Attachment_4.Cisco-Brand_Name_Justification.pdf
PDF 198 KB Posted
- Attached to
- IHS WADO/EADO Cisco VOIP Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- RFQ-19-PHX-59
About this file
Cisco Brand Name JOFOC
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment_2.SOW-EADO.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_1._SOW-WADO.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_3.BOM.Price_Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
06/26/2018
BRAND NAME JUSTIFICATION AND APPROVAL
Cisco Voice/Network/Server
Purchase Request Number
Phoenix Area
1. Organization/Line Office
Indian Health Services DIRM Phoenix Area Office 40 N. Central Ave Phoenix, AZ 85004
2. Description of Action being approved
Single brand justification for infrastructure hardware within the Phoenix Area for new, firm fixed price contracts.
3. Description of Product, Supplies or Services
Indian Health Services, Phoenix Area (PHX IHS) located in Phoenix, AZ has a requirement for Cisco branded products to include, wireless LAN, wired LAN, routers, VoIP Phone system and components, and Server infrastructure.
4. An identification of the statutory authority permitting other than full and open competition. (Requesting Office completes with assistance of Contract Specialist)
This acquisition is being conducted in accordance with FAR 6.302-1 Application of brand name justifications
5. Identification of the Justification Rationale:
This Cisco brand name justification is needed because of the support model that within IHS is Cisco. The IHS has a national contract for router, network, & Wireless maintenance and configuration. The contract holder supports only Cisco branded equipment. If non Cisco branded equipment is used, current maintenance and configuration assistance could not be handled by the current contractor holder and thus would have to seek out a secondary contract to provide maintenance and configuration support. The IHS has a large Cisco infrastructure with management tools in place. To maintain interoperability between systems, the same brand equipment would be required. Also, IHS Federal staff is trained in Cisco hardware, so additional training would be required for non-Cisco hardware.
6. Best Value Determination:
Orders issued under this class limited sources justification represent the best value IHS as the agreed to prices will be based upon competitive quotes received from authorized retailers of the
06/26/2018 brand in a competitive environment. Therefore the price paid will represent the best value and result in the lowest overall cost alternative to meet the needs of IHS
7. Market Research conducted
Market Research was conducted with multiple resellers to determine the necessary equipment to fulfill the current needs. The market research evaluated different configuration options that would best suit the needs of the agency.
8. Statement of actions, if any to remove barriers to competition in the future.
Market Research will continue to be conducted to ascertain if there are changes to the marketplace that would enable future actions to be competed.
9. Any other facts supporting justification:
None.
As the technical or requirement personnel, I certify that the evidence of the supporting data that forms the basis of this justification is complete and accurate.
X Dan Wood System Admin
Technical/Requirements Personnel
X
Contracting Officer
| 2018-08-08T14:20:46-0700 | |
| Leland Stern -S |
| 2019-07-09T13:34:34-0700 | |
| Jeremy D. Steel -S |
File details come from the government source that posted it.