J2 - Evaluation Criteria.pdf
PDF 291 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FM-MNS Road Maintenance Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 12445223Q0027
- Issued by
- Department of Agriculture Forest Service
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SF-1442_12445223Q0027 (Re-Solicitation copy).pdf | ||
| J1 - Statement of Work.pdf | ||
| J3 - Wage Determination_SC20230034 (Hwy).pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
US Department of Agriculture (USDA)
Proposal Evaluation Criteria
Contents
1.1 Factor 1 Technical Confindence
2.1 Factor 2 Past Performance
Summary Evaluation Factors include cost, past performance acceptability, and technical acceptability. Award will be made to the lowest cost, technically acceptable offeror.
2.3 Technical Confidence Rating
Confidence Rating Definition
Sufficient Confidence (Low Risk)
The Government has confidence the vendor understands the requirement, proposes a sound approach, and will be successful in performing the contract with little or no Government intervention.
Insufficient Confidence (Unacceptable and
High Risk)
The Government has low confidence the vendor understands the requirement, proposes a sound approach, and will be successful in performing the contract with some Government intervention.
2. Past Performance Confidence Assessment
Rating Description
Sufficient Confidence Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Insufficient Confidence Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform or the contractor has failed to address past performance .
karlbuchholz Cross-Out
| 1 |
| 1.1 Factor 1 Experience Grading Forest Service Roads |
| 1.1.1 Subfactor 1: Experience grading Coastal Pine Forests |
| Section 3: Definitions |
| 2 |
| 2.1 Go/No Go Ratings |
| 2.2 Adjectival Ratings |
| 2.3 Technical Confidence Rating |
| 2.4 Past Performance Confidence |
| 2.5 Performance Confidence Assessment |
| 2.6 Quote/Proposal Metrics |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .