Questions and Answers 4-1-11.docx
DOCX document 37 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Great Lakes National Program Office Cleanup Services (GLNPOCS) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- SOL-R5-10-00008-1
- Issued by
- Environmental Protection Agency Region 5
About this file
Question and Answers previously posted on 4/1/11.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 2.pdf | ||
| FINAL SOL-R5-10-00008 rev 4-5-2011.pdf | ||
| Questions and Answers 3-31-11.docx | DOCX document | |
| Questions and Answers 3-30-11.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment 1 Cover Page.pdf | ||
| SOL-R5-10-00008 rev 3-24-2011.docx | DOCX document | |
| GLNPOCS Q A 32111.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT 5 - Client Authorization Letter.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 6 - Past Performance questionaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| SCA Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| FINAL SOL-R5-10-00008.docx | DOCX document | |
| FINAL SF-33.pdf | ||
| SOL-R5-10-00008 rev 1-19-2011.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions and Answers GLNPOCS Solicitation
SOL-R5-10-00008
Q1. a) Please clarify the number of awards EPA intends to make under this procurement.
b) Please clarify the joint total acquisition value of this procurement.
c) Assuming multiple awards are made, please clarify the maximum value of each individual award.
A1. a) Three (3)
b) $450 million
c) $150 million
Q2. a) Is the Executive Summary included in the 100-page limitation?
b) Does the Executive Summary have any specific page limitation?
A2. a) No
b) 1 page
Q3. Are Letters of Intent included within the 100-page limitation? Is the format of these letters at the discretion of the offeror?
A3. Letters of Intent are not included within the 100-page limitation. The format of these letters is at the discretion of the offeror.
Q4. a) Please identify if there are any page margin requirements for the proposal. Are there any page margin restrictions for graphics?
b) Graphics - Is 10pt font size acceptable for graphics so they are not overly large?
c) Is a smaller font size also allowed for tables in addition to charts and graphs?
d) Can a smaller font size that is legible (e.g., 10pt) be used in tables and figures?
A4. a) At least a 1 inch margin is required for all parts of the proposal.
b) Yes.
c) Yes
d) Yes
Q5. a) L10. A. Instructions, Required Format (for the Technical/Business Proposal) specifies that “The 100 page limit … does NOT include …Government required forms.” We assume that this refers to Section K (Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offeror). Is this assumption correct?
b) The solicitation indicates that Section K should be included "as part of the technical/business proposal." Are Representations, Certifications and Other Statements then included as part of the 100-pg count allotted to the technical proposal?
c) The following items are required (or suggested) to be included in the Technical/Business Proposal. These required items could easily account for at least 10 of the available 100 pages allowed in the Technical/Business Proposal. Are any of the other required items excluded from the 100 page limit?
· First Page of the Proposal (L2 (c)(2))
· Title Page (L2.(e)(1))
· Cover Letter (L10.I)
· Proposal Assumptions (L10.I(6))
· Exceptions or Deviations (L10.I(7))
· Table of Contents (L.10.Technical/Business Proposal, A. Instructions, Required Format)
· List of Figures (suggested)
· Glossary of Acronyms (suggested)
· Letters of Intent for Key Personnel (L10. Technical/Business Proposal B(2)c.)
d) Regarding Reps and Certs included in Volume 1 - Do we include the entire Section K as part of the submission, even if ORCA was completed online? Or can we insert a single signed page indicating no changes. If we are to include Section K, then are the 12 pages included as part of the 100 page count for the volume, and therefore the contractor should renumber the pages to match their position in the proposal?
e) Please clarify if the Representations and Certifications can be submitted as a tabbed Appendix in the Technical Business Proposal.
f) The solicitation states “each offeror shall include a narrative of 1-3 sediment remediation projects completed within the last 5 years. The narrative shall be no more than four pages, double-sided.” Does this mean that a maximum of four physical pages (8 pages double-sided) is allowed for the complete project narrative (including all 3 projects)? Does “four pages, double sided” mean 4 physical sheets of paper that contain double-sided text or 2 physical sheets of paper that contain double-sided text?
A5. a) Yes.
b) No.
c) The 100 page limit does not apply to the enumerated items.
d) If ORCA was completed online, the certification is all that is needed. As indicated above, the Representations and Certifications do not count against the 100 page limit.
e) Yes.
f) “Four pages double sided” means 4 physical sheets of paper that contain double-sided text. A maximum of four physical pages (8 pages double-sided) is permitted for each project for a maximum of 12 physical pages (24 pages double-sided) if the offeror so desires.
Q6. L10. Technical/Business Proposal. B(2)b (Key Personnel) specifies “…resumes not longer than 2 pages double sided in length…” Please clarify: does this mean 2 physical sheets of paper that contain double-sided text or 1 physical sheet of paper that contains double-sided text? Resume page length - Is each resume 2 pages or 4 pages total in count.
A6. “2 pages double sided in length” means two physical sheets of paper that contain double sided text (4 pages double-sided).
Q7. Page 80 permits the use of an 11"x17" foldout. Do these count as one page?
A7. A single 11” x 17” foldout counts as one physical page. If the offeror chooses to include information on both sides to make the page double-sided, then it counts as 2 pages.
Q8. L10. Technical/Business Proposal. B(4), 2nd paragraph mentions “The Past Performance Questionnaire…” Would EPA please provide the referenced questionnaire?
A8. The referenced questionnaire has been posted on fedbizopps.gov
Q9. L17(e) refers to a “…Client Authorization Letter (see Section J)…” Would EPA please provide the referenced Client Authorization Letter?
A9. The referenced letter has been posted on fedbizopps.gov
Q10. It is understood that there is only 1 rate for each labor category and that that rates applies for both the prime contractor and team subcontractors. According to RFP Section L, Cost/Pricing Proposal Instructions (1)(vi), the prime must show the buildup for their proposed rate. If a rate was developed using a team subcontractor's rate, should the team subcontractor provide the buildup (direct rate, fringe, overhead, G&A, fee) for their rate as well? If so, since this information is often considered confidential, is it acceptable for them to submit via sealed envelope?
A10. Any financial confidential business information from team subcontractors may be submitted in a sealed envelope.
Q11. What is to be submitted by team subcontractors in the cost/pricing volume? Financial Statements? Their qualifications for each labor category? Rate buildup? Indirect rate support etc. Or are these prime contractor requirements only?
A11. You should only submit information from subcontractors that affect your proposal as prime contractor. For example, if rates from a subcontractor’s buildup rate are used for labor categories, that information should be submitted to the government and may be submitted in a sealed envelope.
| Q12. | Which wage determination should be used when developing labor rates? |
| A12. | The referenced wage determination has been posted on fedbizopps.gov. |
Q13. Which RFP Categories do you consider SCA and which SCA categories correspond to those RFP categories (i.e. Is an RFP driver a light, medium or heavy truck driver? Is an Environmental Specialist an SCA Environmental Technician or non-SCA?)
A13. Information regarding the wage determination to be used for proposal purposes has been posted on fedbizopps.gov.
Q14. Pricing tables have been included in the solicitation for the base period, option period 1, and option period 2. These tables include EPA provided estimates for ODC’s at $74,229,000, $33,100,000, and $16,495,300 respectively in the “total” or “extended” column of each table. Please clarify as to whether or not these line items should be subjected to G&A and/or profit (i.e., if these amounts should be moved to the “rate” or “quantity” column) or if the bidder is to assume that the provided number already include associated burdens.
A14. You should use the numbers as stated for the proposal. These numbers are for proposal purposes, not contractual purposes.
Q15. Does EPA desire to see resumes for contractor proposed “other personnel” that are not referenced in the RFP as Key Personnel (i.e., Project Manager), in addition to the requirements noted on Page 91 section (c).
A15. No.
Q16. a) The solicitation requires that "Plans and Procedures" should be submitted in an individual binder. Is only one copy (the original) required as part of the proposal package and three additional copies should be bound separately?
b) Submission of copies. The SF33 says that the original and three (3) copies of the proposal shall be submitted. The Final Solicitation states that the original and six (6) copies of the proposal shall be submitted. Please clarify the number of copies to be submitted.
A16. a) The three additional copies should be bound separately. However, packaging for mailing purposes is within the discretion of the firm submitting the proposal.
b) The technical proposal must include the original and six (6) copies but only three (3) copies are required for Price, Plans and Procedures.
| Q17. | Will all contract holders be required to bid on all task orders? |
| A17. | The decision whether or not to submit a proposal on a particular task order is up to the contract holder. Being awarded a contract does not obligate contract holders to propose on all task orders. |
Q18. When task orders are competed among the contract holders, will cost proposals include the dredging costs, the transportation costs, and the disposal costs, or will the cost proposals exclude these items initially with the intent that they will be competitively bid by the winning contract holder after award of the task order.
A18. Task orders competed among contract holders will include dredging. They will also include estimated transportation and disposal (T&D). T&D will likely be bid after award when actual quantities are better known.
Q19. At the pre-solicitation meeting, the Government stated that Task Orders would be a blend of firm fixed price line items and items bid on a unit cost basis. Please provide clarification on which items will be bid on a unit cost basis.
A19. Please see the answer to Q18 above. Particular items will depend on the task order.
| Q20. | Will contract holders be allowed to self-perform dredging and other related construction activities or is the contract intended to be construction management and construction oversight? |
| A20. | Contract holders will be allowed to self-perform dredging and other related construction activities. |
| Q21. | Please clarify whether project task orders will encompass the entire scope of work associated with each project, or will they encompass only that portion which USEPA GLNPO is funding under the GLLA? In other words, will the task orders also include work being funded by the non-federal sponsors? |
| A21. | All funding will be received from the EPA. |
| Q22. | If task orders will include only work scope funded by USEPA GLNPO under the GLLA, how will USEPA GLNPO ensure appropriate cooperation between multiple contractors answering to different entities, with defined roles and responsibilities? |
| A22. | Generally there will be only one contractor at a site, answering to the EPA. In cases where two or more may be operating at the same site, roles and responsibilities will be clearly defined prior to the project beginning. |
| Q23. | Within Section 2a. of the Technical Proposal (Business Management Qualifications and Experience) you ask offers to demonstrate 'its ability to manage a large multidisciplinary team over large geographic area for multiple tasks' . Is the intent to evaluate our ability to manage multiple task orders over a large geography, or to evaluate our ability to manage multiple tasks on a single geographically widespread project? |
| A23. | We want to see multiple orders over a large area; for example,more than one project at the same time in different locations. |
| Q24. | There is no place on the price sheet to allow markup for ODCs. How should such markup be submitted? |
| A24. | ODC's are a given number for this procurement. We want to see your labor rates, buildup, and overhead/profit/markup rates. There will however be an adjustment to the price schedule to allow for markup rates to be shown and incorporated into the price proposal. |
| Q25 | What are the limits on markup on ODCs? The pricing page demonstrates the vast majority of this work to be subcontracted, and primes must be able to make profit on the subcontracted efforts. |
| A25. | That is up to you, they will be judged against other offerors so they would need to be competitive. |
| Q26 | Task orders are suggested to be very large in dollar magnitude, and the task orders will require bonding. The RFP does not ask for any representation from bidders on their bonding abilities. Shouldn’t that be part of the cost proposal and proposal evaluation? Without this it's very possible that GLNPO will select a winning proposal that is totally incapable of meeting bonding needs. |
| A26. | We have asked for a bonding capacity letter as part of the cost proposal, please see page 81, paragraph (1)(iii). We will evaluate this amount as part of the contractors financial responsibility. |
| Q27. | There are no equipment rates within the pricing page. Are these to be negotiated after award? Equipment rates will be part of competitive bids for each task order. |
| A27. | We will expect competitive rates, but overhead/profit rates that will be identified in your proposal will be used for the "build-up" |
| Q28. | Exhibit A of the Cost / Pricing Proposal instructions consist of many items which must be 'built into' labor rates. Most of these are easy to understand, and represent 'contract level' activities. Others (example= 'mobilization') including items which are clearly task order specific, and are impossible to build into labor without knowing what is being mobilized, to where. Can EPA please clarify if the intent is to build all future mobilization costs (people, material, equipment) into labor rates? |
| A28. | Mobilization will be an additional line item on each project as they are bid out. |
| Q29. | How many simultaneous task orders are envisioned being active within the field at an average and a maximum? |
| A29. | For each contract, it would likely not be more than 2-3 at any one given time. Each project will likely take one construction season of actual field work. |
| Q30. | The Fixed Labor Rates page within Section B has a labor category for Project Manager / Engineer. This position is not discussed in 'key personnel'. What are the minimum experience, education and credential requirements for this individual? |
| A30. | Use the general commercially accepted definition for this position and any others that are not specifically defined by EPA |
| Q31. | Can you provide the appropriate SCA Wage determination for the positions in the pricing page? |
| A31. | Attached to the revision. |
| Q32. | The Fixed Labor Rates page within Section B has a labor category for 'Construction Manager / QA Manager'. Within the technical proposal these are discussed as two separate positions, with each being a key person. Which is correct? If the two positions are combined, what are the minimum experience, education and credential requirements for this individual? |
| A32. | These positions should be separate, this will be fixed on a forthcoming amendment. |
| Q33. | The contract is being placed as competitively bid 'fixed price' task orders. Please reference Section H 3.1552.211-72 Monthly Progress Report. Items (d) and (e) appear to be time and materials breakouts of historic costs. We don’t feel these items are applicable in fixed price work, and create a significant cost tracking burden for fixed price task orders. Can these requirements be eliminated? It may be more beneficial to require monthly summaries of project cost by task instead of breakout by labor position. |
| A33 | This clause will be looked at an may be eliminated if possible. For purposes of this solicitation and the contract, the requirements for monthly reports that are described in Attachment 2 will be the controlling section. Any additional requirements will be task order dependant, and will be described in detail in each task order prior to issuance. |
| Q34. | Referencing Section I25.1552.232-73. The language references limitation on the reimbursement of ODCs and Subcontracts, and does not appear to be applicable for fixed price task orders. Is the contractor truly responsible for providing all backup on all ODCs and subcontracts in a fixed price project? |
| A34. | Generally all task orders will be fixed price. However, there is the possibility that some orders, or portions of orders, may employ time and material. For fixed price task orders, contractors will not be expected to provide this level of detail. The clause is in the contract to allow for time and material portions if it is deemed necessary. |
| Q35. | At what stage will the “design” be for specific projects and/or task orders? Will they be at 20%, 60%, or 100% complete documents? |
| A35. | Generally, 100% but may happen at 90%. |
| Q36. | Are the plans and specifications for the task orders best described as defined work projects, conceptual plans or performance based work (with design submittals for review and approval)? |
| A36. | Defined work projects. |
| Q37. | Within the Statement of work, under General Requirements, Page 94 the contract services include performance of …."develop bids and specification documents". Please help us understand what items you may want our remediation team to prepare documents and solicit bids for. |
| A37. | This refers to subcontracting work. |
Q38. Can the Cover/Transmittal Letter serve to house the information required in L.2 52.215-1 (c) 2 if placed in front of the title page.
A38. Yes
| Q39. | The SCA rates published today on the website include rates for the different regions – Midwest and Northeast. These rates vary based on position and region. Which region should we use in the development of our rates? |
| A39. | The Midwest rates. |
| Q40. | We assume that fees (G&A and profit) should be added to the ODC plug numbers provided in Section B. Is this correct? |
| A40. | The ODC number is just a plug, and is to represent what will otherwise be accounted for in the pricing breakdown for each task order request. For purposes of this solicitation, we are interested in your G&A, overhead, and profit rates. Enter the rates, along with the extended cost into the spreadsheet, using the ODC rate as is. We will also be modifying the task order procedures clause to give more clarity so you can understand how fees can be applied for actual task order RFP’s. However, for the labor costs on the solicitation, you can apply the rates as normal; these three fees are beyond what would go into your normal buildup for any items in a proposal. |
| Q41. | Section B requests pricing for the Base Period, Option Period 1, and Option Period 2. Is a cost summary for all periods also to be provided (i.e., contract total price)? |
| A41. | Yes, we will need to add a total price for all three periods to the final line of the pricing schedule. |
| Q42. | Concerning RFP Section L, Cost/Pricing Proposal instructions (2) Direct Labor (iv), a matrix is requested that summarizes effort proposed, including subcontracts, by professional and technical level specified in the solicitation. We respectfully suggest that it is not possible to provide such matrix because it would require a project specific SOW at a task order level to provide the matrix of personnel and subcontracts. Please verify if you agree and clarify accordingly. |
| A42. | For purposes of the solicitation, we want to see your subcontractors that will be providing significant labor/equipment/support. This is not a specific project effort, it is a general matrix so we can better understand how you will be accomplishing work under task orders. |
Q43. Please clarify the 1st paragraph under RFP Section L, Cost/Pricing Proposal instructions (5) Subcontracts (i) “Identify the subcontractors. State the amount of service estimated to be required and the quoted daily or hourly rate. Rates of subcontractors used to fill key personnel must be identified in your description.”
Per the previous RFP paragraph, team subcontractors are part of the labor on Section B. Also, the pricing form in Section B is structured for hourly rates, but not for “daily” rates. Also, since this is a task order contract, the number and types of subcontractors required will depend on the specific scopes of work of the different individual task orders. We are confused with some of the nomenclature used in this RFP paragraph and with what exactly is being requested. Please clarify.
A43. You are correct, the team subcontractors rates will be the same as the prime contractors. Using the overall estimates of labor hours, please provide a description of how much of the work will be accomplished by subcontractors, or if one category (for example, a field engineer or equipment operator) will be primarily filed by subcontractors.
Q44. Please clarify what is meant by the 3rd paragraph under RFP Section L, Cost/Pricing Proposal instructions (5) Subcontracts (i) - “The labor categories are job disciplines the offerors anticipate will be needed to perform the tasks listed in the PWS. Fully burdened hourly rates should be developed for all labor categories (Non-Field Labor, and Non-Level A Field Labor). The base rate is the current rate of individuals or the contractor’s labor categories anticipated on performing under this contract…..”.
We are particularly confused by the reference to “Non-Field Labor and Non-Level A Field Labor”. Please clarify.
A44. This should have been corrected, please contact us if there is still some confusion.
| Q45. | We see the QA Manager as an audit / QC function, including audit / QC of the Construction Manager activities. What is the intent of combining the two positions? |
| A45. | These positions will be separated in a forthcoming amendment. |
| Q46. | The Fixed Labor Rates page within Section B has a labor category for 'Administration'. What does this position functionally represent? What are the minimum experience, education and credential requirements for this individual? |
| A46. | Responsible for the preparation of correspondence, documents and reports using various word processing and spreadsheet software programs. Interfaces with personnel to coordinate meetings, maintain logs, records and files, provides end-user support, and performs general administrative and clerical duties. Assists in budgetary, billing, and financial management. Responsible for preparing and/or maintaining systems, programming and operations documentation, procedures and methods. High school diploma or GED required plus 5 years experience. |
| Q47. | The Fixed Labor Rates page within Section B has a labor category for 'Environmental Specialist'. What function does this position represent? What are the minimum experience, education and credential requirements for this individual? |
| A47. | Provides scientific, engineering, industrial hygiene, and other technical support for the development, execution, and evaluation of environmental programs, projects, and systems. Typical activities include but are not limited to reviewing technical documents and plans; performing technology evaluations; conducting geological and hydrogeological studies and modeling; evaluating or performing human health and ecological risk assessments; reviewing sampling and analyses procedures and results; performing pollution prevention surveys; developing strategic and program management plans and guidance documents; supporting policy development; conducting audits and technical assessments; preparing and delivering training and facilitation/partnering services; developing and maintaining information systems; and supporting acquisition processes. Typical backgrounds include but are not limited to biology, geology, engineering, and computer and information sciences. Minimum bachelors degree and 10 years experience or masters degree plus 5 years experience. |
| Q48. | The Fixed Labor Rates page within Section B has a labor category for a 'Field Engineer'. What are the minimum experience, education and credential requirements for this individual? |
| A48. | The Field Engineer shall have experience with contaminated sediment site remedial design and actions and restoration planning and implementation. Experience with Great Lakes issues and policies is also a plus. The Field Engineer should be capable of demonstrating an understanding of the requirements as described in the Statement of Work. The Field Engineer should also have experience in overseeing junior technical staff from a variety of disciplines (i.e., policy, technical, IT, scientific staff and project controls) and commensurate written and oral communication skills. In addition, the Field Engineer shall be available for a variety of field work including project site visits/reconnaissance, sampling, sample labeling and shipping, etc. The Field Engineer should have a Bachelors Degree or higher in a subject related to the scope of work in addition to a minimum of 5 years of experience and technical background in projects of similar size and scope is required. |
Q49. Please confirm that the Offeror has the option to either self-perform remediation or subcontract that work. If the Offeror is allowed to self-perform work, there are various inconsistencies in the RFP. Specifically, in Section B (Supplies or Services) the number of hours allocated to self-perform work (e.g., # of hours allocated to craft labor…total of 60,000 hours for three-year base period) is insignificant compared to dollars allocated to ODCs ($74,229,000 for three-year base period). Also, in Attachment 1, Statement of Work, Section III. Specific Requirements…under Remedial Action, the following statement is made: “Implement the design remedy, such as dredging or capping, through the procurement of a construction subcontractor(s), construction management activities, and technical and field engineering services.” These requirements seem to indicate that EPA is only interested in a traditional EPA RAC approach versus self perform…can you please clarify?
A49. The EPA will allow self-performing or subcontracting. The purpose of hours in the labor schedule is an estimate of the hours, and not a binding number based upon government estimates. The ODC’s is also an estimate of the additional cost that will potentially incurred under these contracts should the full amount of services be ordered. Section III of the statement of work is not intended to limit contractors to subcontracts only. It remains up to the prime contractor to define their capabilities and those of their subcontractors.
Q50. Please confirm that we are allowed to use 11x17 sized paper…if so, how many pages would the 11x17 represent?
A50. 11x17 paper can be used in limited quantities, and would represent one page, or two pages if double sided. Again, LIMITED quantities will be allowed, and should be mostly for charts, graphs, or other graphics. The main proposal should be on 8 ½ x 11 paper.
Q51. L10. A. Instructions, Required Format (for the Technical/Business Proposal), 5th paragraph mentions foldout pages. Does a foldout page count as 1 page?
A51. Yes
Q52. In the RFP Section L, Cost/Pricing Proposal instructions (2) Direct Labor (i) it requests support schedules for each proposed labor category indicating both proposed hours and rates. Is this a completed Section B?
A52. Yes, however keep in mind we want to also see how your direct labor rates are “built-up”. This will be used in our analysis of fair and reasonable pricing.
Q53. In the RFP Section L, Cost/Pricing Proposal Instructions (2) Direct Labor (iv) it requests a matrix summarizing the effort proposed. Is this just a table showing the anticipated allocation of the total hours from Section B between the prime and team subcontractors?
| A53. | Yes, we want to see how labor will be distributed between the prime and subcontractors. |
| Q54. | Is the Environmental Specialist an SCA position? |
A54. No, the Environmental Specialist is considered a professional position.
Q55. Section L10, B Technical / Business Proposal Content, Item (4) Past Performance, identifies a Past Performance Questionnaire as Attachment 12. The RFP only has Attachments 1-4 attached. Can you identify any other attachments between Attachment 4 and Attachment 12 that may be missing?
A55. There are no other attachments. The numbering will be corrected in a future amendment.
Q56. Can EPA please extend this proposal due date until April 21? Multiple simultaneous RFPs, and the short time between receiving answers to questions and the due date, may prohibit Offerors from fairly representing their abilities and experience.
A56. At this time, the deadline has not changed. However we are mindful of the impact our responses have on proposals, and are always evaluating any potential extension. Any extension will be announced via Fed Biz Opps.
Q57. “Offeror’s shall submit a list of all or at least 3 contracts and subcontracts completed in the last 5 years. . . “. Please provide a definition of a “completed” contract, e.g., % complete, field work complete, etc.
A57. We will accept projects if they have reached substantial completion.
Q58. In the case of joint venture, does the Gov’t require “all or at least 3 contract/subcontracts” from each JV member, or from the JV as an entity?
A58. We want to see at least one from each JV member. If you have previously worked as a JV, we would also want to see at least one completed project as a JV.
Q59. “Offerors shall submit . . . for subcontracts expected to exceed $1,000,000.00”. Please clarify if the $1M is per year (base period) or for entire contract?
A59. For the base period only. Each period will be looked at individually.
Q60. Hand Carried/Courier Delivery - SF 33 Block 7 - This section instructs that persons hand delivering the proposal contact either the Contract Specialist (Darlene McGary) or the Contract Specialist via the hall telephone on the 10th floor. Please identify who the Contract Specialist is and provide a phone number for the Contract Specialist. Also, if the 10th floor phone uses internal EPA extensions, please identify the proper number to call using this phone to reach the Contract Specialist or the Contract Officer.
A60. The offer should be addressed to Donna Flenard, however anyone in the acquisitions (contracts) section can accept if Donna Flenard, Darlene McGary, or Geoff Krieger is not available. Receipts will be provided by whoever accepts your proposal. A phone is located on the wall as you exit the elevators and instructions will be posted above the phone.
Q61. Compliance with subcontracting plan goals for SDB concerns, monetary targets for SDB participation and notifications. Small Businesses don’t often have SDB subcontracting goals. Please clarify if it is acceptable to note “Not Applicable” in answer to this request if that is the case.
A61. That is acceptable.
Q62. Volume Numbers – Is it acceptable to use the following Volume numbering:
Volume 1: Technical/Business Proposal Volume 2 – Plans & Procedures Volume 3: Cost/Pricing Proposal
A62. This is acceptable.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .