RFI_FFG(X)_Response_Template.docx
DOCX document 34 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFI: FFG(X) - US Navy Guided Missile Frigate Replacement Program Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N0002418R2300
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FFG(X)_RFI_Industry_Question_Responses_10Aug17_FBO.pdf | ||
| FFG(X)_Industry_Day_Attendee_Listing_25_July_2017_FBO.pdf | ||
| FFG(X)_Industry_Day_Brief_25_July_2017_FBO.pdf | ||
| RFI_FFG(X)_Industry_Day_One-On-One_Breakout_Meeting_Schedule.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1_FFG(X)__Industry_Day_Registration_Form_Final.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FFG(X) RFI RESPONSE TEMPLATE
SECTION A: RESPONDER ORGANIZATION INFORMATION:
1. Organization Name:
2. Address:
3. Point of Contact:
a. Name:
b. Position/Title:
c. Email Address:
d. Telephone Number:
SECTION B: REQUESTED INFORMATION:
4. Ship Design Description and Characteristics - Provide drawings or engineering products as attachments. List attachments in item number 9.
a. Explain the vulnerability features of your parent design
b. Provide other Ship Design Description and Characteristics
5. Explain how your parent design can be used in accomplishing the multi-mission capability desired as outlined in the FFG RFI. If you feel the capabilities can be met with systems other than those specified, please provide details and rationale for alternate considerations in meeting the FFG required capabilities.
6. Cost drivers - Identify and detail any significant cost drivers. Identify if the cost driver is non-recurring, recurring or both. Provide ROM estimates of impacts. If there are ranges of uncertainty for ROM, the following guidance is offered: Low: anything below $25M, Moderate: $25M-100M, High: anything above $100M.
a. Cost Driver:
i. Applicable Threshold Requirements or Applicable Warfare Systems:
ii. Recommended Mitigations and ROM Savings:
iii. Rationale for Proposed Tradeoffs:
7. Cost and Schedule Estimates (Base Year 2020 dollars)
a. Non-recurring and Recurring Design Cost:
b. Lead Ship Costs:
c. Average Cost for Follow-on Ships:
d. Most Affordable Procurement Profile:
i. X/X/X/X/X/X/X/X
ii. Scale of Savings versus Baseline Profile
e. Operations & Support Cost Drivers:
i. Manning Numbers:
ii. Maintenance Costs:
iii. Fuel Assumptions and Costs:
iv. Service Life Assumptions:
8. Please provide other relevant ideas, design features, or additional notes
9. Please list all attachments
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .