ATTACHMENT_3.pdf

SOLICITATION NO. N00173-16-R-DH01

Attachment 3

Past Performance Questionnaire

1. Past Performance Assessment. The Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), Washington, DC, is soliciting competitive offers from contractors highly specialized in the areas of Software Defined

Radio Test Bed (SDR) systems that can enable Principal Investigator (PI) led research teams to estimate how digital signal processing algorithms implemented on the SDR would behave in the real world before a field test is conducted. The contractor shall provide SDR system components including software defined radios, channel emulator, RF shielded enclosures to house the SDRs, racks to mount the equipment in, and RF cables required to connect the SDRs to the channel emulator. Additionally, the contractor shall provide engineering, system development, technical documentation, delivery, setup and training of the entire system.

It is requested that you complete this questionnaire and provide via email to the below listed individual no later than 15 August 2016 at 1:00pm, Eastern Standard Time, the closing time for receipt of offers.

Naval Research Laboratory (NRL)

Attn: Lauren Levy, Contract Specialist

4555 Overlook Ave. SW. Washington, DC 20375

Phone: (202) 767-6542

E-Mail: lauren.levy@nrl.navy.mil

RETURN THIS COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE CONTRACT SPECIALIST.

*NOTE: IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OFFEROR TO ENSURE ALL PAST

PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRES ARE SUBMITTED TO THE GOVERNMENT

BY THE CLOSING DATE AND TIME IF DATE IS DIFFERENT THAN ABOVE.

If you need more space than that provided, please attach additional pages. Responses will be treated as source selection sensitive information. If you have any questions, please contact the

Contract Specialist at the above e-mail address.

mailto:lauren.levy@nrl.navy.mil

N00173-16-R-DH01

2. Contract Information. Please complete the following:

Contractor:

Contract Number:

Period of Performance:

Dollar Amount at Award:

Dollar Amount at Completion

(or Current Dollar Amount, if not Completed):

Contract Type: Fixed-Price;

Labor Hour or Time and

Material; Cost-

Reimbursement (CPFF, CPAF, CPIF, etc.)

Describe the Products or

Services:

3. Contract Relevancy. For comparison with the size and scope of the Navy Next Generation

RF Systems acquisition, please provide the following information pertaining to the contract identified in Section 2 above:

(a) Size: $______ per year in contract services.

(b) Scope: Check all that apply:

______ Program Management Support

______ Planning Support

______ Business and Financial Management Support

______ Technical Management Support

______ Test and Evaluation Management Support

______ General Logistics Management Support

______ Production Management Support

______ Engineering Support

______ Other Support (please describe: _________________________)

4. Performance Assessment Values.

5 - Outstanding. Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements, to the Government’s benefit. Contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

4 - Excellent. Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements, to the Government’s benefit. Contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

3 – Good. Performance meets contractual requirements. Contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

2 - Satisfactory. Performance barely meets some contractual requirements. Contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

1 - Unsatisfactory. Performance does not meet some or most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. Contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

0 - Not Applicable. Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed.

5. Assessment Elements. Please select/circle the appropriate performance assessment value for each item on the questionnaire and provide supporting narrative.

a. Cost Control. Rate the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost (including reporting and analyzing variances) and ability to deliver at the agreed-to cost/price. Provide reasons for changes to the contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/underrun, Government-imposed schedule changes).

5 4 3 2 1 0

Comments:

b. Schedule. Rate the contractor’s ability to deliver according to the agreed-to schedule.

What were the causes of any schedule variances?

c. Mission Requirements. Rate the contractor’s ability to provide a product or service that met your mission requirements.

d. Quality. Rate the contractor’s ability to provide a product or service that met your required level of quality. Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards.)

e. Socioeconomic Goals. Rate the contractor’s ability to meet any applicable subcontracting goals for utilization of Small Business (SB), Small Disadvantaged Businesses (SDB), Women-

Owned Small Businesses (WOSB), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business

(SDVOSB), HUBZone and Historically Black Colleges and Universities/Minority Institutions

(HBCU/MI).

f. Subcontract Management. Rate the contractor’s ability to meet the goals of the subcontracting plan, to include the ability to timely award and manage subcontracts.

g. Business Relations. Rate the contractor’s ability to integrate and coordinate all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness, quality of problem resolution, corrective action plans, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, customer satisfaction, and its ability to submit accurate invoices in a timely manner.

h. Management of Key Personnel. Assess the contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing—when necessary—key personnel.

i. Recommendation. To what extent would you recommend this contractor for additional contracts? Rate on the following scale: 5 = Yes, definitely; 4 = Yes, likely; 3 = Maybe, 2 = No, not likely; 1 = No, not ever; 0 = N/A.

6. Other References. If you are aware of any other contract or a Point of Contact (POC) who is familiar with the contractor’s performance under this contract, please identify.

Name, Phone, and E-Mail

Address:

7. Assessor Information. Please provide the following information about yourself:

Name:

Title:

Address:

Phone Number:

E-Mail Address:

Thank you for your assistance.