EPSCoR_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- EPSCoR Evaluation Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- NSFDACS17P1022
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| EPSCoR_Questions_and_Answers.pdf | ||
| EPSCoR_RFP.pdf | ||
| EPSCoR_Evaluation_SOW_Final.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
National Science Foundation 4201 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, Virginia 22230
Attachment B
FROM: NSF, Division of Acquisition & Cooperative Support (DACS)
TO: Whom it may concern
SUBJECT: NSF RFP # DACS17P1022
DATE: February 3, 2017
Your current or former contractor is submitting a proposal to provide services to the National Science Foundation, an independent federal agency. As part of the Foundation’s evaluation process, the prospective contractor’s past performance is reviewed and rated.
Please complete the survey below to help assess this contractor’s performance under any contracts or task orders performed for you within the last three years. Definitions of Rating Guidelines and Performance Elements are included for your use in completing the survey form. Please send your completed survey to Thurl Frazier, Contracting Officer by email to tfrazier@nsf.gov. If you have any questions, please call Thurl Frazier (703) 292-2152.
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY
Contractor’s Name/Location:
Contract #:
| Dates of Service/Contract Term: |
| Agency: |
Description of Services Provided:
| PERFORMANCE ELEMENTS |
| RATINGS |
| Excellent |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Neutral |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Quality of Product or service
Schedule
Cost Control
Management
Comment:
Signature Name/Title Phone Date
Agency/Company/Organization
Page 2. Contractor Performance Evaluation Survey
RATING GUIDELINES
| Grade |
| Definition |
Excellent The quoters record of past performance ratings on relevant and recent projects indicates that excellent performance can be expected.
Very Good The quoters record of past performance ratings on relevant and recent projects indicates that very good performance can be expected.
Satisfactory The quoters record of past performance ratings on relevant and recent projects indicates that satisfactory performance can be expected.
Neutral Assigned to a quoter with no relevant and recent past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available.
| Marginal |
| The quoters record of past performance ratings on relevant and recent projects indicates that marginal performance can be expected and the risk to successful completion of required tasks is moderate. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| The quoters record of past performance ratings on relevant and recent projects indicates that unsatisfactory performance can be expected and the risk of successful completion of required tasks is high. |
image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .