S02 D.1 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan QASP.docx
DOCX document 35 KB Posted
- Attached to
- G004--Emergency Transitional Housing Temple Texas Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C25723Q0850
About this file
This document outlines a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for a contract to provide Emergency Housing for Homeless Veterans in Temple, Texas. The contractor will provide case management, supportive services including transportation and storage of medications, housing, record keeping, dietary services, and ensure staff qualifications. Performance will be evaluated on metrics including rapid residential placement, completing progress reports, discharge planning, transportation to medical appointments, provision of spiritual services, housing conditions, client records, utilization of data systems, meeting dietary standards, and addressing patient complaints. The contractor's performance will be rated as exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, or unsatisfactory. Performance below acceptable quality levels will require corrective action from the contractor. The COR and contractor must acknowledge the QASP.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C25723Q0850 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| S02 D.5 Wage Determination Bell County 2015-5237 Rev 21 Dec 22 2022.pdf | ||
| S02 D.3 Contractor Certification - Immigration and Nationality Act.docx | DOCX document | |
| S02 D.2 Contractor Rules of Behavior.docx | DOCX document | |
| S02 D.4 Organizational Conflicts of Interest.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25723Q0850_1.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
TITLE: Emergency Housing for Homeless Veterans - Temple TX
The contractor will be evaluated in accordance with the following:
1. PURPOSE
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:
· What will be monitored?
· How will monitoring take place?
· Who will conduct the monitoring?
· How will monitoring efforts and results be documented?
This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance.
This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor through contract modification. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.
2. GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.
a. Contracting Officer (CO) – The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.
Assigned CO: Carlos Jaquez Organization or Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs – VHA RPO West – NCO 17
b. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) – The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf.
Assigned COR: Paula Wood
a. Organization or Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs – CTVHCS – Central Texas VA Medical Center.
3. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES
The following employee(s) of the contractor serve as the contractor’s program manager(s) for this contract.
Primary:
Alternate:
4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The contractor is responsible for performance of ALL terms and conditions of the contract. CORs will provide contract progress reports quarterly to the CO reflecting performance on this plan and all other aspects of the resultant contract. The performance standards outlined in this QASP shall be used to determine the level of contractor performance in the elements defined. Performance standards define desired services. The Government performs surveillance to determine the level of Contractor performance to these standards.
The Performance Requirements are listed below in Section 6. The Government shall use these standards to determine contractor performance and shall compare contractor performance to the standard and assign a rating. At the end of the performance period, these ratings will be used, in part, to establish the past performance of the contractor on the contract.
5. METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE
Various methods exist to monitor performance. The COR shall use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.
0. DIRECT OBSERVATION. 100% surveillance: Staff and management’s direct observation of methods, process adherence, and quality during the performance of contractual duties.
0. PERIODIC INSPECTION. Inspections scheduled and reported quarterly per COR delegation or as needed. Clinical or operational reports and/or ten (10) randomly selected patient files will be reviewed per inspection period. All inspections and reports will be conducted in compliance with VA Privacy and Information security standards.
0. VALIDATED USER/CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS. Each customer complaint will be investigated by the Department Administrative Officer. Methods of investigation include the examination of the medical record, EDIS data, and statements provided by the patient, other staff/patients, and the contract personnel. Final determination on the validity of the complaint’s rests with the Department Section Chief.
0. RANDOM SAMPLING. Ten (10) randomly selected patient files will be reviewed per quarter. All reviews and reports will be conducted in compliance with VA Privacy and Information security standards.
0. VERIFICATION AND/OR DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR. Random inspection quarterly to assess the progress of their work for the need to utilize available option years If needed. This information will be obtained from the Department Section Chief.
D.1 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) – RFQ 36C25723Q0850
Item
Task
Indicator
Standard Acceptable Quality Level Method of Surveillance
Case Management Services
| Ability to receive and place Veterans on short-term notice |
| Contractor shall provide rapid, often times same day residential placement |
95% Observation and random inspection
| Compliance in completing progress reports as directed by COR or other HCHV staff |
| Contractor provides Progress Reports in the delineated format and in accordance with timelines established by the COR |
Review and Evaluation of all Required Reports
| Scheduled visits with each Veteran and designated open office hours |
| Contractor shall schedule open office hours and periodic visits with each Veteran to discuss progress towards discharge goals |
Observation and Veteran queries/ complaints
Discharge Planning Contractor conducts discharge planning with Veterans and in collaboration with HCHV Staff and submits plan to COR upon actual discharge of Veteran.
Periodic Review and Evaluation of Discharge Plans
Supportive Services
Transportation Veterans receive timely transportation to and from VA Medical and Dental Appointments at local VA facilities.
Observation and Veteran queries/ complaints
Secure storage of prescription and over the counter medications.
Contractor will provide Veterans with secure place to store their medications for self- administering.
100%
Observation and random inspection.
Opportunities for Veterans to participate in spiritual worship Contractor will have onsite worship services and/or provide transportation for Veterans to attend worship services offsite
80% Observation and Veteran queries/ complaints
Housing
Safe, clean, and sanitary housing for all Veteran residents Contractor provided room and board shall include a minimum per Veteran / family member of one single bed, storage space, and one dresser; indoor lounging/recreation area, and self- service laundry
Observation and Veteran queries/ complaints
Records and Reports
Client record for each Veterans resident Client records will include all information required in accordance with the SOW and be updated as necessitated by Veteran progress
Observation and random inspection of documentation
Utilization of the Homeless Operations Management and Evaluation System (HOMES) and the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS).
If applicable, Contractor will utilize and update these systems as directed by the COR/HCHV program staff
Observation and random inspection of data systems
Dietetic Services
| The dietary needs of all Veteran residents shall be met in accordance with sound nutrition consistent with USDA standards. |
| Veteran residents shall be provided three nutritious meals and two snacks per day; Food shall be prepared, served, and stored under sanitary conditions |
Observation and Veteran queries/ complaints
Qualifications/ Accreditation/ Licensing of Contractor Staff
Contractor shall provide sufficient staff in the number and position with the qualifications necessary to meet the Statement of Work and the Texas State guidelines.
Contractor shall possess a Texas State Business License; Any professional staff shall be certified or licensed by the Texas Board of Examiners; All technical and professional staff shall be Basic Life Support certified
100%
Observation and random inspection
Facility
Contractor facility conformance to all state and federal requirements as pertains to licensing, safety, and health codes.
Per the PWS, facility shall: maintain conformance to all city, county, state and federal licensing requirements and health codes; meet Fire Safety and Joint Commission standards; have a current occupancy permit; meet ADA requirements
Periodic Inspections
Veteran Resident Safety
Identification, Reporting, and Resolution of facility safety Issues All identified safety issues shall be investigated immediately and corrected in a timely manner appropriate for the incident.
Observation, random inspection, and Veteran queries/ complaints
Identification, Reporting, and Resolution of Veteran safety Incidents Any incident involving an injury or severe illness to a Veteran shall be reported immediately after occurrence to the COR. Initial notification shall be via telephone with a follow-up written report provided within 24 hours.
Observation, random inspection, and Veteran queries/ complaints
Patient Satisfaction
Patient Complaints All patient complaints regarding quality of care are reported to the COR within 24 business hours
Veteran queries/ complaints
6. CPARS RATINGS ASSIGNED TO QASP ITEMS:
Metrics and methods are designed to determine rating for a given standard and acceptable quality level. The following ratings shall be used (Reference: CPARS User Manual https://www.cpars.gov/documents/CPARS-Guidance.pdf
| EXCEPTIONAL: |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
Note: To justify an Exceptional rating, you should identify multiple significant events in each category and state how it was a benefit to the GOVERNMENT. However, a singular event could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
| VERY GOOD: |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
Note: To justify a Very Good rating, you should identify a significant event in each category and state how it was a benefit to the GOVERNMENT. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
| SATISFACTORY: |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
Note: To justify a Satisfactory rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
| MARGINAL: |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
Note: To justify Marginal performance, you should identify a significant event in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the GOVERNMENT. A Marginal rating should be supported by referencing the management tool that notified the contractor of the contractual deficiency (e.g. Management, Quality, Safety or Environmental Deficiency Report or letter).
| UNSATISFACTORY: | |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. | |
| Note: To justify an Unsatisfactory rating, you should identify multiple significant events in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the GOVERNMENT. However, a singular problem could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. An Unsatisfactory rating should be supported by referencing the management tools used to notify the contractor of the contractual deficiencies (e.g., Management, Quality, Safety or | Environmental Deficiency Reports, or letters). |
7. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE
a. The Government shall document positive and/or negative performance. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action and preparing annual past performance using CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT (CPAR).
b. If contractor performance does not meet the Acceptable Quality level, the CO shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the CO shall document the discussion and place it in the contract file. When the COR and the CO determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a Contract Report (CR), and present it to CO. The CO will in turn review and will present to the contractor's program manager for corrective action.
The contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CR in writing. The CR will specify if the contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CR will also state how long after receipt the contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the CO. The Government shall review the contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance and the acceptability of the Contractor’s corrective action plan.
Any CRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action deemed necessary by the CO. See Sample CR on the following page.
COR AND CONTRACTOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF QASP
SIGNED:
Paula Wood, Program Analyst Date
SIGNED:
Contractor Name, Title Date
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .