Report_of_Hazardous_Material_Eval.pdf

REPORT OF HAZARDOUS

MATERIAL EVALUATION

Eureka Old Fire Station Admin Site 1080 Spring Street

Eureka, Nevada

Converse Project No. 22-23151-01 June 20, 2022

Prepared For:

Bureau of Land Management Battle Mountain District

1340 Financial Boulevard Reno, Nevada 89502

Prepared By:

Converse Consultants 1 East Liberty Street, Suite 600

Reno, Nevada 89501

CONVERSE CONSULTANTS

75 Years of Dedication in Geotechnical Engineering & Consulting, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Materials

Testing & Inspection Services

1 East Liberty Street, Suite 600, Reno NV 89501

Telephone: (775) 856-3833 ♦ Facsimile: (775) 856-3513 ♦ www.converseconsultants.com

June 20, 2022

BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

1340 Financial Boulevard

Attention: Mr. Parviz Noori, Battle Mountain District Engineer

Subject: REPORT OF HAZARDOUS MATERIAL EVALUTAITON

Eureka Old Fire Station Admin Site

1080 Spring Street

Eureka, Nevada

Converse Project No. 22-23151-01

Dear Mr. Noori, Converse Consultants (Converse) has completed the hazardous materials evaluation at the above referenced facility in accordance with the Agreement and Authorization for

Services executed on March 23, 2022.

The enclosed report details our hazardous material evaluation at the above referenced property.

We appreciate the opportunity to be of service. Should you have any questions or comments regarding this report, please contact the undersigned at 775-856-3833.

Frank M. Reynolds III Philip Childers, CEM Environmental Project Manager Senior Environmental Manger Asbestos Consultant #IJM-1248 Asbestos Consultant, #IJPM 1692 EPA Lead Risk Assessor LBP-R-128380-1 Certified Environmental Manager #1952

Copies Submitted: Addressee (electronic)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 SITE AND PROJECT INFORMATION

2.0 METHODOLOGY

2.1 ASBESTOS METHODOLOGY

2.2 LEAD METHODOLOGY

3.0 RESULTS

3.1 ASBESTOS RESULTS

3.2 LEAD-BASED PAINT RESULTS

4.0 CONCLUSION

5.0 LIMITATIONS

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Asbestos Appendix B – Lead-based Paint, TCLP

REPORT OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS EVALUATION June 20, 2022

Eureka Old Fire Stations Admin Site Converse Project No 22-23151-01

Copyright 2022 Converse Consultants Page 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Converse Consultants (Converse) was retained by the BLM (Client) to provide a hazardous materials evaluation service at the Eureka Old Fire Station Admin Site located at 1080 Spring Street in Eureka, Nevada.

1.1 SITE AND PROJECT INFORMATION

The Eureka Old Fire Station Admin Site is located at 1080 Spring Street in Eureka, Nevada. As described by the Client, the Admin Site is scheduled for demolition activities.

Based on information provided, the scope of work is to demolish the five structures on the property.

1. Structure #1 – This structure used to be the Fire Station garage and used for vehicle repairs and is currently used for storage and is approximately 900 square feet in size. The structure is of wood construction with metal siding and roofing materials on concrete slab.

2. Structure #2 – This structure was used for the mechanical shop for the Fire Station staff and is approximately 440 square feet in size. The structure is of rock and concrete construction for the walls and wood with metal roofing on concrete slab.

3. Structure #3 – This structure used to be the cellar for Fire Station staff and is approximately 140 square feet in size. The structure is of concrete construction with dirt floor.

4. Structure #4 – This structure used to be the Headquarters for the Fire Station staff. The structure is of rock and concrete construction with wood shake roofing material. The interior finishes consist of wood walls and ceilings. The floor finishes consist of vinyl sheet flooring on wood.

5. Structure #5 – This structure is a Warehouse/Quonset Hut style building that was used for the Fire Station staff and is approximately 900 square feet in size. The interior walls and ceilings are taped drywall in the majority of the building and wood finishes in the north portion. The floor finishes consisted of carpet on concrete.

The exterior and roofing materials are metal panels.

2.0 METHODOLOGY

2.1 Asbestos Methodology

A visual survey was performed to classify each suspect asbestos-containing material (ACM) associated with all five structures which may be disturbed during demolition activities. The materials were further classified by location and condition to establish homogeneous areas for bulk sample collection. Homogeneous areas refer to areas in which similar application, age, and appearance of building materials exist. Suspect materials identified during the survey consisted of the following materials:

Copyright 2022 Converse Consultants Page 2

Structure #1 No Materials Identified

Structure #2

• White Window Putty

Structure #3 No Materials Identified

Structure #4

• Roofing Material

• White Window Putty

• Black Mastic on Concrete

• Gray Flower Pattern Sheet Flooring

• Tan with Blue Sheet Flooring

• Brown 9” Square Pattern Sheet Flooring

• Floor Vapor Barrier

Structure #5

• White Window Putty

• Joint Taping Compound

• Drywall

Following the visual portion of the survey, a total of twenty-seven (27) bulk samples were collected from areas representing the homogeneous use of suspect ACMs. A summary of these samples regarding each material location and condition is found in the chain of custody documentation in Appendix A.

In general, suspect ACM bulk samples were obtained by (1) adequately wetting the sample area with amended water and (2) placing bulk pieces of the building materials into labeled plastic bags. Bulk samples were transferred to an analytical laboratory with continuous chain-of-custody documentation. Sample locations are depicted on Figure 1 in Appendix A.

Our sampling methodology followed the general guidelines for bulk asbestos sampling as presented in Section 40, Part 763 (AHERA) of the Code of Federal Regulations.

2.2 Lead Methodology

Prior to sampling, Converse visually surveyed the interior and exterior of all five structures for painted components and suspect lead-containing materials. The interior paints were found to be in fair to good condition. The exterior surfaces were found to be in fair to poor condition. Following the visual inspection Converse analyzed the interior and exterior

Copyright 2022 Converse Consultants Page 3 surfaces using an x-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzer documenting the description, location and condition of the surfaces.

The U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) and the EPA currently define lead-based paint (LBP) as a paint or other surface coating which contains lead equal to or greater than 1 milligram per square centimeter (1.0 mg/cm2) using a x-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzer, or 0.5% (or 5000 parts per million) for bulk samples analyzed using laboratory methods outlined in 40 CFR 745.103. XRF testing was performed on painted surfaces with a total of one-hundred thirty-two (132) readings collected. XRF sample results tested during our investigation identified five paint film coatings to be LBP. The paint film coatings were positive for lead above a level of 1.0 mg/cm2 on the painted surfaces.

In addition to the above requirements the presence of lead in demolition debris has the potential to impose disposal limitations. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), subtitles C and D, require that the waste be analyzed to determine the amount of leachable lead present. This is determined by EPA Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) test for lead. The results of this test determine whether the lead containing construction debris must be handled and/or disposed of as a hazardous waste.

3.0 RESULTS

3.1 Asbestos RESULTS

Current State and Federal standards define an asbestos-containing material as “any material containing asbestos in excess of one percent by weight.” It is noted that Federal OSHA regulates worker exposure to airborne asbestos fibers with Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs) and requires specific work practices and procedures, per 29 CFR 1926.1101, when disturbing materials containing asbestos; Nevada OSHES and EPA Region 9 regulations do not allow any airborne asbestos fiber generation

The suspect ACMs identified and sampled during the course of our investigation consisted of:

• Roofing Material

• White Window Putty (three types)

• Black Mastic on Concrete

• Gray Flower Pattern Sheet Flooring

• Tan with Blue Sheet Flooring

• Brown 9” Square Pattern Sheet Flooring

• Floor Vapor Barrier

• Joint Taping Compound

• Drywall

Copyright 2022 Converse Consultants Page 4

Following the visual portion of the survey, a total of twenty-seven (27) bulk samples were collected from areas representing the homogenous use of suspected building materials.

Bulk analysis of the samples collected was completed utilizing Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) and did not identify any asbestos in the materials analyzed. Information regarding the materials sampled is identified in the attached laboratory report. The bulk samples were analyzed by Eurofins EMLab P&K Laboratory in Phoenix, Arizona (NVLAP Lab No.

50001).

Laboratory results and Chain of Custody documents are included in Appendix A.

3.2 LEAD-Based Paint RESULTS

The EPA regulatory guidelines 40 CFR Part 745 on inspection, abatement procedures, and training for renovation and demolition projects when LBP is present and OSHA regulations governing lead exposure in the construction industry (29 CFR 1926.62) govern all construction activities in the United States. Using a conservative approach, OSHA regulates paint with any measurable lead levels. A LBP project is any project disturbing LBP, including sealing over previous paint coats. OSHA regulations require personnel protective equipment and procedures be used on nearly all LBP projects, unless specific related project documentation including personnel air monitoring for airborne lead levels verifies the protective equipment and procedures are not necessary.

OSHA regulations also require employee training, medical monitoring, proper signage and safety program implementation similar to what is implemented when handling other hazardous materials.

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) currently define lead-based paint as a paint or other surface coating which contains lead equal to or greater than 1 milligram per square centimeter (1.0 mg/cm2) using the XRF analyzer, or 0.5% (or 5000 parts per million) for bulk samples analyzed using laboratory methods outlined in 40 CFR 745.103.

In addition to the above requirements the presence of lead in demolition debris has the potential to impose disposal limitations. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), subtitles C and D, require that waste be analyzed to determine the amount of leachable lead present. This is determined by a Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) test for lead. The results of this test determine whether the materials must be handled and/or disposed of as a hazardous waste material.

XRF testing did identify LBP at or above a level of 1.0 mg/cm2 on twenty-seven readings of the randomly selected painted surfaces that were analyzed throughout the property.

These paints were identified as the following:

• White paint on wood

• Blue paint on wood

• Green paint on wood

Copyright 2022 Converse Consultants Page 5

The sample location, condition and lead concentration can be found in the XRF Data Log sheets in Appendix B.

Summary of LBPs

Building

Components

Paint

Color

Lead

Content

(mg/cm2)

Comments

Wood window and door components.

White 1.7 – 6.4 mg/cm2

XRF Shots # 64, 69, 70, 71, 72

This material was identified on the interior of Structure #4 and was identified on some of the window and door components. The window components included the header in Area 1. The door components consisted of doors and door casings. This paint film coating was found to be in good condition (intact).

Wood door components and walls.

Blue 1.7 – 9.1 mg/cm2

XRF Shots # 70, 71, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102

This material was identified on the interior of Structure #4 and was identified on the door in Area 1, and the walls in Area 3. This paint film coating was found to be in good condition (intact).

Wood Walls

Green

1.1 – 1.6 mg/cm2

XRF Shots # 74, 75, 77

This material was identified on the interior of Structure #4 and was identified on the walls of Area 5. This paint film coating was found to be in fair to good condition (intact).

Wood joists and door components

White

1.4 – 6.7 mg/cm2

XRF Shots # 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115

This material was identified on the exterior of Structure #4 and was identified on the roof joists and door components. The paint film coatings were in fair condition (intact).

Wood window and door components

White 1.5 – 2.1 mg/cm2

XRF Shots # 122, 123

This material was identified on the exterior of Structure #2 and was identified on the window and door components. The paint film coatings were in fair condition (intact).

The surfaces generally were found to be in good condition with peeling or flaking paint only observed on some of the exterior of the windows. Please refer to the attached XRF Data Sheets for the specific materials and locations that were identified.

Damaged (peeling) lead-based paint should be stabilized prior to renovation/remodeling or demolition activities that may impact the LBPs in order to minimize exposure to lead by workers and to avoid possible contamination from loose paint chips and/or lead dust.

Stabilization consists of the removal of loose and peeling LBP (typically by wet scraping or wet sanding), leaving a smooth surface. An encapsulating agent is then applied to the smooth surface to lock down the remaining LBP. Intact painted surfaces do not require stabilization prior to renovation/remodeling or demolition activities.

In addition to the above requirements the presence of lead in demolition debris has the potential to impose disposal limitations. The EPA Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) threshold for lead is 5.0 mg/L. Both TCLP sample results were below the EPA threshold. Structure #2 was 1.15 mg/L and structure #4 was below the

Copyright 2022 Converse Consultants Page 6 detectable limit for hazardous lead. Demolished building components with LBP painted surfaces may be disposed of regular construction debris.

3.3 Other Hazardous Materials

During the site visit, Converse looked for and documented other hazardous materials that might be of concern. These materials consisted of mercury containing thermostats, fluorescent light tubes and PCB containing ballasts. Additional hazardous materials that were identified to be present at the facility, which will require proper handling and disposal prior to renovation/demolition activities, consisted of the following:

• 4 – eight-foot fluorescent light tubes, identified in Structure #2

• 16 – four-foot fluorescent light tubes, identified in Structure #5

• 11 – Ballasts that possibly contain PCBs, identified in structures #2 and #5.

4.0 CONCLUSION

Converse does not recommend any special construction activities or procedures in regard to asbestos containing materials for this project. However, if LBP painted surfaces are to be disturbed as part of your project, OSHA regulations require employee training, medical monitoring, proper signage and safety program implementation similar to what is implemented when handling other hazardous materials.

Both TCLP sample results were below the EPA threshold. Demolished building components with LBP painted surfaces may be disposed of regular construction debris provided they are disposed along with the demolition waste stream and not segregated.

5.0 LIMITATIONS

This report has been prepared for the sole benefit and exclusive use of the BLM as it pertains to the Eureka Old Fire Station Admin Site located at 1080 Spring Street in Eureka, Nevada. Our services have been performed with generally accepted practices in the environmental sciences. No other warranty, either expressed or implied, is made.

Converse is not responsible for any claims or liable for any claims or damages associated with the accuracy or completeness of information provided by others. This letter report should not be regarded as a guarantee that no further asbestos-containing materials and/or lead-based paint, beyond that which was suspected to be present (and sampled) during our investigation, is present at the Property. Other suspect materials may be uncovered that were previously hidden during renovation or demolition. Additional samples of these materials should be collected and analyzed for asbestos and/or lead-based paint if this occurs. If changes in the nature of the Property occur, or additional relevant information about the Property is brought to our attention, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this assessment may not be valid unless these changes

Copyright 2022 Converse Consultants Page 7 and additional relevant information are reviewed, and the recommendations of this assessment are modified or verified in writing. Reliance on this letter report by Third Parties shall be at the Third Party’s sole risk.

Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. Should you have any questions or comments regarding this report, or if you require further assistance, please do not hesitate to call our office.

Frank M. Reynolds III Philip Childers, CEM Environmental Project Manager Senior Environmental Manger Asbestos Consultant #IJM-1248 Certified Asbestos Consultant, #IJPM 1692 EPA Lead Risk Assessor LBP-R-128380-1 Certified Environmental Manager #1952

Copyright 2022 Converse Consultants Page 8

Asbestos

A p p e n d ix

Lead p p e n d ix

B

XRF SAMPLE LOG

Project Name: Former Eureka Fire Station Site Project Address: Eureka Old Fire Station Admin Site

Converse Job No.: 22-23151-01 Spring Street Date: March 29, 2022 Eureka, Nevada

Sampled By: Frank Reynolds III Client Contact : Mr. Parviz Noori

Sample

No.

Interior

Exterior

Substrate

Sample Location & Comments

Condition

Lead Conc.

(mg/cm2)

LBP

Yes No

1 ---- ---- ---- ---- Calibration Check ---- 0.7 ---- ----

2 ---- ---- ---- ---- Calibration Check ---- 0.8 ---- ----

3 ---- ---- ---- ---- Calibration Check ---- 0.8 ---- ----

4 X White Drywall Building #5, Area 1 – Wall A Good -0.0 X

5 X White Drywall Building #5, Area 1 – Wall B Good -0.2 X

6 X White Drywall Building #5, Area 1 – Wall C Good -0.0 X

7 X White Drywall Building #5, Area 1 – Wall D Good -0.1 X

8 X White Drywall Building #5, Area 1 – Ceiling Good -0.3 X

9 X Blue Wood Building #5, Area 1 – Wall A Door Trim Good -0.0 X

10 X Blue Wood Building #5, Area 1 – Wall A Door Casing Good -0.2 X

11 X ----- ----- Duplicate Shot #10 ---- -0.0 X

12 X Blue Wood Building #5, Area 1 – Wall C Door Casing Good -0.2 X

13 X Blue Wood Building #5, Area 1 – Wall C Door Trim Good -0.2 X

14 X White Wood Building #5, Area 1 – Wall C Door Casing Good -0.1 X

Additional Comments: North Wall is always wall “A” working in a clockwise direction.

1 E Liberty Street, Suite 600

Tel.: 775-856-3833 Fax: 775-856-3513

(mg/cm2)

15 X Blue Wood Building #5, Area 1 – Wall B Window Trim Good -0.1 X

16 X Blue Wood Building #5, Area 1 – Wall C Door Trim Good -0.2 X

17 X White Drywall Building #5, Area 2 – Wall A Good -0.3 X

18 X White Drywall Building #5, Area 2 – Wall B Good -0.1 X

19 X White Drywall Building #5, Area 2 – Wall C Good -0.1 X

20 X White Drywall Building #5, Area 2 – Wall D Good -0.2 X

21 X ----- ----- Duplicate Shot #20 ---- -0.2 X

22 X Blue Wood Building #5, Area 2 – Wall D Door Casing Good -0.0 X

23 X Blue Wood Building #5, Area 2 – Wall D Door Trim Good -0.0 X

24 X White Drywall Building #5, Area 2 – Ceiling Good -0.2 X

25 X White Drywall Building #5, Area 3 – Wall B Good 0.0 X

26 X White Drywall Building #5, Area 3 – Wall C Good -0.2 X

27 X White Drywall Building #5, Area 3 – Wall D Good -0.2 X

28 X Blue Wood Building #5, Area 3 – Wall D Door Trim Good -0.2 X

Additional Comments:

(mg/cm2)

29 X Blue Wood Building #5, Area 3 – Wall D Door Casing Good -0.0 X

30 X Stain Wood Building #5, Area 3 – Wall A Door Good -0.2 X

31 X ----- ----- Duplicate Shot #30 ---- -0.1 X

32 X White Porcelain Building #5, Area 3 – Wall D Water Closet Good -0.5 X

33 X White Metal Building #5, Area 3 – Wall D Sink Good -0.2 X

34 X White Metal Building #5, Area 3 – Wall D Casework Good -0.2 X

35 X White Drywall Building #5, Area 4 – Wall A Good 0.0 X

36 X White Drywall Building #5, Area 4 – Wall B Good -0.1 X

37 X White Drywall Building #5, Area 4 – Wall C Good -0.4 X

38 X White Drywall Building #5, Area 4 – Wall D Good -0.3 X

39 X Blue Wood Building #5, Area 4 – Wall D Door Casing Good -0.1 X

40 X Blue Wood Building #5, Area 4 – Wall D Door Trim Good -0.0 X

41 X ----- ----- Duplicate Shot #40 ---- -0.1 X

42 X Stain Wood Building #5, Area 4 – Wall A Door Good -0.2 X

(mg/cm2)

43 X White Wood Building #5, Area 5 – Wall A Good -0.3 X

44 X White Wood Building #5, Area 5 – Wall C Good -0.2 X

45 X Green Metal Building #5, Area 5 – Wall B Framing Good 0.2 X

46 X Red Metal Building #5, Area 5 – Wall B Framing Good 0.4 X

47 X Red Metal Building #5, Area 5 – Wall D Framing Good -0.2 X

48 X Pale Green Metal Building #5, Wall A Good 0.1 X

49 X Pale Green Metal Building #5, Wall B Good -0.1 X

50 X Green Wood Building #5, Wall B North Window Awning Good -0.0 X

51 X ----- ----- Duplicate Shot #50 ---- -0.1 X

52 X Green Wood Building #5, Wall B South Window Awning Good -0.3 X

53 X Pale Green Metal Building #5, Wall C Good 0.2 X

54 X Pale Green Metal Building #5, Wall C Corner Trim Good 0.1 X

55 X Green Wood Building #5, Wall D North Window Good 0.0 X

56 X Blue Wood Building #4, Area 1 – Wall A Good 0.0 X

(mg/cm2)

57 X Blue Wood Building #4, Area 1 – Wall B Good 0.0 X

58 X Blue Concrete Building #4, Area 1 – Wall C Good 0.5 X

59 X Blue Concrete Building #4, Area 1 – Wall D Good 0.4 X

60 X White Wood Building #4, Area 1 – Wall C Window Good 0.2 X

61 X ----- ----- Duplicate Shot #60 ---- 0.3 X

62 X White Wood Building #4, Area 1 – Wall C Windowsill Good 0.0 X

63 X White Wood Building #4, Area 1 – Wall C Window Casing Good 0.1 X

64 X White Wood Building #4, Area 1 – Wall C Window Header Good 6.4 X

65 X White Wood Building #4, Area 1 – Wall D Window Good 0.1 X

66 X White Wood Building #4, Area 1 – Wall D Window Casing Good 0.3 X

67 X White Wood Building #4, Area 1 – Wall D Windowsill Good 0.2 X

68 X White Wood Building #4, Area #1 – Wall D Window Header Good -0.0 X

69 X White Wood Building #4, Area 1 – Wall D Door Good 1.7 X

70 X Blue Wood Building #4, Area 1 – Wall D Door Good 1.7 X

(mg/cm2)

71 X ----- ----- Duplicate Shot #70 ---- 1.8 X

72 X White Wood Building #4, Area 1 – Wall D Door Casing Good 2.4 X

73 X Blue Wood Building #4, Area #1 – Wall A Door Casing Good -0.2 X

74 X Green Wood Building #4, Area 5 – Wall A Good 1.6 X

75 X Green Wood Building #4, Area 5 – Wall B Good 1.1 X

76 X Green Concrete Building #4, Area 5 – Wall C Good -0.3 X

77 X Green Wood Building #4, Area 5 – Wall C Good 1.3 X

78 X White Wood Building #4, Area 5 – Wall D Window Good -0.2 X

79 X White Wood Building #4, Area 5 – Wall D Window Header Good -0.0 X

80 X White Wood Building #4, Area 5 – Wall D Window Sash Good 0.0 X

81 X ----- ----- Duplicate Shot #80 ---- -0.1 X

82 X Green Wood Building #4, Area 5 – Wall D Door Good 0.6 X

83 X Green Wood Building #4, Area 5 – Ceiling Good 0.4 X

84 X White Concrete Building #4, Area 6 – Wall A Good 0.2 X

(mg/cm2)

85 X Blue Wood Building #4, Area 6 – Wall B Good -0.1 X

86 X Tan Wood Building #4, Area 6 – Wall C Good 0.1 X

87 X White Concrete Building #4, Area 6 – Wall D Good -0.3 X

88 X Tan Wood Building #4, Area 6 – Ceiling Good 0.2 X

89 X White Wood Building #4, Area 4 – Wall A Door Good -0.0 X

90 X White Wood Building #4, Area 4 – Wall A Door Casing Good 0.2 X

91 X ----- ----- Duplicate Shot #90 ---- 0.3 X

92 X White Wood Building #4, Area 4 – Wall A Door Header Good 0.0 X

93 X White Concrete Building #4, Area 4 – Wall A Good 0.2 X

94 X White Concrete Building #4, Area 4 – Wall B Good 0.4 X

95 X White Wood Building #4, Area 4 – Wall B Window Good 0.2 X

96 X White Wood Building #4, Area 4 – Wall B Window Casing Good -0.0 X

97 X Blue Wood Building #4, Area 3 – Wall A Good 6.1 X

98 X Blue Wood Building #4, Area 3 – Wall B Good 7.4 X

(mg/cm2)

99 X Blue Wood Building #4, Area 3 – Wall C Good 5.0 X

100 X Blue Wood Building #4, Area 3 – Wall D Good 6.5 X

101 X ----- ----- Duplicate Shot #100 ---- 6.7 X

102 X Blue Wood Building #4, Area 3 – Wall C Door Good 9.1 X

103 X White Wood Building #4, Area 3 – Wall C Door Good 0.0 X

104 X Gray Wood Building #4, Area 3 – Floor Good -0.2 X

105 X White Wood Building #4 – Wall A Soffit Good 0.1 X

106 X White Wood Building #4 – Wall A Fascia Good -0.1 X

107 X White Wood Building #4 – Wall A Door Good 2.0 X

108 X White Wood Building #4 -Wall A Door Casing Good 2.4 X

109 X White Wood Building #4 – Wall D Joist Good 6.7 X

110 X White Wood Building #4 – Wall A North Door Good 3.6 X

111 X ----- ----- Duplicate Shot #110 ---- 3.8 X

112 X White Wood Building #4 – Wall A South Door Good 3.8 X

(mg/cm2)

113 X White Wood Building #4 – Wall D South Window Good 1.4 X

114 X White Wood Building #4 – Wall D Center Window Good 1.5 X

115 X White Wood Building #4 – Wall D North Window Good 2.0 X

116 X White Wood Building #4 – Wall C West Window Good 0.7 X

117 X White Wood Building #3 – Wall D Door Good 0.6 X

118 X White Wood Building #3 – Wall D Door Casing Good 0.5 X

119 X White Wood Building #3 – Wall D Window Good 0.6 X

120 X White Wood Building #2 – Wall D Door Good 0.1 X

121 X ----- ----- Duplicate Shot #120 ---- 0.2 X

122 X White Wood Building #2 – Wall D Door Casing Good 1.5 X

123 X White Wood Building #2 – Wall D Window Good 2.1 X

124 X White Wood Building #2 – Wall D Window Casing Good 1.4 X

125 X Gray Wood Building #2 – Ceiling Good 0.0 X

126 X Green Wood Building #2 – Ceiling Good -0.1 X

(mg/cm2)

127 X White Wood Building #2 – Wall C Door Good 0.3 X

128 X White Wood Building #2 – Wall C Door Casing Good 0.3 X

129 X Green Wood Building #2 – Wall C Soffit Good -0.2 X

130 ---- ---- ---- ---- Calibration Check ---- 0.9 ---- ----

131 ---- ---- ---- ---- Calibration Check ---- 0.8 ---- ----

132 ---- ---- ---- ---- Calibration Check ---- 0.9 ---- ----

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

Converse Consultants