The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
(Woodcraft Instruction Services / Solicitation No. N4561015RC00022) When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104 Contractor’s Name: _____________________________________________________________ Reference Name and Title: _______________________________________________________ Telephone Number:_________________________Email: _______________________________
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: _____________________ Dollar Amount: ___________ Contract Period of Performance (Recent): ____________________________________________
Description of Work (Relevancy): ________________________________________________________________________
Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 2. |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| 3. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner |
| 4. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| 5. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| 6. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 7. |
| Maintained acceptable work attendance and training attendance? |
| 8. |
| Maintained adequate subject matter knowledge to successfully train prisoners/workers? |
| YES/NO |
| 9. |
| Managed production methods for woodcraft type work? |
| YES/NO |
| 10. |
| Performed woodcraft shop instruction? |
| YES/NO |
| 11. |
| Supervised student woodcraft workers? |
| YES/NO |
| 12. |
| National Center for Construction Education and Research (NCCER) certified? |
| YES/NO |
| 13. |
| Obtained and maintained a security clearance? |
| YES/NO |
| 14. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 15. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
Reference table for rating scale.
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
Additional Comments: __________________________________________________________