Past Performance Questionaire.doc
DOC document 192 KB Posted
- Attached to
- PERL CUSTODIAL CONTRACT Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140P8221Q0005
About this file
This document is a past performance questionnaire for a contractor that previously provided janitorial services at Pearl Harbor National Monument. The questionnaire asks the respondent to provide details on the nature, dollar value, and period of performance for the previous work. It also requests ratings and commentary on the contractor's timeliness and communications, quality of work, need for post-award modifications, and whether the reference would recommend hiring the contractor again. Specifically, it asks about work location, deliverables, surveys, reports, tasks, promptness and professionalism of communications, quality of clerical work, and reasonableness of any requested modifications. The related federal contract opportunity is solicitation number 140P8221Q0005 for custodial services at Pearl Harbor National Monument from the Department of the Interior National Park Service.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140P8221Q0005_Amd_0004.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P8221Q0005_Amd_0003.pdf | ||
| PERL App C Site Floorplans_0002.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P8221Q0005_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| Service Contract Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| PERL Restrooms Custodial-Services 11-24-20 (1).docx | DOCX document | |
| Sol_140P8221Q0005.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Pearl Harbor National Monument Janitorial Services
Past Performance Questionnaire Contractor Name:_______________________________________ NPS Employee _________________________________________
For each numbered item below, please document pertinent details and summarize an adjectival rating. (Excellent, good, acceptable, marginal, poor)
1. What was the nature of the work they performed (EA, EIS, NEPA - other, etc)? Where was the work performed? What was the dollar value and period of performance?
2. Timeliness and communications. Did the Contractor complete contract requirements (deliverables, surveys, reports, tasks, etc.) on time? Were there communications prompt, responsible, clear, professional?
3. Quality of work. What was the contractor's quality of work (surveys, reports, documentation, clerical - punctuation, spelling, etc.) ?
4. Post-award problems? Did the contractor request modifications after award to extend time of performance or cost of contract, or were they able to meet all requirements as quoted with no changes? If changes were requested, were they reasonable?
5. Would this reference recommend hiring this contractor again (highly recommend, recommend, not recommend) ?
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .