Past Performance Instructions and Evaluation.docx

Past Performance Instructions/Evaluation

Past Performance: Limited to no more than two (4) pages per contract listed. Only references for relevant past efforts/contracts are desired. Submit one (1) copy with proposal.

1. Offerors shall, if available, submit recent and relevant contracts (maximum of three contracts) as defined below. Provide pictures of projects if available. The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to the acquisition. . Performance as subcontractor may be included; the offeror shall include contract number and prime contractor. The Government will consider this information, along with information obtained from other sources (e.g., Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reports System (CPARS), customer interviews, etc.). Offeror may use past performance of as a subcontractor to satisfy recent and relevant past performance. If this is a first time joint venture, each party to the joint venture must provide a list of past relevant contracts (maximum of three). Furnish the following information for each contract listed:

(i) Company/Division name

(ii) Product/Service

(iii) Contracting Agency/Customer

(iv) Contract Number

(v) Contract Dollar Value

(vi) Period of Performance

(vii) Verified, up-to-date name, address, FAX & telephone number of the contracting officer

(viii) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions

(ix) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.

2. Recency - is defined as performance within the last three years from the date of the issuance of the solicitation. The Government will not consider performance on contracts where performance was concluded more than three years prior to the solicitation issue date or contracts awarded. The contract/task order in its entirety may be evaluated for past performance if any part of the contract performance falls within the three year timeframe.

3. Relevancy – is defined as work that involves approximately the same type(s) of aircraft maintenance stand manufacturing described in the Request for Quote (RFQ), Purchase Specification. The offeror shall address any performance problems/issues and explain the corrective action taken or current status.

4. Offerors may address any past performance problems or issues that the Government may identify and explain corrective action taken and current status. The Government will consider this information in determining the offeror’s past performance rating. An offeror’s failure to address performance problems or issues within this volume does not preclude the Government from using such information in determining a past performance rating.

6.

5. Quality and Satisfaction Rating for Contracts Completed in the Past Three Years: Provide any information currently available (letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc.) which demonstrates customer satisfaction with overall job performance and quality of completed product for relevant past efforts/contracts (similar in scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires). In addition, explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and any current performance problems such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, numerous warranty calls, etc.

Past performance will be rated on an “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” basis using the following ratings.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability or unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “Acceptable.”