Section L - Instruction to Offerors.pdf
PDF 162 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Lightweight Airborne Recovery System (LARS) Software Upgrade Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8509-23-R-0008
About this file
This document provides evaluation criteria for a proposal to update software for the HC-130J Lightweight Airborne Recovery System. Technical proposals will be evaluated based on three subfactors: describing the process for updating and delivering software to address requirements; describing the software development plan, version plan, acceptance test plan, and user manual updates; and describing planned documentation updates to technical orders, flight manuals, training, and other materials. Proposals must receive an "acceptable" rating for each subfactor and meet a development and delivery schedule of 12 months after award to be considered awardable. The related federal contract opportunity is a pre-solicitation for the HC-130J LARS Software Upgrade from the Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center at Robins Air Force Base.
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Proposal and Eval Criteria for
HC-130J Lightweight Airborne Recovery System (LARS) Software Update
L - INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS
How proposals will be evaluated:
Factor 1: Technical.
The offeror’s proposal shall, at a minimum, address each of the sub factors, as they apply to the HC-130J LARS Software Update, and the technical proposal should demonstrate the contractor’s ability to perform the technical requirements.
Sub-Factor 1.1 – Submittal Requirements: This element is met when the detailed narrative adequately describes, within your technical approach, the process for updating and delivering software to address customer requirements.
Sub-Factor 1.2 – Submittal Requirements: This element is met when the detailed narrative adequately describes, within your technical approach, the following elements: Software Development Plan, Software Version Plan, Acceptance Test Plan, and Software User’s Manual updates.
Subfactor 1.3 – Submittal Requirements: This element is met when the detailed narrative adequately describes, within your technical approach, the planned documentation updates to TOs, flight manuals, training, etc.
To be considered awardable, there must be an “acceptable” rating in every Subfactor.
Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings:
Adjectival Rating Description Acceptable 1. Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.
2. Meets development and delivery schedule of 12 months after award.
Unacceptable 1. Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.
2. Does not meet development and delivery schedule of 12 months after award.
Factor 1: Technical.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .