Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 42 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Moving Services CBP Puerto Rico Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 70B03C24Q00000004
About this file
This document is a past performance questionnaire for a moving services contract opportunity with the Department of Homeland Security Customs and Border Protection in Puerto Rico. The solicitation number is 70B03C24Q00000004 and involves providing moving services. Respondents are asked to provide ratings on a contractor's past performance in areas such as quality of services, project management, timeliness of performance, and cost effectiveness on a previous contract. The questionnaire requests details on the previous contract such as award date, completion date, value, and brief description of requirements. Responses are due back to the identified contracting officer by October 31.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions and Answers.docx | DOCX document | |
| WD 2015-5707 R21.pdf | ||
| RFQ 70B03C24Q00000004.pdf | ||
| SOW.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Moving Services CBP Puerto Rico
RFQ 70B03C24Q00000004
PART ONE: INSTRUCTIONS
The company who has provided you with this form is proposing on a Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Protection solicitation. Past Performance is an important part of the evaluation criteria for this acquisition, so your input is very important. Please provide an honest assessment and return the questionnaire to the vendor by Tuesday, October 31, 4:00 p.m. AST or email to robert.j.kay@cbp.dhs.gov.
PART TWO: GENERAL INFORMATION
1. OFFEROR’S NAME AND ADDRESS 2. CUSTOMER ORGANIZATION
3. CONTRACT NUMBER: 2a. EVALUATOR
4. CONTRACT VALUE: $______________________ NAME:
TITLE:
PHONE NO:
| 5. CONTRACT AWARD DATE: | 6. CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: | |
| _____/_____/_____ | _____/____/_____ |
7. CONTRACT TYPE: 8. COMPLEXITY OF WORK (Circle One)
DIFFICULT ROUTINE
9. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF YOUR CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS:
| __________________________________________________________________________ | |
| _____________________________________________________________________________ |
PART THREE: OFFEROR PERFORMANCE RATING
On the following pages, please summarize the offeror’s performance in each rating factors. Each factor has a set of sub-factors with four possible confidence ratings. Determine the adjectival rating that most nearly represents experience with this offeror and indicate assessment by placing an “X” under the appropriate heading. Offeror performance factors are:
| A. QUALITY OF SERVICES/REPORTS |
| B. PROJECT MANAGEMENT - RESOURCE ALLOCATION |
| C. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE |
| D. COST EFFECTIVENESS |
Adjectival ratings are defined below and should be used as a reference in assessing performance:
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Superior |
| Based on the offeror’s past performance record, it is highly likely that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
Satisfactory Based on the offeror’s past performance record, it is likely that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Unsatisfactory Based on the offeror’s past performance record, it is not likely that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
| Neutral |
| No relevant performance record is identifiable upon which to base a meaningful performance rating. A search was unable to identify any relevant past performance information for the offeror, key personnel, or subcontractors. This is neither a negative or positive assessment. |
| A |
| QUALITY OF SERVICE |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Not Applicable |
| 1 |
| How was the overall value of services provided? |
| 2 |
| Did the contractor provide quality reports and documentation (i.e., accurate, current and complete)? |
| B |
| PROJECT MANAGEMENT |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Not Applicable |
| 1 |
| Did the contractor provide effective contract and project management? |
| 2 |
| Was the contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from counterparts? |
| 3 |
| Did the contractor supply adequate and qualified replacement personnel? |
| 4 |
| How effective has the contractor been in understanding and responding to user requirements? |
| 5 |
| Did the contractor establish and maintain effective quality control standards and procedures? |
C
| TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Not Applicable |
| 1 |
| Did the contractor adhere to contract delivery schedules in the following areas: |
(a) Performance of services?
(b) Delivery of goods?
(c) Delivery of reports or other documentation?
| 2 |
| Were replacement personnel identified and assigned to the project in a timely manner? |
D
| COST EFFECTIVENESS |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Not Applicable |
| 1 |
| To what extent did the contractor meet the cost estimate? |
| 2 |
| Did the contractor effectively plan work to ensure maximum effective utilization of resources? |
PART THREE: OFFEROR PERFORMANCE RATING CONTINUED
1. Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience?
| YES | Default___ or Convenience ___ |
| NO |
If yes, please explain (e.g. inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules - also include contract number, name, address, and phone number of Terminating Contracting Officer - TCO).
2. What was the contractor’s greatest strength in the performance of the contract?
3. What was the contractor’s greatest weakness in the performance of the contract?
4. Would you award another contract to this contractor?
YES No
COMMENTS:
PART FOUR: EVALUATOR’S CERTIFICATION
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION IN THIS FORM IS ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
SIGNATURE OF EVALUATOR
TITLE OF EVALUATOR
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .