Past Performance Questionaire blank.docx
DOCX document 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- United Stated Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) Postdoctoral Research Awards Program Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA9550-11-R-0001
About this file
Word document version of the Past Performance questionaire to make it easier for your references to fill out.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FA9550-11-R-0001 0003.pdf | ||
| FA9550-11-R-0001 0002.pdf | ||
| FA9550-11-R-0001 RFP Q A.docx | DOCX document | |
| FA9550-11-R-0001 conformed to 0001.pdf | ||
| FA9550-11-R-0001 0001.pdf | ||
| FA9550-11-R-0001 30 June.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
10.0 PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When filled in this document is source selection sensitive information iaw FAR 2.101 and 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor: _________________________________________________________________________
Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _________________________________
Contract number: _______________________________________
Contract type: ______________________________
Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____
Period of performance: _________________________________________________________
Initial contract cost: $____________________________
Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________
Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:
Description of service provided: ____________________________________________________________________________________
SECTION 2. CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
Customer or agency name: ____________________________________________________________________________________
Customer or agency description (if applicable): ____________________________________________________________________________________
Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:
SECTION 3. EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
Evaluator's name: ___________________________________________________________________________________
Evaluator's title: ___________________________________________________________________________________
Evaluator's phone/fax number: ___________________________________________________________________________________
D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: _____________________
SECTION 4. EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor's performance by placing an "X" in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL
B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - The contractor's performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
P PURPLE/VERY GOOD- The contractor's performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
G GREEN/SATISFACTORY - The contractor's performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Y YELLOW/MARGINAL - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
R RED/UNSATISFACTORY - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.
SECTION 5. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
| EXPERIENCE ELEMENT |
| Blue |
| Purple |
| Green |
| Yellow |
| Red |
| N/A |
| Providing successful accomplishment of all aspects of program management and administration of research program in a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) environment to include: |
| Continual execution of a process to successfully conduct capital rationing that has resulted in maximizing ROI and minimizing opportunity cost on internal projects |
Prior program management of all aspects of administration, management, and execution all logistical processes necessary to oversee up to 70 professionals with technical backgrounds at geograph-ically separated locations
Execution of prior marketing plan/process to attract superior research that has resulted in successful outreach and promotion as evidenced by meeting or exceeding pre-determined goals of the marketing plan/process.
Providing performance in a DoD environment
SECTION 5. EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor's performance by placing an "X" in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL
B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - The contractor's performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
P PURPLE/VERY GOOD- The contractor's performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
G GREEN/SATISFACTORY - The contractor's performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Y YELLOW/MARGINAL - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
R RED/UNSATISFACTORY - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.
SECTION 6: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
What were the contractor's greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?
What were the contractor's greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor's performance, as desired.
Evaluator's Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
| Mailing Address: | Air Force Office of Scientific Research/PK | |
| Attn: Ms. Laura Peters, Past Performance Evaluation Chairperson | ||
| 875 North Randolph Street | ||
| Suite 325, Room 4041 | ||
| Arlington VA 22203 |
| Or Encrypted Email to: | laura.peters@afosr.af.mil | |
| Or FAX to: | (703) 696-6420 |
FA9550-11-R-0001
Attachment 3, FAR 52.212-1 5 July 2011
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .