Past Performance Questionaire blank.docx

DOCX document 24 KB Posted

Attached to
United Stated Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) Postdoctoral Research Awards Program Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA9550-11-R-0001
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Research Laboratory

About this file

Word document version of the Past Performance questionaire to make it easier for your references to fill out.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to United Stated Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) Postdoctoral Research Awards Program, newest first.
File Type Posted
FA9550-11-R-0001 0003.pdf PDF
FA9550-11-R-0001 0002.pdf PDF
FA9550-11-R-0001 RFP Q A.docx DOCX document
FA9550-11-R-0001 conformed to 0001.pdf PDF
FA9550-11-R-0001 0001.pdf PDF
FA9550-11-R-0001 30 June.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

10.0 PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When filled in this document is source selection sensitive information iaw FAR 2.101 and 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor: _________________________________________________________________________

Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _________________________________

Contract number: _______________________________________

Contract type: ______________________________

Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

Initial contract cost: $____________________________

Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

Description of service provided: ____________________________________________________________________________________

SECTION 2. CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

Customer or agency name: ____________________________________________________________________________________

Customer or agency description (if applicable): ____________________________________________________________________________________

Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3. EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

Evaluator's name: ___________________________________________________________________________________

Evaluator's title: ___________________________________________________________________________________

Evaluator's phone/fax number: ___________________________________________________________________________________

D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: _____________________

SECTION 4. EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor's performance by placing an "X" in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - The contractor's performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

P PURPLE/VERY GOOD- The contractor's performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

G GREEN/SATISFACTORY - The contractor's performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Y YELLOW/MARGINAL - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

R RED/UNSATISFACTORY - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.

SECTION 5. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

EXPERIENCE ELEMENT
Blue
Purple
Green
Yellow
Red
N/A
Providing successful accomplishment of all aspects of program management and administration of research program in a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) environment to include:
Continual execution of a process to successfully conduct capital rationing that has resulted in maximizing ROI and minimizing opportunity cost on internal projects

Prior program management of all aspects of administration, management, and execution all logistical processes necessary to oversee up to 70 professionals with technical backgrounds at geograph-ically separated locations

Execution of prior marketing plan/process to attract superior research that has resulted in successful outreach and promotion as evidenced by meeting or exceeding pre-determined goals of the marketing plan/process.

Providing performance in a DoD environment

SECTION 5. EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor's performance by placing an "X" in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - The contractor's performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

P PURPLE/VERY GOOD- The contractor's performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

G GREEN/SATISFACTORY - The contractor's performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Y YELLOW/MARGINAL - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

R RED/UNSATISFACTORY - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.

SECTION 6: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

What were the contractor's greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?

What were the contractor's greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor's performance, as desired.

Evaluator's Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing Address:Air Force Office of Scientific Research/PK
Attn: Ms. Laura Peters, Past Performance Evaluation Chairperson
875 North Randolph Street
Suite 325, Room 4041
Arlington VA 22203
Or Encrypted Email to:laura.peters@afosr.af.mil
Or FAX to:(703) 696-6420

FA9550-11-R-0001

Attachment 3, FAR 52.212-1 5 July 2011

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .