18R3352_A0003_RFP_Edit.pdf
PDF 149 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Long Term Dry Cargo Time Charter Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N32205-18-R-3352
About this file
EDITS TO PARTS X AND XI; INSTRUCTIONS AND EVALUATION
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 18R3352_Q&A_0002.pdf | ||
| 17R3352_A0002_Closing_Time.pdf | ||
| DRYTIME_Fuel_Consumption.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 18R3352_Q&A_0001.pdf | ||
| 18R3352_A0001_RFP_Edit.pdf | ||
| 18R3352_RFP.pdf | ||
| DOL_WD_2014-0801_6.pdf | ||
| DOL_WD_2014-0800_7.pdf | ||
| DRYTIME_Fuel_Consumption.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
18 DECEMBER 2017
THIS IS THE MILITARY SEALIFT COMMAND NORFOLK, STRATEGIC SEALIFT
PROGRAM SUPPORT OFFICE, N103B
TO: ALL POTENTIAL OFFERORS
SUBJECT: N32205-18-R-3352, AMENDMENT 0003
REF: (A) MSC RFP N32205-18-R-3352, DATED 07 DECEMBER 2017, AS AMENDED
1. SUBJECT RFP IS HEREBY AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:
A. PART X(b)(10): ADD AS FOLLOWS: PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION:
(TAILORED)
FOR THE PURPOSE OF EVALUATING OFFERORS’ PAST PERFORMANCE:
A. “RECENT” IS DEFINED AS A CONTRACT IN-PROGRESS OR
COMPLETED WITHIN THE LAST THREE (3) YEARS.
B. “RELEVANT” IS DEFINED AS A CONTRACT THAT IS OF SIMILAR
SCOPE, MAGNITUDE, COMPLEXITY TO THE REQUIREMENTS AS SET FORTH
IN THIS SOLICITATION.
1. SCOPE: EXPERIENCE IN THE AREAS DEFINED IN THE PWS.
2. MAGNITUDE: THE MEASURE OF THE SIMILARITY OF THE
VOLUME, DOLLAR VALUE AND/OR DURATION OF THE WORK
ACTUALLY PERFORMED UNDER THE OFFEROR’S SUBMITTED
CONTRACTS TO THE PWS.
3. COMPLEXITY: THE MEASURE OF THE SIMILARITY OF
TECHNICAL DIFFICULTY, MANAGERIAL INTRICACY AND/OR
REQUIRED COORDINATION OF EFFORTS AND DISCIPLINES
PERFORMED BY THE OFFEROR IN ITS SUBMITTED CONTRACTS TO
THE PWS. FOR COMPLEXITY, NOT ONLY WILL THE TASKS
PERFORMED BY THE OFFEROR BE CONSIDERED, BUT ALSO THE
OFFEROR’S ABILITY TO COORDINATE TASKS (E.G., CONCURRENT
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS).
B. PART XI(d): AMEND TO READ AS FOLLOWS: PAST PERFORMANCE. THE
GOVERNMENT WILL SEARCH PPIRS FOR EACH OFFEROR’S THREE MOST
RECENT AND RELEVANT GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS FOR THE OCEAN
TRANSPORTATION OF CARGO.WHILE THE GOVERNMENT INTENDS TO
USE PRIMARILY PPIRS TO GATHER INFORMATION ON OFFERORS’ PAST
PERFORMANCE, IT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CONSIDER OTHER
SOURCES OF RELEVANT INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT WILL NOT
CONSIDER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF PARENT OR SISTER
COMPANIES, AND WILL ONLY CONSIDER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF
THE OFFEROR. RECENCY AND RELEVANCY ARE DEFINED IN SECTION X,
ABOVE, OF PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT
WILL CONSIDER THE EXTENT OF THE OFFEROR’S ABILITY TO PERFORM
A PREVIOUS CONTRACT SUCCESSFULLY IN THE AREAS OF; (A) QUALITY
OF PRODUCT OR SERVICES; (B) TIMELINESS OR SCHEDULING OF
SUPPLIES/DELIVERIES; (C) BUSINESS RELATIONS/CUSTOMER
SATISFACTION; AND (D) KEY PERSONNEL AND STAFFING (INCLUDING
SUBCONTRACTORS).
(A) AT A MINIMUM, AWARD WILL NOT BE MADE TO AN OFFEROR WHO IS
OR WITHIN THE PAST THREE YEARS HAS BEEN SERIOUSLY DEFICIENT
IN CONTRACT PERFORMANCE, UNLESS THE CONTRACTING OFFICER
DETERMINES THAT THE CIRCUMSTANCES WERE PROPERLY BEYOND
THE OFFEROR’S CONTROL OR THAT THE OFFEROR TOOK APPROPRIATE
CORRECTIVE ACTION.
(B) IF DISCUSSIONS ARE HELD, OFFEORS WILL BE GIVEN THE
OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS UNFAVORABLE REPORTS OF PAST
PERFORMANCE.
(C) RATING SCALE: THE GOVERNMENT WILL ASSIGN RATINGS AS
FOLLOWS: ACCEPTABLE: BASED ON THE OFFEROR'S PERFORMANCE
RECORD, THE GOVERNMENT HAS A REASONABLE EXPECTATION THAT
THE OFFEROR WILL SUCCESSFULLY PERFORM THE REQUIRED EFFORT,
OR THE OFFEROR'S PERFORMANCE RECORD IS UNKNOWN (SEE NOTE
BELOW). UNACCEPTABLE: BASED ON THE OFFEROR'S PERFORMANCE
RECORD, THE GOVERNMENT DOES NOT HAVE A REASONABLE
EXPECTATION THAT THE OFFEROR WILL BE ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY
PERFORM THE REQUIRED EFFORT.
NOTE: IN THE CASE OF AN OFFEROR WITHOUT A RECORD OF
RELEVANT PAST PERFORMANCE OR FOR WHOM INFORMATION ON
PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT AVAILABLE OR SO SPARSE THAT NO
MEANINGFUL PAST PERFORMANCE RATING CAN BE REASONABLY
ASSIGNED, THE OFFEROR MAY NOT BE EVALUATED FAVORABLY OR
UNFAVORABLY ON PAST PERFORMANCE (SEE FAR 15.305(A) (2) (IV)).
THEREFORE, THE OFFEROR SHALL BE DETERMINED TO HAVE
UNKNOWN PAST PERFORMANCE. IN THE CONTEXT OF
ACCEPTABILITY/UNACCEPTABILITY, “UNKNOWN” SHALL BE
CONSIDERED “ACCEPTABLE.”
C. PART XI(e)(a): AMEND TO READ AS FOLLOWS: THE OFFEROR'S PRICE
PROPOSAL WILL BE EVALUATED BASED ON THE VALUE OF THE CHARTER
HIRE RATES OFFERED FOR THE ENTIRE CHARTER PERIOD, COST OF FUEL,
AND ANY OTHER COSTS (E.G. DELIVERY AND/OR REDELIVERY BONUSES)
SET FORTH IN THE OFFER. FOR EVALUATION PURPOSES THE PERIOD OF
PERFORMANCE WILL CONSIST OF 365 DAYS FOR THE BASE PERIOD AND
365 DAYS FOR THE OPTION PERIOD. FUEL CALCULATIONS WILL BE BASED
UPON (A) 570 DAYS UNDERWAY LADEN AT THE SPEED SPECIFIED IN THE
INDIVIDUAL SOLICITATION (DRYTIME BOXES 66, 68, AND 70); (B) 0 DAYS
UNDERWAY BALLAST AT THE SPEED SPECIFIED IN THE INDIVIDUAL
SOLICITATION (DRYTIME BOXES 67, 69, AND 70); AND (C) 160 DAYS IN PORT
IDLE (DRYTIME BOX 71). DAYS INCLUDE THE BASE PERIOD OF
PERFORMANCE, PLUS THE OPTION PERIOD.
2. ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED.
SIGNED: KENNETH D. ALLEN, CONTRACTING OFFICER, MSC N103B
File details come from the government source that posted it.