15P0194amend.pdf

NSWC INDIAN HEAD EOD TECHNOLOGY DIVISION

ATTN: SUSAN GAYLOR

4072 NORTH JACKSON ROAD

INDIAN HEAD MD 20640

1300497301

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to add email address to Past Performance Sheet and change quote due date to 5 Nov 2015.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 7

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 05-Oct-2015

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N00174-15-T-0194

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

02-Oct-2015

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

05-Oct-2015

CODE

NSWC IHD

ATTN: SUSAN KILINSKI C12B

SUSAN.KILINSKI@NAVY.MIL

4072 N JACKSON RD., STE 132

INDIAN HEAD MD 20640-5115

N00174 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE N00174

FACILITY CODECODE

susan.gaylor@navy.milEMAIL:301-744-6617TEL:

SUSAN GAYLOR / CONTRACTS

N00174-15-T-0194

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 02-Nov-2015 05:00 PM to 05-Nov-2015 05:00 PM.

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES

The following were previously included by reference and are now included by full text:

52.222-25 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION COMPLIANCE (APR 1984)

The offeror represents that

(a) [ ] it has developed and has on file, [ ] has not developed and does not have on file, at each establishment, affirmative action programs required by the rules and regulations of the Secretary of Labor (41 CFR 60-1 and 60-2), or

(b) [ ] has not previously had contracts subject to the written affirmative action programs requirement of the rules and regulations of the Secretary of Labor.

(End of provision)

SECTION K - REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS

The following were previously included by reference and are now included by full text:

52.222-22 PREVIOUS CONTRACTS AND COMPLIANCE REPORTS (FEB 1999)

The offeror represents that --

(a) ( ) It has, ( ) has not participated in a previous contract or subcontract subject to the Equal Opportunity clause of this solicitation;

(b) ( ) It has, ( ) has not, filed all required compliance reports; and

(c) Representations indicating submission of required compliance reports, signed by proposed subcontractors, will be obtained before subcontract awards.

(End of provision)

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONARE

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FOR SOLICITATION NUMBER

Offeror’s Name:

Name of agency/activity completing questionnaire:

Name and title of the person completing questionnaire:

Length of time your agency/activity has been involved with the Offeror:

SUBMIT PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO THE CLOSING DATE OF THE

SOLICITATION TO:

Naval Surface Warfare Center

4072 North Jackson Road

Suite 132, Code A24B

Indian Head, MD 20640-5115 e-mail address: susan.gaylor@navy.mil or FAX: 301-744-6632

RATING

Please use the following guidelines to answer the questions. The Offeror’s Past Performance will be considered

ACCEPTABLE or UNACCEPTABLE as detailed below:

EVALUATION CRITERIA

ACCEPTABLE-The Offeror’s performance of previously awarded relevant contract(s) met or exceeded contractual requirements. The assessed prior performance was accomplished with very minor problems or some problems for which corrective actions taken, or proposed to be taken, by the Offeror were, or are expected to be, mostly effective.

Performance over completed contracts ranged from adequate to the highest quality or exhibited a trend of becoming

so. The Offeror’s past performance record leads to an expectation of successful performance.

UNACCEPTABLE-The Offeror’s performance of previously awarded relevant contract(s) did not meet some contractual requirements and recovery did not occur within the period of performance. The assessed prior performance reflected some serious problem(s) for which the Offeror either failed to identify or implement corrective actions in a timely manner, or for which the corrective actions implemented or proposed to be implemented were, or are expected to be, partially or mostly ineffective. Performance over completed contracts was consistently of mediocre or poor quality or exhibited a trend of becoming so. The Offeror’s past performance record leads to an expectation that successful performance will not be achieved, or might be difficult to achieve, or that it can occur only with increased levels of Government management and oversight.

A C

C E

P T

A B

L E

U N

A C

C E

P T

A B

L E

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

The referenced contractor was responsive to the customer’s needs.

The contractor’s personnel were qualified to meet the requirements.

The contractor’s ability to accurately estimate cost.

TIMELINESS

The contractor’s ability to ensure, to the extent of its responsibility, that all tasks were completed within the requested time frame.

TECHNICAL SUCCESS

The contractor had a clear understanding of the tasks detailed in the SOW and/or

Delivery Orders.

The contractor’s ability to complete tasks correctly the first time.

The contractor’s ability to resolve problems.

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

Did the contractor successfully manage its subcontractors?

Was the contractor’s management effective in controlling cost, schedule and performance requirements?

QUALITY

The contractor’s quality and reliability of services delivered.

PLEASE PROVIDE SUBJECTIVE RESPONSES FOR THE FOLLOWING:

1. Would you recommend this contractor for similar contracts? Please explain:

2. Have you experienced special or unique problems with the referenced contractor that the Government should be aware of in making our decision?

PRIME ONLY

Past Performance Matrix

References $ Value of

Contract Product/Work Description

Contract

Completed on Time

YES / NO

Contract

Completed at

Proposed

Cost

YES / NO

(if no % of overrun)

Provide Explanation for

NO answers

The following have been deleted:

HQ M-2-0001 BASIS OF AWARD

(End of Summary of Changes)