SATPC0037237 Tab 06 RDSS..pdf
PDF 173 KB Posted
- Attached to
- New Clausing Lathe C22 Geared Head Gap Bed Head Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 80NSSC25891149Q
About this file
This is a Recommendation and Determination to Solicit from One Source (RDSS) form from the NASA Shared Services Center for a New Clausing Lathe C22 Geared Head Gap Bed Head. The document recommends sole source procurement from Worldwide Machine Tool with a delivery timeframe of 90 days after award.
The justification for sole source procurement states that Worldwide Machine Tool is a small business registered in SAM and has provided machinery to multiple NASA locations, federal and state entities, and the Department of Defense. The document indicates that using another vendor would potentially cause delays to testing and variance in performance, as the new lathe needs to fit within an existing footprint. The form is dated 12/11/2024 and includes signature spaces for a Technical User and Contracting Officer, along with various FAR authority options for the contracting officer to select from to justify the sole source procurement.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SATPC0037237 Tab 04 4 SOW.pdf | ||
| SATPC0037237 Tab 07 Capability Statement SAM.gov.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Page 1 V2.0 3-15-2017
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
NASA SHARED SERVICES CENTER
RECOMMENDATION AND DETERMINATION TO SOLICIT FROM ONE SOURCE
OR BRAND NAME
PICK ONE
Sole Source:
☒I recommend that NASA, NASA Shared Services Center negotiate with Worldwide Machine Tool only for New Clausing Lathe C22 Geared Head Gap Bed Head. The total estimated cost of this effort is and the estimated period of performance or lead-time for delivery is 90 days after award.
OR
Brand Name Justification:
☐I recommend that NASA, NASA Shared Services Center negotiate with only with vendors who can provide the subject band name from Manufacture Name for Enter Supply or Service to be procured. The total estimated cost of this effort is Enter Dollar amount and the estimated period of performance or lead-time for delivery is Date.
This recommendation is for the acquisition of supplies or services determined to be reasonably available from only one source/only one manufacture. Competition is impractical for the following reasons (please answer the questions below):
1. What are the reasons for soliciting only the suggested source/suggested brand name? Please provide the unique characteristics of the items or services along with the supporting rationale and the market research performed to substantiate your reason for the suggested source/brand name.
Worldwide Machine Tool is a small business, we are registered with SAM and have a , we are a trusted supplier as we have provided machinery to many NASA locations, Federal & State entities, Department of Defense and more.
2. What is the impact to the government if another vendor/brand was used? Include any dollar, schedule, or compatibility impacts if possible.
Replacing existing Lathe with more efficient that will fit in existing footprint. Delays to testing and protentional variance in performance.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
12/11/2024
Technical User Name Date
Title
Office
Page 2 V3.0 01/18/2023
****FOR NSSC SAT USE ONLY****
The above justification in pursuant to one of the following (only select one):
☐ - Recommendation and Determination to Solicit from One Source (RDSS): For open market purchases, pursuant to FAR 5.101(a)(1), the proposed contract action will be placed on SAM.gov under the authority of FAR 13.106 -
1(b)(1)(i).
☐ - Recommendation and Determination to Solicit from One Source (RDSS): For open market purchases, pursuant to FAR 5.101(a)(2), the proposed contraction action was not placed on SAM.gov as oral solicitation will be used to solicit quotation under the authority of FAR 13.106-1(c).
☐ - Recommendation and Determination to Solicit from One Source (RDSS): For open market purchases, pursuant to FAR 5.202(a)(2), the proposed contract action is exempt from publication on SAM.gov because the government would be seriously injured if the Agency complies with the time periods specified in FAR 5.203.
☐ - Brand Name Justification (BNJ): For open market purchases, pursuant to FAR 13.106-1(b)(1)(i), the acquisition of the referenced brand name item is hereby justified. (Under $25,000)
☐ - Brand Name Justification (BNJ): For open market purchases, pursuant to FAR 13.106-1(b)(1)(i), the acquisition of the referenced brand name item is hereby justified. Pursuant to FAR 5.201, any contract action over $25,000 shall be synopsized in the Government wide Point of Entry (GPE) and the brand name justification must be attached.
☐ SEWP/IDIQ Brand Name Justification (BNJ): For schedule/IDIQ purchases, pursuant to FAR 16.505(4)(i)(ii), the acquisition of the referenced brand name item(s) is hereby justified. (under $30,000)
☐ SEWP/IDIQ Brand Name Justification (BNJ): For schedule/IDIQ purchases, pursuant to FAR
16.505(a)(4)(i)(ii)(iii)(A), the acquisition of the referenced brand name item(s) is hereby justified. Any action over
$30,000 the brand name shall be posted on the agency website used to solicit offers for orders.
☐ - Limited Source Justification (LSJ) Sole Source: For GSA orders, pursuant to FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(B), only one source is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services are unique or highly specialized. Action will be performed against GSA Contract ___________________.
☐ - Limited Source Justification (LSJ) Brand Name: For GSA orders, pursuant to FAR 8.405-6(b), the item is peculiar to one manufacturer. A brand name item, whether available on one or more schedule contracts, is an item peculiar to one manufacturer.
☐ - Exception to Fair Opportunity (EFO): For SEWP orders or orders placed against other IDIQ contracts, under the authority of the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA) and Pursuant to FAR 16.505(b), exemption under
FAR 16.505(b)(2) used is based on the following:
☐ (A) The agency need for the supplies or services is so urgent that providing a fair opportunity would result in unacceptable delays
☐ (B) Only one awardee is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services ordered are unique or highly specialized.
☐ (C) The order must be issued on a sole-source basis in the interest of economy and efficiency because it is a logical follow-on to an order already issued under the contract, provided that all awardees were given a fair opportunity to be considered for the original order.
I hereby accept the above stated recommendation and determine that the circumstances of the contract action deem only one source reasonably available.
X
Contracting Officer
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .