Attachment_3_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_.docx
DOCX document 29 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Evaluating Approaches for Quantifying Maritime Emissions Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HSCG2315QMSR067
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment_2-_Pricing_Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| NewSynopsisSolicitation_Amendment_2.docx | DOCX document | |
| Responses_to_Questions_submitted_in_response_to_Solicitation.doc | DOC document | |
| Amendment_2_.pdf | ||
| Amendment_1_to_Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Ombudsman_Notice.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_1-SOW_Quantifications_of_Maritime_Air_Emissions.docx | DOCX document | |
| NewSynopsisSolicitation_(2).docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_2-_Pricing_Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Enclosure 3
HSCG23-15-Q-MSR067
Submit Completed Questionnaires to: Angie.S.White@uscg.mil By 12:00pm EST August 13, 2015.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
See the below table for the adjectival ratings and definitions for the past performance evaluation:
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Exceptional |
| Three or more examples where performance on the subject contract significantly exceeded requirements to the Government’s benefit. |
| Very Good |
| One or two examples where performance on the subject contract met requirements and exceeded some to the Government’s benefit. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance on the subject contract met requirements. |
| Marginal |
| Performance on the subject contract did not meet some requirements. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| One or more examples where performance on the subject contract significantly failed to meet requirements due to fault of contractor. |
Quality of Product or Service:
Remarks:
Timeliness of Performance:
Business Relations:
If subcontracts were involved, rate Contractor’s performance in managing them:
Was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction?: Check One: |_| Yes |_| No
Would you recommend the selection of this firm?: Check One: |_| Yes |_| No
Overall Rating:
image1.emf
Microsoft_Office_Word_97_-_2003_Document1.doc Enclosure 3
HSCG23-12-Q-MOT001
Submit Completed Questionnaires to: Marlecia Newby
Email: Marlecia.M.Newby@uscg.mil
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Contractor’s Name:
Customer’s Name:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Period of Performance:
Contract Value: $
Description of Requirement:
Quality of Product or Service:
Cost Control:
Timeliness of Performance:
Business Relations: Rating -
If subcontracts were involved, rate Contractor’s performance in managing them:
Was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction?: Check One: FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No
Would you recommend the selection of this firm?: Check One: FORMCHECKBOX Yes FORMCHECKBOX No
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .