Amendment_002 _FormSF30.pdf
PDF 523 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- SB1341-16-RQ-0652
About this file
SB1341-16-RQ-0652 Amendment 002
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_001 __SF30.pdf | ||
| Attachment_C_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_PPQ.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_B_-_Experience_Project_Data_Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_D_-_RFQ_Question_Inquiry_Submittal_Form.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_F_-_Schedule.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFQ_SB1341-16-RQ-0652.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment Page
PAGE 2 OF 2 SB1341-16-RQ-0652/002
Attachment D - RFQ Question/Inquiry Submittal Form
REFERENCE
QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE
Page Section Para.
1 E 43 G 2 No.
2 E 43 J 6 No.
3 E 43 J 8
4 E 44 L 3.b Please explain the requirement for a negative bias?
5 C All No.
6 B All No.
Question No.
RFP
Attachment
No.
Is the minimum maximum pressure of 50 Pa typographical error that should really be 500 Pa?
Is the negative tilt requirment of -2 degrees a typographical error that should really be -20 degrees?
Please explain the intended usage of 100 nm minimum step size? Can you specify the desired/required stage positioning precision (e.g.
positioning repeatability), which is a more typical stage specification?
Minimum step size refers to the smallest step over which the stage can be moved in X, Y, or Z; that specification is 100 nm or smaller. Positioning repeatability, or precision, of the stage refers to the ability to return to a previously-used position;
there is no specification for stage positioning precision.
The purpose for a negative bias is to operate in a "reflected" electron mode, wherein low-energy electrons are repelled, while higher-energy electrons such as backscattered electrons are detected.
We request that a list of references replace Attachment C. Our reasoning is that the nature of this solicitation is to purchase an off the shelf microscope. The subject matter of Attachment C is to provide feedback on a construction project making more than half of the questions on the document do not apply and are subject to interpretation.
We request that a configuration description for each refence replace Attachment B. Our reasoning is similar to the question about Attachment C more than half of the question fields do not apply. There is dupilcation of information in Attahcment B and C, we will provide information about the same microscope(s) for both forms.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .