA 23709 SW3129
Williamsburg VA NWT-FISC Fleet Industrial Supply Center Williamsburg, VA 23185 SW3126
Yorktown VA NWT-Weapons Yorktown Weapons Station Yorktown, VA 23691 SW3199
Zone 2:
SITE LOCATION DoDAAC Barstow CA DDBC DLA Distribution Barstow Barstow, CA 92311-5014 SB3208
Port Hueneme NWT-NB
PAGE 7 OF 36 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:
Naval Base Ventura County Port Hueneme, CA 93043 SW3251
San Diego CA DDDC DLA Distribution San Diego San Diego, CA 92136-3581 SB3204
San Diego CA DDMA-MSO DLA Distribution Mapping Activity San Diego, CA 92135-7057 SW3136
San Joaquin CA DDJC DLA Distribution San Joaquin Tracy, CA 95304-5000 SW3240 DLA Distribution San Joaquin Tracy, CA 95304 SB3200
Oklahoma City OK DDOO DLA Distribution Oklahoma Tinker AFB, OK 73145-8000 SB3212
Corpus Christi TX DDCT DLA Distribution Corpus Christi Corpus Christi, TX 78419-5255 SB3214
Red River TX DDRT DLA Distribution Red River Texarkana, TX 75507-5000 SW3231 DLA Distribution Red River Texarkana, TX 75507-5000 SB3213
Hill UT DDHU DLA Distribution Hill Hill AFB, UT 84056-5702 SB3217
Hill UT DDHU-DEPMEDS DLA Distribution Hill Hill AFB, UT 84056-5713 SM3400
Everett WA NWT - Everett DLA Dist Puget Sound - Everett Everett, WA 98207-0001 SB3237
Puget Sound WA DDPW DLA Distribution Puget Sound Bremerton, WA 98314-5130 SB3207
Below is the list of DLA customers for this requirement. Each customers’ shipping address and “MARK FOR” (DoDAAC) for each site are shown below:
DDAA
Defense Distribution Anniston, AL BOSS Supply Officer 7 Frankford Avenue, Bldg 362 Anniston, AL 36201-4199
MARK FOR: SB3540
DDAG
Defense Distribution Albany, GA
PAGE 8 OF 36 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:
Building 1221 Bay 5 Regional Supply Officer Albany, GA 31704-1128
MARK FOR: SB3550
DDMA
DLA Distribution Mapping 8000 Jefferson Davis Highway Warehouse 66, Bay D Richmond, VA 23297-5516
MARK FOR: SW3141
DDNV
DLA Distribution Norfolk, VA Receiving Officer 1968 Gilbert Street, Bldg W135 Door 10 Norfolk, VA 23512-0001
MARK FOR: SB3106
DDTP
DLA Distribution Tobyhanna, PA BOSS Receiving Officer Myers & 2nd Street, Whse 2 Bay 1 Tobyhanna, PA 18466-5059
MARK FOR: SB3103
DDED
DLA Distribution Susquehanna, PA Consolidation and Containerization Point Bldg 2001 CCP Door 135 thru 168 New Cumberland, PA 17070-5001
MARK FOR: VARIOUS
DDSP
Defense Distribution Susquehanna, PA Base Supply Bldg 50, Bay 1 2001 Normandy Drive New Cumberland, PA 17070
MARK FOR: SB3300
DDSI
DLA Distribution Susquehanna, PA Consolidation and Containerization Point Bldg 2001 CCP Door 135 thru 168 New Cumberland, PA 17070-5001
MARK FOR: SB3114
DDJC
Defense Distribution San Joaquin, CA POC: Kathy Tynes Phone: 209-839-4032 25600 S. Chrisman Road Whse 29, Sec 5 Tracy Site Tracy, CA 95376-5000
MARK FOR: SB3200
DDPH
DLA Distribution San Joaquin, CA CCP Warehouse 30 25600 South Chrisman Road Tracey, CA 95376-5000
MARK FOR: SB3111
DDDK Korea Defense Distribution San Joaquin, CA CCP Warehouse 30 25600 S. Chrisman Road
PAGE 9 OF 36 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:
Tracy, CA 95304-5000
MARK FOR: SB3205
DDYJ
DLA Distribution San Joaquin, CA CCP Warehouse 30 25600 S. Chrisman Road Tracy, CA 95304-5000
MARK FOR: SB3112
DDRT
Defense Distribution Red River, TX BOSS Receiving Officer 101 Street & K Avenue Bldg 499 Texarkana, TX 75507-5000
MARK FOR: SB3213
DDCT
DLA Distribution Corpus Christi, TX BOSS Receiving Officer 540 First Street SE, Bldg 1846 Corpus Christi, TX 78419-5255
MARK FOR: SB3214
DDOO
DLA Distribution Oklahoma City, OK Warehouse Division Attn: Supply Area 405-739-7093 Building 1, Door 80 Tinker AFB, OK 73145-5000
MARK FOR: SB3212
DDHU
DLA Distribution Hill, UT 6149 Wardleigh Road, Bldg 1160
DEPMEDS
Hill AFB, UT 84056-5840
MARK FOR: SM3400
DDPW
DLA Distribution Puget Sound, WA BOSS Receiving Officer 467 "W" Street, Bldg 467 Door 8 Bremerton, WA 98314-5130
MARK FOR: SB3207
NWT-Crane, Indiana DLA Distribution Crane Bldg 41 SW 300 Highway 361 Crane, IN 47522-5001
MARKFOR: SW3151
NWT-Groton, CT Fleet Industrial Supply Center Naval Submarine Base New London Bldg 33 Grayback Avenue Groton, CT 06349-5500
MARK FOR: SW3132
PAGE 10 OF 36 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:
NWT-NAS Panama City, Florida Naval Supply Activity 101 Vernon Avenue Panama City Beach, FL 32407
MARK FOR: SW310E
NWT-NCBC
Dept of Navy Receiving Officer NCBC 5201 11th Street Building 437 OELF Gulfport, MS 39501-5001
MARK FOR: SW310M
NWT-Williamsburg, VA Fleet Industrial Supply Center Cheatham Annex 1 C Street Williamsburg, VA 23195
MART FOR: SW3126
NWT-Indian Head, MD Navy Support Facility Indian Head Supply Receiving Officer 4522 McMahon Road, Building 116 Indian Head, MD 20640-517.5
MARK FOR: SW3148
NWT-Portsmouth, VA Commanding Officer FISC-N Code 432.4 ISSOT, Building 384 Navy Southgate 7 Burtons Point Road Portsmouth, VA 23709
MARK FOR: SW3129
INVOICING PROCEDURES
WAWF Invoicing Procedures: Invoices shall be submitted in accordance with WAWF procedures provided in DFARS Clause 252.232-7006 Wide Area Work Flow Payment Instructions (May 2013.)
DFARS 252.232-7006 WIDE AREA WORKFLOW PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS (MAY 2013)
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause— “Department of Defense Activity Address Code (DoDAAC)” is a six position code that uniquely identifies a unit, activity, or organization.
“Document type” means the type of payment request or receiving report available for creation in Wide Area WorkFlow
(WAWF).
“Local processing office (LPO)” is the office responsible for payment certification when payment certification is done external to the entitlement system.
(b) Electronic invoicing. The WAWF system is the method to electronically process vendor payment requests and receiving reports, as authorized by DFARS 252.232-7003, Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving Reports.
(c) WAWF access. To access WAWF, the Contractor shall—
(1) Have a designated electronic business point of contact in the System for Award Management at https://www.acquisition.gov; and
(2) Be registered to use WAWF at https://wawf.eb.mil/ following the step-by-step procedures for self-registration available at this web site.
(d) WAWF training. The Contractor should follow the training instructions of the WAWF Web-Based Training Course and use the Practice Training Site before submitting payment requests through WAWF. Both can be accessed by selecting the “Web Based Training” link on the WAWF home page at https://wawf.eb.mil/
(e) WAWF methods of document submission. Document submissions may be via web entry, Electronic Data Interchange, or File Transfer Protocol.
PAGE 11 OF 36 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:
SP3300-14-R-0004
http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfars/html/current/252232.htm https://www.acquisition.gov/ https://wawf.eb.mil/ https://wawf.eb.mil/
(f) WAWF payment instructions. The Contractor must use the following information when submitting payment requests and receiving reports in WAWF for this contract/order:
(1) Document type. The Contractor shall use the following document type(s).
INVOICE
(2) Inspection/acceptance location. The Contractor shall select the following inspection/acceptance location(s) in WAWF, as specified by the contracting officer.
Not Applicable
(3) Document routing. The Contractor shall use the information in the Routing Data Table below only to fill in applicable fields in WAWF when creating payment requests and receiving reports in the system.
Routing Data Table* Field Name in WAWF Data to be entered in WAWF Pay Official DoDAAC SL4701 Issue By DoDAAC SP3300 Admin DoDAAC SP3300 Inspect By DoDAAC Ship To Code See the “MARK FOR”
(DoDAAC) shown above for each Customer. The DoDAAC used is for the Customer where the material was shipped.
Ship From Code Mark For Code Service Approver (DoDAAC) Service Acceptor (DoDAAC) Accept at Other DoDAAC LPO DoDAAC DCAA Auditor DoDAAC Other DoDAAC(s)
(4) Payment request and supporting documentation. The Contractor shall ensure a payment request includes appropriate contract line item and subline item descriptions of the work performed or supplies delivered, unit price/cost per unit, fee (if applicable), and all relevant back-up documentation, as defined in DFARS Appendix F, (e.g. timesheets) in support of each payment request.
(5) WAWF email notifications. The Contractor shall enter the e-mail address identified below in the “Send Additional Email Notifications” field of WAWF once a document is submitted in the system.
SEE WAWF POINT OF CONTACT TABLE ABOVE
(1) The Contractor may obtain clarification regarding invoicing in WAWF from the following contracting activity’s WAWF point of contact.
Mr. Ken Decker, DLA Distribution WAWF POC kenneth.decker@dla.mil
(2) For technical WAWF help, contact the WAWF helpdesk at 866-618-5988.
(End of clause)
Part 12 Clauses
PAGE 12 OF 36 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:
mailto:kenneth.decker@dla.mil
CLAUSES ADDED TO PART 12 BY ADDENDUM
FAR 52.212-1
FAR 52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS
Addenda to FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors -- Commercial Items
Reference paragraph (c) under referenced provision FAR 52.212-1; this paragraph is tailored to read as follows:
(c) Period of acceptance of offers. The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 60 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers.
The following paragraph under referenced provision 52.212-1 is hereby deleted:
(e) Multiple offers
(h) Multiple awards
Communications Between the Government and Offerors
Questions regarding this solicitation prior to proposal submission may occur for the purpose of clarifying elements of the solicitation.
Questions shall be submitted by electronic mail to the Contract Specialist, Kimberly LeCates via email at Kimberly.Lecates@dla.mil with the appropriate subject: SP3300-14-R-0004 Solicitation Question. Question(s) must be received by 4:00PM Eastern local time on Thursday, January 23, 2014. Questions received after this date and time will not receive a response. Answers to questions will be posted to the FEDBIZOPPS website via an amendment to the solicitation.
Offerors shall submit questions in an MS Word Table landscape format with the following column headings:
Question RFP Page RFP Para Reference (if question relates to the
RFP)
Name of Firm
POC Tel No.
Fax No.
No information concerning this RFP or requests for clarification will be provided in response to offeror-initiated telephone calls. All such requests must be made by electronic mail in the format noted above and submitted to the above email address.
The hour and date for receipt of offers is 4:00PM Eastern Standard Time on Wednesday, February 12, 2014. HARD COPY OFFERS MUST BE RECEIVED IN THIS OFFICE BY THIS DATE AND TIME. The Offeror shall submit one electronic copy of the entire proposal via electronic mail (e-mail) in accordance with the instructions below, however; submission of electronic proposal will not be used for purposes of determining date and hour for receipt of offerer’s original proposal submitted in hard copy format.
Proposals sent via US Postal Service shall be addressed to the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), Ms. Margaret K. Ross and mailed to:
DLA DISTRIBUTION
ATTN: MARGARET K. ROSS
ACQUISTION OPERATIONS
5404 J AVENUE, BLDG 404
NEW CUMBERLAND, PA 17070-5059
Proposals sent via Commercial Carrier (i.e., FedEx, UPS, DHL, etc.) shall be addressed to the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), Ms. Margaret K. Ross and mailed to:
DLA DISTRIBUTION
ATTN: MARGARET K. ROSS
ACQUISTION OPERATIONS
5404 J AVENUE, BLDG 404
NEW CUMBERLAND, PA 17070-5059
PAGE 13 OF 36 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:
mailto:Kimberly.Lecates@dla.mil
If the offeror plans to hand deliver the proposal, they shall contact the Contract Specialist via e-mail (Kimberly.LeCates@dla.mil) at least one (1) business day in advance to coordinate the proposal delivery.
Electronic version of proposal shall be submitted electronically to the contract specialist at Kimberly.lecates@DLA.mil.
Each proposal must be clearly marked with the Offeror’s Name and solicitation number and the following statement:
“FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY -- SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND FAR 3.104”
If an offeror has any questions regarding this solicitation or believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error or omission, the offeror shall immediately notify the Contract Specialist, Kimberly LeCates (Kimberly.LeCates@dla.mil) in writing in the format provided in paragraph 1(b) above. If an offeror believes that the requirements in this instruction are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the PCO, Ms. Margaret K. Ross (margaret.ross@dla.mil), in writing with supporting rationale. The offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussions.
Submission of a proposal that does not contain all of the items requested in the Instruction to Offerors may result in elimination from consideration for award.
PROPOSAL PREPARATION REQUIREMENTS
1. Organization/Number of Copies/Page Limits: The Offeror shall prepare the proposal in the English language as set forth in the Proposal Organization Table below. The titles and contents and number of copies required for each volume are defined in this table.
Proposals shall be submitted as four separate volumes as follows:
VOLUME TITLE PAPER COPIES ELECTRONIC COPY
(E-MAIL)
I Solicitation and Contract Award Documents Original 1
Section 1: Cover Letter and SF1449, Signed Standard Form 30, Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract for all amendments, if applicable
Section 2: Signed Standard Form 30, Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract for all amendments, if applicable
Section 3: Attachment 1 of Solicitation (Section B, Schedule of Supplies and Services)
Section 4: Representations and Certifications II Past Performance Proposal Original +1 1
2. Page Limitations: There are no page limitations applicable to this RFP.
3. Cross-Referencing: To the greatest extent possible, each volume shall be written on a stand-alone basis so that its contents may be evaluated with the minimum of cross-referencing to other volumes of the proposal. Information required for proposal evaluation which is not found in its designated volume will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal.
Cross-referencing within a proposal volume is permitted where its use would conserve space without impairing clarity. The past performance proposal shall not contain any reference to price.
4. Indexing: Each volume shall contain a more detailed table of contents to delineate the subparagraphs within that volume. The detailed table of contents is not part of or included in the page limitation. Tab indexing shall be used to identify sections. Any cross-reference matrix table is not part of the page limitation.
5. Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms: Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, with an explanation of each. Glossaries do not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.
6. Page Size and Format:
PAGE 14 OF 36 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:
a. The Offeror’s proposal shall be prepared on standard 8.5 x 11 inch paper and submitted in three-ring binders. Except for the reproduced sections of the solicitation document and chart labels, the text size shall be no less than 10 point font. Use at least 1-inch margins on the top and bottom and ¾ inch side margins. Pages shall be numbered sequentially by volume.
b. Legible tables, charts, graphs and figures shall be used wherever practical to depict organizations, systems and layout, implementation schedules, plans, etc. These displays shall not exceed 11 X 17 inches in size. Foldout pages shall fold entirely within the volume, and may only be used for large tables, charts graphs, diagrams and schematics.
c. EVERY PROPOSAL PAGE MUST BE MARKED WITH THE STATEMENT, “SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE
FAR 2.101 AND 3.104.”
7. Binding and Labeling: Each volume of the proposal shall be separately bound in a three-ring loose-leaf binder which shall permit the volume to lie flat when open. Staples shall not be used. A cover sheet should be bound in each book, clearly marked as to volume number, title, copy number, solicitation identification and the offer’s name. The same identifying data should be placed on the spine of each binder. Offerors are advised to apply all appropriate markings including those prescribed in FAR 3.104-4, Disclosure, Protection and Marking of Contractor Bid or Proposal Information and Source Selection Information.
8. Distribution: The originals shall be clearly identified as the “ORIGINAL”, and bear the original signature(s) of the Offeror. The “copies” shall be complete and clearly identified as “COPY” or “DUPLICATE”. Offerors are advised that the proposal is “For Official Use Only” and are considered “Source Selection Information” – See FAR 2.101 & 3.104.
9. Table of Contents: A table of contents for each volume is required.
VOLUME I – SOLICTATION AND CONTRACT AWARD DOCUMENTS
SECTION 1 – COVER LETTER AND SF1499
If the Offeror makes any qualifications to any provisions in the RFP, all such qualifications shall be listed in a cover letter to the proposal. Offerors shall fully complete, execute and return the SF1449 as part of this Volume. Special attention should be taken to ensure that an authorized person signs the offer in Block 30.
SECTION 2 – STANDARD FORM 30, AMENDMENTS TO SOLICITATION
Offerors are also reminded that one signed copy of each amendment must be included in the submitted proposal package (applicable only if any amendments are issued), otherwise the Offeror’s proposal could be considered unacceptable and may not be considered.
SECTION 3 – SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES
The Schedule of Supplies and Services, Attachment 1of the solicitation, shall contain the proposed amount for each CLIN, the total for all the CLINs for each respective year, and the total estimated contract price. The proposed price shall not be carried out past two decimal points in U.S. dollars.
SECTION 4 – REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS
By the proposal submission, the Offeror verifies their Representation and Certifications are available through the System for Award Management (SAM) database which can be found at https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/ and have been entered or updated within the last 12 months and are current, accurate, complete and applicable to this solicitation (including the business size standard applicable to the NAICS code referenced for this solicitation), as of the date of this offer.
The Offeror shall address each Representation and Certification identified at FAR 52.212-3, with its Alternate I, and DFARS 212.301(f)
VOLUME II – PAST PERFORMANCE PROPOSAL
The past performance proposal shall not contain any reference to price.
PAGE 15 OF 36 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:
The Offeror shall describe their background, knowledge and experience related to the manufacture and delivery of the types of single and double wall corrugated fiberboard boxes required by the solicitation. Of particular emphasis is performance that was executed in accordance with the same or similar scope and magnitude that is described in the Schedule of Supplies/Services. Past performance information is used in determining the level of confidence the Government has for successful performance based upon the Offeror’s actions under previously awarded, relevant contracts.
To be considered relevant, the Offeror must demonstrate an ability to perform the work described in the solicitation through its successful past execution of similar contracts in terms of scope, complexity, and magnitude of effort within the past five years. (The Government recommends submission of at least three contracts, but will evaluate any and all submitted). Offerors shall provide a detailed explanation of the relevance of the contracts or efforts to the requirements as defined in the RFP. If subcontractor experience is provided as part of the most relevant contracts, it will be given weight relative to the percentage of effort being provided by that particular subcontractor in the offer submitted. The references will be evaluated in the aggregate in order to allow offerors who may not have the entire scope, magnitude, and complexity of the requirement under one individual contract to still be considered relevant if experience with the full scope, magnitude, and complexity of the requirement can be demonstrated within the allotted number of references as described above.
If an Offeror or its subcontractor determines they have no past performance data, they shall provide the following statement in lieu of the information requested below: “(Insert Offeror or subcontractor’s name) has determined that they possess no past performance information in accordance with the RFP.”
To be compliant with this factor offerors shall provide the following information for both the Offeror and proposed subcontractors.
(1) An index of previous contract data for the Offeror. The index shall contain three or more PRIME contracts and SUBCONTRACTS that the Offeror is currently performing or has completed during the last five years. The index shall include:
- Contractor Name
- Name of the customer/agency
- Contract/Purchase Order Number
- Customer points of contact (minimum of two, provide name, telephone number, fax number, and e-mail addresses)
- Length of contract
- Period of performance (dates)
- Initial Contract Price
- Final Contract Price or price as of the last modification
- Description of product/service provided (include sufficient detail to demonstrate the scope and complexity of the product/service provided)
- Discussion of the similarities and differences of experience (include sufficient detail to demonstrate similarities/dissimilarities to the requirements of this solicitation)
- Facilities in which the product/service was performed
- Quality of Past Performance; to include a discussion of actual performance under each contract listed, including problems encountered; how they were resolved; the timeliness of deliverables required; how costs were controlled; business relationships;
management of personnel, and any other areas deemed necessary to provide insight into actual performance issues
(2) A narrative synopsis that shall describe the specific nature of the work, similarities with the proposed work and the relevant experience gained.
(3) An index of Previous Contract Data for all subcontractors containing the information listed in (1) above as it relates to PRIME and SUBCONTRACTS that the subcontractor is currently performing or has completed during the last five years.
(4) Attachment 2, Past Performance Questionnaire. Offerors and all major subcontractors shall send this questionnaire to previous customers of relevant prime and subcontracts. A major subcontractor is defined as those providing twenty percent of total dollar threshold AND/OR twenty-five percent of total man-hour effort. All questionnaires shall be sent by the proposal due date and time identified in the Instructions to Offerors. All previous contracts the offeror utilizes for Questionnaire information must be contained in the Previous Contract Data index for the offeror/major subcontractor. The offeror/major subcontractor shall complete Part I of Attachment 2 prior to submitting the questionnaire to the customer. The offeror/major subcontractor shall ask the customer to complete the questionnaire and return it directly via email to the Contract Specialist identified in Part III – RETURN INFORMATION of the questionnaire. Evaluation members may contact the named individuals to clarify, obtain additional information, or conduct a telephonic survey of present/past performance. As such, the offeror/subcontractor shall provide a list of all Questionnaires submitted that provides the following information:
Name of the customer/agency;
PAGE 16 OF 36 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:
Date submitted to customer/agency;
Contract/Purchase Order Number Customer points of contact (minimum of two, provide name, telephone number, fax number and e-mail addresses) and;
Whether the offeror/major subcontractor was a Prime or Subcontractor.
(5) Offerors and their subcontractors may describe any quality awards or certifications that indicate technical excellence in the service requested. Examples of such awards or certifications include, the Malcolm Aldridge Quality Award, other Government quality awards, and private sector awards or certifications (e.g., the automobile industries QS 9000, Semitic’s SSQA, or ANS/EIA-599). Indicate what segment of the company (division or entire company) received the award or certification and the date. If the award or certification is over three years old, present evidence the qualifications still apply.
The Government may utilize the Federal Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), responses received from the Performance Risk Assessment Questionnaire, data submitted by the Offeror, and any other information available to determine the quality and relevance of the Offeror’s past performance.
VOLUME IV – PRICE PROPOSAL
The offeror shall provide Attachment 1 Schedule of Supplies and Services, in hard copy and electronic formal as discussed above.
a. All unit prices SHALL be rounded to 2 decimal points only.
b. Offerors are to enter unit prices for each CLIN for the base and option years.
c. The Base Year by Zone Worksheet shows the total contract estimated price for the base year, each option year, and the total contract price.
FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation Commercial Items
FAR 52.212-2 EVALUATION FACTORS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS
EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS
The Government intends to award one contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation using the lowest price technically acceptable source selection procedures in accordance with FAR 15.101-2, as supplemented. Technical tradeoffs will not be made and no additional credit will be given for exceeding acceptability. Award will be made to the acceptable offeror with the lowest evaluated price, inclusive of options, which is deemed responsible in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), and which has submitted a proposal conforming to the solicitation requirements. The requirements include all stated terms, conditions, completion of representations and certifications, and all other requirements of this solicitation. The Government intends to award without discussions; therefore, the initial offer should contain the offeror’s best terms from a cost and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if determined necessary by the Contracting Officer.
Proposals shall be evaluated for acceptability or unacceptability only and shall not be rated. Award will be based on the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for the non-price factor. Any offeror who has been found to have an acceptable past performance will then have their proposal evaluated for lowest price.
The following non-price factor shall be used to determine acceptability of a proposal:
Past Performance
Past performance shall be evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv), Past Performance Evaluation). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”
To be considered acceptable and eligible for award, an Offeror must address the past performance factor set forth in accordance with the instructions of this solicitation. A major item and/or gross omission which precludes meeting solicitation objectives that cannot be corrected prior to or during discussions without major revision or complete resubmission of the proposal will cause a proposal to be found technically unacceptable.
PAGE 17 OF 36 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:
An initial proposal evaluation of "Unacceptable" in the Past Performance Factor will not automatically eliminate an offeror from the competitive range, but may be considered in making the competitive range determination if communications have been conducted pursuant to FAR 15.306(b)(1)(i). Communications shall be held with offerors whose past performance information is the determining factor keeping them from being placed within the competitive range if the communications are necessary to allow them to address adverse past performance information to which the offeror(s) had not had a prior opportunity to respond.
It is the intention of the Government to award without discussions. However, if it is determined that discussions are required, then the determination of the competitive range will include all proposals which are considered to be technically acceptable and may include those that are considered to have a reasonable chance of being selected for award, unless the competitive range is further limited in accordance with FAR 15.306(c)(2).
Those offerors whose proposals do not fall into the competitive range will be notified as required by FAR 15.503(a)(1). Offerors will be notified in writing with a concise explanation of their proposal deficiencies without jeopardizing the competitive range.
Those offerors whose proposals are determined by the Contracting Officer to be in the competitive range will be contacted by the Contract Specialist for discussions. Discussions will be conducted in accordance with FAR 15.306(d). If verbal discussions are held they will be followed by a written reiteration of the discussion. Written discussions may also be held, whereby the Government will provide a written list of discussion questions to each offeror, as appropriate. In the case of both verbal and written discussions, the offeror will provide a written response to the discussion question and revision to the proposal as required. This response and revision (if required) will be marked accordingly to distinguish it as a supplement to their original proposal. More than one round of discussions may be held. At the conclusion of final discussions, the Government will request each offeror in the competitive range to submit a Final Proposal Revision (FPR).
The FPR will be evaluated as to its revised past performance, and/or pricing approach in response to the issues identified during discussions. The Government then intends, in accordance with the evaluation factor for award set forth below, to award a contract to the offeror who has submitted the lowest priced proposal with a record of acceptable past performance.
If discussions are held, a proposal will be determined “unacceptable” for award if the non-price Factor, Past Performance Record, is evaluated as unacceptable.
Past Performance Record: The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s Past Performance Record to determine acceptability of a proposal as follows:
Past Performance shall be evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv), Past Performance Evaluation). Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”
The Government may utilize the Federal Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), data submitted by the Offeror as part of the Past Performance Proposal, and any other information available to determine the quality and relevance of the Offeror’s past performance.
Each proposal will be evaluated to the extent to which the Offeror has demonstrated an ability and willingness to perform: 1) A quality product or service (i.e. the conformance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship); 2) Timeliness of the contract with regard to completion of contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules and administrative requirements (e.g., effort that contributes to or affects the schedule variance); 3) Acceptable cost control with regard to the Offeror’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling contract cost; 4) Good business relationships with regard to the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification and resolution, Offeror’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, customer satisfaction, timely award and management of subcontracts, and whether the contractor met their small/small disadvantaged and women owned business participation goals; and 5) Management of personnel with regard to demonstration of a commitment to the management of personnel with regard to the Offeror’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing when necessary, personnel.
The Government will only consider relevant past performance data of the Offeror and its major subcontractors. A major subcontractor is defined as those providing twenty percent of total dollar threshold AND/OR twenty-five percent of total man-hour effort. Subcontractors not meeting the definition of a “major subcontractor” will not be evaluated. To be considered relevant, the Offeror must demonstrate past execution of similar contracts in terms of complexity, magnitude of effort, and scope. Additionally, the performance must have occurred during the last five years. Offerors shall be evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv), Past Performance Evaluation). Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable”. Should the Government
PAGE 18 OF 36 PAGESCONTINUATION SHEET REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED:
discover adverse past performance information to which the Offeror(s) had not had a prior opportunity to respond, the KO will conduct communications if deemed appropriate.
PRICE PROPOSAL
If a proposal has been determined acceptable for the non-price factor listed above, the Government will then evaluate the proposal for the lowest price. The proposal total price-the sum of the total amount for all CLINS-between offers will be the determining factor in the selection of a proposal for award. The Government will assess the offeror’s price to determine if it is reasonable for the requirements described in the RFP.
PRICE
The Government will perform a price analysis to determine the reasonableness of proposed price in accordance with FAR 15.404- 1(B)(2). The Government will utilize a comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation. Normally, adequate price competition establishes price reasonableness (see FAR 15.404-1 (b)). In addition the Government may utilize a comparison of previously proposed prices and previous Government and commercial contract prices with current proposed prices for the same or similar items, if both the validity of the comparison and the reasonableness of the previous price(s) can be established. The Government intends to make one award as a result of this solicitation.
(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced.
Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).
(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.
Additional Contract Requirements
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORTING SYSTEM (CPARS) REQUIREMENTS
(a) The contractor, in performing this contract, will be subject to a past performance assessment in accordance with FAR
42.15 and the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) Guide at http://www.cpars.navy.mil/cparsfiles/pdfs/navycparsmanual.pdf. All information contained in the assessment may be used by the Government, within the limitations of FAR 42.15, for future source selections in accordance with FAR 15.304 where past performance is an evaluation factor. Assessments will be conducted as prescribed by CPARS guidance.
(b)The contractor will be provided with a copy of the assessment. The contractor will have 30 calendar-days to submit comments, additional information, or rebut statements if warranted or desired. The contractor must strictly control access to the assessment while in the Contractor's possession and must ensure that the assessment is never released to persons or entities outside of the contractor's control. After receipt of Contractor's comments or expiration of the 30 day comment period, whichever occurs first, and depending on the Contractor's response the Government will:
(i) If no comments are received; close the CPAR by the Assessing Official Rep and Reviewing Official
(ii) If the Contractor concurs with the assessment; accept/update and close the CPAR and forward comments to all reviewers
(iii) If Contractor does not concur with the…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .