FA9301-16-R-0010_EAFB_DFAC_Services.pdf

SEE ADDENDUM

(No Collect Calls)

FA9301-16-R-0010 14-Apr-2017

b. TELEPHONE NUMBER

661-277-2094

8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME

12:00 PM 15 May 2017

5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012)

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

(TYPE OR PRINT)

(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER)

ADDENDA ARE

26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )

23.

CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS

SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER

17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT

BELOW IS CHECKED

TELEPHONE NO.

FA93019. ISSUED BY

18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK

7. FOR SOLICITATION

INFORMATION CALL:

a. NAME

JENNA A. JACOBSON

2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER

(TYPE OR PRINT)

30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

0 27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.

25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

1. REQUISITION NUMBER

20.

ADDITIONAL SHEETS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED.

OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

ARE NOT ATTACHED

27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED

(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE

SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:

. YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION

28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN

% FOR:SET ASIDE:UNRESTRICTED OR X

SMALL BUSINESS

17a.CONTRACTOR/ CODE FACILITY

OFFEROR CODE

AFTC/PZIOA - FA9301

JENNA JACOBSON - 5 SO WOLFE

EDWARDS AFB CA 93524

18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

RATED ORDER UNDER

DPAS (15 CFR 700)

13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A

13b. RATING

CODE15. DELIVER TO CODE F1S3AD 16. ADMINISTERED BY

12. DISCOUNT TERMS11. DELIVERY FOR FOB DESTINA-

TION UNLESS BLOCK IS

MARKED

SEE SCHEDULE

14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION

RFQ IFB RFPX

41 SPTG/SVMF JOSHUA TREE - F5SVMF-F1S3AD

RAY MCMILLAN

130 W POPSON AVE BLDG 2412

EDWARDS AFB CA 93524-1065

TEL: 661-275-3665 FAX:

FAX:

TEL: 6612772094 SERVICE-DISABLED

VETERAN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS

8(A)

HUBZONE SMALL

BUSINESS

X

SIZE STANDARD:

38500000

NAICS:

722310

X

OFFER DATED

29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REF.

DELIVER ALL ITEMS SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY

COPIES TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND

EMAIL:

TEL:

31c. DATE SIGNED

SEE SCHEDULE

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICESITEM NO. QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

24.22.21.19.

WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS (WOSB)

ELIGIBLE UNDER THE WOMEN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM

EDWOSB

32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

(CONTINUED)

PAGE 2 OF67

ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________

32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN

RECEIVED INSPECTED

32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

37. CHECK NUMBER

FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE

36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED

CORRECT FOR

34. VOUCHER NUMBER

FINAL

33. SHIP NUMBER

PARTIAL

38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY

41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT

41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE

42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)

42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)

42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012) BACK

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

SEE SCHEDULE

20.

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES

21.

QUANTITY UNIT

22. 23.

UNIT PRICE

24.

AMOUNT

19.

ITEM NO.

FA9301-16-R-0010

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES ESTIMATED

QUANTITY

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

0001 11 Months

FULL FOOD SERVICE

FFP

The intent and scope of this Contract Line Item (CLIN) is to provide meal service according to the applicable regulation for ALL authorized users at Edwards, AFB.

Throughout the life of this contract it is fully expected that Averages as outlined in the PWS Appendix 2 - Workload Estimates. If at any time during the life of the contract the Monthly Meal Average varies more than the established +/- 15% as outlined in the PWS and either party under FAR Clause 52.243-1 Alt 1, Changes - Fixed Price, can request an equitable adjustment. Any modifications resulting in an increase or decrease in service under this CLIN will be considered to be in scope of this contract and its requirements.

FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED

NET AMT

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

0002 75 Hours

MEAL DELIVERY

FFP

Deliver meals for alerts, emergencies, special events, in accordance with the attached PWS paragraphs 1.4, 1.11, & 1.12.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

0003 75 Hours

EXTENDED SERVICE HOURS

FFP

Extended Meal Service for hours of operation beyond normal serving times in accordance with the attached PWS paragraph 1.12.

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES MAX

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

0004 1 Lot

MAINTENANCE & REPAIR OVER & ABOVE

FFP

Equipment maintenance and repair in accordance with PWS paragraph 1.9.

MAX

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

0005 30 Days

FOOD SERVICES AND TRANSITION PERIOD

FFP

Transition Period to cover training and familiarization of staff.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

1001 12 Months

OPTION FULL FOOD SERVICE

FFP

The intent and the scope of this Contract Line Item (CLIN) is to provide meal service according to the applicable regulation for ALL authorized users at Edwards, AFB. Throughout the life of this contract it is fully expected that the number of authorized users will fluctuate; this will affect the number of meals served. This price of this CLIN is based on the current Monthly Meal Averages as outlined in the PWS Appendix 2 - Workload Estimates. If at any time during the life of the contract the Monthly Meal Average varies more than the established +/- 15% as outlined in the PWS and either party under FAR Clause 52.243-1 Alt 1, Changes - Fixed Price, can request an equitable adjustment. Any modifications resulting in an increase or decrease in service under this CLIN will be considered to be in scope of this contract and its requirements.

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

1002 75 Hours

OPTION MEAL DELIVERY

FFP

Deliver meals for alerts, emergencies, special events, in accordance with the

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

1003 75 Hours

OPTION EXTENDED SERVICE HOURS

FFP

Extended Meal Service for hours of operation beyond normal serving times in

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

1004 1 Lot

OPTION MAINTENANCE & REPAIR OVER & ABOVE

FFP

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

2001 12 Months

OPTION FULL FOOD SERVICE

FFP

The intent and scope of this Contract Line Item (CLIN) is to provide meal service according to the applicable regulation for ALL authorized users at Edwards, AFB.

Throughout the life of this contract it is fully expected that Averages as outlined in the PWS Appendix 2 - Workload Estimates. If at any time during the life of the contract the Monthly Meal Average varies more than the established +/- 15% as outlined in the PWS and either party under FAR Clause 52.243-1 Alt 1, Changes - Fixed Price, can request an equitable adjustment. Any modifications resulting in an increase or decrease in service under this CLIN will be considered to be in

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

2002 75 Hours

OPTION MEAL DELIVERY

FFP

Deliver meals for alerts, emergencies, special events, in accordance with the

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

2003 75 Hours

OPTION EXTENDED SERVICE HOURS

FFP

Extended Meal Service for hours of operation beyond normal serving times in

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

2004 1 Lot

OPTION MAINTENANCE & REPAIR OVER & ABOVE

FFP

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

3001 12 Months

OPTION FULL FOOD SERVICE

FFP

The intent and scope of this Contract Line Item (CLIN) is to provide meal service according to the applicable regulation for ALL authorized users at Edwards, AFB.

Throughout the life of this contract it is fully expected that Averages as outlined in the PWS Appendix 2 - Workload Estimates. If at any time during the life of the contract the Monthly Meal Average varies more than the established +/- 15% as outlined in the PWS and either party under FAR Clause 52.243-1 Alt 1, Changes - Fixed Price, can request an equitable adjustment. Any modifications resulting in an increase or decrease in service under this CLIN will be considered to be in

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

3002 75 Hours

OPTION MEAL DELIVERY

FFP

Deliver meals for alerts, emergencies, special events, in accordance with the

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

3003 75 Hours

OPTION EXTENDED SERVICE HOURS

FFP

Extended Meal Service for hours of operation beyond normal serving times in

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

3004 1 Lot

OPTION MAINTENANCE & REPAIR OVER & ABOVE

FFP

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

4001 12 Months

OPTION FULL FOOD SERVICE

FFP

The intent and scope of this Contract Line Item (CLIN) is to provide meal service according to the applicable regulation for ALL authorized users at Edwards, AFB.

Throughout the life of this contract it is fully expected that Averages as outlined in the PWS Appendix 2 - Workload Estimates. If at any time during the life of the contract the Monthly Meal Average varies more than the established +/- 15% as outlined in the PWS and either party under FAR Clause 52.243-1 Alt 1, Changes - Fixed Price, can request an equitable adjustment. Any modifications resulting in an increase or decrease in service under this CLIN will be considered to be in

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

4002 75 Hours

OPTION MEAL DELIVERY

FFP

Deliver meals for alerts, emergencies, special events, in accordance with the

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

4003 75 Hours

OPTION EXTENDED SERVICE HOURS

FFP

Extended Meal Service for hours of operation beyond normal serving times in

UNIT UNIT PRICE ESTIMATED AMOUNT

4004 1 Lot

OPTION MAINTENANCE & REPAIR OVER & ABOVE

FFP

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 Destination Government Destination Government 0002 Destination Government Destination Government 0003 Destination Government Destination Government 0004 Destination Government Destination Government 0005 Destination Government Destination Government 1001 Destination Government Destination Government 1002 Destination Government Destination Government 1003 Destination Government Destination Government 1004 Destination Government Destination Government 2001 Destination Government Destination Government 2002 Destination Government Destination Government 2003 Destination Government Destination Government 2004 Destination Government Destination Government 3001 Destination Government Destination Government 3002 Destination Government Destination Government 3003 Destination Government Destination Government 3004 Destination Government Destination Government 4001 Destination Government Destination Government 4002 Destination Government Destination Government 4003 Destination Government Destination Government 4004 Destination Government Destination Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 POP 01-AUG-2017 TO

30-JUN-2018

N/A 41 SPTG/SVMF JOSHUA TREE - F5SVMF-

F1S3AD

RAY MCMILLAN

130 W POPSON AVE BLDG 2412

EDWARDS AFB CA 93524-1065

661-275-3665

F1S3AD

0002 POP 01-AUG-2017 TO

30-JUN-2018

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

0003 POP 01-AUG-2017 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

0004 POP 01-AUG-2017 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

0005 POP 01-JUL-2017 TO

31-JUL-2017

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

1001 POP 01-JUL-2018 TO

30-JUN-2019

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

1002 POP 01-JUL-2018 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

1003 POP 01-JUL-2018 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

1004 POP 01-JUL-2018 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

2001 POP 01-JUL-2019 TO

30-JUN-2020

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

2002 POP 01-JUL-2019 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

2003 POP 01-JUL-2019 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

2004 POP 01-JUL-2019 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

3001 POP 01-JUL-2020 TO

30-JUN-2021

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

3002 POP 01-JUL-2020 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

3003 POP 01-JUL-2020 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

3004 POP 01-JUL-2020 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

4001 POP 01-JUL-2021 TO

30-JUN-2022

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

4002 POP 01-JUL-2021 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

4003 POP 01-JUL-2021 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

4004 POP 01-JUL-2021 TO

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.202-1 Definitions NOV 2013 52.203-3 Gratuities APR 1984 52.203-12 Limitation On Payments To Influence Certain Federal

Transactions

OCT 2010

52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer Fiber Content Paper

MAY 2011

52.204-7 System for Award Management JUL 2013 52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel JAN 2011 52.209-6 Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting

With Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment

OCT 2015

52.209-7 Information Regarding Responsibility Matters JUL 2013 52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition JAN 2004 52.215-1 Alt I Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition (Jan 2017) -

Alternate I

OCT 1997

52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990 52.219-3 Notice of HUBZone Set-Aside or Sole Source Award NOV 2011 52.219-8 Utilization of Small Business Concerns OCT 2014 52.219-9 (Dev) Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Deviation 2016-O0009) NOV 2016 52.219-14 Limitations On Subcontracting NOV 2011 52.222-1 Notice To The Government Of Labor Disputes FEB 1997 52.222-22 Previous Contracts And Compliance Reports FEB 1999 52.223-2 Affirmative Procurement of Biobased Products Under Service and Construction Contracts

SEP 2013

52.223-5 Alt I Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know Information (May 2011) Alternate I

MAY 2011

52.223-10 Waste Reduction Program MAY 2011 52.225-13 Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases JUN 2008 52.227-1 Authorization and Consent DEC 2007 52.227-2 Notice And Assistance Regarding Patent And Copyright

Infringement

DEC 2007

52.228-5 Insurance - Work On A Government Installation JAN 1997

52.229-4 Federal, State, And Local Taxes (State and Local Adjustments)

FEB 2013

52.232-18 Availability Of Funds APR 1984 52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business

Subcontractors

DEC 2013

52.237-1 Site Visit APR 1984 52.237-2 Protection Of Government Buildings, Equipment, And

Vegetation

APR 1984

52.237-3 Continuity Of Services JAN 1991 52.242-13 Bankruptcy JUL 1995 52.242-15 Stop-Work Order AUG 1989 52.243-1 Changes--Fixed Price AUG 1987 52.243-1 Alt I Changes--Fixed Price (Aug 1987) - Alternate I APR 1984 52.247-68 Report of Shipment (REPSHIP) FEB 2006 52.253-1 Computer Generated Forms JAN 1991 252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

SEP 2011

252.203-7002 Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights SEP 2013 252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

NOV 2011

252.204-7000 Disclosure Of Information AUG 2013 252.204-7003 Control Of Government Personnel Work Product APR 1992 252.204-7004 Alt A System for Award Management Alternate A FEB 2014 252.204-7006 Billing Instructions OCT 2005 252.204-7008 Compliance With Safeguarding Covered Defense Information

Controls

DEC 2015

252.204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting

OCT 2016

252.205-7000 Provision Of Information To Cooperative Agreement Holders DEC 1991 252.209-7004 Subcontracting With Firms That Are Owned or Controlled By

The Government of a Country that is a State Sponsor of Terrorism

OCT 2015

252.217-7028 Over And Above Work DEC 1991 252.222-7007 Representation Regarding Combating Trafficking in Persons JAN 2015 252.223-7006 Prohibition On Storage, Treatment, and Disposal of Toxic or

Hazardous Materials

SEP 2014

252.225-7001 Buy American And Balance Of Payments Program-- Basic (Nov 2014)

NOV 2014

252.225-7002 Qualifying Country Sources As Subcontractors DEC 2012 252.225-7012 Preference For Certain Domestic Commodities FEB 2013 252.226-7001 Utilization of Indian Organizations and Indian-Owned

Economic Enterprises, and Native Hawaiian Small Business Concerns

SEP 2004

252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving Reports

JUN 2012

252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments DEC 2006 252.243-7001 Pricing Of Contract Modifications DEC 1991 252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment DEC 2012 252.244-7000 Subcontracts for Commercial Items JUN 2013

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.203-2 CERTIFICATE OF INDEPENDENT PRICE DETERMINATION (APR 1985)

(a) The offeror certifies that --

(1) The prices in this offer have been arrived at independently, without, for the purpose of restricting competition, any consultation, communication, or agreement with any other offeror or competitor relating to –

(i) Those prices,

(ii) The intention to submit an offer, or

(iii) The methods of factors used to calculate the prices offered:

(2) The prices in this offer have not been and will not be knowingly disclosed by the offeror, directly or indirectly, to any other offeror or competitor before bid opening (in the case of a sealed bid solicitation) or contract award (in the case of a negotiated solicitation) unless otherwise required by law; and

(3) No attempt has been made or will be made by the offeror to induce any other concern to submit or not to submit an offer for the purpose of restricting competition.

(b) Each signature on the offer is considered to be a certification by the signatory that the signatory --

(1) Is the person in the offeror's organization responsible for determining the prices offered in this bid or proposal, and that the signatory has not participated and will not participate in any action contrary to subparagraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this provision; or

(2) (i) Has been authorized, in writing, to act as agent for the following principals in certifying that those principals have not participated, and will not participate in any action contrary to subparagraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this provison ______________________________________________________ (insert full name of person(s) in the offeror's organization responsible for determining the prices offered in this bid or proposal, and the title of his or her position in the offeror's organization);

(ii) As an authorized agent, does certify that the principals named in subdivision (b)(2)(i) above have not participated, and will not participate, in any action contrary to subparagraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) above; and

(iii) As an agent, has not personally participated, and will not participate, in any action contrary to subparagraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this provision.

(c) If the offeror deletes or modifies subparagraph (a)(2) of this provision, the offeror must furnish with its offer a signed statement setting forth in detail the circumstances of the disclosure.

(End of Provision)

52.209-5 CERTIFICATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (OCT 2015)

(a)(1) The Offeror certifies, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that-

(i) The Offeror and/or any of its Principals-

(A) Are ( ) are not ( ) presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, or declared ineligible for the award of contracts by any Federal agency;

(B) Have ( ) have not ( ), within a three-year period preceding this offer, been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for: commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) contract or subcontract; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes relating to the submission of offers; or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion, violating Federal criminal tax laws, or receiving stolen property (if offeror checks “have”, the offeror shall also see 52.209-7, if included in this solicitation); and

(C) Are ( ) are not ( ) presently indicted for, or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity with, commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (a)(1)(i)(B) of this provision.;

and

(D) Have , have not , within a three-year period preceding this offer, been notified of any delinquent Federal taxes in an amount that exceeds $3,500 for which the liability remains unsatisfied.

(1) Federal taxes are considered delinquent if both of the following criteria apply:

(i) The tax liability is finally determined. The liability is finally determined if it has been assessed. A liability is not finally determined if there is a pending administrative or judicial challenge. In the case of a judicial challenge to the liability, the liability is not finally determined until all judicial appeal rights have been exhausted.

(ii) The taxpayer is delinquent in making payment. A taxpayer is delinquent if the taxpayer has failed to pay the tax liability when full payment was due and required. A taxpayer is not delinquent in cases where enforced collection action is precluded.

(2) Examples. (i) The taxpayer has received a statutory notice of deficiency, under I.R.C. Sec. 6212, which entitles the taxpayer to seek Tax Court review of a proposed tax deficiency. This is not a delinquent tax because it is not a final tax liability. Should the taxpayer seek Tax Court review, this will not be a final tax liability until the taxpayer has exercised all judicial appeal rights.

(ii) The IRS has filed a notice of Federal tax lien with respect to an assessed tax liability, and the taxpayer has been issued a notice under I.R.C. Sec. 6320 entitling the taxpayer to request a hearing with the IRS Office of Appeals contesting the lien filing, and to further appeal to the Tax Court if the IRS determines to sustain the lien filing. In the course of the hearing, the taxpayer is entitled to contest the underlying tax liability because the taxpayer has had no prior opportunity to contest the liability. This is not a delinquent tax because it is not a final tax liability. Should the taxpayer seek tax court review, this will not be a final tax liability until the taxpayer has exercised all judicial appeal rights.

(iii) The taxpayer has entered into an installment agreement pursuant to I.R.C. Sec. 6159. The taxpayer is making timely payments and is in full compliance with the agreement terms. The taxpayer is not delinquent because the taxpayer is not currently required to make full payment.

(iv) The taxpayer has filed for bankruptcy protection. The taxpayer is not delinquent because enforced collection action is stayed under 11 U.S.C. 362 (the Bankruptcy Code).

(ii) The Offeror has ( ) has not ( ), within a three-year period preceding this offer, had one or more contracts terminated for default by any Federal agency.

(2) Principal, for the purposes of this certification, means an officer, director, owner, partner, or a person having primary management or supervisory responsibilities within a business entity (e.g., general manager; plant manager;

head of a division or business segment; and similar positions).

(b) The Offeror shall provide immediate written notice to the Contracting Officer if, at any time prior to contract award, the Offeror learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

(c) A certification that any of the items in paragraph (a) of this provision exists will not necessarily result in withholding of an award under this solicitation. However, the certification will be considered in connection with a determination of the Offeror's responsibility. Failure of the Offeror to furnish a certification or provide such additional information as requested by the Contracting Officer may render the Offeror nonresponsible.

(d) Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render, in good faith, the certification required by paragraph (a) of this provision. The knowledge and information of an Offeror is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

(e) The certification in paragraph (a) of this provision is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when making award. If it is later determined that the Offeror knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Government, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract resulting from this solicitation for default.

(End of provision)

52.209-12 CERTIFICATION REGARDING TAX MATTERS (FEB 2016)

(a) This provision implements section 523 of Division B of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (Pub. L. 113-235), and similar provisions, if contained in subsequent appropriations acts.

(b) If the Offeror is proposing a total contract price that will exceed $5,000,000 (including options), the Offeror shall certify that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, it--

(1) Has [ ] filed all Federal tax returns required during the three years preceding the certification;

(2) Has not [ ] been convicted of a criminal offense under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and

(3) Has not [ ], more than 90 days prior to certification, been notified of any unpaid Federal tax assessment for which the liability remains unsatisfied, unless the assessment is the subject of an installment agreement or offer in compromise that has been approved by the Internal Revenue Service and is not in default, or the assessment is the subject of a non-frivolous administrative or judicial proceeding.

(End of provision)

52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2016)

THIS SECTION IS FOR SOLICITATION PURPOSES ONLY. THIS SECTION WILL BE PHYSICALLY

REMOVED FROM ANY RESULTANT AWARD, BUT WILL BE DEEMED INCORPORATED BY

REFERENCE.

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1, PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

1. Adherence to Instructions: The offeror must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award.

2. Exceptions to Terms and Conditions: Offerors must clearly identify any exception to solicitation terms and conditions and provide accompanying rationale.

3. Solicitation Face Page: Complete blocks 12, 17a, and 30a, b, and c of the SF1449. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the SOLICITATION, with attachments. The SOLICITATION constitutes the model contract.

4. Period of Acceptance of Offers: Paragraph 52.212-1(c), Period for Acceptance of Offers, is tailored as follows: “The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 180 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers.”

5. Registration in System for Award Management (SAM): In order to be eligible for contract award, offerors must be registered in SAM at https://Sam.gov.

6. Site Visit: A site visit will be held Thursday, 27 April 2017 at 9:00am. This site visit is not mandatory. To be able to attend this site visit please provide the name of each person to attend as it appears on the person’s drivers’ license, drivers’ license number, whether or not the person is a U.S. citizen, the last four numbers of SSN, and date of birth to Ms. Jenna Jacobson, jenna.jacobson@us.af.mil and Mr. Nicholas Gava, nicholas.gava.2@us.af.mil NLT 12:00pm 20 April 2017. When reporting to the registration office, the authorized contractor individual(s) should provide a valid driver’s license, current vehicle registration, valid vehicle insurance certificate, and 1) contract number, 2) location of work, 3) dates access is needed to obtain a vehicle pass. Additionally, Vendors/Contractors with driver’s licenses from ME, MN, MO, MT and WA (exceptions are Enhanced Driver’s Licenses (EDLs) from MN and WA) will not be able to obtain Base access without another form of identification as an identity proofing document. The list of authorized IDs can be found in the REAL ID Act of 2005. Please visit the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) website to get the latest information: https://www. Dhs.gov/current-status-states-territories

7. The Contractor shall comply with all security requirements imposed by the Installation.

8. Cost or Pricing Data: The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and if, in the contracting officer’s opinion, adequate price competition exists, no additional cost information will be requested. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists, offerors may be required to submit cost or pricing data to support a determination of price reasonableness and affordability. Further, the contracting officer may request that the data be submitted consistent with the format in Table 15-2 of FAR 15.408, but without the certification requirement of FAR 15.406-2 (see solicitation FAR Clause 52.215-20, Alt IV).

9. Proposal – General Information:

(a) The offer shall consist of three (3) separate volumes (all in separate 3-ring binders):

Volume I - Price Proposal Volume II - Mission-Essential Contractor Services Plan Volume III - Past Performance Information

(b) Documents must be fully responsive to and consistent with the following:

Solicitation requirements Evaluation factors for award in FAR Provision 52.212-2 EVALUATION -- COMMERCIAL ITEMS of the solicitation Page formatting and limitations – incorrectly formatted pages and excess pages will not be read or evaluated and will be removed from the proposal. In addition, company introductory pages, to include marketing information, will not be read or evaluated and will be removed from the proposal.

(c) Proposals must be mailed to the following address:

AFTC/PZIOA

Attn: Nicholas Gava/Jenna Jacobson 5 South Wolfe Avenue Edwards AFB, CA 93524

RE: FA9301-16-R-0010

10. Volume I – Price Proposal:

(a) Proposal Guidance:

Enter your pricing into SF1449 Retain template format/formulas Enter pricing for the base period and all option periods

(b) Paper Copies:

A page will be on 8 ½” x 11” paper A page is defined as one single sided sheet of paper containing information Font shall be Times New Roman Font, size 12 Submit three (3) copies (One original and two copies)

(c) Electronic Copy: Submit on a non-rewriteable Compact Disk (CDR)

(d) Evaluation Criteria: See FAR Provision 52.212-2 EVALUATION -- COMMERCIAL ITEMS

11. Volume II, Part 1 – Mission Essential Contractor Services Plan: In accordance with DFARS Provision

252.237-7024, Notice of Continuation of Essential Contractor Services, and DFARS Clause 252.237-7023, Continuation of Essential Contractor Services, offerors will detail how mission-essential dining facility food services will be provided during periods of crisis.

(a) Plan Guidance:

Attachment 2 of RFP Retain template format

(b) Paper Copies:

A page will be on 8 ½” x 11” paper A page is defined as one single sided sheet of paper containing information Font shall be Times New Roman Font, size 12 Submit three (3) copies (One original and two copies)

(c) Electronic Copy:

Must be in Adobe (.pdf), Microsoft Word version 2010, or Excel 2010 or earlier format Submit on a non-rewriteable Compact Disk (CDR)

(d) Page Limits: Submit no more than ten (10) pages (excluding cover page and signature page)

(e) Evaluation Criteria: See FAR Provision 52.212-2 EVALUATION -- COMMERCIAL ITEMS

12. Volume III – Past Performance Information:

(a) Form Guidance: Attachment 3 of RFP

(b) Paper Copies:

A page will be on 8 ½” x 11” paper A page is defined as one single sided, double-spaced sheet of paper containing information Font shall be Times New Roman Font, size 12 Submit four (4) copies (One original and three copies)

(c) Electronic Copy:

Must be in Adobe (.pdf), Microsoft Word version 2010, or Excel 2010 or earlier format Submit on a non-rewriteable Compact Disk (CDR)

(d) Page Limits: Limited to no more than five (5) pages per contract submitted

(e) Evaluation Criteria:

i. Format: Use attached Performance Information Form (Attachment 3 of RFP) to submit recent, relevant, and current performance information.

ii. Contract Submission Limits:

Submit no more than three (3) contract’s Performance Information Forms that are current, recent, and relevant which demonstrate your company’s ability to perform dining facility services. Contracts in excess of 3 will not be read or evaluated and will be removed from the proposal.

Refer to FAR 52.212-2 EVALUATION -- COMMERCIAL ITEMS to determine if the contracts meet the definitions of “current”, “recent”, and “relevant”.

iii. Content: Offerors are required to thoroughly explain what aspects of the submitted contracts are deemed relevant to the proposed dining facility services. Relate your relevant experience to the Performance Work Statement (PWS) and cite specific PWS paragraphs. Explanations without PWS citations will not be evaluated. Thoroughly explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and any current performance problems such as exceeded performance periods.

iv. Predecessor Companies: If any of the contracts submitted were performed by a predecessor company, submit documentation that shows a legal tie between the companies. Contracts submitted without this documentation will not be evaluated.

v. Partnership Agreements Past Contracts: If any of the contracts submitted (Prime or Major Subcontractor) were performed as teaming or joint venture partners, offerors must thoroughly explain the relationship of each partner (e.g. managing partner under the contract submitted) and the duties that each assumed on the submitted contract. Relate duties to the PWS to include paragraph citations. Also include copies of the teaming and/or joint venture agreement for these contracts (copies of teaming and/or joint venture agreements shall be provided under a separate tab and will not count towards the page count of Volume III, Past Performance Information). Contracts submitted without this documentation (nature of relationship, duties performed (with PWS citations), and teaming/joint venture agreements) will not be evaluated.

vi. Major Subcontractor Consents: Past performance information pertaining to a major subcontractor (see paragraph viii) cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor’s consent. Contractors must provide, with the proposal, a signed letter of consent from all major subcontractors consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime contractor. Contracts submitted without consents will not be evaluated.

vii. Past Performance Questionnaire: The offeror shall send out and track the completion of the Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 4 of RFP) for each contract point of contact identified in the Performance Information Forms. The responsibility to timely send out and track the completion of the Past Performance Questionnaire rests solely with the offeror. The offeror shall exert its best efforts to ensure the points of contact submit completed Past Performance Questionnaires directly to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist as specified on the Past Performance Questionnaire by the closing date of the solicitation.

(End Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, Proposal Preparation Instructions)

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

(1) PRICE

(2) TECHNICAL CAPABILITY

(3) PAST PERFORMANCE

Past Performance will be approximately equal to Price when being evaluated.

(b) The Government will evaluate an offeror’s Mission-Essential Contractor Services Plan on a Technically Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. See FAR 52.212-2 Addendum.

(c) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for the option period to the total price for the basic requirement. Evaluation of the option shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option.

(d) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer, whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2

BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This is a competitive best value source selection in which competing offerors' past performance history will be evaluated on a basis of past performance being approximately equal to price.

However, in accordance with the Randolph – Sheppard Act - 34 CFR § 395.33 the State of California's Department of Rehabilitation will be allowed to propose as the State Licensing Authority (SLA) for the Randolph - Sheppard Act.

The solicitation is a competitive HUBZone set-aside, but also permits the SLA, which may not be considered a Small Business concern, to participate in the procurement. The priority embodied in the Randolph-Sheppard Act (R-SA) takes precedence over small business preferences. Therefore, if the SLA’s proposal is determined to be in the competitive range and remains so after discussions, in accordance with the R-SA, the Government will award the contract to the SLA. To be in the competitive range a proposal must be technically acceptable and have satisfactory confidence in performance. A neutral past performance rating for a HubZone offeror will suffice for a competitive range determination. The SLA will be required to provide a subcontracting plan to afford small business an opportunity to perform aspects of the requirement. Should the SLA not be eligible for award the remaining offerors will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 52.212-2, “Evaluation - Commercial Items”. By submission of its offer in accordance with the instructions provided in FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors, the offeror accedes to the terms of this model contract and all such offerors shall be treated equally except for their prices, technical submissions, and performance records. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined technically unacceptable. The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:

A. Price Evaluation. Offers will initially be ranked according to price (lowest to highest), including all options. The offeror’s proposed prices will be determined by multiplying the quantities identified in the Pricing Schedule by the unit price for each item to confirm the extended amount for each. The evaluation will begin with the lowest priced offer being evaluated for technical capability.

B. Technical Requirement.

Subfactor 1: Mission-Essential Contractor Services Plan The Government will evaluate that the offeror adequately addressed the elements outlined in paragraph 3 (items A-F) of the plan template (Attachment 2 to the RFP). This requirement is met if the offeror’s plan reflects a sound, logical, and detailed approach to the performance of mission-essential services during a time of emergency crisis. Submission of a plan does not guarantee an acceptable/pass rating. Offerors will be assigned a technical rating as outlined in the DoD Source Selection Procedures, Table C-1. If the plan is found technically unacceptable, proposal evaluation stops and the Government will begin evaluating the proposal of the next higher-priced offeror. If the plan is found technically acceptable, the offeror’s Past Performance will be evaluated.

Table C-1. Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

C. Past Performance.

1. The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to allow the Government to assess the offeror’s ability to perform the effort described in this solicitation, based on the offeror’s demonstrated present and past performance. To assess the Government’s confidence in an offeror’s ability to perform as proposed, past performance will be evaluated on recency, relevancy, and quality. The assessment process will result in an overall performance confidence assessment rating of Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, No Confidence, or Unknown Confidence defined in the DoD Source Selection Procedures 1 APR 2016, Table 5.

2. The contracting officer shall seek recent and relevant performance information on the lowest-priced offer based on (1) the references provided by the offeror and (2) data independently obtained from other Government and commercial sources. Relevant present/past performance efforts are those that involve a similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities required by this solicitation. The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to assess the degree of confidence the Government has in the offeror’s ability to supply the dining facility services that meet the end user’s needs based on the offeror’s demonstrated record of performance.

a. Recent: Ongoing contracts (a minimum of six months is required to be considered current) with a performance history and contracts completed within five years from the issue date of this solicitation (see SF 1449 Block 6).

b. Relevant: Includes performance of efforts involving dining facility services involving a similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities required by this solicitation (see DoD Source Selection Procedures, Table 4 and the solicitation Relevancy Definitions, Chart A).

3. The Government will evaluate the quality and extent of an offeror’s performance deemed recent and relevant to the requirements of this solicitation. Past performance efforts will be evaluated on relevancy and assigned a relevancy rating as outlined in the DoD Source Selection Procedures, Table 4 (below). Current performance will generally have greater impact in the performance assessment than recent performance.

Performance that is more recent will usually have more impact than less recent performance. Past performance information that is found to be neither current nor recent will not be evaluated. Higher relevancy will be assessed for contracts that are most similar to the effort, or portion of the effort, for which that Contractor is being proposed (i.e. contracts performed on Federal or State facilities located in the state of California will be given a higher relevancy rating). The Government is not bound by the offeror’s opinion of relevancy. In evaluating past performance, the Government reserves the right to give greater consideration to information on those contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in this solicitation. The Government will use the following degrees of relevancy when assessing current or recent and relevant contracts (note: the items listed in the “Assessment Area” column are listed in descending order of importance):

Table 4. Past Performance Relevancy Ratings Rating Definition

Very Relevant

Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant

Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant

Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Chart A – Relevancy Matrix

Assessment Area Very Relevant Relevant Somewhat Relevant

Scope (Reference Performance Work Statement (PWS))

Responsible for operation of a dining facility where performance is essentially the same as or greater than tasks as outlined in the PWS as a Prime/JV Contractor

Responsible for operation of a dining facility where the performance involved tasks that are very similar to those outlined in the PWS

Responsible for operation of a dining facility where performance involved some similar tasks outlined in the PWS

Magnitude Responsible for operation of a dining facility with a workload same as or greater than the historical workload as outlined in the PWS as a Prime/JV Contractor

Responsible for operation of a dining facility with workload similar to the historical workload as outlined in the PWS

Responsible for operation of a dining facility with a workload somewhat less than historical workloads as outlined in the

PWS

Complexity Responsible for operation of a dining facility with a workload same as or greater than the historical workload as outlined in the PWS as a Prime/JV Contractor

Responsible for operation of a dining facility with workload similar to the historical workload as outlined in the PWS

Responsible for operation of a dining facility with a workload somewhat less than historical workloads as outlined in the

PWS

Contract Type Performance under a DoD Firm- Fixed Price IDIQ Contract

Performance under a Fixed Price Contract

Any other contract type other than Fixed Price

Contract Environment Contract performance on a Military installation

Contract performance at a government facility

Contract performance at any U.S.

location.

4. Next, the offeror will be assigned a performance confidence rating, which is based on how well an offeror performed on the specified contracts. Potential sources of performance data are Government sources such as the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Performance Information Forms, and Past Performance Questionnaires tailored to the circumstances of this acquisition, and non- Government sources such as information provided by the offeror as solicited. Offerors with no relevant past or present performance history or the offeror’s performance record is so limited that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned shall receive the rating “Unknown Confidence,” meaning the rating is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably. The performance confidence assessment ratings are outlined in the DoD Source Selection Procedures, Table 5.

Table 5. Performance Confidence Assessments Rating Description Substantial Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral)

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

5. After discussions, if the SLA’s proposal is determined not to be in the competitive range, if the lowest priced offeror is not judged to have a Substantial Confidence performance confidence assessment, the next lowest priced offeror will be evaluated and the process will continue (in order by price) until an offeror is judged to have a Substantial Confidence performance confidence assessment or until all offerors are evaluated.

The Source Selection Authority shall then make an integrated assessment best value award decision. The Government reserves the right to seek information on higher priced offerors if none of the lower priced offerors receives a “Substantial Confidence” performance assessment.

6. Past performance regarding predecessor companies or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement will be rated as highly as past performance information for the principal offeror.

D. Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in FAR 52.212-1, Instruction to Offerors -- Commercial Items. Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal (for example, the relevance of past performance information) or respond to adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system. Communication conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision.

E. The Government intends to award a contract with discussions with respective offerors in accordance with FAR 52.215-1, Instruction to Offerors -- Competitive Acquisition. If the offeror’s proposal has been evaluated as acceptable at the time discussions are closed, any changes or exceptions in the FPR are subject to evaluation and may introduce risk that the offeror’s proposal be determined unacceptable and ineligible for award.

(End Addendum to FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation)

52.212-3 OFFEROR REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (APR 2016)

The Offeror shall…