Att_6_PPQ.doc
DOC document 85 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Edwards AFB Base Pest Control Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA9301-15-R-0001
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Revised_Pest_Control_PWS__081815 1 .pdf | ||
| Atch_5_Bid_Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Pest_Control_QA_Rev_1.pdf | ||
| PEST_CONTROL_Q_AND_A.pdf | ||
| contractor_sign_in_sheet.pdf | ||
| FA9301-15-R-0001-_Base_Pest_Control_Services_Att_1-4.pdf | ||
| Atch_5_Bid_Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| FA9301-15-R-0001_Att_1-4.pdf | ||
| Presolicitation_Notice.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
Attachment 6 – Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
TO:
You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for an Base Pest Control Services contract at Edwards AFB, CA.
Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, I can be contacted at ________________________________.
Please submit completed questionnaire to the Government Contract Specialist identified on the attached questionnaire.
Contractor Signature
1 Attachment:
Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate
Contractor’s Name:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
Point of Contact:
Project Title and Brief Description of Work*: ______________________________________________________________________________
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ________________ Dollar Amount:$__________
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror*: _____________________
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent:
Title: ______________________
Address: _____________________
Telephone Number: _________________
Fax Number:
Email Address: _____________________
C. . SEND COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO (E-mail is Preferred Method):
Jared Ayers
Charles Richardson
AFTC/PZIOC
AFTC/PZIOC
jared.ayers@us.af.mil charles.richardson.16@us.af.mil
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION:
Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
| Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________
CONTRACT #: _______________
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| Contractor Performance or Situation |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| N/A |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified, licensed, certified Pest Control personnel during the contract period. |
| 3. |
| Corporate office delegate authority to project managers and supervisors to fully act on behalf of management |
| 4. |
| Contractor’s personnel were trained and possessed expertise necessary for successful contract performance |
| 5. |
| Timeliness of Contractor’s performance |
| 6. |
| Submitted timely, Integrated Pest Management Information System (IPMIS) reports |
| 7. |
| Complied with Environmental Laws and Regulations |
| 8. |
| Followed approved Integrated Pest Management plan throughout the contract |
| 9. |
| Provide all records and reports as required by contract requirements |
| 10. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements |
| 11. |
| Followed the approved Quality Control Plan |
| 12. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 13. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies |
| 14. |
| Management responded to problems and concerns, taking action to ensure no repeat occurrences |
| 15. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 16. |
| Overall quality of Pest Control services provided |
| 17. |
| Was responsive to contract changes.requirement’s |
| 18. |
| Was able to obtain bonding and liability insurance |
| 19. |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner |
| 20. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| 21. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 22. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 24. |
| If a Government Contract, is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES/NO |
| 25. |
| Does the contractor have experience managing a Pest Control Program in an Industrial Complex or at Commercial Facilities |
| YES/NO |
| 26. |
| Does the contractor have experience managing a Pest Control Program on a Government Facility |
| YES/NO |
| 27. |
| Recommend doing business with this contractor |
| YES/NO |
Remarks:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Attachment 6
FA9301-15-R-0001
Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .