Past Performance Information Questionnaire- Final.doc

DOC document 63 KB Posted

Attached to
NIST Computer and Information Security Services IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
SB1341-12-RP-0019
Issued by
Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to NIST Computer and Information Security Services IDIQ, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment 008 RFP.pdf PDF
Amendment 008 vuln-model-web-service.zip ZIP file
Amendment 008 Questions Responses.pdf PDF
Amendment 007 Questions Responses.pdf PDF
Amendment 006 RFP.pdf PDF
Amendment 006 Questions Responses.pdf PDF
Amendment 005 Questions Responses.pdf PDF
Amendment 004 Questions Responses.pdf PDF
Pre-proposal Conference Registrants.xls XLS spreadsheet
RFP SB1341-12-RP-0019.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE

(SEE FAR 3.104)

RFP #SB1341-12-RP-0019

Template for Past Performance Information Questionnaire

PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE FOR

SOLICITATION NO. SB1341-12-RP-0019

PART I: FOR COMPLETION BY OFFEROR

Instructions:

The Offeror shall complete all items set forth in this Part I for each past performance information reference and return the completed forms with the proposal.

The Offeror shall also coordinate with their identified references, supplying them with the completed Part I and a blank Part II for completion, sufficiently in advance of the due date identified in Part II. The Government may contact the Offeror’s references after proposals are received to obtain any Part II documents that are not submitted by the proposal due date and time and/or to discuss their submissions to ensure a clear understanding of their evaluation.

Name and address of company being evaluated:

Name of customer firm/agency for which the referenced work was performed:

Description of firm/agency (check one):
Commercial (for Profit) FORMCHECKBOX

Federal Government FORMCHECKBOX

Local/State Government FORMCHECKBOX

Address of customer firm/agency:

Name, title, employer, and contact information for individual providing reference:

Referenced contract/order number:

Period of performance for referenced contract/order:

Contract/order award date:

Contract/order amount (including options exercised):

Contract type:
Fixed-Price FORMCHECKBOX

Cost Plus Incentive Fee FORMCHECKBOX

Labor-Hour FORMCHECKBOX

Cost Plus Award Fee FORMCHECKBOX

Cost Plus Fixed Fee FORMCHECKBOX

Time-and-Materials FORMCHECKBOX

Was the Offeror for which this reference is being provided the Prime Contractor?
Yes FORMCHECKBOX

No FORMCHECKBOX

Description of the contract/order work:

Relevance of the contract/order work to the work described in RFP SB1341-12-RP-0019:

PART II: FOR COMPLETION BY OFFEROR’S PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION REFERENCE

Instructions:

References are asked to complete all items set forth in this Part II and should submit the completed form ELECTRONICALLY so that it is received no later than June 5, 2012 at 12:00 pm EST at:

Email: keith.bubar@nist.gov

All submissions of this Part should reference Solicitation number SB1341-12-RP-0019 in the email Subject Line.

Background Information

Name of contractor being evaluated:

Name of Respondent, Position and title:

Employer name:

Employer’s address:

Contact information:
Telephone:
Fax:
e-mail:

Referenced Contract/Order Number for which information is being provided:

Basis of qualification to evaluate Contractor’s past performance:

Names of key Contractor personnel:

Evaluation

For each performance element identified below, references should evaluate performance of the firm or individual identified in Part 1 of this form. Where the reference lacks sufficient information to provide an evaluation for a particular performance element, this should be noted. Where any deficiency or unfavorable information is identified, the reference should identify any mitigating factors that may weigh in favor of the person/firm on whose behalf the reference is provided (i.e., problems due to causes outside the contractor’s control). An individual within your organization who is knowledgeable of the Contractor’s day-to-day operations and overall performance should complete this questionnaire. However, that individual is encouraged to supplement their own knowledge of the Contractor’s performance with the judgment of others within their organization, as applicable.

Date this questionnaire was completed:

Please provide answers to the questions listed below. When responding to the questions listed, circle the letter that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation (see the “ratings” chart below for a description of each letter). For any marginal or unacceptable rating, please provide explanatory narratives in the “Remarks” section at the bottom of this questionnaire. These remarks need not be lengthy, just detailed. If more space is required, attach additional pages. Handwritten responses to this questionnaire are acceptable. However, if responses are handwritten, please print legibly.

Definitions of Potential Ratings for Questions Below:

Adjective
Description
Exceptional (E)
Possessing outstanding quality or merit, remarkably good.
Good (G)
Possessing more than satisfactory quality or merit.
Acceptable (A)
Possessing adequate quality or merit.
Marginal (M)
Possessing limited quality or merit.
Unacceptable (U)
Possessing inadequate quality or merit.
Not Applicable (N/A)
Reference has no knowledge of Contractor’s past performance in this area, reference has insufficient information to provide a rating in this area, or question does not apply to the referenced contract.

1)QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE

Contractor’s ability to meet minimum quality requirements specified in contract

E G A M U N/A

Contractor’s ability to effectively control the quality of products or services provided

E G A M U N/A

2)DAY TO DAY MANAGEMENT

Contractor’s ability to manage its financial and human resources to meet contract requirements

E G A M U N/A

Contractor’s ability to recruit qualified personnel within a reasonable period of time

E G A M U N/A

Contractor’s ability to effectively manage the contract/order from a contract administration standpoint

E G A M U N/A

Contractor’s professionalism and business acumen

E G A M U N/A

3)STAFF RETENTION

Contractor’s ability to retain quality staff to within reasonable levels of turnover

E G A M U N/A

4)TIMELINESS

Contractor’s ability to meet timeliness requirements for contract deliverables

E G A M U N/A

Contractor’s ability to mitigate schedule risk when unanticipated events occur

E G A M U N/A

5)COST CONTROL

Contractor’s ability to manage its resources within cost limitations set forth in the contract (assuming no growth in requirements)

E G A M U N/A

Contractor’s ability to adequately and accurately track and report costs as required by the contract

E G A M U N/A

6)MEETING PROJECT DEADLINES

Contractor’s ability to meet project deadlines in a multidisciplinary environment

E G A M U N/A

OVERALL RATING: E G A M U

Remarks

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .