AiR_Support_-_Technical_Evaluation_Criteria.docx

DOCX document 21 KB Posted

Attached to
Analysis of Integrated Resources (AiR) and QlikView Worksheet (QVW) projects. Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
NIHMH201818003604
Issued by
Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health National Library of Medicine

About this file

Technical Evaluation Criteria

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Analysis of Integrated Resources (AiR) and QlikView Worksheet (QVW) projects., newest first.
File Type Posted
AiR_Support_-_Technical_Evaluation_Criteria_Revised.pdf PDF
AiR_SOW_for_Sept_2018_v2018_08_31.docx DOCX document
FAR_52.212-4_and_FAR_52.212-5.docx DOCX document
IT_Security_clauses.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Technical Evaluation Criteria

Management Approach and Technical Capabilities:

1. Familiarity with the AiR project and the QlikView system are essential to understanding the SOW.

2. Ability to address anticipated potential problem areas, and creativity and feasibility of solutions to problems and future integration of new processes and technology enhancements.

3. Evidence of ability to develop and maintain both data schema infrastructure and the Graphic User Interface (GUI).

Personnel Qualifications:

1. Clear experience in information technology. Specifically, all key personnel should have at least 7 years of experience in their designated IT area (whether it be data schema building or GUI).

Organizational Experience:

1. Evidence that the organization has current capabilities; and for assuring performance of this requirement.

2. Appropriate human subjects protection practices

3. Assurance of sufficient time to conduct the study Past Performance:

1. The organizations history of successful completion of projects; history of producing high quality reports and other deliverables; history of staying on schedule and within budget.

2. The quality of cooperation (with each other) of key individuals within your organization, and quality of cooperation and performance between your organization and its clients.

3. The organization’s specific past performance on prior similar efforts specified within this SOW.

4. Completion of task within negotiated budget

File details come from the government source that posted it.