N6945020R0010_0005.pdf

NAVFAC SOUTHEAST

PWD GTMO

PSC 1005, PO BOX 37

FPO AE 09593

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

N69450-20-R-0010, NSGB BOS Services

See BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE on page 2.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 14

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 27-Feb-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6945020R0010

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

13-Dec-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

27-Feb-2020

CODE

NAVFAC SOUTHEAST

FSC-BOS

BUILDING 903, PO BOX 30

JACKSONVILLE FL 32212-0030

N69450 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE N69450

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

jennifer.doherty Typewritten Text

N6945020R0010

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0005

This amendment is issued to make the following changes:

1) Revise Section M.2 Evaluation Factor, 2. Basis of Evaluation (b) Non-cost/price Factors, as follows

(changes within are indicated in red font):

FROM:

a. RELEVANT PROJECT: Relevant projects include those that demonstrate the capability to perform services similar in size, scope, and complexity to those described in the performance work statement/specifications of the RFP with a contract value of $20,000,000.00 per year or greater and shall be: 1) ongoing with at least 12 months of contract performance completed by the date of receipt of proposals, or 2) shall be completed within the last five (5) years. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as Base Operations Support (BOS) services (or equivalent) that encompass at least two of the following:

TO:

RELEVANT PROJECT: “Relevant projects include those that demonstrate the capability to perform services similar in size, scope, and complexity to those described in the performance work statement/specifications of the RFP with a contract value of $20,000,000.00 per year or greater and shall be: 1) ongoing with at least 12 months of contract performance completed by the date of receipt of proposals, or 2) shall be completed within the last eight (8) years. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as Base Operations Support (BOS) services (or equivalent) that encompass at least two of the following:

2) Section J – The Table of Contents has been revised as follows (changes within the Table of Contents are indicated in red font):

a. Responses to Government Pre-Award Inquires (GPIs) are provided via attachment under file name JL-9_N6945020R0010_GPI_0005.pdf.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The following have been modified:

SECTION J

Section J - Table of Contents list the Documents, Exhibits and Other Attachments for this Section are posted on the SAM website at https://beta.sam.gov/ with the solicitation.

The ACQUISITION documents are posted as individual file names as indicated in the table. The TECHNICAL documents are posted as individual file names as indicated in the table or “all-inclusive” under filename:

N6945020R0010_Section_J_0004.pdf

Section J – Table of Contents

JB-1 JB1 FTE. Provided as file name JB-1 FTE_N6945020R0010_0004.xlsx JL-1 Government Pre-award Inquiry Form (GPIF). Provided as file name JL-

1_N6945020R0010_GPIF.xlsx.

JL-2 AMAG Form to Obtain Visitor’s Pass. Provided as file name JL-2_N6945020R0010_AMAG.xlsx.

JL-3 SECNAV 5512/1 Form for base access. Provided as file name JL-

3_N6945020R0010_SECNAV5512.pdf JL-4 GTMO Entry Forms- Welcome Aboard TDY. Provided as file name JL-4_GTMO Entry Forms-

Welcome Aboard TDY.doc JL-5 NSGB BOS Site Visit Itinerary Revised. Provided as file name JL-5_NSGB BOS Site Visit Itinerary

Revised.pdf JL-6 PWD JAX Building 27 Location Map. Provided as file name JL-6_N6945020R0010_ PWD JAX

Building 27 Location Map.pdf JL-7 Site Visit Brief. Provided as file name JL-7_N6945020R0010_Site_Visit_Brief.pdf JL-8 Site Visit Attendee Sign In Sheets. Provided as file name JL-8_N6945020R0010_

SiteVisit_SignIn_Sheets.pdf JL-9 Government Pre-Award Inquires. Provided as file name JL-9_N6945020R0010_ GPI_0005.pdf JM-1 Corporate Experience. Provided as file name JM-1_N6945020R0010_Corporate Experience.doc JM-2 Safety Data Sheet. Provided as file name JM-2_N6945020R0010_Safety Data 0003.doc.

JM-3 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ). Provided as file name JM-3_N6945020R0010_PPQ.doc J- TECHNICAL N69450-20-R-0010 Section J-Technical Attachments. Provided as file name

N6945020R0010_SectionJ_TECHNICAL-Attachments_0003.xls.

J-0200000-06 SERVICE PROVIDER INFORMATION. Provided as file name J-0200000- 06_ SERVICE PROVIDER INFORMATION.xls

J-0200000-07 ASSET INFORMATION. Provided as file name J-0200000-07_ASSET INFORMATION.xls J-0200000-08 ASSET PROTECTION. Provided as file name J-0200000-08_ASSET SPECIFICATION.xls J-0200000-09 CHARACTERISTIC METER READING INFORMATION. Provided as file name J-0200000-

09_CHARACTERISTIC METER READING INFORMATION.xls

J-0200000-12 Commander, Navy Region Southeast Instruction 4101.1B. Provided as file name J- 0200000-12CNRSEINST41011BEnergyManagementProgram.pdf.

J-0200000-13 Exhibit Line Item Number (ELIN) spreadsheet. Provided as file name J-0200000- 13ELINs_N6945020R0010_0004.xls.

J-1501000-04 Base Map. Provided as file name J-1501000-04_BaseMap.pdf J-1502000-15 (DHA)MedicalAirGasAndVacuumSystemsMaps. Provided as file name J-150200-

15_(DHA)MedicalAirGasAndVacuumSystemsMaps.pdf J-1502000-20 (DHA)FireWallsAndFireDoorsMap. Provided as file name J-1502000-

20_(DHA)FireWallsAndFireDoorsMap.pdf J-1503050-05 Site. Provided as file name J-1503050-05_Site.pdf J-1503050-08 Roads. Provided as file name J-1503050-08_Roads.pdf J-1601000-12 Outage Request. Provided as file name J-1601000-12_Outage request.pdf J-1604000-05 Sample Reports. Provided as file name J-1604000-05_Sample Reports.pdf J-1606000-05 Sample Reports. Provided as file name J-16069000-05_Sample Reports.pdf J-1700000-10 DDForm1970. Provided as file name J-1700000-10_DDForm1970.pdf

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

M.2 EVALUATION FACTORS

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors:

Factor 1 – Corporate Experience Factor 2 – Management Factor 3 – Technical Approach

Factor 4 – Safety Factor 5 – Past Performance

2. The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is the technical Factors 1, 2, 3, and 4 are of equal importance to each other and, when combined, are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment Factor 5. When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-cost/price evaluation factors) are significantly more important than price.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

(i) Provide a completed Section B of the solicitation.

(ii) Provide a completed Section J Exhibit Line Item Number (ELIN) Pricing Attachment. There are multiple worksheets within this file that require completion. Proposed prices for Spec Item 3 Labor Cost, Spec Item 3 Material, Spec Item 3 Equipment, Spec Items 1 and 2 On-Site Cost, Off-Site Cost, and Profit shall be provided in the same level of detail for all requirements, whether the work is proposed to be accomplished as the prime contractor, subcontractor, or by other means.

(iii) Submit pricing data (Section B and Section J ELINs) in hard copy and in electronic

(Microsoft Office Version 2016 compatible) format on CD-ROM. Offerors shall utilize the pricing attachments provided in Section J to submit the Section B and ELIN data in the format provided. Because the pricing evaluation will concentrate on the electronic files submitted, in the event of a discrepancy between the proposal hard copies and the proposal electronic copies, the proposal electronic copies will take precedence.

(iv) Provide a narrative (limited to 15 pages) of all costs your firm classifies as direct and indirect and describe the basis and rationale for the proposed amounts. Explain how these costs are allocated to each of the cost elements identified in the Section J ELIN Attachment (Spec Item 3 Labor, Spec Item 3 Material, Spec Item 3 Equipment, Off-Site Cost, etc.).

(2) Basis of Evaluation:

(i) The Government will evaluate price based on proposed Section J ELIN Pricing at the functional (Annex/Sub-annex, Spec Item, etc.) and elemental (Spec Item 3 Labor, Spec Item 3 Material, Spec Item 3 Equipment, etc.) level and the total proposed price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items (see Section B of the solicitation). The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section M of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(a) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(b) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGE.

(c) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(d) Comparison of market survey results.

(e) And/or any other methodology deemed appropriate by the Contracting Officer and consistent with FAR 15.404-1.

(ii) Identification of unbalanced pricing including allocation to the ELIN/Sub-ELIN unit prices.

Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more prices at the functional (Annex/Sub-annex, Spec Item, etc.) level, ELIN/Sub-ELIN unit prices, or contract line items is significantly overstated or understated. An offer may be rejected if the proposed price is materially unbalanced between line items or sub-line items within a pricing period, or between line items or sub-line items for the basic requirement and any option period.

(iii) Any suspected issues or concerns in the price proposal, including any inconsistent pricing submitted within Section B and the Section J ELIN attachment.

(iv) Any inconsistency, whether real or apparent, between proposed performance and price must be clearly explained in the price proposal. For example, if unique and innovative approaches are the basis for an apparently unbalanced/inconsistently priced proposal, the nature of these approaches and their impact on price must be completely documented. It is the responsibility of the offeror to provide all required documentation.

(v) The analysis may consider whether prices are realistic in relation to the work to be performed, reflect a clear understanding of the requirements, and are consistent with other portions of the offeror’s proposal. A price that is found either unreasonably high or unrealistically low in relation to the proposed work may be indicative of an inherent lack of understanding of the solicitation requirements and may result in the overall proposal not being considered for award.

(b) Non-cost/price Factors:

The offeror’s response to factors that require the submission of Experience Narrative and Past Performance shall be based on the following relevancy definition:

RELEVANT PROJECT: Relevant projects include those that demonstrate the capability to perform services similar in size, scope, and complexity to those described in the performance work statement/specifications of the RFP with a contract value of $20,000,000.00 per year or greater and shall be: 1) ongoing with at least 12 months of contract performance completed by the date of receipt of proposals, or 2) shall be completed within the last eight (8) years. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as Base Operations Support (BOS) services (or equivalent) that encompass at least two of the following:

a. 1502000 – Facility Investment (at minimum, Service orders, HVAC Systems maintenance and repairs, and two other facility investment spec items identified in the RFP).

b. Utility sub-annex Electrical 1602000 (at minimum, Service orders, Electrical Power Generation, Transmission & Distribution operations, maintenance and repairs).

c. Utility sub-annex Water 1606000 (at minimum, Service orders, Raw Water Supply, Water Treatment Plant & Distribution Systems operation, maintenance and repairs).

d. 1700000 – BSVE (at minimum, including dispatch, operations, maintenance and repair of vehicles and equipment including Material Handling Equipment (MHE) similar to the requirements of this RFP).

Complexity will be determined based on the projects’ contract type, facilities maintained (size, quantity and type), systems maintained (quantities and capacities), and program structure (combination of Preventive Maintenance (PM) Program, service orders, Integrated Maintenance Program (IMP), other recurring services).

(1) Factor 1, Corporate Experience

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The offeror shall submit a minimum of two (2) to a maximum of five (5) examples of recent, relevant projects that the offeror (including joint ventures and partnerships) completed and served as the prime contractor. For each project the offeror shall provide a completed Corporate Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) that includes all information requested on the form. The Corporate Experience Project Data attachment may be expanded and is not limited to the two (2) pages provided within the solicitation.

The offeror’s submitted projects must aggregately demonstrate experience self-performing or managing the following annexes/sub-annexes: 1502000 – Facility Investment similar to the requirements of the RFP (at minimum, Service Orders, HVAC Systems maintenance and repairs and two other facility investment spec items identified in the RFP); 1602000 – Electrical similar to the requirements of the RFP (at minimum, Electrical Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution Systems operation, maintenance and repairs); 1606000 – Water similar to the requirements of the RFP (at minimum, Service Orders, Raw Water Supply, Water Treatment Plant and Distribution Systems operation, maintenance and repairs).

If the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), submit recent, relevant projects completed by the JV entity. If the JV does not have such experience, at least one relevant project shall be submitted for each JV member.

If a submitted project was performed by a JV and not all members of that JV are proposed for this solicitation, the offeror shall clearly demonstrate what portion of the work was performed by the offeror as prime.

An offeror may rely on the prime contractor experience or corporate affiliates (e.g., subsidiaries, sister companies and parent companies) to demonstrate experience, provided the offeror submits the following:

a. A one-page narrative clearly demonstrating the corporate affiliates will have meaningful participation in the project by identifying the personnel or resources from the corporate affiliates that will be dedicated to the project; and

b. An organization chart that demonstrates the corporate relationship of the affiliates.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: For Factor 1 Corporate Experience, the Government will evaluate the offeror’s demonstrated relevant experience and depth of relevant experience as a prime contractor directly responsible to the owner; managing multiple subcontractors and coordinating with multiple stakeholders. The assessment of the offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Offerors who fail to demonstrate relevant experience in one or more of the following annexes/sub-annexes will be considered unacceptable: 1502000 – Facility Investment similar to the requirements of the RFP (at minimum, Service Orders, HVAC Systems maintenance and repairs and two other facility investment spec items identified in the RFP); 1602000 – Electrical similar to the requirements of the RFP (at minimum, Electrical Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution Systems operation, maintenance and repairs); 1606000 – Water similar to the requirements of the RFP (at minimum, Service Orders, Raw Water Supply, Water Treatment Plant and Distribution Systems operation, maintenance and repairs) and 1700000 – BSVE (at minimum, including dispatch, operations, maintenance and repair of vehicles and equipment including Material Handling Equipment (MHE) similar to the requirements of this RFP).Lack of demonstrated experience in one or more of the remaining technical annexes/sub-annexes may result in a lower rating.

Projects completed by the offeror or its corporate affiliates (e.g., subsidiaries, sister companies, and parent companies) in any capacity other than as prime contractor will be considered not relevant.

Projects completed by a proposed subcontractor will be considered not relevant.

Projects submitted by JVs where the JV members performed together may be evaluated more favorably than projects in which the JV members did not perform together.

With the exception of offerors covered by Mentor-Protégé Agreements approved by the Small Business Administration, if the offeror is a JV, each member of the JV must demonstrate prime contractor experience on at least one relevant project. If each member of the JV does not have at least one relevant experience project, then the offeror will be considered unacceptable.

Offerors who demonstrate experience without relying on corporate affiliates (e.g., subsidiaries, sister companies, and parent companies) may be evaluated more favorably.

For multiple award contracts (MACs) or indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts, the specific relevant task order, not the entire MAC or IDIQ contract, will be considered a project for evaluation purposes.

Offerors who submit at least one recent/relevant project which demonstrate experience self-performing or managing Base Operating Services (BOS) (or equivalent) contracts at a remote and/or OCONUS location may be evaluated more favorably.

(i) Factor 2, Management

(ii) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The offeror shall clearly demonstrate a feasible approach for controlling and managing the entire project, including the interface between the major functional areas and sub-annexes, and the offeror’s general management and administration structure. For organizational purposes, address the requested information in the following format.

a. Workforce Management. Provide and explain a plan to organize, manage, and supervise workforce personnel to accomplish the requirements of this contract. The plan shall include an organization chart identifying the on-site organization, on-site staff, and corporate staff that will be used to perform this contract as well as the lines of management authority, supervision, span of control, and accountability, including the relationship between overall management (corporate and on-site), administration, sub-annex area organizations, and subcontractors. The plan shall identify the function(s) of the various groups of the organization, direct and indirect staffing and associated trade classifications with skill level (journeyman, etc.) consistent with the FTEs and labor hours provided in Section J Attachment JB-1 Staffing Levels. The hours, FTEs and staffing levels on organizational chart shall be consistent with the Basis of Estimate and the JB-1 Staffing Levels.

b. Quality Management System (QMS). Provide a summary QMS Program, as described in

Section C 0200000, 2.6.7 Management and Administration Quality Management System (QMS), that demonstrates the processes (practices, resources, and activities) and minimum controls that will be used to ensure full compliance with all management and administration requirements, performance objectives and standards throughout the performance work statement. Additionally, provide details which clearly identify how the contractor intends to oversee and control IMP to ensure IMP systems are operating as required by this specification. At a minimum, address the following: technical qualifications of the individual(s) providing QC oversight; how the QC personnel will become and remain cognizant of what encompasses contractual operation of IMP systems; and how the QC personnel will assess IMP systems to ensure contract performance in accordance with all applicable requirements.

Limit the QMS submission to ten (10) pages.

c. Scheduling. Provide the methodology used to determine if and when there is a need to adjust the recurring work schedule. Describe scheduling procedures to minimize interference with Government operations and the flexibility to adjust schedules to allow for access outside regular Government working hours; as well as the flexibility to manage workload fluctuations due to surges of non-recurring work task orders, natural disasters that could occur or any other foreseeable contingencies.

d. Phase-In and Phase-Out Plans. Provide an approach to each phase-in and phase-out plan.

The phase-in plan is limited to no more than 90 calendar days. The plans shall include: 1) a schedule for all key events; 2) personnel actions and responsibilities regarding employees at all levels; 3) acquisition, delivery, storage, inventory and disposal of equipment, working stock, and materials (to include inbound items as applicable).

(i) Basis of Evaluation: Factor 2 will be evaluated as an overall factor with no sub-factors. The

Government will evaluate the management approach considering the extent to which the offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the effectiveness of the approach to determine the likelihood that the work will be performed in accordance with the requirements of the

RFP.

The degree to which the offeror demonstrates a management plan that demonstrates an effective and resource efficient approach to management of their workforce; labor; quality management; scheduling; and phase-in & phase-out plans. Workforce Management plans with hours, FTEs and staffing levels on organizational charts that are not consistent with the Basis of estimate and the JB1 Staffing Levels may be deemed unacceptable.

(ii) Factor 3, Technical Approach

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

a. Describe staffing levels for each annex and sub-annex listed below. Provide a completed

Attachment JB-1 for the total effort to include the prime contractor and all subcontractors for the base period.

Attachment JB-1 is provided under file name N6945020R0010JB1FTE.xlsx. The JB-1 shall be submitted in hard copy and electronically in the format provided. In summary, provide the rationale for Basis of Estimate (BOE) for each specification item listed in Section J Attachment JB-1. BOE shall include labor classification; annual direct and indirect labor hours; direct and indirect FTEs; state the estimate data source(s) (such as, RS Means Facilities Maintenance & Repair Cost Data, Whitestone Building and Repair Cost Reference, etc.) and methodology used to develop estimate for performing each specification item listed in JB-1.

b. Describe the methodology to be implemented to accomplish the requirements in each annex and sub-annex and detail how the proposed approach will effectively achieve each performance objective and standard across all annexes and sub-annexes. For each applicable sub-annex, the offeror’s methodology shall demonstrate an approach to perform service orders, preventative maintenance (PM) program, integrated maintenance program (IMP), other recurring services program, unscheduled services and all other spec items in the respective sub annexes. The solicitation uses a systems approach that does not list every ancillary part/component of a system; however, the requirement is to maintain the system to include all mechanically and electrically interlocked ancillary parts, equipment, and components forming a functioning system (i.e. fire protection system, HVAC system, Utility Systems, etc.). The offeror’s methodology shall clearly demonstrate an approach to performing service on the systems for applicable sub-annexes to include but not limited to PM and IMP requirements. The offeror’s methodology shall demonstrate: (i) an understanding of all Limits of Liability (LOL) for service orders, PM Program, IMP, and any other requirement that includes LOLs; (ii) an understanding of supply chain management necessary to ensure materials, supplies, and equipment availability meet contractual delivery timelines and all other logistical challenges performing services at a remote OCONUS location; (iii) a labor efficient approach that ensures best industry practices are applied to accomplish all requirements; and (iv) an understanding of current industry standards, policies, procedures, and processes utilized in accomplishing the complexity and magnitude of service requirements set forth in the performance objectives and standards of the Performance Work Statement for each of the following annexes and sub-annexes:

Annex 14 Housing

1401000 Family Housing Annex 15 Facilities Support

1501000 Facility Management 1502000 Facility Investment 1502000 Facility Investment (DHA) 1502000 Facility Investment (JTF) 1503010 Custodial 1503020 Pest Control 1503030 Integrated Solid Waste Management 1503040 Other (Swimming Pools) 1503050 Grounds Maintenance and Landscaping

Annex 16 Utilities 1601000 Utilities Management 1602000 Electrical 1604000 Wastewater 1606000 Water

Annex 17 Base Support Vehicles and Equipment

c. In addition to submittal requirements identified in b., respond to each request identified below and provide a methodology that clearly demonstrates full understanding of requirements regarding the following:

1. Off base disposal. Note that the solicitation requires off base removal of various materials such as tires, recoverable material, and recyclable material. See Annex 1503030. Provide a narrative that clearly demonstrates an adequate approach that ensures full performance of the requirement.

2. Systems maintenance (PM, IMP, and other). Note that the solicitation uses a systems approach that does not list every ancillary part/component of a system, however, the requirement is to maintain the system to include all mechanically and/or electronically interlocked parts, equipment, and components forming a functioning system (i.e. fire protection system, HVAC system, etc.). Provide a narrative that clearly demonstrates an approach to perform services on the complete systems for applicable sub-annexes to include but not limited to PM and IMP requirements.

3. Service orders. Note that service orders are required in multiple annexes/sub-annexes within the solicitation. Provide a narrative that demonstrates an efficient and effective approach to performing service orders for each applicable annex/sub-annex.

4. Utility services. Note that NS Guantanamo Bay produces its own electricity and water, and utilities must be remain adequate and sufficient at all times. See sub-annexes 1602000 and 1606000.

Provide a narrative that clearly demonstrates understanding of policies, procedures, and processes utilized in accomplishing the complexity and magnitude of service requirements set forth in each of the performance objectives and standards of sub-annexes 1602000 and 1606000. Provide a methodology that ensures all availability of electrical power and quality water will remain consistently sufficient.

5. Logistics. Note that NS Guantanamo Bay is an isolated location, but adequate staffing, supplies, spare parts, material, equipment and any other items that requires shipment must be available at all times to prevent unwarranted mission impacts and delays. Provide a narrative that demonstrates that proper personnel, spare parts, materials, and equipment will be readily available, and that downtime for all systems will be minimized.

6. ICAP and UICAP requirements. See sub-annexes 1501000 and 1601000, respectively and provide a narrative demonstrating an understanding of ICAP and UICAP procedures and requirements.

7. Transportation equipment. Note that vehicles and transportation equipment must be maintained and repaired within specified time frames with minimal allowable downtime. See Annex 1700000 Sections C and J. Provide a narrative that demonstrates that all vehicles will be maintained and repaired within the specified timeframes identified in Annex 1700000.

8. Unit Price Labor (UPL). Note the requirement to provide a UPL rate to perform one hour of work-in-place for the negotiation for any work over the Limits of Liability and any other over and above work identified by the Government. Provide a detailed understanding of all costs included within the contractor’s unit price to perform one hour of work-in-place.

9. Risk mitigation. Note that practical contingency plans are required to mitigate risks involving shortages of: material, equipment, and workers (licensed, certified, and security cleared as appropriate) to successfully perform the contract. Provide a narrative on how the technical approach and contingency plans will mitigate risks involving shortages of material, equipment and workers.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: Factor 3 will be evaluated as an overall factor with no sub-factors. The Government will evaluate the degree to which the offeror’s technical approach:

a. Demonstrates adequate staffing levels for each annex, sub-annex, and spec item supported by a reasonable Basis of Estimate (BOE), a reasonable understanding of the requirements and labor quantities and skills needed to successfully perform. Offerors who fail to provide a completed hard copy and MS Excel version of the Attachment JB-1 for the total effort to include the prime contractor and all subcontractors for the base period will be considered unacceptable. Offerors who propose inadequate staffing levels without a unique and innovative approach or methodology to support it may be evaluated less favorably or considered unacceptable.

b. Demonstrates an approach/methodology to effectively achieve performance objectives and standards for each annex, sub-annex, and spec item that reflects the current industry and/or commercial practices, standards and procedures for each major task. The offeror’s methodology clearly demonstrates an approach to performing service on the systems for applicable sub-annexes to include but not limited to PM and IMP requirements. The offeror’s methodology clearly demonstrates an adequate approach to performing service orders.

The offeror demonstrates an understanding of and commitment to adhere to all limits of liability identified in each respective spec item. The approach clearly demonstrates an understanding of the systems approach described in Section J. The methodology demonstrates a state-of-the-art, reliability-centered inspection, testing, maintenance and repair program that ensures systems are maintained fully functional in accordance with design parameters and OEM specifications. The methodology presents a labor efficient approach that ensures best industry practices are applied to accomplish all requirements. The approach demonstrates an understanding of supply chain management necessary to ensure materials, supplies, and equipment availability meet contractual delivery timelines. The approach demonstrates an understanding of current industry standards, policies, procedures, and processes utilized in accomplishing the complexity and magnitude of service requirements set forth in the performance objectives and standards of the Performance Work Statement.

c. The offeror shall provide the following:

1. Demonstrates an approach/methodology to effectively achieve the 1503030 requirement of the removal tires, recoverable material, and recyclable material off of NS Guantanamo Bay. Failure to provide a methodology ensuring the removal of tires, recoverable material, and recyclable material will be considered unacceptable.

2. The offeror’s methodology clearly demonstrates an approach to performing service on the systems for applicable sub-annexes to include but not limited to PM and IMP requirements. The offeror demonstrates an understanding of all limits of liability identified in each respective spec item. The approach clearly demonstrates an understanding of the systems approach described in Section J. The methodology demonstrates a state-of-the-art, reliability-centered inspection, testing, maintenance and repair program that ensures systems are maintained fully functional in accordance with design parameters and OEM specifications.

3. The offeror’s methodology for performing and understanding service orders for each applicable annex/sub-annex demonstrates an efficient and effective approach to achieve the requirements in the solicitation. The offeror demonstrates an understanding of the service order limits of liability identified in each respective spec item.

4. The offeror’s methodology clearly demonstrates an effective and efficient approach that ensures electrical power and quality water production is available at all times. Methodology must ensure that all performance objectives and standards are met and ensures safe, quality electrical and water is provided to Guantanamo Bay residents.

5. The methodology presents an efficient approach that ensures best industry practices are applied to accomplish all requirements. The approach demonstrates an understanding of supply chain management necessary to ensure materials, supplies, spare parts and equipment availability meet contractual delivery timelines. The approach demonstrates an understanding of current industry standards, policies, procedures, and processes utilized in accomplishing the complexity and magnitude of service requirements set forth in the performance objectives and standards of the Performance Work Statement.

6. Demonstrates an approach/methodology to effectively achieve the ICAP and UICAP requirements identified in Sub-annexes 1501000 and 1601000, respectively.

7. Demonstrates a methodology that ensures Annex 1700000 vehicles are maintained and repaired within the allowable downtime standard. Methodology demonstrates an understanding of the maintenance and repair requirements and the BSVE limits of liabilities identified in Section C.

8. The offeror demonstrates an understanding of the unit price labor (UPL) rate.

Acknowledges that the labor rate is fully burden and no additional costs will be added post-award. Proposal will be deemed unacceptable if UPL rate is not fully burden.

d. Demonstrates an understanding of the potential, relevant risks to be encountered during contract performance as well as an approach/contingency plan to effectively mitigate risks across all annexes and sub-annexes.

e. Demonstrates realistic labor (direct and indirect), material, and equipment in relation to the work to be performed that reflects a clear understanding of the requirements, and is consistent with other portions of the offeror’s proposal (i.e. Attachments JB-1, JB-2, etc.).

(iii) Factor 4, Safety

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The offeror shall submit the following information:

(For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR, DART and TRC Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.) A copy of the blank Safety Data Sheet to be used for submission is provided as Attachment JM-2_N6945020R0010_SafetyData.docx.

a. Experience Modification Rate (EMR): Include three previous complete calendar years’

(2016, 2017 & 2018) worth of data. This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If the offeror has no EMR or premium, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of the factor submission.

b. OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate and

Submit three previous complete calendar years’ (2016, 2017 & 2018) worth of data. If an offeror cannot submit an OSHA DART rates, for any year, affirmatively state so and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART rate data negatively must be addressed as part of this factor submission.

c. Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate: Submit three previous complete calendar years’

(2016, 2017 & 2018) worth of data. If an offeror cannot submit an OSHA TRC rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA TRC rate data negatively must be addressed as part of this factor submission.

d. Technical Approach for Safety: Describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. The offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work. The offeror will describe any innovative methods that will be employed to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and/or all subcontractor levels. Additionally, the contactor will describe their methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. The technical approach to safety narrative shall be limited to two pages.

(i) Basis of Evaluation: The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

- Experience Modification Rate (EMR)

- OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART)

- OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates

- Offeror Technical Approach to Safety

- Other sources of information available to the Government

a. Experience Modification Rate (EMR): For the three previous complete calendar years

(2016, 2017 & 2018) the offeror will submit EMR. If no EMR exists, the offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate explaining why not. If an insurance company-provided equivalent rate is provided, it will be treated the same as an EMR. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of this selection factor. The board will evaluate the EMR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

b. OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rates: For the three previous complete calendar years (2016, 2017 & 2018), the offeror will submit their OSHA DART, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If unable to submit OSHA DART rates, affirmatively state so, and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART rate data and negative trends should be addressed as part of this element. The board will evaluate the OSHA DART rates to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact rates.

c. OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates: For the three previous complete calendar years (2016, 2017 & 2018), the offeror will submit their OSHA TRC, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If unable to submit OSHA TRC rates, affirmatively state so, and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA TRC rate data and negative trends should be addressed as part of this element. The board will evaluate the OSHA TRC rates to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact rates.

d. Technical Approach to Safety: The offeror will describe their plan to evaluate their safety performance and that of potential subcontractors. Also, describe any innovative methods that the offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. The Safety Narrative shall be limited to two pages. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which the offeror will consider a history of safe performance in the selection of subcontractors for the upcoming project. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which innovations are being proposed that may enhance safety on this procurement and validate the contractor has addressed methodology to be used in the execution of an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques/processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. Those offerors whose plan demonstrates a commitment to hire subcontractors with a culture of safety and who propose innovative methods to enhance a safe working environment may be given greater weight in the evaluation.

e. Other Sources of Information Available to the Government: Other sources for safety may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) in Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and other related databases.

(1) Factor 5, Past Performance

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: FOR EACH PROJECT IDENTIFIED IN RESPONSE

TO FACTOR 1, IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED

WITH THE PROPOSAL. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1, Corporate Experience. AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ

WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

If a CPARS evaluation is not available, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment C), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Jennifer Doherty or Rebecca Jones via email at Jennifer.doherty@navy.mil or rebecca.m.jones@navy.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Also, include performance recognition documents received within the last five (5) years such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the offeror.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The degree to which past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (e.g., PPIRS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), performance recognition documents, and information obtained from any other source) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance considering:

− A pattern of successful completion of tasks;

− A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality;

− A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.); and − Recency/relevancy (as defined in Factor 1) of tasks performed that are identical to, similar to, or related to the task at hand.

(End of Summary of Changes)