N6817124Q20270001U00002.pdf

N6299524RC00YYK

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The Purpose of this amendment is to extend out the due date and to change 52.212-2 language to make this a Best Value Procurement.

Please See Summary of Changes for more details.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 5

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6817124Q2027

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

02-May-2024

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

U0002

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

13-May-2024

CODE

NAVSUP FLC SIGONELLA EXPEDITIONARY TEAM

PSC 817 BOX 50

FPO AE 09622

N68171 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL: TEL:

N6817124Q2027

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 13-May-2024 02:00 PM to 20-May-2024 02:00 PM.

The following have been modified:

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1

52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS--COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL

SERVICES (NOV 2021)

It is emphasized that this is solicitation is issued in accordance with the procedures of FAR Parts 13 and 13.106- 2(b)(3), which are intended to streamline source selection and be minimally burdensome for both the Navy and the quoters interested in competing for this requirement. The procedures of FAR Part 15.3 do not apply to this source selection. While not an all-inclusive list, some examples of FAR 15.3 requirements that do not apply are the late is late rule, competitive range determinations, the FAR Part 15.3 rules for discussions, formal evaluations plans, and formal evaluation documentation. Any references in the solicitation to offer/offeror shall be deemed to mean quotation/quoter.

The following clause is tailored in accordance with FAR Part 12.302(d) and replaces the foregoing clause, FAR 52.212-1, in its entirety:

Instructions to Offerors-Commercial Items, quotes shall also consist of the following:

1) TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION: Vendor shall submit technical narrative description of how the work will be accomplished and a description of the warranty of the work offered as detailed within the Performance Work Statement / Statement of Work (SOW) and addition to the SOW detailed within this RFQ.

2) PRICING INFORMATION: The contractor shall submit a signed copy of the SF-1449

Solicitation/Contract/Order for Commercial Items, with blocks 17a, and 30a through 30c completed. All solicitation amendments must be acknowledged or signed and returned with the quote. The SF1449 should also contain pricing info for Contract Line Item Number (CLINs) 0001 and CLIN 1001 pricing.

3) PAST PERFORMANCE: If available, the contractor may submit past performance data on similar contracts as this requirement.

Quote Response Date & Time:

Each quoter must submit the following items to Kenneth Mackay at FISCSI DET Sigonella by the RFQ closing date stated on Block 8 of the SF-1449 at the following email addresses, clearly identifying RFQ #N6817124Q2027 in the subject line:

kenneth.e.mackay.civ@us.navy.mil heather.l.hall62.civ@us.navy.mil

All quoters are responsible for verifying if their quote was received by the contracting office. It is suggested to verify that the quote has been correctly received or by e-mail or calling Tel. Numbers 095 867492 or 095 862311.

Offerors are advised that delays can be experienced with the Government’s e-mail system. Additionally, the e-mail system capacity for each e-mail is 10MB (better if smaller). E-mails greater than 10MB will not be delivered and will not be considered. Therefore, quotes exceeding the size limit must be sent via multiple e- mails. Zipped files are not accepted.

Questions Response Date & Time:

Questions to this RFQ are due by 1400 local time (Catania, Italy time) on 15 May 2024 and will be submitted electronically, in writing to kenneth.e.mackay.civ@us.navy.mil and heather.l.hall62.civ@us.navy.mil with RFQ#: N6817124Q2027 in the subject line. Other methods of submitting questions are not authorized and will not be acknowledged or addressed. All items detailed below must be submitted for the quote to be considered complete. The Government reserves the right to not evaluate incomplete quotes.

ADDITIONAL IMPORTANT INFORMATION:

4) A quote will be accepted in the English language only. Any quote received in other than the English language will be rejected.

5) All quotes shall be in US Dollars Currency.

6) The Quoter agrees to hold the prices in its quote firm for 60 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of the Quote.

7) System for Award Management (SAM). The Contractor shall be registered in the SAM database prior to the award of this contract. Further information and guidance regarding SAM can be found at the SAM website: www.sam.gov.

8) Each quote should contain the contractor's best terms from a price and technical standpoint. It is the contractor’s responsibility to ensure that there are no discrepancies presented within the information contained in its quote. Potential quoters are hereby notified that in the event there are discrepancies within information in a quote will be rejected.

(End of provision)

FAR 52.212-2 - EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES

(NOV 2021)

(a) The Government intends to award a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contract resulting from this RFQ to the responsible Offeror whose offer, conforming to the RFQ, provides the best value to the Government, all factors considered.

"Best value" means the expected outcome of an acquisition that, in the Government's estimation, provides the greatest overall benefit(s) in response to the requirement. The Offeror is advised that the proposal meeting the solicitation requirements with the lowest price may not be selected for an award if award to a higher priced Offeror is determined to be more beneficial to the Government.

(b) Quotes will be evaluated using the following factors to select the quote that provides the best value:

(1) Factor 1 –Technical Capability - Certifications

The Quote will be evaluated to determine if the Quoter has submitted the following required documentation:

CAGE Code and/or UEI number (Reference 52.212-3 – Requirement to have an active SAM registration)

This Factor will be evaluated as Pass/Fail as stated in Table 1 below.

Table 1 - Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings

Acceptable Quote clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Quote does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

NOTE: All quoters receiving a rating of “Acceptable” in Technical Capability will then be evaluated on Past Performance and Price. Any quoter rated “Unacceptable” in Factor 1 will not be evaluated further.

Past Performance and Price will be subject to the best value trade-off process. Past Performance is more important than price.

(2) Factor 2 – Past Performance

The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to allow the Government to assess the Quoter’s ability to perform the effort described in this RFQ, based on the Quoter’s demonstrated recent and relevant past performance.

If a Quoter has no recent/relevant past performance record, or if a Quoter’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned, the Quoter may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on Factor 2. In this case, the Quoter’s past performance will be assigned a rating of ‘Neutral Confidence.’

(i) The first part of the evaluation is to evaluate the recency of the offeror’s past performance. Past performance will be considered recent if the work has been performed within three (3) years before the RFQ release date.

(ii) The second part of the evaluation is to evaluate the relevance of the offeror’s past performance. To be considered relevant, the offeror’s past performance information will be assessed on the similarity of the scope, magnitude, and complexity of the Offeror’s prior or ongoing contracts to this RFQ’s performance requirements.

The Government will evaluate Past Performance relevancy as per Table 4 below:

Table 4 - Past Performance Relevancy Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Description

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

(iii) The third part of the evaluation is to evaluate the overall quality of the offeror’s past performance for a confidence assessment rating. The Government will evaluate confidence as per Table 5 below:

Table 5 - Performance Confidence Assessments Ratings

Adjectival Rating Description Substantial Confidence

Based on the Quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the Quoter will successfully perform the required effort

Satisfactory Confidence

Based on the Quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Quoter will successfully perform the required effort

Neutral Confidence

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Quoter’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned

Limited Confidence

Based on the Quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the Quoter will successfully perform the required effort

No Confidence Based on the Quoter’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the Quoter will be able to successfully perform the required effort

The Government will use the Past Performance Information Sheets, Past Performance Questionnaires, and any information independently obtained from Government or commercial sources to evaluate past performance for each Quoter. The Government may verify past performance information and may contact some or all of the references provided, and may collect information through questionnaires and telephone interviews. Additional past performance information may be obtained from other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (ESRS), other databases, the Defense Contract Management Agency, and interviews with Government personnel.

(3) Factor 3 – Price

Price will not be assigned an adjectival rating but will be evaluated for completeness and reasonableness.

1. Completeness: All price information/data required in the RFQ has been submitted.

2. Reasonableness: Price is fully justified and supported and is considered fair under current market conditions. Reasonableness may be determined by comparison with the Government estimate, comparison with other Quotes received, or any other applicable price analysis technique outlined in FAR 13. The Contracting Officer must determine the Quoter’s price to be fair and reasonable in order for the Quote to be eligible for award.

The government reserves the right to determine which Quotes show the capability to meet the requirements of this solicitation. The government reserves the right to eliminate from further consideration those Quotes which are considered unacceptable and not capable of being made acceptable without major rewrite or revision.

EVALUATION OF PRICE

The Government will evaluate offers, for award purposes, by adding the price of all base period and option CLINs.

CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY

To be eligible for award of a contract hereunder, a Quoter must be determined by the Contracting Officer to be a responsible prospective contractor in accordance with FAR 9.1.

(End of Summary of Changes)